These builtins are expanded in CGBuiltin to use intrinsics
for (signed/unsigned) shift left long top/bottom.
Reviewers: efriedma, SjoerdMeijer
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79579
RecoveryExprs are modeled as dependent type to prevent bogus diagnostics
and crashes in clang.
This patch allows to preseve the type for broken calls when the
RecoveryEprs have a known type, e.g. a broken non-overloaded call, a
overloaded call when the all candidates have the same return type, so
that more features (code completion still work on "take2args(x).^") still
work.
However, adding the type is risky, which may result in more clang code being
affected leading to new crashes and hurt diagnostic, and it requires large
effort to minimize the affect (update all sites in clang to handle errorDepend
case), so we add a new flag (off by default) to allow us to develop/test
them incrementally.
This patch also has some trivial fixes to suppress diagnostics (to prevent regressions).
Tested:
all existing tests are passed (when both "-frecovery-ast", "-frecovery-ast-type" flags are flipped on);
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: rsmith, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79160
Defaulting to -Xclang -coverage-version='407*' makes .gcno/.gcda
compatible with gcov [4.7,8)
In addition, delete clang::CodeGenOptionsBase::CoverageExtraChecksum and GCOVOptions::UseCfgChecksum.
We can infer the information from the version.
With this change, .gcda files produced by `clang --coverage a.o` linked executable can be read by gcov 4.7~7.
We don't need other -Xclang -coverage* options.
There may be a mismatching version warning, though.
(Note, GCC r173147 "split checksum into cfg checksum and line checksum"
made gcov 4.7 incompatible with previous versions.)
The 'class' or 'struct' keyword is only permitted as part of either an
enum definition or a standalone opaque-enum-declaration, not as part of
an elaborated type specifier. We previously failed to diagnose this, and
generally didn't properly implement the restrictions on elaborated type
specifiers for enumeration types.
In passing, also fixed incorrect parsing for enum-bases, which we
previously parsed as a type-name, but are actually a type-specifier-seq.
This matters for cases like 'enum E : int *p;', which is valid as a
Microsoft extension.
Plus some minor parse diagnostic improvements.
Bumped the recently-added ExtWarn for 'enum E : int x;' to be
DefaultError; this is not an intentional extension, so producing an
error by default seems appropriate, but the warning flag to disable it
may still be useful for code written against old Clang. The same
treatment is given here to the diagnostic for 'enum class E x;', which
we similarly have incorrectly accepted for many years. These diagnostics
continue to be suppressed under -fms-extensions and when compiling
Objective-C code. We will need to decide separately whether Objective-C
should follow the C++ rules or the (older) MSVC rules.
rL144865 incorrectly wrote function names for GCOV_TAG_FUNCTION
(this might be part of the reasons the header says
"We emit files in a corrupt version of GCOV's "gcda" file format").
rL176173 and rL177475 realized the problem and introduced -coverage-no-function-names-in-data
to work around the issue. (However, the description is wrong.
libgcov never writes function names, even before GCC 4.2).
In reality, the linker command line has to look like:
clang --coverage -Xclang -coverage-version='407*' -Xclang -coverage-cfg-checksum -Xclang -coverage-no-function-names-in-data
Failing to pass -coverage-no-function-names-in-data can make gcov 4.7~7
either produce wrong results (for one gcov-4.9 program, I see "No executable lines")
or segfault (gcov-7).
(gcov-8 uses an incompatible format.)
This patch deletes -coverage-no-function-names-in-data and the related
function names support from libclang_rt.profile
Previously we implemented non-standard disambiguation rules to
distinguish an enum-base from a bit-field but otherwise treated a :
after an elaborated-enum-specifier as introducing an enum-base. That
misparses various examples (anywhere an elaborated-type-specifier can
appear followed by a colon, such as within a ternary operator or
_Generic).
We now implement the C++11 rules, with the old cases accepted as
extensions where that seemed reasonable. These amount to:
* an enum-base must always be accompanied by an enum definition (except
in a standalone declaration of the form 'enum E : T;')
* in a member-declaration, 'enum E :' always introduces an enum-base,
never a bit-field
* in a type-specifier (or similar context), 'enum E :' is not
permitted; the colon means whatever else it would mean in that
context.
Fixed underlying types for enums are also permitted in Objective-C and
under MS extensions, plus as a language extension in all other modes.
The behavior in ObjC and MS extensions modes is unchanged (but the
bit-field disambiguation is a bit better); remaining language modes
follow the C++11 rules.
Fixes PR45726, PR39979, PR19810, PR44941, and most of PR24297, plus C++
core issues 1514 and 1966.
Summary:
Since the underlying wait and notify instructions are only available
when the atomics feature is enabled, it only makes sense to expose
their builtin functions when atomics are enabled.
Reviewers: aheejin, sunfish
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, jfb, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79534
D52774 fixed a bug with typo correction of includes, but didn't add
a test.
D65907 then broke recovery of typo correction of includes again,
because it extracted the code that writes to Filename to a separate
function that took the parameter not by reference.
Fix that, and also don't repeat the slash normalization computation
and fix both lookup and regular file name after recovery.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79595
This is a standalone patch and this would help Propeller do a better job of code
layout as it can accurately attribute the profiles to the right internal linkage
function.
This also helps SampledFDO/AutoFDO correctly associate sampled profiles to the
right internal function. Currently, if there is more than one internal symbol
foo, their profiles are aggregated by SampledFDO.
This patch adds a new clang option, -funique-internal-funcnames, to generate
unique names for functions with internal linkage. This patch appends the md5
hash of the module name to the function symbol as a best effort to generate a
unique name for symbols with internal linkage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73307
I discovered that when using an aux-target builtin, it was recognized as
a builtin but never checked. This patch checks for an aux-target builtin
and instead validates it against the correct target.
It does this by extracting the checking code for Target-specific
builtins into its own function, then calls with either targetInfo or
AuxTargetInfo.
I discovered that the limit on possible builtins managed by this
ObjCOrBuiltin variable is too low when combining large targets, since
aux-targets are appended to the targets list. A runtime assert exists
for this, however this patch creates a static-assert as well.
The logic for said static-assert is to make sure we have the room for
the aux-target and target to both be the largest list, which makes sure
we have room for all possible combinations.
I also incremented the number of bits by 1, since I discovered this
currently broken. The current bit-count was 36, so this doesn't
increase any size.
This patch adds various builtins under their corresponding feature macros:
Defined under __ARM_FEATURE_SVE2_AES:
- svaesd
- svaese
- svaesimc
- svaesmc
- svpmullb_pair
- svpmullt_pair
Defined under __ARM_FEATURE_SVE2_SHA3:
- svrax1
Defined under __ARM_FEATURE_SVE2_SM4:
- svsm4e
- svsm4ekey
Defined under __ARM_FEATURE_SVE2_BITPERM:
- svbdep
- svbext
- svbgrp
Summary:
omp.h header file defines omp_null_allocator as a predefined allocator,
need to consider it also as a predefined allocator.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: jholewinski, yaxunl, guansong, cfe-commits, caomhin
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79186
Summary:
Conflicting types for the same section name defined in clang section
pragmas and GNU-style section attributes were not properly captured by
Clang's Sema. The lack of diagnostics was caused by the fact the section
specification coming from attributes was handled by Sema as implicit,
even though explicitly defined by the user.
This patch enables the diagnostics for section type conflicts between
those specifications by making sure sections defined in section
attributes are correctly handled as explicit.
Reviewers: hans, rnk, javed.absar
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78573
Summary:
Section names used in clang section pragmas were not validated against
previously defined sections, causing section type conflicts to be
ignored by Sema.
This patch enables Clang to capture these section type conflicts by
using the existing Sema's UnifySection method to validate section names
from clang section pragmas.
Reviewers: hans, rnk, javed.absar
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78572
Summary: systemd recently added a clang-format file. One issue I
encountered in using clang-format on systemd is that systemd does
not add a space before the parens of their foreach macros but
clang-format always adds a space. This does not seem to be
configurable in clang-format. This revision adds the
ControlStatementsExceptForEachMacros option to SpaceBeforeParens
which puts a space before all control statement parens except
ForEach macros. This drastically reduces the amount of changes
when running clang-format on systemd's source code.
Reviewers: MyDeveloperDay, krasimir, mitchell-stellar
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78869
The built-in SVE types are supposed to be treated as opaque types.
This means that for initialisation purposes they should be treated
as a single unit, much like a scalar type.
However, as Eli pointed out, actually using "scalar" in the diagnostics
is likely to cause confusion, given the types are logically vectors.
The patch therefore uses custom diagnostics or generalises existing
ones. Some of the messages use the word "indivisible" to try to make
it clear(er) that these types can't be initialised elementwise.
I don't think it's possible to trigger warn_braces_around_(scalar_)init
for sizeless types as things stand, since the types can't be used as
members or elements of more complex types. But it seemed better to be
consistent with ext_many_braces_around_(scalar_)init, so the patch
changes it anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76689
I have a follow-on patch that uses an alternative wording for
ext_excess_initializers in some cases. This patch puts it and
a couple of related warnings under their own -W option in order
to avoid a regression in Misc/warning-flags.c.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79244
