It turns out that the whole header is only enabled in C++20 and above,
so these checks were redundant (and always true).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121604
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
We don't need preprocessor logic to exclude those declarations when compiling for
the Windows App Store, because that is handled by using_if_exists now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108632
Instead of carrying around #ifdefs to determine whether those functions
are available on the platform, unconditionally use the using_if_exists
attribute to import it into namespace std only when available. That was
the purpose of this attribute from the start.
This change means that trying to use libc++ with an old SDK (or on an
old platform for platforms that ship system headers in /usr/include)
will require a recent Clang that supports the using_if_exists attribute.
When using an older Clang or GCC, the underlying platform has to support
a C11 standard library.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108203
As a fly-by fix, also move it closer to where it is needed, and add a
comment explaining the existence of this weird function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121231
operator-> is not a requirement for most iterators, so remove it. To
account for this change, the `common_iterator.operator->` test needs to
be refactored quite a bit -- improve test coverage while we're at it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118400
Now that we've branched for the LLVM 14 release, our support window
moves to clang-13 and clang-14. Similarly, AppleClang 13 has been
released for some time now, so that should be the oldest compiler
we support, per our policy.
A possible follow-up would be to remove _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS, since
I don't think we support any compiler that doesn't support concepts
anymore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118831
This reverts commit 276ca873. That commit has quite a history at this
point. It was first landed in dbc647643577, which broke std::shared_ptr<T const>
and was reverted in 9138666f5. It was then re-applied in 276ca873, with
the std::shared_ptr issue fixed, but it caused widespread breakage at
Google (which suggests it would cause similar breakage in the wild too),
so now I'm reverting again.
Instead, I will add a escape hatch that vendors can turn on to enable
the extension and perform a phased transition over one or two releases
like we sometimes do when things become non-trivial.
These tests don't seem specific to the debug mode, so it makes sense to
run them even when the debug mode is disabled. When we run with the debug
mode enabled, we'll get the out-of-bounds checking that this test seems
to be concerned with.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121241
Based on review comments in D97705 applied some code cleanups in
<charconv>. The header now uses a more recent libc++ style.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, #libc, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121223
LIBCXX_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS does not have any relationship to the `assert`
macro -- it only controls assertions that are internal to the library.
Playing around with `NDEBUG` only muddies the picture further than it
already is.
Also, remove a failing assertion in the benchmarks. That assertion had
never been exercised because we defined `NDEBUG` manually, and it was
failing since we introduced the ability to generate a benchmark vector
with the Quicksort adversary ordering (which is obviously not sorted).
This was split off of https://llvm.org/D121123.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121244
Those older versions used a different monetary decimal separator.
To avoid unnecessary churn to support that, just XFAIL the test
on those older versions. (Up until
df1e43c496b43e998f66c610b0e15a0951f316b3, the whole test was XFAILed
on all versions of glibc.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120979
On Windows, constants like F::alpha and F::print are bitmasks
consisting of multiple bits (e.g. F::alpha consisting of both the
bits F::upper and F::lower). In such a case, we can't check that
all the bits from all the expected constants are set. Instead,
check that (p[i] & mask) != 0 returns the expected value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120802
This extension is a portability trap for users, since no other standard
library supports it. Furthermore, the Standard explicitly allows
implementations to reject std::allocator<cv T>, so allowing it is
really going against the current.
This was discovered in D120684: this extension required `const_cast`ing
in `__construct_range_forward`, a fishy bit of code that can be removed
if we don't support the extension anymore.
This is a re-application of dbc647643577, which was reverted in 9138666f5
because it broke std::shared_ptr<T const>. Tests have now been added and
we've made sure that std::shared_ptr<T const> wouldn't be broken in this
version.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120996
As a fly-by fix, enable the complexity-changing assertions in __debug_less
only when the full debug mode is enabled, since debugging level 0 is usually
understood to only contain basic assertions that do not change the complexity
of algorithms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121129
These are some checks that make sense in libc++ IMO. The checks after `#TODO: investigate these checks` are candidates, but they can't be enabled without some cleanup.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: aheejin, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120925
Saves one move in each case, which is basically nothing perf-wise;
this is more about simplifying the code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121130
If LIBCXX_ENABLE_SHARED isn't explicitly set on the cmake command
line, isn't set in the cache, and the libcxxabi project is configured
before libcxx, then LIBCXX_ENABLE_SHARED isn't defined yet. Once
the libcxx cmake project has been parsed, LIBCXX_ENABLE_SHARED would
have been set to its default value of ON.
This makes sure that the symbols are properly dllexported in such
a configuration scenario.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120982
This extension is a portability trap for users, since no other standard
library supports it. Furthermore, the Standard explicitly allows
implementations to reject std::allocator<cv T>, so allowing it is
really going against the current.
This was discovered in D120684: this extension required `const_cast`ing
in `__construct_range_forward`, a fishy bit of code that can be removed
if we don't support the extension anymore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120996
AIX print -0.0 , inf, nan differently, which are causing the test
failures. We are OK for most other tests.
This patch remove the tests related these limitations conditionally on AIX,
so that we can enable the other tests to avoid losing test coverage.
The general direction is:
```
if strings don't differ between environments, keep the string literal "INF" and the padding, instead of folding them into variables.
```
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120448
Move `__quoted_output_proxy` into the one file that uses it.
A `const char*` has no associated traits class, so `std::quoted("literal")`
should be printable into any basic_ostream regardless of traits.
Use hidden-friend `operator<<` and `operator>>`, since we're permitted to.
(The exact signature is unspecified because the class itself is unspecified.)
We shouldn't support `std::quoted("literal")` in C++03 or C++11 mode.
(We do need `std::__quoted(s)` and `std::__quoted(cs)` in C++11 mode,
because they're used by `std::__fs::filesystem::path`.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120135
Zero-sized types are a GCC extension, also supported by Clang.
In theory it's already invalid to `delete` a void pointer or a
pointer-to-incomplete, so we shouldn't need any special code
to catch those cases; but in practice Clang accepts both
constructs with just a warning, and GCC even accepts `sizeof(void)`
with just a warning! So we must keep the static_asserts.
The hard errors are tested in `unique_ptr_dltr_dflt/*.compile.fail.cpp`.
In ranges::begin/end, check `sizeof >= 0` instead of `sizeof != 0`,
so as to permit zero-sized types while still disallowing incomplete
types.
Fixes#54100.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120633
I believe the origin issue in PR31864 has been addressed by https://reviews.llvm.org/D59566.
As discussed in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53840, `ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE == 2` sometimes is not consistent with `std::atomic<long long>::is_always_lock_free`, since the macro takes `long long`'s ABI alignment into account. https://reviews.llvm.org/D28213 proposed we should not rely on ABI alignment of types, thus we have consistent `ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE` and `std::atomic<long long>::is_always_lock_free` on x86's old cpu. Currently, I plan to move on to remove the workaround which should have been addressed and don't want to break current tests.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119931
This change makes the behavior of `<experimental/coroutine>` consistent with other headers that only work conditionally.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: Mordante, ChuanqiXu, libcxx-commits, arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119964
Previously, this test snippet would report incorrect information:
F::mask m;
std::wstring in(L"\u00DA"); // LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH ACUTE
f.is(in.data(), in.data() + 1, &m);
// m & F::lower would be set
The single-character version of the `is` function wasn't
affected by this issue though.
Define `_LIBCPP_CTYPE_MASK_IS_COMPOSITE_ALPHA` for Windows,
as the `alpha` / `_ALPHA` constant is a mask consisting of
multiple bits set, which avoids setting `alpha` whenver any
of the bits is set, in the `do_is` implementation.
On Windows, with the "C" locale, wchars are classified according
to their Unicode interpretation, just as in the en_US.UTF-8 locale on
all platforms.
Due to the differing classification of some characters, the
`scan_is` and `scan_not` tests are quite annoying to fix, thus just
ifdef out some of the tests for the "C" locale there - the code gets
tested with the more standard en_US.UTF-8 locale anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120796
Fixes LWG3656, "Inconsistent bit operations returning a count".
https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3656
The fix has been approved for C++23 and left to vendors' discretion
in C++20 (but it sounds like everyone's on the same page that
of course it should be DR'ed back to C++20 too).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120444
