for TestNamespaceLookup.py; didn't see anything obviously wrong so I'll
need to look at this more closely before re-committing. (passed OK on
macOS ;)
llvm-svn: 273531
There's uses of "macosx" that will be more tricky to
change, like in triples (e.g. "x86_64-apple-macosx10.11") -
for now I'm just updating source comments and strings printed
for humans.
llvm-svn: 273524
This patch allows LLDB for AArch64 to watch all bytes, words or double words individually on non 8-byte alligned addresses.
This patch also adds tests to verify this functionality.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21280
llvm-svn: 272916
Summary:
Because PIE executables have an e_type of llvm::ELF::ET_DYN,
they are not of type eTypeExecutable, and were being removed
when svr4 packets were used.
Reviewers: clayborg, ADodds, tfiala, sas
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20990
llvm-svn: 271899
The error was not getting propagated to the caller, so the higher layers thought the breakpoint
was successfully set & resolved.
I added a testcase, but it assumes 0x0 is not a valid place to set a breakpoint. On most systems
that is true, but if it isn't true of your system, either find another good place and add it to the
test, or x-fail the test.
<rdar://problem/26345962>
llvm-svn: 270014
This is a pretty straightforward first pass over removing a number of uses of
Mutex in favor of std::mutex or std::recursive_mutex. The problem is that there
are interfaces which take Mutex::Locker & to lock internal locks. This patch
cleans up most of the easy cases. The only non-trivial change is in
CommandObjectTarget.cpp where a Mutex::Locker was split into two.
llvm-svn: 269877
Summary:
MonitorDebugServerProcess went to a lot of effort to make sure its asynchronous invocation does
not cause any mischief, but it was still not race-free. Specifically, in a quick stop-restart
sequence (like the one in TestAddressBreakpoints) the copying of the process shared pointer via
target_sp->GetProcessSP() was racing with the resetting of the pointer in DeleteCurrentProcess,
as they were both accessing the same shared_ptr object.
To avoid this, I simply pass in a weak_ptr to the process when the callback is created. Locking
this pointer is race-free as they are two separate object even though they point to the same
process instance. This also removes the need for the complicated tap-dance around retrieving the
process pointer.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: tberghammer, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20107
llvm-svn: 269281
Summary:
This replaces the C-style "void *" baton of the child process monitoring functions with a more
C++-like API taking a std::function. The motivation for this was that it was very difficult to
handle the ownership of the object passed into the callback function -- each caller ended up
implementing his own way of doing it, some doing it better than others. With the new API, one can
just pass a smart pointer into the callback and all of the lifetime management will be handled
automatically.
This has enabled me to simplify the rather complicated handshake in Host::RunShellCommand. I have
left handling of MonitorDebugServerProcess (my original motivation for this change) to a separate
commit to reduce the scope of this change.
Reviewers: clayborg, zturner, emaste, krytarowski
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20106
llvm-svn: 269205
Summary:
If the remote uses svr4 packets to communicate library info,
the LoadUnload tests will fail, as lldb only used the basename
for modules, causing problems when two modules have the same basename.
Using absolute path as sent by the remote will ensure that lldb
locates the module from the correct directory when there are overlapping
basenames. When debugging a remote process, LoadModuleAtAddress will still
fall back to using basename and module_search_paths, so we don't
need to worry about using absolute paths in this case.
Reviewers: ADodds, jasonmolenda, clayborg, ovyalov
Subscribers: lldb-commits, sas
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19557
llvm-svn: 267741
Summary:
If the remote uses include features when communicating
xml register info back to lldb, the existing code would reset the
lldb register index at the beginning of each include node.
This would lead to multiple registers having the same lldb register index.
Since the lldb register numbers should be contiguous and unique,
maintain them accross the parsing of all of the xml feature nodes.
Reviewers: jingham, jasonmolenda, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits, sas
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19303
llvm-svn: 267468
Summary:
When we receive an svr4 packet from the remote, we check for new modules
and add them to the list of images in the target. However, we did not
do the same for modules which have been removed.
This was causing TestLoadUnload to fail when using ds2, which uses
svr4 packets to communicate all library info on Linux. This patch fixes
the failing test.
Reviewers: zturner, tfiala, ADodds
Subscribers: lldb-commits, sas
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19230
llvm-svn: 267467
In turns out this does make a functional change, in case when the inferior hits an int3 that was
not placed by the debugger. Backing out for now.
llvm-svn: 265647
Summary:
SetThreadStopInfo was checking for a breakpoint at the current PC several times. This merges the
identical code into a separate function. I've left one breakpoint check alone, as it was doing
more complicated stuff, and it did not see a way to merge that without making the interface
complicated. NFC.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18819
llvm-svn: 265560
Summary:
This resolves a similar problem as D16720 (which handled the case when we single-step onto a
breakpoint), but this one deals with involutary stops: when we stop a thread (e.g. because
another thread has hit a breakpont and we are doing a full stop), we can end up stopping it right
before it executes a breakpoint instruction. In this case, the stop reason will be empty, but we
will still step over the breakpoint when do the next resume, thereby missing a breakpoint hit.
I have observed this happening in TestConcurrentEvents, but I have no idea how to reproduce this
behavior more reliably.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18692
llvm-svn: 265525
Summary:
The logic to read modules from memory was added to LoadModuleAtAddress
in the dynamic loader, but not in process gdb remote. This means that when
the remote uses svr4 packets to give library info, libraries only present
on the remote will not be loaded.
This patch therefore involves some code duplication from LoadModuleAtAddress
in the dynamic loader, but removing this would require some amount of code
refactoring.
Reviewers: ADodds, tberghammer, tfiala, deepak2427, ted
Subscribers: tfiala, lldb-commits, sas
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18531
Change by Francis Ricci <fjricci@fb.com>
llvm-svn: 265418
rnb_err_t
RNBRemote::HandlePacket_stop_process (const char *p)
{
if (!DNBProcessInterrupt(m_ctx.ProcessID()))
HandlePacket_last_signal (NULL);
return rnb_success;
}
In the call to DNBProcessInterrupt we did:
nub_bool_t
DNBProcessInterrupt(nub_process_t pid)
{
MachProcessSP procSP;
if (GetProcessSP (pid, procSP))
return procSP->Interrupt();
return false;
}
This would always return false. It would cause HandlePacket_stop_process to always call "HandlePacket_last_signal (NULL);" which would send an extra stop reply packet _if_ the process is stopped. On a machine with enough cores, it would call DNBProcessInterrupt(...) and then HandlePacket_last_signal(NULL) so quickly that it will never send out an extra stop reply packet. But if the machine is slow enough or doesn't have enough cores, it could cause the call to HandlePacket_last_signal() to actually succeed and send an extra stop reply packet. This would cause problems up in GDBRemoteCommunicationClient::SendContinuePacketAndWaitForResponse() where it would get the first stop reply packet and then possibly return or execute an async packet. If it returned, then the next packet that was sent will get the second stop reply as its response. If it executes an async packet, the async packet will get the wrong response.
To fix this I did the following:
1 - in debugserver, I fixed "bool MachProcess::Interrupt()" to return true if it sends the signal so we avoid sending the stop reply twice on slower machines
2 - Added a log line to RNBRemote::HandlePacket_stop_process() to say if we ever send an extra stop reply so we will see this in the darwin console output if this does happen
3 - Added response validators to StringExtractorGDBRemote so that we can verify some responses to some packets.
4 - Added validators to packets that often follow stop reply packets like the "m" packet for memory reads, JSON packets since "jThreadsInfo" is often sent immediately following a stop reply.
5 - Modified GDBRemoteCommunicationClient::SendPacketAndWaitForResponseNoLock() to validate responses. Any "StringExtractorGDBRemote &response" that contains a valid response verifier will verify the response and keep looking for correct responses up to 3 times. This will help us get back on track if we do get extra stop replies. If a StringExtractorGDBRemote does not have a response validator, it will accept any packet in response.
6 - In GDBRemoteCommunicationClient::SendPacketAndWaitForResponse we copy the response validator from the "response" argument over into m_async_response so that if we send the packet by interrupting the running process, we can validate the response we actually get in GDBRemoteCommunicationClient::SendContinuePacketAndWaitForResponse()
7 - Modified GDBRemoteCommunicationClient::SendContinuePacketAndWaitForResponse() to always check for an extra stop reply packet for 100ms when the process is interrupted. We were already doing this because we might interrupt a process with a \x03 packet, yet the process was in the process of stopping due to another reason. This race condition could cause an extra stop reply packet because the GDB remote protocol says if a \x03 packet is sent while the process is stopped, we should send a stop reply packet back. Now we always check for an extra stop reply packet when we manually interrupt a process.
The issue was showing up when our IDE would attempt to set a breakpoint while the process is running and this would happen:
--> \x03
<-- $T<stop reply 1>
--> z0,AAAAA,BB (set breakpoint)
<-- $T<stop reply 1> (incorrect extra stop reply packet)
--> c
<-- OK (response from z0 packet)
Now all packet traffic was off by one response. Since we now have a validator on the response for "z" packets, we do this:
--> \x03
<-- $T<stop reply 1>
--> z0,AAAAA,BB (set breakpoint)
<-- $T<stop reply 1> (Ignore this because this can't be the response to z0 packets)
<-- OK -- (we are back on track as this is a valid response to z0)
...
As time goes on we should add more packet validators.
<rdar://problem/22859505>
llvm-svn: 265086
to each other. This should remove some infrequent teardown crashes when the
listener is not the debugger's listener.
Processes now need to take a ListenerSP, not a Listener&.
This required changing over the Process plugin class constructors to take a ListenerSP, instead
of a Listener&. Other than that there should be no functional change.
<rdar://problem/24580184> CrashTracer: [USER] Xcode at …ework: lldb_private::Listener::BroadcasterWillDestruct + 39
llvm-svn: 262863
on attach uses the architecture it has figured out, rather than the Target's
architecture, which may not have been updated to the correct value yet.
<rdar://problem/24632895>
llvm-svn: 261279
Summary:
r259344 introduced a bug, where we fail to perform a single step, when the instruction we are
stepping onto contains a breakpoint which is not valid for this thread. This fixes the problem
and add a test case.
Reviewers: tberghammer, emaste
Subscribers: abhishek.aggarwal, lldb-commits, emaste
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16767
llvm-svn: 259488
Summary:
- The patch solves Bug 23478 and Bug 19311. Resolving
Bug 23478 also resolves Bug 23039.
Correct ThreadStopInfo is set for Linux and FreeBSD
platforms.
- Summary:
When a trace event is reported, we need to check
whether the trace event lands at a breakpoint site.
If it lands at a breakpoint site then set the thread's
StopInfo with the reason 'breakpoint'. Else, set the reason
to be 'Trace'.
Change-Id: I0af9765e782fd74bc0cead41548486009f8abb87
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Aggarwal <abhishek.a.aggarwal@intel.com>
Reviewers: jingham, emaste, lldb-commits, clayborg, ovyalov
Subscribers: emaste
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16720
llvm-svn: 259344
Summary:
Allows the remote to enumerate the link map when adding and removing
shared libraries, so that lldb doesn't need to read it manually from
the remote's memory.
This provides very large speedups (on the order of 50%) in total
startup time when using the ds2 remote on android or Tizen devices.
Reviewers: ADodds, tberghammer, tfiala
Subscribers: tberghammer, sas, danalbert, llvm-commits, srhines
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16004
Change by Francis Ricci <fjricci@fb.com>
llvm-svn: 257502
at each public stop to improve performance a bit. Most of the
information lldb needed was already in the jThreadsInfo response;
complete that information and catch a few cases where we could still
fall back to getting the information via discrete memory reads.
debugserver adds 'associated_with_dispatch_queue' and 'dispatch_queue_t
keys to the jThreadsInfo response for all the threads. lldb needs the
dispatch_queue_t value. And associated_with_dispatch_queue helps to
identify which threads definitively don't have any queue information so
lldb doesn't try to do memory reads to get that information just because
it was absent in the jThreadsInfo response.
Remove the queue information from the questionmark (T) packet. We'll
get the information for all threads via the jThreadsInfo response -
sending the information for the stopping thread (on all the private
stops, plus the less frequent public stop) was unnecessary information
being sent over the wire.
SystemRuntimeMacOSX will try to get information about queues by asking
the Threads for them, instead of reading memory.
ProcessGDBRemote changes to recognize the new keys being sent in the
jThreadsInfo response. Changes to ThreadGDBRemote to track the new
information. Also, when a thread is marked as definitively not
associated with a libdispatch queue, don't fall back to the system
runtime to try memory reads to find the queue name / kind / ID etc.
<rdar://problem/23309359>
llvm-svn: 257453
"qserial" to "qserialnum" because "qserial" looks a lot like the
queue type (either 'serial' or 'concurrent') and can be confusing
to read through. debugserver passes these up either in the questionmark
("T") packet, or in the response to the jThreadsInfo packet.
llvm-svn: 257121
(There are changes in the copies of these four files in the FreeBSD base
system, and I've changed these ones to reduce gratuitous diffs in future
imports.)
llvm-svn: 256723
"thread-pcs" key is added to the T (questionmark) packet in
gdb-remote protocol so that lldb doesn't need to query the
pc values of every thread before it resumes a process.
The only odd part with this is that I'm sending the pc
values in big endian order, so we need to know the endianness
of the remote process before we can use them. All other
register values in gdb-remote protocol are sent in native-endian
format so this requirement doesn't exist. This addition is a
performance enhancement -- lldb will fall back to querying the
pc of each thread individually if it needs to -- so when
we don't have the byte order for the process yet, we don't
use these values. Practically speaking, the only way I've
been able to elicit this condition is for the first
T packet when we attach to a process.
<rdar://problem/21963031>
llvm-svn: 255942
Summary:
Since this is within the lldb namespace, the compiler tries to
export a symbol for it. Unfortunately, since it is inlined, the
symbol is hidden and this results in a mess of warnings when
building on OS X with cmake.
Moving it to the lldb_private namespace eliminates that problem.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14417
llvm-svn: 252396
This allows open source MacOSX clients to not have to build debugserver and the current LLDB can find debugserver inside the selected Xcode.app on your system.
<rdar://problem/23167253>
llvm-svn: 250735
Most platforms have "/dev/null". Windows has "nul". Instead of
hardcoding the string /dev/null at various places, make a constant
that contains the correct value depending on the platform, and use
that everywhere instead.
llvm-svn: 250331
Summary:
This commit adds support for binary memory reads ($x) to lldb-server. It also removes the "0x"
prefix from the $x client packet, to make it more compatible with the old $m packet. This allows
us to use almost the same code for handling both packet types. I have verified that debugserver
correctly handles $x packets even without the leading "0x". I have added a test which verifies
that the stub returns the same memory contents for both kinds of memory reads ($x and $m).
Reviewers: tberghammer, jasonmolenda
Subscribers: iancottrell, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13695
llvm-svn: 250295
The Go runtime schedules user level threads (goroutines) across real threads.
This adds an OS plugin to create memory threads for goroutines.
It supports the 1.4 and 1.5 go runtime.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5871
llvm-svn: 247852
"gcc" register numbers are now correctly referred to as "ehframe"
register numbers. In almost all cases, ehframe and dwarf register
numbers are identical (the one exception is i386 darwin where ehframe
regnums were incorrect).
The old "gdb" register numbers, which I incorrectly thought were
stabs register numbers, are now referred to as "Process Plugin"
register numbers. This is the register numbering scheme that the
remote process controller stub (lldb-server, gdbserver, core file
support, kdp server, remote jtag devices, etc) uses to refer to the
registers. The process plugin register numbers may not be contiguous
- there are remote jtag devices that have gaps in their register
numbering schemes.
I removed all of the enums for "gdb" register numbers that we had
in lldb - these were meaningless - and I put LLDB_INVALID_REGNUM
in all of the register tables for the Process Plugin regnum slot.
This change is almost entirely mechnical; the one actual change in
here is to ProcessGDBRemote.cpp's ParseRegisters() which parses the
qXfer:features:read:target.xml response. As it parses register
definitions from the xml, it will assign sequential numbers as the
eRegisterKindLLDB numbers (the lldb register numberings must be
sequential, without any gaps) and if the xml file specifies register
numbers, those will be used as the eRegisterKindProcessPlugin
register numbers (and those may have gaps). A J-Link jtag device's
target.xml does contain a gap in register numbers, and it only
specifies the register numbers for the registers after that gap.
The device supports many different ARM boards and probably selects
different part of its register file as appropriate.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12791
<rdar://problem/22623262>
llvm-svn: 247741
qXfer:features:read:target.xml packet, or via the
plugin.process.gdb-remote.target-definition-file setting, if the
register definition doesn't give us eh_frame or DWARF register
numbers for that register, try to get that information from the ABI
plugin.
The DWARF/eh_frame register numbers are defined in the ABI
standardization documents - so getting this from the ABI plugin is
reasonable. There's little value in having the remote stub inform
us of this generic information, as long as we can all agree on the
names of the registers.
There's some additional information we could get from the ABI. For
instance, on ABIs where function arguments are passed in registers,
lldb defines alternate names like "arg1", "arg2", "arg3" for these
registers so they can be referred to that way by the user. We could
get this from the ABI if the remote stub doesn't provide that. That
may be something worth doing in the future - but for now, I'm keeping
this a little more minimal.
Thinking about this, what we want/need from the remote stub at a
minimum are:
1. The names of the register
2. The number that the stub will use to refer to the register with
the p/P packets and in the ? response packets (T/S) where
expedited register values are provided
3. The size of the register in bytes
(nice to have, to remove any doubt)
4. The offset of the register in the g/G packet if we're going to
use that for reading/writing registers.
debugserver traditionally provides a lot more information in
addition to this via the qRegisterInfo packet, and debugserver
augments its response to the qXfer:features:read:target.xml
query to include this information. Including:
DWARF regnum, eh_frame regnum, stabs regnum, encoding (ieee754,
Uint, Vector, Sint), format (hex, unsigned, pointer, vectorof*,
float), registers that should be marked as invalid if this
register is modified, and registers that contain this register.
We might want to get all of this from the ABI - I'm not convinced
that it makes sense for the remote stub to provide any of these
details, as long as the ABI and remote stub can agree on register
names.
Anyway, start with eh_frame and DWARF coming from the ABI if
they're not provided by the remote stub. We can look at doing
more in the future.
<rdar://problem/22566585>
llvm-svn: 247121
Summary:
There was a race condition in the AsyncThread, where we would end up sending a vAttach
notification to the thread before it got a chance set up its listener (this can be reproduced by
adding a sleep() at the very beginning of ProcessGDBRemote::AsyncThread()). This event would then
get lost and we LLDB would deadlock. I fix this by setting up the listener early on, in the
ProcessGDBRemote constructor.
This should improve the stability of all attach tests. For now, I am removing XTIMEOUT from
TestAttachResume, and will watch the buildbots for signs of trouble.
Reviewers: clayborg, ovyalov
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12552
llvm-svn: 246756
