Clang has been updated to support C++26, this adds the same support for
libc++. At the moment C++23 and C++26 are identical. During the next
plenary in June the first C++26 papers will be voted on.
Note like Clang this patch uses C++26 is the internal part and C++2c in
the user visible part.
Depends on D150795
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151026
During the ISO C++ Committee meeting plenary session the C++23 Standard
has been voted as technical complete.
This updates the reference to c++2b to c++23 and updates the __cplusplus
macro.
Note since we use clang-tidy 16 a small work-around is needed. Clang
knows -std=c++23 but clang-tidy not so for now force the lit compiler
flag to use -std=c++2b instead of -std=c++23.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, jloser, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150795
This removes the need for a custom libc++ build to have a basic set of PSTL algorithms.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: miyuki, libcxx-commits, arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149624
These have the same purposes but two different implementations.
llvm_check_compiler_linker_flag uses CMAKE_REQUIRED_FLAGS which affects
flags used both for compilation and linking which is problematic because
some flags may be link-only and trigger unused argument warning when set
during compilation. llvm_check_linker_flag does not have this issue so
we chose it as the prevailaing implementation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143052
Some clients use libc++ with modules and LSV (Local Submodule Visibility)
enabled, and we see frequent downstream breakage caused by that. Until
modules use LSV by default (which is apparently a desire), add a CI job
that tests this sub-configuration to avoid high cost downstream breakage.
For more information about LSV, see https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20150504/128395.html.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143273
`_LIBCPP_REMOVE_TRANSITIVE_INCLUDES` doesn't do anything anymore in C++23 mode, so it's now just a duplicate of the C++23 configuration.
Also add new steps to the post-release checklist for updating the supported compilers.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: arichardson, libcxx-commits, arphaman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133364
This allows porting the library to platforms that are able to support
<iostream> but that do not have a notion of a filesystem, and where it
hence doesn't make sense to support std::fstream (and never will).
Also, remove reliance on <fstream> in various tests that didn't
actually need it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138327
Fixes warnings (or errors, if someone injects -Werror in their build system,
which happens in fact with some folks vendoring LLVM too) with Clang 16:
```
+/var/tmp/portage.notmp/portage/sys-devel/llvm-15.0.4/work/llvm_build-abi_x86_64.amd64/CMakeFiles/CMakeTmp/src.c:3:9: warning: a function declaration without a prototype
is deprecated in all versions of C [-Wstrict-prototypes]
-/var/tmp/portage.notmp/portage/sys-devel/llvm-14.0.4/work/llvm_build-abi_x86_64.amd64/CMakeFiles/CMakeTmp/src.c:3:9: error: a function declaration without a prototype is
deprecated in all versions of C [-Werror,-Wstrict-prototypes]
int main() {return 0;}
^
void
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137503
However, mark them as EXCLUDE_FROM_ALL when we don't want to build them.
Simply declaring the targets should be of no harm, and it allows other
projects to mention these targets regardless of whether they end up
being built or not.
While the diff may not make that obvious, this patch basically
moves the definition of e.g. `cxx_shared` out of the `if (LIBCXX_ENABLE_SHARED)`
and instead marks it as `EXCLUDE_FROM_ALL` conditionally on whether
LIBCXX_ENABLE_SHARED is passed. It then does the same for libunwind
and libc++abi targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134221
This patch enables libc++ build as shared library in all combinations of ASCII/EBCDIC and 32-bit/64-bit variants. In particular it introduces:
# ASCII version of libc++ named as libc++_a.so
# Script to rename DLL name inside the generated side deck
# Various names for dataset members where DLL libraries and their side decks will reside
# Add the following options:
- LIBCXX_SHARED_OUTPUT_NAME
- LIBCXX_ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS
- LIBCXX_ADDITIONAL_LIBRARIES
- LIBCXXABI_ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS
- LIBCXXABI_ADDITIONAL_LIBRARIES
**Background and rational of this patch**
The linker on z/OS creates a list of exported symbols in a file called side deck. The list contains the symbol name as well as the name of the DLL which implements the symbol. The name of the DLL depends on what is specified in the -o command line option. If it points to a USS file, than the DLL name in the side deck will be the USS file name. If it points to a member of a dataset then the DLL name in the side deck is the member name.
If CMake could deal with z/OS datasets we could use -o that points to a dataset member name, but this does not seem to work so we have to produce a USS file as the DLL and then copy the content of the produced side deck to a dataset as well as rename the USS file name in the side deck to a dataset member name that corresponds to that DLL.
Reviewed By: muiez, SeanP, ldionne, #libc, #libc_abi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118503
Now that all jobs have moved over to the new style of Lit configuration,
we can remove all traces of the legacy testing configuration system.
This includes:
- Cache settings that are not honored or useful anymore
- Several CMake options that were only useful in the context of the
legacy Lit configuration system
- A bunch of Python support code that is not used anymore
- The legacy lit.cfg.in files themselves
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134650
The libc++.so linker script generation uses the IMPORTED_LIBNAME
target property on libcxx-abi-shared. However, libcxx-abi-shared
is not an interface library and as such cannot have an
IMPORTED_LIBNAME target property.
Convert libcxx-abi-shared into an imported interface library
and use IMPORTED_LIBNAME in place of IMPORTED_LOCATION. This makes
linker script generation work correctly with system-libcxxabi.
I believe this fixes the issue that D131037 was intended to fix.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133566
Otherwise, we would end up passing `-lNOTFOUND` to the compiler, which
caused various compiler checks to fail and ended up breaking the build
in the most obscure ways. For example, checks for -faligned-allocation
would fail because the compiler would complain about an unknown library
called NOTFOUND, and we would end up not passing -faligned-allocation
anywhere in our build. This is madness.
An even better alternative would be to simply FATAL_ERROR if we don't
find the builtins library. However, it seems like our build has been
working fine without finding it for a while, so instead of making a
bunch of builds fail, we can figure out why linking against compiler-rt
doesn't actually seem to be required in a follow-up, and perhaps
relax that.
Trying to be generic didn't work properly because we had to special-case
some interface libraries that we didn't want in the linker script. Instead,
only look at the ABI and the unwinding libraries explicitly.
This should solve the issue reported by @dim in [1].
[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/15-0-0-rc1-has-been-tagged/64174/22
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131037
Leave the escape hatch in place with a note, but don't include the
debug mode symbols by default since we don't support the debug mode
in the normal library anymore.
This is technically an ABI break for users who were depending on
those debug mode symbols in the dylib, however those users will
already be broken at compile-time because they must have been using
_LIBCPP_DEBUG=2, which is now an error.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127360
In particular remove the ability to expel incomplete features from the
library at configure-time, since this can now be done through the
_LIBCPP_ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL macro.
Also, never provide symbols related to incomplete features inside the
dylib, instead provide them in c++experimental.a (this changes the
symbols list, but not for any configuration that should have shipped).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128928
This re-applies bb939931a1ad, which had been reverted by 09cebfb978de
because it broke Chromium. The issues seen by Chromium should be
addressed by 1d0f79558ca4.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128927
This caused build failures when building Clang and libc++ together on Mac:
fatal error: 'experimental/memory_resource' file not found
See the code review for details. Reverting until the problem and how to
solve it is better understood.
(Updates to some test files were not reverted, since they seemed
unrelated and were later updated by 340b48b267b96.)
> This is the first part of a plan to ship experimental features
> by default while guarding them behind a compiler flag to avoid
> users accidentally depending on them. Subsequent patches will
> also encompass incomplete features (such as <format> and <ranges>)
> in that categorization. Basically, the idea is that we always
> build and ship the c++experimental library, however users can't
> use what's in it unless they pass the `-funstable` flag to Clang.
>
> Note that this patch intentionally does not start guarding
> existing <experimental/FOO> content behind the flag, because
> that would merely break users that might be relying on such
> content being in the headers unconditionally. Instead, we
> should start guarding new TSes behind the flag, and get rid
> of the existing TSes we have by shipping their Standard
> counterpart.
>
> Also, this patch must jump through a few hoops like defining
> _LIBCPP_ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL because we still support compilers
> that do not implement -funstable yet.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128927
This reverts commit bb939931a1adb9a47a2de13c359d6a72aeb277c8.
This is the first part of a plan to ship experimental features
by default while guarding them behind a compiler flag to avoid
users accidentally depending on them. Subsequent patches will
also encompass incomplete features (such as <format> and <ranges>)
in that categorization. Basically, the idea is that we always
build and ship the c++experimental library, however users can't
use what's in it unless they pass the `-funstable` flag to Clang.
Note that this patch intentionally does not start guarding
existing <experimental/FOO> content behind the flag, because
that would merely break users that might be relying on such
content being in the headers unconditionally. Instead, we
should start guarding new TSes behind the flag, and get rid
of the existing TSes we have by shipping their Standard
counterpart.
Also, this patch must jump through a few hoops like defining
_LIBCPP_ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL because we still support compilers
that do not implement -funstable yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128927
This commit re-applies 9ee97ce3b830, which was reverted by 61d417ce
because it broke the LLDB data formatter tests. It also re-applies
6148c79a (the manual GN change associated to it).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127444
Since dfa88927ae1411ccc3b248b7e624f2acf623d947, the static
libc++experimental should work in mingw dll builds. (It probably worked
all along in static mingw builds.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129270
Instead of marking private symbols with internal_linkage (which leads to
one copy per translation unit -- rather wasteful), use an ABI tag that
gets rev'd with each libc++ version. That way, we know that we can't have
name collisions between implementation-detail functions across libc++
versions, so we'll never violate the ODR. However, within a single program,
each symbol still has a proper name with external linkage, which means
that the linker is free to deduplicate symbols even across TUs.
This actually means that we can guarantee that versions of libc++ can
be mixed within the same program without ever having to take a code size
hit, and without having to manually opt-in -- it should just work out of
the box.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127444
This commit re-adds transitive includes that had been removed by
4cd04d1687f1, c36870c8e79c, a83f4b9cda57, 1458458b558d, 2e2f3158c604,
and 489637e66dd3. This should cover almost all the includes that had
been removed since LLVM 14 and that would contribute to breaking user
code when releasing LLVM 15.
It is possible to disable the inclusion of these headers by defining
_LIBCPP_REMOVE_TRANSITIVE_INCLUDES. The intent is that vendors will
enable that macro and start fixing downstream issues immediately. We
can then remove the macro (and the transitive includes) by default in
a future release. That way, we will break users only once by removing
transitive includes in bulk instead of doing it bit by bit a every
release, which is more disruptive for users.
Note 1: The set of headers to re-add was found by re-generating the
transitive include test on a checkout of release/14.x, which
provided the list of all transitive includes we used to provide.
Note 2: Several includes of <vector>, <optional>, <array> and <unordered_map>
have been added in this commit. These transitive inclusions were
added when we implemented boyer_moore_searcher in <functional>.
Note 3: This is a best effort patch to try and resolve downstream breakage
caused since branching LLVM 14. I wasn't able to perfectly mirror
transitive includes in LLVM 14 for a few headers, so I added a
release note explaining it. To summarize, adding boyer_moore_searcher
created a bunch of circular dependencies, so we have to break
backwards compatibility in a few cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128661
This patch switches the build compiler for AIX from ibm-clang to clang. ibm-clang++_r has `-pthread` by default, but clang for AIX doesn't, so `-pthread` had to be added to the test config. A bunch of tests now pass, so the `XFAIL` was removed. This patch also switch the build to use the visibility support available in clang-15 to control symbols exported by the shared library (AIX traditionally uses explicit export lists for this purpose).
Reviewed By: #libc, #libc_abi, daltenty, #libunwind, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127470
The debug mode has been broken pretty much ever since it was shipped
because it was possible to enable the debug mode in user code without
actually enabling it in the dylib, leading to ODR violations that
caused various kinds of failures.
This commit makes the debug mode a knob that is configured when
building the library and which can't be changed afterwards. This is
less flexible for users, however it will actually work as intended
and it will allow us, in the future, to add various kinds of checks
that do not assume the same ABI as the normal library. Furthermore,
this will make the debug mode more robust, which means that vendors
might be more tempted to support it properly, which hasn't been the
case with the current debug mode.
This patch shouldn't break any user code, except folks who are building
against a library that doesn't have the debug mode enabled and who try
to enable the debug mode in their code. Such users will get a compile-time
error explaining that this configuration isn't supported anymore.
In the future, we should further increase the granularity of the debug
mode checks so that we can cherry-pick which checks to enable, like we
do for unspecified behavior randomization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122941
Summary:
This patch changes scripts to add libunwind CI on AIX. Test config file ibm-libunwind-shared.cfg.in is introduced for testing on AIX.
Reviewed by: ldionne, MaskRay, libunwind, ibc++abi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126017
Also, add a CI job that tests this configuration. The exact configuration
is that we build a shared libc++ and merge objects for the ABI library
and the unwinder library into it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125903
This is a variant of D116689 rebased on top of the new (proposed) ABI
refactoring in D120727. It should conserve the basic properties of the
original patch by @phosek, except it also allows cleaning up the merging
of libc++abi into libc++ from the libc++ side.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125393
This patch overhauls how we pick up the ABI library. Instead of setting
ad-hoc flags, it creates interface targets that can be linked against by
the rest of the build, which is easier to follow and extend to support
new ABI libraries.
This is intended to be a NFC change, however there are some additional
simplifications and improvements we can make in the future that would
require a slight behavior change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120727
We add `--unwindlib=none` to `CMAKE_REQUIRED_FLAGS`
to make sure that builds with a yet-incomplete toolchain succeed,
to avoid linker failures about missing unwindlib.
When this option is added to `CMAKE_REQUIRED_FLAGS`, it gets added to
both compile and link commands in CMake compile tests. If
`--unwindlib=none` is included in compilation commands, it causes
warnings about unused arguments, as the flag only is relevant for
linking.
Due to the warnings in CMake tests, the later CMake test for the
`-Werror` option failed (as the tested `-Werror` option caused the
preexisting warning due to unused `--unwindlib=none` to become a
hard error). Therefore, most CI configurations that build with
`LIBCXX_ENABLE_WERROR` didn't actually end up enabling `-Werror`
after all.
When looking at the CI build log of recent CI builds, they do
end up printing:
-- Performing Test LIBCXX_SUPPORTS_WERROR_FLAG
-- Performing Test LIBCXX_SUPPORTS_WERROR_FLAG - Failed
-- Performing Test LIBCXX_SUPPORTS_WX_FLAG
-- Performing Test LIBCXX_SUPPORTS_WX_FLAG - Failed
Thus while the configurations are meant to error out on warnings,
they actually haven't done that, due to the interaction of these
options.
To fix this, remove the individual cases of adding `--unwindlib=none`
into `CMAKE_REQUIRED_FLAGS` in libcxx and libunwind.
`runtimes/CMakeLists.txt` still adds `--unwindlib=none` if needed, but
not otherwise. (The same issue with enabling `-Werror` does remain
if `--unwindlib=none` strictly is needed though - that can be fixed
separately afterwards.)
These individual cases in libunwind and libcxx were added while
standalone builds of the runtimes still were supported - but no longer
are necessary now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124375
Avoid repeating CMake checks across runtimes by unifying names of
variables used for results to leverage CMake caching.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110005
Since a8d15a926689c126c4d316788786e0160cfc1d5d / D110975, this is
the default, even if winpthread headers are available, so we don't
need to cargo cult setting this option in all builds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122717
This means that re-running with llvm-lit in that configuration will
work as expected. This also enables assertions in libc++abi in the
Generic-assertions CI job, which was disabled previously.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122597
This patch adds a lightweight assertion handler mechanism that can be
overriden at link-time in a fashion similar to `operator new`.
This is a third take on https://llvm.org/D121123 (which allowed customizing
the assertion handler at compile-time), and https://llvm.org/D119969
(which allowed customizing the assertion handler at runtime only).
This approach is, I think, the best of all three explored approaches.
Indeed, replacing the assertion handler in user code is ergonomic,
yet we retain the ability to provide a custom assertion handler when
deploying to older platforms that don't have a default handler in
the dylib.
As-is, this patch provides a pretty good amount of backwards compatibility
with the previous debug mode:
- Code that used to set _LIBCPP_DEBUG=0 in order to get basic assertions
in their code will still get basic assertions out of the box, but
those assertions will be using the new assertion handler support.
- Code that was previously compiled with references to __libcpp_debug_function
and friends will work out-of-the-box, no changes required. This is
because we provide the same symbols in the dylib as we used to.
- Code that used to set a custom __libcpp_debug_function will stop
compiling, because we don't provide that declaration anymore. Users
will have to migrate to the new way of setting a custom assertion
handler, which is extremely easy. I suspect that pool of users is
very limited, so breaking them at compile-time is probably acceptable.
The main downside of this approach is that code being compiled with
assertions enabled but deploying to an older platform where the assertion
handler didn't exist yet will fail to compile. However users can easily
fix the problem by providing a custom assertion handler and defining
the _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_CUSTOM_ASSERTION_HANDLER_PROVIDED macro to
let the library know about the custom handler. In a way, this is
actually a feature because it avoids a load-time error that one would
otherwise get when trying to run the code on the older target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121478
It's the role of the C++ ABI library to install its own headers, not libc++.
This fixes an existing issue causing spurious CI failures where both libc++
and libc++abi would try to install <cxxabi.h> & friends in the same location,
leading to failures during the installation step.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121706
Add an explicit LIBCXX_CXX_ABI=system-libcxxabi option for linking to
system-installed libc++abi. This fixes the ability to link against one
when building libcxx via the runtimes build, as otherwise the build
system insists on linking into in-tree targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119539
This commit reverts 5aaefa51 (and also partly 7f285f48e77 and b6d75682f9,
which were related to the original commit). As landed, 5aaefa51 had
unintended consequences on some downstream bots and didn't have proper
coverage upstream due to a few subtle things. Implementing this is
something we should do in libc++, however we'll first need to address
a few issues listed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124#3349710.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120683
libc++ has started splicing standard library headers into much more
fine-grained content for maintainability. It's very likely that outdated
and naive tooling (some of which is outside of LLVM's scope) will
suggest users include things such as <__ranges/access.h> instead of
<ranges>, and Hyrum's law suggests that users will eventually begin to
rely on this without the help of tooling. As such, this commit
intends to protect users from themselves, by making it a hard error for
anyone outside of the standard library to include libc++ detail headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124
As suggested by the cmake warning:
CMake Warning at <...>/llvm-project/libcxx-ci/libcxx/CMakeLists.txt:289 (message):
LIBCXX_TARGET_TRIPLE is deprecated, please use CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_TARGET instead
Depends on D119948
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120038
