registers.
This patch fixes a bug in r328731 that caused structs transitively
containing __weak fields to be passed in registers. The patch replaces
the flag RecordDecl::CanPassInRegisters with a 2-bit enum that indicates
whether the struct or structs containing the struct are forced to be
passed indirectly.
rdar://problem/39194693
llvm-svn: 329617
Found via codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt
Where whitelist consists of:
archtype
cas
classs
checkk
compres
definit
frome
iff
inteval
ith
lod
methode
nd
optin
ot
pres
statics
te
thru
Patch by luzpaz! (This is a subset of D44188 that applies cleanly with a few
files that have dubious fixes reverted.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44188
llvm-svn: 329399
layout" rules.
The new rules say that a standard-layout struct has its first non-static
data member and all base classes at offset 0, and consider a class to
not be standard-layout if that would result in multiple subobjects of a
single type having the same address.
We track "is C++11 standard-layout class" separately from "is
standard-layout class" so that the ABIs that need this information can
still use it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45176
llvm-svn: 329332
ObjC and ObjC++ pass non-trivial structs in a way that is incompatible
with each other. For example:
typedef struct {
id f0;
__weak id f1;
} S;
// this code is compiled in c++.
extern "C" {
void foo(S s);
}
void caller() {
// the caller passes the parameter indirectly and destructs it.
foo(S());
}
// this function is compiled in c.
// 'a' is passed directly and is destructed in the callee.
void foo(S a) {
}
This patch fixes the incompatibility by passing and returning structs
with __strong or weak fields using the C ABI in C++ mode. __strong and
__weak fields in a struct do not cause the struct to be destructed in
the caller and __strong fields do not cause the struct to be passed
indirectly.
Also, this patch fixes the microsoft ABI bug mentioned here:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D41039?id=128767#inline-364710
rdar://problem/38887866
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44908
llvm-svn: 328731
r327219 added wrappers to std::sort which randomly shuffle the container before
sorting. This will help in uncovering non-determinism caused due to undefined
sorting order of objects having the same key.
To make use of that infrastructure we need to invoke llvm::sort instead of
std::sort.
llvm-svn: 328636
This patch uses the infrastructure added in r326307 for enabling
non-trivial fields to be declared in C structs to allow __weak fields in
C structs in ARC.
This recommits r327206, which was reverted because it caused
module-enabled builders to fail. I discovered that the
CXXRecordDecl::CanPassInRegisters flag wasn't being set correctly in
some cases after I moved it to RecordDecl.
Thanks to Eric Liu for helping me investigate the bug.
rdar://problem/33599681
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44095
llvm-svn: 327870
The patch adds nocf_check target independent attribute for disabling checks that were enabled by cf-protection flag.
The attribute can be appertained to functions and function pointers.
Attribute name follows GCC's similar attribute name.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41880
llvm-svn: 327768
This patch uses the infrastructure added in r326307 for enabling
non-trivial fields to be declared in C structs to allow __weak fields in
C structs in ARC.
rdar://problem/33599681
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44095
llvm-svn: 327206
This patch removes the HashString function from StringExtraces and
replaces its uses with calls to djbHash from DJB.h.
This change is *almost* NFC. While the algorithm is identical, the
djbHash implementation in StringExtras used 0 as its default seed while
the implementation in DJB uses 5381. The latter has been shown to result
in less collisions and improved avalanching and is used by the DWARF
accelerator tables.
Because some test were implicitly relying on the hash order, I've
reverted to using zero as a seed for the following two files:
lld/include/lld/Core/SymbolTable.h
llvm/lib/Support/StringMap.cpp
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43615
llvm-svn: 326091
It looks like some of our tests depend on the ordering of hashed values.
I'm reverting my changes while I try to reproduce and fix this locally.
Failing builds:
lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lld-x86_64-darwin13/builds/18388
lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-x86_64-sde-avx512-linux/builds/6743
lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-windows10pro-fast/builds/15607
llvm-svn: 326082
This removes the HashString function from StringExtraces and replaces
its uses with calls to djbHash from DJB.h
This is *almost* NFC. While the algorithm is identical, the djbHash
implementation in StringExtras used 0 as its seed while the
implementation in DJB uses 5381. The latter has been shown to result in
less collisions and improved avalanching.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D43615
(cherry picked from commit 77f7f965bc9499a9ae768a296ca5a1f7347d1d2c)
llvm-svn: 326081
diagnostic settings using _Pragma within a macro.
The AST writer had previously been assuming that all diagnostic state
transitions would occur within a FileID corresponding to a file. When a
diagnostic state change occured within a macro, it was unable to form a
location for that state change and would instead corrupt the diagnostic state
of the "root" node (and thus that of the main compilation).
Also introduce a "#pragma clang __debug diag_mapping" debugging utility
that I added to track this issue down.
llvm-svn: 324695
The 'trivial_abi' attribute can be applied to a C++ class, struct, or
union. It makes special functions of the annotated class (the destructor
and copy/move constructors) to be trivial for the purpose of calls and,
as a result, enables the annotated class or containing classes to be
passed or returned using the C ABI for the underlying type.
When a type that is considered trivial for the purpose of calls despite
having a non-trivial destructor (which happens only when the class type
or one of its subobjects is a 'trivial_abi' class) is passed to a
function, the callee is responsible for destroying the object.
For more background, see the discussions that took place on the mailing
list:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-November/055955.htmlhttp://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20180101/thread.html#214043
rdar://problem/35204524
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41039
llvm-svn: 324269
TemplateTemplateParmDecls of alias templates ended-up serialized as 'file-level decls' which was causing a crash while trying to index a PCH/module file that contained them.
Commit makes sure TemplateTemplateParmDecls are not recorded as such kind of decls.
Fixes crash of rdar://36608297
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42588
llvm-svn: 323549
The skipped preprocessor ranges are now serialized in the AST PCH file. This fixes, for example, libclang's clang_getSkippedRanges() returning zero ranges after reparsing a translation unit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20124
llvm-svn: 322503
- reverts r321622, r321625, and r321626.
- the use of bit-fields is still resulting in warnings - even though we can use static-asserts to harden the code and ensure the bit-fields are wide enough. The bots still complain of warnings being seen.
- to silence the warnings requires specifying the bit-fields with the underlying enum type (as opposed to the enum type itself), which then requires lots of unnecessary static casts of each enumerator within DeclSpec to the underlying-type, which even though could be seen as implementation details, it does hamper readability - and given the additional litterings, makes me question the value of the change.
So in short - I give up (for now at least).
Sorry about the noise.
llvm-svn: 321628
- Since these enums are used as bit-fields - for the bit-fields to be interpreted as unsigned, the underlying type must be specified as unsigned.
Previous failed attempt - wherein I did not specify an underlying type - was the sum of:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rC321614https://reviews.llvm.org/rC321615
llvm-svn: 321622
- the enum changes to TypeSpecifierType are breaking some tests - and will require a more careful integration.
Sorry about rushing these changes - thought I could sneak them in prior to heading out for new years ;)
llvm-svn: 321616
The current code would hit an assert in ASTWriter when trying to write
out the filename for a line table entry that didn't have any. Fix this
by allowing the -1 sentinel value to round-trip through serialization.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40746
llvm-svn: 319707
When a preamble ends in a conditional preprocessor block that is being
skipped, the preprocessor needs to continue skipping that block when
the preamble is used.
This fixes PR34570.
llvm-svn: 317308
for instantiating its definition.
We model the 'inline'ness as being instantiated with the static data member in
order to track whether the declaration has become a definition yet.
llvm-svn: 317147
This feature is not (yet) approved by the C++ committee, so this is liable to
be reverted or significantly modified based on committee feedback.
No functionality change intended for existing code (a new type must be defined
in namespace std to take advantage of this feature).
llvm-svn: 315662
This patch relates to: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33666 This adds support
for template parameters to be passed to the address_space attribute.
The main goal is to add further flexibility to the attribute and allow
for it to be used easily with templates.
The main additions are a new type (DependentAddressSpaceType) alongside
its TypeLoc and its mangling. As well as the logic required to support
dependent address spaces which mainly resides in TreeTransform.h and
SemaType.cpp.
llvm-svn: 314649
Introduce a new "export_as" directive for top-level modules, which
indicates that the current module is a "private" module whose symbols
will eventually be exported through the named "public" module. This is
in support of a common pattern in the Darwin ecosystem where a single
public framework is constructed of several private frameworks, with
(currently) header duplication and some support from the linker.
Addresses rdar://problem/34438420.
llvm-svn: 313316
This follows the scheme agreed with Nathan Sidwell, which can be found here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cxx-modules?action=AttachFile
This will be proposed to the itanium-cxx-abi list once we have some experience
with how well it works; the ABI for this TS should be considered unstable until
it is part of the Itanium C++ ABI.
llvm-svn: 312467
Extend the -fmodule-file option to support the [<name>=]<file> value format.
If the name is omitted, then the old semantics is preserved (the module file
is loaded whether needed or not). If the name is specified, then the mapping
is treated as just another prebuilt module search mechanism, similar to
-fprebuilt-module-path, and the module file is only loaded if actually used
(e.g., via import). With one exception: this mapping also overrides module
file references embedded in other modules (which can be useful if module files
are moved/renamed as often happens during remote compilation).
This override semantics requires some extra work: we now store the module name
in addition to the file name in the serialized AST representation.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35020
llvm-svn: 312220
Extend the -fmodule-file option to support the [<name>=]<file> value format.
If the name is omitted, then the old semantics is preserved (the module file
is loaded whether needed or not). If the name is specified, then the mapping
is treated as just another prebuilt module search mechanism, similar to
-fprebuilt-module-path, and the module file is only loaded if actually used
(e.g., via import). With one exception: this mapping also overrides module
file references embedded in other modules (which can be useful if module files
are moved/renamed as often happens during remote compilation).
This override semantics requires some extra work: we now store the module name
in addition to the file name in the serialized AST representation.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35020
llvm-svn: 312105
constructors when deciding whether classes should be passed indirectly.
This fixes ABI differences between Clang and GCC:
* Previously, Clang ignored the move constructor when making this
determination. It now takes the move constructor into account, per
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/pull/17 (this change may
seem recent, but the ABI change was agreed on the Itanium C++ ABI
list a long time ago).
* Previously, Clang's behavior when the copy constructor was deleted
was unstable -- depending on whether the lazy declaration of the
copy constructor had been triggered, you might get different behavior.
We now eagerly declare the copy constructor whenever its deletedness
is unclear, and ignore deleted copy/move constructors when looking for
a trivial such constructor.
This also fixes an ABI difference between Clang and MSVC:
* If the copy constructor would be implicitly deleted (but has not been
lazily declared yet), for instance because the class has an rvalue
reference member, we would pass it directly. We now pass such a class
indirectly, matching MSVC.
Based on a patch by Vassil Vassilev, which was based on a patch by Bernd
Schmidt, which was based on a patch by Reid Kleckner!
This is a re-commit of r310401, which was reverted in r310464 due to ARM
failures (which should now be fixed).
llvm-svn: 310983
constructors when deciding whether classes should be passed indirectly.
This fixes ABI differences between Clang and GCC:
* Previously, Clang ignored the move constructor when making this
determination. It now takes the move constructor into account, per
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/pull/17 (this change may
seem recent, but the ABI change was agreed on the Itanium C++ ABI
list a long time ago).
* Previously, Clang's behavior when the copy constructor was deleted
was unstable -- depending on whether the lazy declaration of the
copy constructor had been triggered, you might get different behavior.
We now eagerly declare the copy constructor whenever its deletedness
is unclear, and ignore deleted copy/move constructors when looking for
a trivial such constructor.
This also fixes an ABI difference between Clang and MSVC:
* If the copy constructor would be implicitly deleted (but has not been
lazily declared yet), for instance because the class has an rvalue
reference member, we would pass it directly. We now pass such a class
indirectly, matching MSVC.
llvm-svn: 310401
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The second recommit (r309106) was reverted because the "non-default #pragma
pack value chages the alignment of struct or union members in the included file"
warning proved to be too aggressive for external projects like Chromium
(https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=749197). This recommit
makes the problematic warning a non-default one, and gives it the
-Wpragma-pack-suspicious-include warning option.
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309386
The warning fires on non-suspicious code in Chromium. Reverting until a
solution is figured out.
> Recommit r308327 2nd time: Add a warning for missing
> '#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
>
> The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
> change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
> in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
> #includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
> alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
>
> Original message:
>
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309186
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309106
This seems to have broken the sanitizer-x86_64-linux buildbot. Reverting until
it's fixed, especially since this landed just before the 5.0 branch.
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308455
and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308441
of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308327
- Extracted the reading of the tokens out into a separate function.
- Replace 'Argument' with 'Parameter' when referring to the identifiers of the macro definition (as opposed to the supplied arguments - MacroArgs - during the macro invocation).
This is in preparation for submitting patches for review to implement __VA_OPT__ which will otherwise just keep lengthening the HandleDefineDirective function and making it less comprehensible.
I will also directly update some extra clang tooling that is broken by the change from Argument to Parameter.
Hopefully the bots will stay appeased.
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 308190
- Extracted the reading of the tokens out into a separate function.
- Replace 'Argument' with 'Parameter' when referring to the identifiers of the macro definition (as opposed to the supplied arguments - MacroArgs - during the macro invocation).
This is in preparation for submitting patches for review to implement __VA_OPT__ which will otherwise just keep lengthening the HandleDefineDirective function and making it less comprehensible.
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 308157
These cases occur frequently for declarations in the global module (above the
module-declaration) in a Modules TS module interface. When we merge a
definition from another module into such a module-private definition, ensure
that we transitively make everything lexically within that definition visible
to that translation unit.
llvm-svn: 307129
