This should have all the correct files now.
<rdar://problem/41471112>
Patch by Shafik Yaghmour.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49271
llvm-svn: 338156
Summary:
We currently allow any completion handler to read and manipulate the list of matches we
calculated so far. This leads to a few problems:
Firstly, a completion handler's logic can now depend on previously calculated results
by another handlers. No completion handler should have such an implicit dependency,
but the current API makes it likely that this could happen (or already happens). Especially
the fact that some completion handler deleted all previously calculated results can mess
things up right now.
Secondly, all completion handlers have knowledge about our internal data structures with
this API. This makes refactoring this internal data structure much harder than it should be.
Especially planned changes like the support of descriptions for completions are currently
giant patches because we have to refactor every single completion handler.
This patch narrows the contract the CompletionRequest has with the different handlers to:
1. A handler can suggest a completion.
2. A handler can ask how many suggestions we already have.
Point 2 obviously means we still have a dependency left between the different handlers, but
getting rid of this is too large to just append it to this patch.
Otherwise this patch just completely hides the internal StringList to the different handlers.
The CompletionRequest API now also ensures that the list of completions is unique and we
don't suggest the same value multiple times to the user. This property has been so far only
been ensured by the `Option` handler, but is now applied globally. This is part of this patch
as the OptionHandler is no longer able to implement this functionality itself.
Reviewers: jingham, davide, labath
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49322
llvm-svn: 338151
In r338058 we removed the target `lldb-framework-headers`, which mean
lldb-framework no longer depended on `framework_headers`, so they never
actually got generated. This is a partial revert of r338058: I added
back the lldb-framework-headers target, but the framework-header-fix.sh
script still runs on the copied headers.
llvm-svn: 338074
Summary:
Previously the framework-header-fix script would change the sources
before they were copied, leading to unnecessary rebuilds on repeat
`ninja lldb` invocations. This runs the script on the headers after
they're copied into the produced LLDB.framework, meaning it doesn't
affect any files being built.
Patch by Keith Smiley <keithbsmiley@gmail.com>!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49779
llvm-svn: 338058
Summary:
So far lldb is printing this when it finds an ambiguous command:
```
(lldb) g
Ambiguous command 'g'. Possible matches:
gdb-remote
gui
gdb-remote
gui
```
The duplicates come from the fact that we call the same query twice with the same parameters
and add it to the same list. This patch just removes the second query call to `GetCommandObject`.
As `GetCommandObject` is const and the name parameter is also not modified, this shouldn't break
anything else. I didn't merge the remaining if statement into the else as I think otherwise the
`if obj==nullptr do X else Y` pattern in there becomes hard to recognize.
Reviewers: davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49866
llvm-svn: 338043
Summary:
We always print two error messages when we hit an unknown command. As the function
`CommandInterpreter::HandleCommand` that prints the second error message unconditionally called the `CommandInterpreter::ResolveCommandImpl` before (which prints the first error message), we can just remove
that second error message.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38312
Reviewers: labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: labath, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49831
llvm-svn: 338040
Summary:
Replace the existing combination of FastDemangle and the fallback to llvm::itaniumDemangle() with LLVM's new ItaniumPartialDemangler. It slightly reduces complexity and slightly improves performance, but doesn't introduce conceptual changes. This patch is preparing for more fundamental improvements on LLDB's demangling approach.
Reviewers: friss, jingham, erik.pilkington, labath, clayborg, mgorny, davide, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, labath, clayborg, davide, lldb-commits, mgorny, erik.pilkington
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49612
llvm-svn: 337931
Summary: This class doesn't seem to be used anywhere, so we might as well remove the code.
Reviewers: labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: labath, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49755
llvm-svn: 337855
Summary:
The dump function was the only part of this class which depended on
high-level functionality. This was due to the DumpDataExtractor
function, which uses info from a running target to control dump format
(although, RegisterValue doesn't really use the high-level part of
DumpDataExtractor).
This patch follows the same approach done for the DataExtractor class,
and extracts the dumping code into a separate function/file. This file
can stay in the higher level code, while the RegisterValue class and
anything that does not depend in dumping can stay go to lower layers.
The XCode project will need to be updated after this patch.
Reviewers: zturner, jingham, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48351
llvm-svn: 337832
Summary:
LLDB_PLUGINS doesn't exist as a variable, so this line doesn't add any dependencies and is
just confusing. It seems this slipped in from the gdb-remote CMake I was using as a CMake template.
The gdb-remote CMake itself is using a local LLDB_PLUGINS variable, so that code is fine.
Reviewers: davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: davide, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49695
llvm-svn: 337741
The new test checks that we are actually able to read data from these
kinds of elf headers correctly instead of just that we read the section
number correctly. It is also easier to figure out what's going on in the
test.
llvm-svn: 337459
we were printing an extra space before the start for the expression and
an extra space after some dwarf operators. This makes sure we only print
exactly one space **between** operators and nowhere else.
llvm-svn: 337452
Summary: This one fixes variables.test after D49018. The test was broken because D49018 adds a location information to variables, but I hadn't noticed that, because I used 32-bit build to run tests, so the test looked to me already broken before that commit (the test relies on mangled names, but the mangling schemes are different for 32-bit and 64-bit).
Reviewers: stella.stamenova, lldb-commits
Reviewed By: stella.stamenova
Patch By: Aleksandr Urakov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49475
llvm-svn: 337397
Summary: Right now we always try to retrieve ComSpec and if we fail, we give up. This rarely fails, but we can update the logic so that we fail even less frequently. Since there is a well-known path (albeit not always correct), try the path when we failed to retrieve it. Note that on other platforms, we generally just return a well-known path without any checking.
Reviewers: asmith, zturner, labath
Reviewed By: zturner, labath
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49451
llvm-svn: 337395
Summary: Several tests exist in both lit and lldbsuite. This removes the lit version of the duplicated tests.
Reviewers: asmith, zturner
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49450
llvm-svn: 337393
Summary:
Currently, if you build lldb-framework the entire framework doesn't
actually build. In order to build the entire framework, you need to actually
build lldb-suite. This abstraction doesn't feel quite right because
lldb-framework truly does depend on lldb-suite (liblldb + related tools).
In this change I want to invert their dependency. This will mean that lldb and
finish_swig will depend on lldb-framework in a framework build, and lldb-suite
otherwise. Instead of adding conditional logic everywhere to handle this, I
introduce LLDB_SUITE_TARGET to handle it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49406
llvm-svn: 337311
llvm-lit uses `map_config` directives (generated at configuration-time) to
make it possible to pass a test path relative to the source instead of
the build folder (CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR).
However, this doesn't work in the case of swift where the build
directory layout prevents llvm-lit from knowing about lldb and its test
paths. This caused check-lldb-unit to fail in this configuration, while
everything was working as expected upstream. This patch fixes the issue
by passing a path relative to the build directory. This was already the
case for check-lldb-lit.
llvm-svn: 337291
We used to have a pretty stack trace printer in SystemInitializerCommon.
This was disabled on Apple because we didn't want the library to be
setting signal handlers, as this was causing issues when loaded into
Xcode. However, I think it's useful to have this for the LLDB driver, so
I moved it up to use the PrettyStackTraceProgram in the driver's main.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49377
llvm-svn: 337261
Summary:
This change makes the install targets for lldb tools functional when
building for the framework.
I am currently working on the install rules for lldb-framework and this will
let me make `install-lldb-framework` rely on `install-lldb-argdumper` for
instance. This is especially important for `install-lldb-framework-stripped`. It
is much better for `install-lldb-framework-stripped` to rely on
`install-lldb-argdumper-stripped` than to copy and strip lldb-argdumper
manually.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49038
llvm-svn: 337202
Summary:
This patch fixes a few problems with the FormatAnsiTerminalCodes function:
* It does an infinite loop on an unknown color value.
* It crashes when the color value is at the end of the string.
* It deletes the first character behind the color token.
Also added a few tests that reproduce those problems (and test some other corner cases).
Reviewers: davide, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: labath, lldb-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49307
llvm-svn: 337189
Wrong FileCheck header meant that we were not matching what we should.
This allows us to get rid of the -allow-deprecated-dag-overlap flag in
the test.
llvm-svn: 337188
clang recently started diagnosing "exception specification in
declaration does not match previous declaration" errors. Unfortunately
old libc++ versions had a bug, where they violated this rule, which
means that tests using this library version now fail due to build
errors.
Since it was easy to work around the bug by compiling this test with
-fno-exceptions, I do that here. If supporting old libc++ versions
becomes a burden, we'll have to revisit this.
llvm-svn: 337173
The synthetic child providers for these classes had a type expression that matched
pointers & references to the type, but the Front End only worked on the actual object.
I fixed this by adding a way for the Synthetic Child FrontEnd provider to request dereference,
and then had these formatters use that mode.
<rdar://problem/40849836>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49279
llvm-svn: 337035
Summary: Should fix the builds (and prevent future builds from failing when people try to reduce includes).
Reviewers: jingham
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: jingham, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49311
llvm-svn: 337032
Summary:
As suggested in D48796, this patch replaces even more internal calls that were using the old
completion API style with a single CompletionRequest. In some cases we also pass an option
vector/index, but as we don't always have this information, it currently is not part of the
CompletionRequest class.
The constructor of the CompletionRequest is now also more sensible. You only pass the
user input, cursor position and your list of matches to the request and the rest will be
inferred (using the same code we used before to calculate this). You also have to pass these
match window parameters to it, even though they are unused right now.
The patch shouldn't change any behavior.
Reviewers: jingham
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48976
llvm-svn: 337031
Summary:
The refactoring patch for DoExecute missed this case of a variadic function that just silently
accepts a StringRef which it then tries to reinterpret as a C-string.
This should fix the Windows builds.
Reviewers: stella.stamenova
Reviewed By: stella.stamenova
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49309
llvm-svn: 337030
