Compare commits

...
7 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Mervin Praison 262a90a235 Merge pull request #310 from MervinPraison/develop
2.0.51
2025-01-18 06:02:35 +00:00
MervinPraison 60928dcb90 Update PraisonAI to version 2.0.51 and enhance dependencies
- Bumped PraisonAI version from 2.0.50 to 2.0.51 in `Dockerfile`, `pyproject.toml`, and `uv.lock` to reflect the latest updates.
- Updated the `praisonai.rb` formula to point to the new version's tarball.
- Updated the `praisonaiagents` dependency version from `0.0.41` to `0.0.42` across relevant files for improved functionality.
- Enhanced documentation with updated installation instructions for various examples, ensuring users have access to the latest package versions.

These changes improve the overall functionality and usability of the PraisonAI framework, particularly in dependency management and documentation clarity.
2025-01-18 06:02:09 +00:00
MervinPraison c8552e1158 Update PraisonAI agents package version to 0.0.42 in pyproject.toml and uv.lock
- Bumped the version from 0.0.41 to 0.0.42 to reflect recent updates and ensure users have access to the latest features and improvements.
- This change maintains the integrity of the PraisonAI framework and prepares it for future enhancements.
2025-01-18 05:48:57 +00:00
Mervin Praison c57d7db9bb Merge pull request #309 from MervinPraison/develop
Enhance Streamlit UIs for Code Analysis and Hackathon Judging
2025-01-17 22:21:06 +00:00
MervinPraison 236abc2c83 Enhance Streamlit UIs for Code Analysis and Hackathon Judging
- Updated `mint.json` to group Streamlit pages under a new "Streamlit" section, improving organization.
- Renamed titles in `code-analysis.mdx` and `hackathon-judge.mdx` to include "Agent" for clarity.
- Added new Streamlit UI files: `code-analysis-streamlit.mdx` and `hackathon-judge-streamlit.mdx`, providing interactive interfaces for code analysis and hackathon project evaluation.
- Each new UI includes detailed descriptions, features, quick start guides, and visual flowcharts to enhance user experience and understanding.

These changes significantly improve the usability and accessibility of the PraisonAI framework's Streamlit applications, offering users powerful tools for code and project evaluation.
2025-01-17 22:20:51 +00:00
Mervin Praison 76c5f8fe3f Merge pull request #308 from MervinPraison/develop
Add new code analysis and hackathon judge agents with Streamlit integ…
2025-01-17 19:03:12 +00:00
MervinPraison 82750020d2 Add new code analysis and hackathon judge agents with Streamlit integration
- Introduced `code-analysis-agents.py` and `code-analysis-streamlit.py` for comprehensive code evaluation, including metrics on architecture, maintainability, performance, and security.
- Added `context-agents-code.py` and `context-agents.py` for CV analysis capabilities, providing detailed scoring and recommendations.
- Implemented `hackathon-judge-agent.py` and `hackathon-judge-streamlit.py` for evaluating hackathon projects through video demonstrations, offering scores and feedback on innovation, technical complexity, and presentation quality.
- Enhanced documentation with new examples for code analysis and hackathon judging, improving user guidance and showcasing agent capabilities.
- Updated `mint.json` to include new examples, enriching the available resources for users.

These additions significantly expand the functionality of the PraisonAI framework, providing users with powerful tools for code and project evaluation.
2025-01-17 19:02:56 +00:00
28 changed files with 3008 additions and 59 deletions

No files matched your search

+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
FROM python:3.11-slim
WORKDIR /app
COPY . .
RUN pip install flask praisonai==2.0.50 gunicorn markdown
RUN pip install flask praisonai==2.0.51 gunicorn markdown
EXPOSE 8080
CMD ["gunicorn", "-b", "0.0.0.0:8080", "api:app"]
+97
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
from praisonaiagents import Agent, Task, PraisonAIAgents
from pydantic import BaseModel
from typing import List, Dict
from gitingest import ingest
class CodeMetrics(BaseModel):
category: str
score: int
findings: List[str]
class CodeAnalysisReport(BaseModel):
overall_quality: int
code_metrics: List[CodeMetrics]
architecture_score: int
maintainability_score: int
performance_score: int
security_score: int
test_coverage: int
key_strengths: List[str]
improvement_areas: List[str]
tech_stack: List[str]
recommendations: List[str]
complexity_metrics: Dict[str, int]
best_practices: List[Dict[str, str]]
potential_risks: List[str]
documentation_quality: int
code_analyzer = Agent(
role="Code Analysis Expert",
goal="Provide comprehensive code evaluation and recommendations",
backstory="""Expert code analyst specializing in architecture review,
best practices, and technical debt assessment.""",
verbose=True
)
code_analysis_task = Task(
description="""Analyze code repository and provide structured evaluation:
1. Overall Quality (0-100)
2. Core Metrics Analysis:
- Architecture and Design
- Code Maintainability
- Performance Optimization
- Security Practices
- Test Coverage
3. Technical Assessment:
- Technology Stack Review
- Code Complexity Analysis
- Best Practices Adherence
- Risk Assessment
4. Recommendations:
- Key Improvements
- Architecture Suggestions
- Security Enhancements""",
expected_output="Detailed code analysis report with metrics and recommendations",
agent=code_analyzer,
output_pydantic=CodeAnalysisReport
)
def analyze_code(code_source: str) -> CodeAnalysisReport:
"""
Analyze code from directory path or GitHub URL
"""
# Ingest code content
summary, tree, content = ingest(code_source)
# Concatenate context into structured format
context_text = f"""
CODE REPOSITORY ANALYSIS
=======================
SUMMARY
-------
{summary}
REPOSITORY STRUCTURE
-------------------
{tree}
SOURCE CODE
-----------
{content}
"""
# Initialize and run analysis
agents = PraisonAIAgents(
agents=[code_analyzer],
tasks=[code_analysis_task]
)
return agents.start(context_text)
if __name__ == "__main__":
# Example usage
code_source = "https://github.com/openai/openai-python/tree/main/src/openai/cli/_api/chat" # GitHub URL or local directory
result = analyze_code(code_source)
print(result)
+217
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
import streamlit as st
from praisonaiagents import Agent, Task, PraisonAIAgents
from pydantic import BaseModel
from typing import List, Dict, Any
from gitingest import ingest
# Import the same classes and code from code-analysis-agents.py
class CodeMetrics(BaseModel):
category: str
score: int
findings: List[str]
class CodeAnalysisReport(BaseModel):
overall_quality: int
code_metrics: List[CodeMetrics]
architecture_score: int
maintainability_score: int
performance_score: int
security_score: int
test_coverage: int
key_strengths: List[str]
improvement_areas: List[str]
tech_stack: List[str]
recommendations: List[str]
complexity_metrics: Dict[str, int]
best_practices: List[Dict[str, str]]
potential_risks: List[str]
documentation_quality: int
def analyze_code(code_source: str) -> CodeAnalysisReport:
"""
Analyze code from directory path or GitHub URL
"""
# Create code analyzer agent
code_analyzer = Agent(
role="Code Analysis Expert",
goal="Provide comprehensive code evaluation and recommendations",
backstory="""Expert code analyst specializing in architecture review,
best practices, and technical debt assessment.""",
verbose=True
)
# Create analysis task
code_analysis_task = Task(
description="""Analyze code repository and provide structured evaluation:
1. Overall Quality (0-100)
2. Core Metrics Analysis:
- Architecture and Design
- Code Maintainability
- Performance Optimization
- Security Practices
- Test Coverage
3. Technical Assessment:
- Technology Stack Review
- Code Complexity Analysis
- Best Practices Adherence
- Risk Assessment
4. Recommendations:
- Key Improvements
- Architecture Suggestions
- Security Enhancements""",
expected_output="Detailed code analysis report with metrics and recommendations",
agent=code_analyzer,
output_pydantic=CodeAnalysisReport
)
# Ingest code content
summary, tree, content = ingest(code_source)
# Concatenate context into structured format
context_text = f"""
CODE REPOSITORY ANALYSIS
=======================
SUMMARY
-------
{summary}
REPOSITORY STRUCTURE
-------------------
{tree}
SOURCE CODE
-----------
{content}
"""
# Initialize and run analysis
agents = PraisonAIAgents(
agents=[code_analyzer],
tasks=[code_analysis_task]
)
result = agents.start(context_text)
# Extract the Pydantic model from the result
if isinstance(result, dict) and 'task_results' in result:
# Get the first task result's pydantic output
analysis_result = result['task_results'][0].pydantic
if isinstance(analysis_result, CodeAnalysisReport):
return analysis_result
# If we can't get the Pydantic model, create one from the raw data
return CodeAnalysisReport(**result)
def display_code_metrics(metrics, cols):
"""Display code metrics in columns with color-coded scores"""
for i, metric in enumerate(metrics):
score = metric.score
color = "red" if score < 60 else "orange" if score < 75 else "green"
# Use modulo to alternate between columns
with cols[i % len(cols)]:
st.markdown(f"### {metric.category}")
st.markdown(f"**Score:** :{color}[{score}%]")
for finding in metric.findings:
st.markdown(f"• {finding}")
def display_section(title: str, items: list, icon: str = "•"):
"""Display a section with items in a consistent format"""
st.markdown(f"### {title}")
for item in items:
if isinstance(item, dict):
for key, value in item.items():
st.markdown(f"{icon} **{key}**: {value}")
else:
st.markdown(f"{icon} {item}")
def main():
st.set_page_config(
page_title="Code Analysis Agent",
layout="wide",
initial_sidebar_state="expanded"
)
st.title("Code Analysis Agent")
with st.sidebar:
st.header("Input")
code_source = st.text_input(
"GitHub URL or Local Path",
placeholder="https://github.com/username/repo or /path/to/directory"
)
analyze_button = st.button("Analyze Code", type="primary")
if analyze_button and code_source:
try:
with st.spinner("Analyzing code..."):
result = analyze_code(code_source)
# Overall Metrics
st.header("Overall Metrics")
cols = st.columns(6)
metrics = {
"Overall Quality": result.overall_quality,
"Architecture": result.architecture_score,
"Maintainability": result.maintainability_score,
"Performance": result.performance_score,
"Security": result.security_score,
"Test Coverage": result.test_coverage
}
for (metric, value), col in zip(metrics.items(), cols):
color = "red" if value < 60 else "orange" if value < 75 else "green"
col.metric(metric, f"{value}%")
col.markdown(f":{color}[{'●' * (value // 20)}]")
# Detailed Analysis
st.header("Detailed Analysis")
metric_cols = st.columns(2)
display_code_metrics(result.code_metrics, metric_cols)
# Technology Stack
col1, col2 = st.columns(2)
with col1:
st.header("Technology Stack")
for tech in result.tech_stack:
st.markdown(f"🔧 {tech}")
with col2:
st.header("Complexity Metrics")
for metric, value in result.complexity_metrics.items():
st.metric(metric.replace('_', ' ').title(), value)
# Key Findings
st.header("Key Findings")
cols = st.columns(2)
with cols[0]:
display_section("✅ Strengths", result.key_strengths)
display_section("🔄 Best Practices", result.best_practices)
with cols[1]:
display_section("⚠️ Areas for Improvement", result.improvement_areas)
display_section("❗ Potential Risks", result.potential_risks)
# Recommendations
st.header("Recommendations")
for i, rec in enumerate(result.recommendations, 1):
st.markdown(f"**{i}.** {rec}")
# Documentation Quality
st.header("Documentation")
doc_score = result.documentation_quality
color = "red" if doc_score < 60 else "orange" if doc_score < 75 else "green"
st.markdown(f"Documentation Quality: :{color}[{doc_score}%]")
except Exception as e:
st.error(f"Error analyzing code: {str(e)}")
st.exception(e)
elif analyze_button:
st.warning("Please enter a GitHub URL or local path")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
+98
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
from praisonaiagents import Agent, Task, PraisonAIAgents
from pydantic import BaseModel
from typing import List, Dict
class SkillMetrics(BaseModel):
name: str
score: int
comments: str
class CVAnalysisReport(BaseModel):
overall_score: int
skill_metrics: List[SkillMetrics]
experience_score: int
education_score: int
presentation_score: int
achievement_impact_score: int
market_readiness: int
key_strengths: List[str]
areas_for_improvement: List[str]
market_fit: str
recommendations: List[str]
technical_skills: List[Dict[str, int]]
soft_skills: List[Dict[str, int]]
skill_gaps: List[str]
key_achievements: List[str]
impact_metrics: List[Dict[str, str]]
areas_of_expertise: List[str]
# Create single CV analysis agent
cv_analyzer = Agent(
role="CV Analysis Expert",
goal="Provide comprehensive CV evaluation and recommendations",
backstory="""You are an expert CV analyst with deep knowledge of industry requirements,
market trends, and talent assessment. You excel at evaluating skills, experience,
and providing actionable recommendations.""",
verbose=True
)
# Single comprehensive analysis task
cv_analysis_task = Task(
description="""Perform a detailed CV analysis with scoring metrics and provide output in the following format:
1. Overall Score (0-100):
- Calculate based on weighted average of all metrics
2. Individual Skill Metrics:
- For each major skill found in CV:
* Name of skill
* Score (0-100)
* Specific feedback/comments
3. Core Metrics (0-100 each):
- Experience Score: Based on relevance and years
- Education Score: Based on relevance and level
- Presentation Score: CV format, clarity, structure
- Achievement Impact Score: Measurable results
- Market Readiness: Current market fit
4. Technical Skills:
- List each skill with proficiency score (0-100)
- Example: {"Python": 85, "AWS": 70}
5. Soft Skills:
- List each skill with proficiency score (0-100)
- Example: {"Communication": 90, "Leadership": 75}
6. Detailed Analysis:
- Key Strengths: Top 3-5 standout points
- Areas for Improvement: 3-5 specific points
- Market Fit: Current industry alignment
- Skill Gaps: Missing critical skills for target role
- Key Achievements: Quantifiable accomplishments
- Impact Metrics: {"metric": "value"}
- Areas of Expertise: Primary domains of expertise
7. Recommendations:
- 3-5 actionable steps for improvement
Provide clear justification for all scores and ensure feedback is specific and actionable.""",
expected_output="Structured CV analysis report with detailed metrics and scoring justification",
agent=cv_analyzer,
output_pydantic=CVAnalysisReport
)
# Create and run the agent
agents = PraisonAIAgents(
agents=[cv_analyzer],
tasks=[cv_analysis_task]
)
# Read and pass CV content through start()
with open('cv.txt', 'r') as file:
cv_content = file.read()
# Start the analysis by passing CV content
result = agents.start(cv_content)
print(result)
+182 -33
View File
@@ -1,53 +1,202 @@
import streamlit as st
from praisonaiagents import Agent, Task, PraisonAIAgents
from pydantic import BaseModel
from typing import List, Dict
import json
import asyncio
import nest_asyncio
from functools import partial
# Enable nested event loops
nest_asyncio.apply()
class SkillMetrics(BaseModel):
name: str
score: int
comments: str
class CVAnalysisReport(BaseModel):
overall_score: int
skill_metrics: List[SkillMetrics]
experience_score: int
education_score: int
presentation_score: int
achievement_impact_score: int
market_readiness: int
key_strengths: List[str]
areas_for_improvement: List[str]
market_fit: str
recommendations: List[str]
technical_skills: List[str]
soft_skills: List[str]
technical_skills: List[Dict[str, int]]
soft_skills: List[Dict[str, int]]
skill_gaps: List[str]
key_achievements: List[str]
impact_metrics: List[Dict[str, str]]
areas_of_expertise: List[str]
# Create single CV analysis agent
cv_analyzer = Agent(
role="CV Analysis Expert",
goal="Provide comprehensive CV evaluation and recommendations",
backstory="""You are an expert CV analyst with deep knowledge of industry requirements,
market trends, and talent assessment. You excel at evaluating skills, experience,
and providing actionable recommendations.""",
verbose=True
)
async def analyze_cv_async(cv_content):
cv_analyzer = Agent(
role="CV Analysis Expert",
goal="Provide comprehensive CV evaluation and recommendations",
backstory="""You are an expert CV analyst with deep knowledge of industry requirements,
market trends, and talent assessment. You excel at evaluating skills, experience,
and providing actionable recommendations.""",
verbose=True
)
# Single comprehensive analysis task
cv_analysis_task = Task(
description="""Analyze the CV comprehensively including:
1. Technical and soft skills assessment
2. Experience and achievements evaluation
3. Overall CV evaluation with recommendations
Provide detailed insights and actionable recommendations.""",
expected_output="Complete CV analysis report",
agent=cv_analyzer,
output_pydantic=CVAnalysisReport
)
cv_analysis_task = Task(
description="""Perform a detailed CV analysis with scoring metrics and provide output in the following format:
1. Overall Score (0-100):
- Calculate based on weighted average of all metrics
2. Individual Skill Metrics:
- For each major skill found in CV:
* Name of skill
* Score (0-100)
* Specific feedback/comments
3. Core Metrics (0-100 each):
- Experience Score: Based on relevance and years
- Education Score: Based on relevance and level
- Presentation Score: CV format, clarity, structure
- Achievement Impact Score: Measurable results
- Market Readiness: Current market fit
4. Technical Skills:
- List each skill with proficiency score (0-100)
5. Soft Skills:
- List each skill with proficiency score (0-100)
6. Detailed Analysis sections
7. Recommendations:
- 3-5 actionable steps for improvement""",
expected_output="Structured CV analysis report with detailed metrics and scoring justification",
agent=cv_analyzer,
output_pydantic=CVAnalysisReport
)
# Create and run the agent
agents = PraisonAIAgents(
agents=[cv_analyzer],
tasks=[cv_analysis_task]
)
agents = PraisonAIAgents(
agents=[cv_analyzer],
tasks=[cv_analysis_task]
)
# Read and pass CV content through start()
with open('cv.txt', 'r') as file:
cv_content = file.read()
try:
result = await agents.astart(cv_content)
return result['task_results'][0].pydantic
except Exception as e:
print(f"Error during analysis: {str(e)}")
raise e
# Start the analysis by passing CV content
result = agents.start(cv_content)
def analyze_cv(cv_content):
async def run_analysis():
return await analyze_cv_async(cv_content)
try:
loop = asyncio.new_event_loop()
asyncio.set_event_loop(loop)
result = loop.run_until_complete(run_analysis())
return result
except Exception as e:
raise e
finally:
loop.close()
print(result)
def main():
st.set_page_config(page_title="CV Analyzer", layout="wide")
st.title("Professional CV Analyzer")
# File upload
cv_file = st.file_uploader("Upload your CV (TXT format)", type=['txt'])
if cv_file:
cv_content = cv_file.read().decode()
with st.spinner('Analyzing your CV...'):
try:
analysis = analyze_cv(cv_content)
# Display Overall Score
col1, col2, col3 = st.columns(3)
with col1:
st.metric("Overall Score", f"{analysis.overall_score}/100")
with col2:
st.metric("Market Readiness", f"{analysis.market_readiness}/100")
with col3:
st.metric("Experience Score", f"{analysis.experience_score}/100")
# Core Metrics
st.subheader("Core Metrics")
metrics_cols = st.columns(4)
with metrics_cols[0]:
st.metric("Education", f"{analysis.education_score}/100")
with metrics_cols[1]:
st.metric("Presentation", f"{analysis.presentation_score}/100")
with metrics_cols[2]:
st.metric("Achievement Impact", f"{analysis.achievement_impact_score}/100")
with metrics_cols[3]:
st.metric("Market Readiness", f"{analysis.market_readiness}/100")
# Skill Metrics
st.subheader("Detailed Skill Analysis")
for skill in analysis.skill_metrics:
with st.expander(f"{skill.name} - Score: {skill.score}/100"):
st.write(skill.comments)
# Technical and Soft Skills
col1, col2 = st.columns(2)
with col1:
st.subheader("Technical Skills")
for skill in analysis.technical_skills:
for skill_name, score in skill.items():
st.progress(score/100)
st.caption(f"{skill_name}: {score}/100")
with col2:
st.subheader("Soft Skills")
for skill in analysis.soft_skills:
for skill_name, score in skill.items():
st.progress(score/100)
st.caption(f"{skill_name}: {score}/100")
# Key Information
st.subheader("Key Analysis")
col1, col2 = st.columns(2)
with col1:
st.write("🎯 Key Strengths")
for strength in analysis.key_strengths:
st.write(f"• {strength}")
st.write("🎮 Areas of Expertise")
for expertise in analysis.areas_of_expertise:
st.write(f"• {expertise}")
with col2:
st.write("🔄 Areas for Improvement")
for area in analysis.areas_for_improvement:
st.write(f"• {area}")
st.write("⚠️ Skill Gaps")
for gap in analysis.skill_gaps:
st.write(f"• {gap}")
# Impact Metrics
st.subheader("Impact Metrics")
for metric in analysis.impact_metrics:
for key, value in metric.items():
st.metric(key, value)
# Recommendations
st.subheader("📋 Recommendations")
for rec in analysis.recommendations:
st.write(f"• {rec}")
except Exception as e:
st.error(f"An error occurred during analysis: {str(e)}")
else:
st.info("Please upload your CV in TXT format to begin the analysis")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
+159
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
from praisonaiagents import Agent, Task, PraisonAIAgents
from pydantic import BaseModel
from typing import List, Dict
import os
import json
class ProjectEvaluation(BaseModel):
innovation_score: int # 0-100
technical_complexity: int # 0-100
presentation_quality: int # 0-100
user_experience: int # 0-100
completeness: int # 0-100
overall_score: int # 0-100
key_strengths: List[str]
areas_for_improvement: List[str]
notable_features: List[str]
technical_highlights: List[str]
recommendations: List[str]
market_potential: str
scalability_assessment: str
# Create Vision Analysis Agent
hackathon_judge = Agent(
name="HackathonJudge",
role="Technical Project Evaluator",
goal="Evaluate hackathon projects through video demonstrations",
backstory="""You are an experienced hackathon judge and technical expert.
You excel at evaluating innovation, technical implementation, and presentation quality.
You provide constructive feedback and identify both strengths and areas for improvement.""",
llm="gpt-4o-mini", # Using vision-capable model
self_reflect=False,
knowledge=""
)
def evaluate_project(video_path: str) -> ProjectEvaluation:
"""
Evaluate a hackathon project based on its video demonstration
"""
evaluation_task = Task(
name="project_evaluation",
description="""Analyze this hackathon project video demonstration and provide a comprehensive evaluation:
1. Score the following aspects (0-100):
- Innovation and Creativity
- Technical Complexity
- Presentation Quality
- User Experience
- Project Completeness
2. Identify:
- Key strengths and standout features
- Areas that could be improved
- Notable technical implementations
- Market potential and scalability
3. Provide:
- Specific recommendations for improvement
- Technical suggestions
- Potential future enhancements""",
expected_output="Detailed project evaluation with scores and feedback",
agent=hackathon_judge,
output_pydantic=ProjectEvaluation,
images=[video_path] # Video input for multimodal analysis
)
# Initialize and run evaluation
agents = PraisonAIAgents(
agents=[hackathon_judge],
tasks=[evaluation_task],
process="sequential",
verbose=True
)
response = agents.start()
try:
# If response contains task_results, extract the Pydantic model directly
if isinstance(response, dict) and 'task_results' in response:
task_output = response['task_results'][0]
if hasattr(task_output, 'pydantic'):
return task_output.pydantic
elif hasattr(task_output, 'raw'):
# Extract JSON from raw string if it's wrapped in ```json
raw_text = task_output.raw
if raw_text.startswith('```json'):
raw_text = raw_text.split('\n', 1)[1].rsplit('\n', 1)[0]
evaluation_data = json.loads(raw_text)
else:
evaluation_data = json.loads(task_output) if isinstance(task_output, str) else task_output
# If response is a string, try to parse it as JSON
elif isinstance(response, str):
evaluation_data = json.loads(response)
# If response is a dict with task_status
elif isinstance(response, dict) and 'task_status' in response:
content = response['task_status']
if isinstance(content, dict):
evaluation_data = content
else:
evaluation_data = json.loads(content) if isinstance(content, str) else content
else:
evaluation_data = response
print(f"Debug - Parsed evaluation_data: {evaluation_data}")
# Create and return ProjectEvaluation instance
return ProjectEvaluation(
innovation_score=int(evaluation_data.get('innovation_score', 0)),
technical_complexity=int(evaluation_data.get('technical_complexity', 0)),
presentation_quality=int(evaluation_data.get('presentation_quality', 0)),
user_experience=int(evaluation_data.get('user_experience', 0)),
completeness=int(evaluation_data.get('completeness', 0)),
overall_score=int(evaluation_data.get('overall_score', 0)),
key_strengths=evaluation_data.get('key_strengths', []),
areas_for_improvement=evaluation_data.get('areas_for_improvement', []),
notable_features=evaluation_data.get('notable_features', []),
technical_highlights=evaluation_data.get('technical_highlights', []),
recommendations=evaluation_data.get('recommendations', []),
market_potential=str(evaluation_data.get('market_potential', '')),
scalability_assessment=str(evaluation_data.get('scalability_assessment', ''))
)
except Exception as e:
print(f"Debug - Raw response: {response}")
print(f"Error processing response: {e}")
raise
if __name__ == "__main__":
# Example usage
current_dir = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))
video_path = os.path.join(current_dir, "presentation.mp4")
result = evaluate_project(video_path) # Now returns ProjectEvaluation directly
print("\nHackathon Project Evaluation")
print("===========================")
print(f"\nOverall Score: {result.overall_score}/100")
print("\nDetailed Scores:")
print(f"Innovation: {result.innovation_score}/100")
print(f"Technical Complexity: {result.technical_complexity}/100")
print(f"Presentation: {result.presentation_quality}/100")
print(f"User Experience: {result.user_experience}/100")
print(f"Completeness: {result.completeness}/100")
print("\nKey Strengths:")
for strength in result.key_strengths:
print(f"- {strength}")
print("\nAreas for Improvement:")
for area in result.areas_for_improvement:
print(f"- {area}")
print("\nTechnical Highlights:")
for highlight in result.technical_highlights:
print(f"- {highlight}")
print("\nRecommendations:")
for rec in result.recommendations:
print(f"- {rec}")
print(f"\nMarket Potential: {result.market_potential}")
print(f"\nScalability Assessment: {result.scalability_assessment}")
+159
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
from praisonaiagents import Agent, Task, PraisonAIAgents
from pydantic import BaseModel
from typing import List, Dict
import os
import json
class ProjectEvaluation(BaseModel):
innovation_score: int # 0-100
technical_complexity: int # 0-100
presentation_quality: int # 0-100
user_experience: int # 0-100
completeness: int # 0-100
overall_score: int # 0-100
key_strengths: List[str]
areas_for_improvement: List[str]
notable_features: List[str]
technical_highlights: List[str]
recommendations: List[str]
market_potential: str
scalability_assessment: str
# Create Vision Analysis Agent
hackathon_judge = Agent(
name="HackathonJudge",
role="Technical Project Evaluator",
goal="Evaluate hackathon projects through video demonstrations",
backstory="""You are an experienced hackathon judge and technical expert.
You excel at evaluating innovation, technical implementation, and presentation quality.
You provide constructive feedback and identify both strengths and areas for improvement.""",
llm="gpt-4o-mini", # Using vision-capable model
self_reflect=False,
knowledge=""
)
def evaluate_project(video_path: str) -> ProjectEvaluation:
"""
Evaluate a hackathon project based on its video demonstration
"""
evaluation_task = Task(
name="project_evaluation",
description="""Analyze this hackathon project video demonstration and provide a comprehensive evaluation:
1. Score the following aspects (0-100):
- Innovation and Creativity
- Technical Complexity
- Presentation Quality
- User Experience
- Project Completeness
2. Identify:
- Key strengths and standout features
- Areas that could be improved
- Notable technical implementations
- Market potential and scalability
3. Provide:
- Specific recommendations for improvement
- Technical suggestions
- Potential future enhancements""",
expected_output="Detailed project evaluation with scores and feedback",
agent=hackathon_judge,
output_pydantic=ProjectEvaluation,
images=[video_path] # Video input for multimodal analysis
)
# Initialize and run evaluation
agents = PraisonAIAgents(
agents=[hackathon_judge],
tasks=[evaluation_task],
process="sequential",
verbose=True
)
response = agents.start()
try:
# If response contains task_results, extract the Pydantic model directly
if isinstance(response, dict) and 'task_results' in response:
task_output = response['task_results'][0]
if hasattr(task_output, 'pydantic'):
return task_output.pydantic
elif hasattr(task_output, 'raw'):
# Extract JSON from raw string if it's wrapped in ```json
raw_text = task_output.raw
if raw_text.startswith('```json'):
raw_text = raw_text.split('\n', 1)[1].rsplit('\n', 1)[0]
evaluation_data = json.loads(raw_text)
else:
evaluation_data = json.loads(task_output) if isinstance(task_output, str) else task_output
# If response is a string, try to parse it as JSON
elif isinstance(response, str):
evaluation_data = json.loads(response)
# If response is a dict with task_status
elif isinstance(response, dict) and 'task_status' in response:
content = response['task_status']
if isinstance(content, dict):
evaluation_data = content
else:
evaluation_data = json.loads(content) if isinstance(content, str) else content
else:
evaluation_data = response
print(f"Debug - Parsed evaluation_data: {evaluation_data}")
# Create and return ProjectEvaluation instance
return ProjectEvaluation(
innovation_score=int(evaluation_data.get('innovation_score', 0)),
technical_complexity=int(evaluation_data.get('technical_complexity', 0)),
presentation_quality=int(evaluation_data.get('presentation_quality', 0)),
user_experience=int(evaluation_data.get('user_experience', 0)),
completeness=int(evaluation_data.get('completeness', 0)),
overall_score=int(evaluation_data.get('overall_score', 0)),
key_strengths=evaluation_data.get('key_strengths', []),
areas_for_improvement=evaluation_data.get('areas_for_improvement', []),
notable_features=evaluation_data.get('notable_features', []),
technical_highlights=evaluation_data.get('technical_highlights', []),
recommendations=evaluation_data.get('recommendations', []),
market_potential=str(evaluation_data.get('market_potential', '')),
scalability_assessment=str(evaluation_data.get('scalability_assessment', ''))
)
except Exception as e:
print(f"Debug - Raw response: {response}")
print(f"Error processing response: {e}")
raise
if __name__ == "__main__":
# Example usage
current_dir = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))
video_path = os.path.join(current_dir, "presentation.mp4")
result = evaluate_project(video_path) # Now returns ProjectEvaluation directly
print("\nHackathon Project Evaluation")
print("===========================")
print(f"\nOverall Score: {result.overall_score}/100")
print("\nDetailed Scores:")
print(f"Innovation: {result.innovation_score}/100")
print(f"Technical Complexity: {result.technical_complexity}/100")
print(f"Presentation: {result.presentation_quality}/100")
print(f"User Experience: {result.user_experience}/100")
print(f"Completeness: {result.completeness}/100")
print("\nKey Strengths:")
for strength in result.key_strengths:
print(f"- {strength}")
print("\nAreas for Improvement:")
for area in result.areas_for_improvement:
print(f"- {area}")
print("\nTechnical Highlights:")
for highlight in result.technical_highlights:
print(f"- {highlight}")
print("\nRecommendations:")
for rec in result.recommendations:
print(f"- {rec}")
print(f"\nMarket Potential: {result.market_potential}")
print(f"\nScalability Assessment: {result.scalability_assessment}")
+210
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,210 @@
import streamlit as st
import os
from praisonaiagents import Agent, Task, PraisonAIAgents
from pydantic import BaseModel
from typing import List, Dict
import tempfile
import json
class ProjectEvaluation(BaseModel):
innovation_score: int # 0-100
technical_complexity: int # 0-100
presentation_quality: int # 0-100
user_experience: int # 0-100
completeness: int # 0-100
overall_score: int # 0-100
key_strengths: List[str]
areas_for_improvement: List[str]
notable_features: List[str]
technical_highlights: List[str]
recommendations: List[str]
market_potential: str
scalability_assessment: str
# Set page config
st.set_page_config(
page_title="Hackathon Project Evaluator",
page_icon="🏆",
layout="wide"
)
# Create Vision Analysis Agent
@st.cache_resource
def get_hackathon_judge():
return Agent(
name="HackathonJudge",
role="Technical Project Evaluator",
goal="Evaluate hackathon projects through video demonstrations",
backstory="""You are an experienced hackathon judge and technical expert.
You excel at evaluating innovation, technical implementation, and presentation quality.
You provide constructive feedback and identify both strengths and areas for improvement.""",
llm="gpt-4o-mini", # Using vision-capable model
self_reflect=False,
knowledge=""
)
def evaluate_project(video_path: str) -> ProjectEvaluation:
"""
Evaluate a hackathon project based on its video demonstration
"""
hackathon_judge = get_hackathon_judge()
evaluation_task = Task(
name="project_evaluation",
description="""Analyze this hackathon project video demonstration and provide a comprehensive evaluation:
1. Score the following aspects (0-100):
- Innovation and Creativity
- Technical Complexity
- Presentation Quality
- User Experience
- Project Completeness
2. Identify:
- Key strengths and standout features
- Areas that could be improved
- Notable technical implementations
- Market potential and scalability
3. Provide:
- Specific recommendations for improvement
- Technical suggestions
- Potential future enhancements""",
expected_output="Detailed project evaluation with scores and feedback",
agent=hackathon_judge,
output_pydantic=ProjectEvaluation,
images=[video_path] # Video input for multimodal analysis
)
# Initialize and run evaluation
agents = PraisonAIAgents(
agents=[hackathon_judge],
tasks=[evaluation_task],
process="sequential",
verbose=True
)
response = agents.start()
try:
# If response contains task_results, extract the Pydantic model directly
if isinstance(response, dict) and 'task_results' in response:
task_output = response['task_results'][0]
if hasattr(task_output, 'pydantic'):
return task_output.pydantic
elif hasattr(task_output, 'raw'):
# Extract JSON from raw string if it's wrapped in ```json
raw_text = task_output.raw
if raw_text.startswith('```json'):
raw_text = raw_text.split('\n', 1)[1].rsplit('\n', 1)[0]
evaluation_data = json.loads(raw_text)
else:
evaluation_data = json.loads(task_output) if isinstance(task_output, str) else task_output
elif isinstance(response, str):
evaluation_data = json.loads(response)
elif isinstance(response, dict) and 'task_status' in response:
content = response['task_status']
if isinstance(content, dict):
evaluation_data = content
else:
evaluation_data = json.loads(content) if isinstance(content, str) else content
else:
evaluation_data = response
# Create and return ProjectEvaluation instance
return ProjectEvaluation(
innovation_score=int(evaluation_data.get('innovation_score', 0)),
technical_complexity=int(evaluation_data.get('technical_complexity', 0)),
presentation_quality=int(evaluation_data.get('presentation_quality', 0)),
user_experience=int(evaluation_data.get('user_experience', 0)),
completeness=int(evaluation_data.get('completeness', 0)),
overall_score=int(evaluation_data.get('overall_score', 0)),
key_strengths=evaluation_data.get('key_strengths', []),
areas_for_improvement=evaluation_data.get('areas_for_improvement', []),
notable_features=evaluation_data.get('notable_features', []),
technical_highlights=evaluation_data.get('technical_highlights', []),
recommendations=evaluation_data.get('recommendations', []),
market_potential=str(evaluation_data.get('market_potential', '')),
scalability_assessment=str(evaluation_data.get('scalability_assessment', ''))
)
except Exception as e:
print(f"Debug - Raw response: {response}")
print(f"Error processing response: {e}")
raise
# Title and description
st.title("🏆 Hackathon Judge Agent")
st.markdown("""
Upload your hackathon project demonstration video for an AI-powered evaluation.
Get comprehensive feedback on various aspects of your project.
""")
# File uploader
uploaded_file = st.file_uploader("Choose a video file", type=['mp4', 'avi', 'mov', 'mkv'])
if uploaded_file:
# Create a temporary file to store the video
with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile(delete=False, suffix='.'+uploaded_file.name.split('.')[-1]) as tmp_file:
tmp_file.write(uploaded_file.getvalue())
video_path = tmp_file.name
with st.spinner("🤖 AI is evaluating your project..."):
try:
# Evaluate the project
result = evaluate_project(video_path)
# Display results
st.header("Overall Score")
st.metric("Overall Score", f"{result.overall_score}/100")
# Display detailed scores
st.header("Detailed Scores")
col1, col2, col3 = st.columns(3)
with col1:
st.metric("Innovation", f"{result.innovation_score}/100")
st.metric("Technical Complexity", f"{result.technical_complexity}/100")
with col2:
st.metric("Presentation", f"{result.presentation_quality}/100")
st.metric("User Experience", f"{result.user_experience}/100")
with col3:
st.metric("Completeness", f"{result.completeness}/100")
# Display qualitative feedback
st.header("Key Strengths")
for strength in result.key_strengths:
st.write(f"• {strength}")
st.header("Areas for Improvement")
for area in result.areas_for_improvement:
st.write(f"• {area}")
st.header("Technical Highlights")
for highlight in result.technical_highlights:
st.write(f"• {highlight}")
st.header("Notable Features")
for feature in result.notable_features:
st.write(f"• {feature}")
st.header("Recommendations")
for rec in result.recommendations:
st.write(f"• {rec}")
# Market Analysis
st.header("Market Analysis")
col1, col2 = st.columns(2)
with col1:
st.subheader("Market Potential")
st.write(result.market_potential)
with col2:
st.subheader("Scalability Assessment")
st.write(result.scalability_assessment)
except Exception as e:
st.error(f"Error evaluating the project: {str(e)}")
finally:
# Clean up the temporary file
os.unlink(video_path)
else:
# Display placeholder content
st.info("👆 Upload a video file to get started!")
+12 -8
View File
@@ -256,14 +256,18 @@ Your Goal: {self.goal}
# Store user_id
self.user_id = user_id
# Initialize Knowledge with provided or default config
from praisonaiagents.knowledge import Knowledge
self.knowledge = Knowledge(knowledge_config or None)
# Handle knowledge
if knowledge:
for source in knowledge:
self._process_knowledge(source)
# Check if knowledge parameter has any values
if not knowledge:
self.knowledge = None
else:
# Initialize Knowledge with provided or default config
from praisonaiagents.knowledge import Knowledge
self.knowledge = Knowledge(knowledge_config or None)
# Handle knowledge
if knowledge:
for source in knowledge:
self._process_knowledge(source)
def _process_knowledge(self, knowledge_item):
"""Process and store knowledge from a file path, URL, or string."""
+1 -1
View File
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ build-backend = "setuptools.build_meta"
[project]
name = "praisonaiagents"
version = "0.0.41"
version = "0.0.42"
description = "Praison AI agents for completing complex tasks with Self Reflection Agents"
authors = [
{ name="Mervin Praison" }
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1558,7 +1558,7 @@ wheels = [
[[package]]
name = "praisonaiagents"
version = "0.0.41"
version = "0.0.42"
source = { editable = "." }
dependencies = [
{ name = "openai" },
+39
View File
@@ -6,6 +6,45 @@ icon: "robot"
PraisonAI provides a diverse set of specialized agents for various tasks. Each agent is designed with specific capabilities and tools to handle different types of tasks effectively.
```mermaid
graph LR
%% Define the main flow
Start([▶ Start]) --> Agent1
Agent1 --> Process[⚙ Process]
Process --> Agent2
Agent2 --> Output([✓ Output])
Process -.-> Agent1
%% Define subgraphs for agents and their tasks
subgraph Agent1[ ]
Task1[📋 Task]
AgentIcon1[🤖 AI Agent]
Tools1[🔧 Tools]
Task1 --- AgentIcon1
AgentIcon1 --- Tools1
end
subgraph Agent2[ ]
Task2[📋 Task]
AgentIcon2[🤖 AI Agent]
Tools2[🔧 Tools]
Task2 --- AgentIcon2
AgentIcon2 --- Tools2
end
classDef input fill:#8B0000,stroke:#7C90A0,color:#fff
classDef process fill:#189AB4,stroke:#7C90A0,color:#fff
classDef tools fill:#2E8B57,stroke:#7C90A0,color:#fff
classDef transparent fill:none,stroke:none
class Start,Output,Task1,Task2 input
class Process,AgentIcon1,AgentIcon2 process
class Tools1,Tools2 tools
class Agent1,Agent2 transparent
```
## Data & Analysis
<CardGroup cols={2}>
+1 -1
View File
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ Loads environment variables from .env file or system and sets them.</p>
file.write(&#34;FROM python:3.11-slim\n&#34;)
file.write(&#34;WORKDIR /app\n&#34;)
file.write(&#34;COPY . .\n&#34;)
file.write(&#34;RUN pip install flask praisonai==2.0.50 gunicorn markdown\n&#34;)
file.write(&#34;RUN pip install flask praisonai==2.0.51 gunicorn markdown\n&#34;)
file.write(&#34;EXPOSE 8080\n&#34;)
file.write(&#39;CMD [&#34;gunicorn&#34;, &#34;-b&#34;, &#34;0.0.0.0:8080&#34;, &#34;api:app&#34;]\n&#39;)
+203
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,203 @@
---
title: "Code Analysis Agent"
description: "Learn how to create AI agents for comprehensive code analysis and quality assessment."
icon: "code-merge"
---
```mermaid
flowchart LR
In[In] --> Analyzer[Code Analyzer]
Analyzer --> Quality[Quality Assessment]
Quality --> Metrics[Core Metrics]
Metrics --> Technical[Technical Review]
Technical --> Recommendations[Recommendations]
Recommendations --> Out[Out]
style In fill:#8B0000,color:#fff
style Analyzer fill:#2E8B57,color:#fff
style Quality fill:#2E8B57,color:#fff
style Metrics fill:#2E8B57,color:#fff
style Technical fill:#2E8B57,color:#fff
style Recommendations fill:#2E8B57,color:#fff
style Out fill:#8B0000,color:#fff
```
## What is Code Analysis?
Code Analysis is a systematic process of evaluating source code to assess its quality, maintainability, performance, and security. This helps developers and organizations maintain high code standards and identify areas for improvement.
## Features
<CardGroup cols={2}>
<Card title="Quality Assessment" icon="chart-simple">
Comprehensive evaluation of code quality with numerical scoring.
</Card>
<Card title="Core Metrics Analysis" icon="gauge">
Analysis of architecture, maintainability, performance, and security.
</Card>
<Card title="Technical Assessment" icon="code">
Review of tech stack, complexity, and best practices adherence.
</Card>
<Card title="Risk Assessment" icon="shield">
Identification of potential risks and security vulnerabilities.
</Card>
<Card title="Recommendations" icon="lightbulb">
Actionable suggestions for improvements and enhancements.
</Card>
</CardGroup>
## Quick Start
<Steps>
<Step title="Install Package">
First, install the PraisonAI Agents package:
```bash
pip install praisonaiagents gitingest
```
</Step>
<Step title="Set API Key">
Set your OpenAI API key as an environment variable in your terminal:
```bash
export OPENAI_API_KEY=your_api_key_here
```
</Step>
<Step title="Create a file">
Create a new file `code_analysis.py` with the following code:
```python
from praisonaiagents import Agent, Task, PraisonAIAgents
from pydantic import BaseModel
from typing import List, Dict
from gitingest import ingest
class CodeMetrics(BaseModel):
category: str
score: int
findings: List[str]
class CodeAnalysisReport(BaseModel):
overall_quality: int
code_metrics: List[CodeMetrics]
architecture_score: int
maintainability_score: int
performance_score: int
security_score: int
test_coverage: int
key_strengths: List[str]
improvement_areas: List[str]
tech_stack: List[str]
recommendations: List[str]
complexity_metrics: Dict[str, int]
best_practices: List[Dict[str, str]]
potential_risks: List[str]
documentation_quality: int
code_analyzer = Agent(
role="Code Analysis Expert",
goal="Provide comprehensive code evaluation and recommendations",
backstory="""Expert code analyst specializing in architecture review,
best practices, and technical debt assessment.""",
verbose=True
)
code_analysis_task = Task(
description="""Analyze code repository and provide structured evaluation:
1. Overall Quality (0-100)
2. Core Metrics Analysis:
- Architecture and Design
- Code Maintainability
- Performance Optimization
- Security Practices
- Test Coverage
3. Technical Assessment:
- Technology Stack Review
- Code Complexity Analysis
- Best Practices Adherence
- Risk Assessment
4. Recommendations:
- Key Improvements
- Architecture Suggestions
- Security Enhancements""",
expected_output="Detailed code analysis report with metrics and recommendations",
agent=code_analyzer,
output_pydantic=CodeAnalysisReport
)
def analyze_code(code_source: str) -> CodeAnalysisReport:
"""
Analyze code from directory path or GitHub URL
"""
# Ingest code content
summary, tree, content = ingest(code_source)
# Concatenate context into structured format
context_text = f"""
CODE REPOSITORY ANALYSIS
=======================
SUMMARY
-------
{summary}
REPOSITORY STRUCTURE
-------------------
{tree}
SOURCE CODE
-----------
{content}
"""
# Initialize and run analysis
agents = PraisonAIAgents(
agents=[code_analyzer],
tasks=[code_analysis_task]
)
return agents.start(context_text)
if __name__ == "__main__":
# Example usage
code_source = "https://github.com/openai/openai-python/tree/main/src/openai/cli/_api/chat" # GitHub URL or local directory
result = analyze_code(code_source)
print(result)
```
</Step>
</Steps>
## Understanding the Output
The code analysis generates a comprehensive report with the following components:
- Overall Quality Score (0-100)
- Core Metrics Analysis
- Architecture and Design Score
- Code Maintainability Score
- Performance Score
- Security Score
- Test Coverage Percentage
- Technical Assessment
- Technology Stack
- Complexity Metrics
- Best Practices Review
- Risk Assessment
- Recommendations
- Key Improvements
- Architecture Suggestions
- Security Enhancements
## Next Steps
<CardGroup>
<Card title="Introduction" icon="book" href="/introduction">
Learn more about PraisonAI and its core concepts
</Card>
<Card title="Quick Start" icon="bolt" href="/quickstart">
Get started with the basics of PraisonAI
</Card>
<Card title="API Reference" icon="code" href="/api-reference">
Explore the complete API documentation
</Card>
</CardGroup>
+265
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,265 @@
---
title: "Hackathon Judge Agent"
description: "Learn how to create AI agents for evaluating hackathon projects through video demonstrations."
icon: "trophy"
---
```mermaid
flowchart LR
In[In] --> Judge[Hackathon Judge]
Judge --> Scores[Project Scores]
Scores --> Analysis[Detailed Analysis]
Analysis --> Feedback[Feedback]
Feedback --> Recommendations[Recommendations]
Recommendations --> Out[Out]
style In fill:#8B0000,color:#fff
style Judge fill:#2E8B57,color:#fff
style Scores fill:#2E8B57,color:#fff
style Analysis fill:#2E8B57,color:#fff
style Feedback fill:#2E8B57,color:#fff
style Recommendations fill:#2E8B57,color:#fff
style Out fill:#8B0000,color:#fff
```
## What is Hackathon Project Evaluation?
Hackathon Project Evaluation is an automated process for assessing hackathon projects through video demonstrations. It provides comprehensive scoring across multiple dimensions including innovation, technical complexity, and presentation quality, helping organizers make informed decisions and providing valuable feedback to participants.
## Features
<CardGroup cols={2}>
<Card title="Project Scoring" icon="star">
Comprehensive scoring system across multiple dimensions (0-100).
</Card>
<Card title="Technical Analysis" icon="microchip">
Evaluation of technical complexity and implementation quality.
</Card>
<Card title="Innovation Assessment" icon="lightbulb">
Analysis of creativity and unique project features.
</Card>
<Card title="Market Analysis" icon="chart-line">
Assessment of market potential and scalability.
</Card>
<Card title="Detailed Feedback" icon="comments">
Constructive feedback and specific recommendations for improvement.
</Card>
</CardGroup>
## Quick Start
<Steps>
<Step title="Install Package">
First, install the PraisonAI Agents package:
```bash
pip install praisonaiagents opencv-python moviepy
```
</Step>
<Step title="Set API Key">
Set your OpenAI API key as an environment variable in your terminal:
```bash
export OPENAI_API_KEY=your_api_key_here
```
</Step>
<Step title="Create a file">
Create a new file `hackathon_judge.py` with the following code:
```python
from praisonaiagents import Agent, Task, PraisonAIAgents
from pydantic import BaseModel
from typing import List, Dict
import os
import json
class ProjectEvaluation(BaseModel):
innovation_score: int # 0-100
technical_complexity: int # 0-100
presentation_quality: int # 0-100
user_experience: int # 0-100
completeness: int # 0-100
overall_score: int # 0-100
key_strengths: List[str]
areas_for_improvement: List[str]
notable_features: List[str]
technical_highlights: List[str]
recommendations: List[str]
market_potential: str
scalability_assessment: str
# Create Vision Analysis Agent
hackathon_judge = Agent(
name="HackathonJudge",
role="Technical Project Evaluator",
goal="Evaluate hackathon projects through video demonstrations",
backstory="""You are an experienced hackathon judge and technical expert.
You excel at evaluating innovation, technical implementation, and presentation quality.
You provide constructive feedback and identify both strengths and areas for improvement.""",
llm="gpt-4o-mini", # Using vision-capable model
self_reflect=False,
knowledge=""
)
def evaluate_project(video_path: str) -> ProjectEvaluation:
"""
Evaluate a hackathon project based on its video demonstration
"""
evaluation_task = Task(
name="project_evaluation",
description="""Analyze this hackathon project video demonstration and provide a comprehensive evaluation:
1. Score the following aspects (0-100):
- Innovation and Creativity
- Technical Complexity
- Presentation Quality
- User Experience
- Project Completeness
2. Identify:
- Key strengths and standout features
- Areas that could be improved
- Notable technical implementations
- Market potential and scalability
3. Provide:
- Specific recommendations for improvement
- Technical suggestions
- Potential future enhancements""",
expected_output="Detailed project evaluation with scores and feedback",
agent=hackathon_judge,
output_pydantic=ProjectEvaluation,
images=[video_path] # Video input for multimodal analysis
)
# Initialize and run evaluation
agents = PraisonAIAgents(
agents=[hackathon_judge],
tasks=[evaluation_task],
process="sequential",
verbose=True
)
response = agents.start()
try:
# If response contains task_results, extract the Pydantic model directly
if isinstance(response, dict) and 'task_results' in response:
task_output = response['task_results'][0]
if hasattr(task_output, 'pydantic'):
return task_output.pydantic
elif hasattr(task_output, 'raw'):
# Extract JSON from raw string if it's wrapped in ```json
raw_text = task_output.raw
if raw_text.startswith('```json'):
raw_text = raw_text.split('\n', 1)[1].rsplit('\n', 1)[0]
evaluation_data = json.loads(raw_text)
else:
evaluation_data = json.loads(task_output) if isinstance(task_output, str) else task_output
# If response is a string, try to parse it as JSON
elif isinstance(response, str):
evaluation_data = json.loads(response)
# If response is a dict with task_status
elif isinstance(response, dict) and 'task_status' in response:
content = response['task_status']
if isinstance(content, dict):
evaluation_data = content
else:
evaluation_data = json.loads(content) if isinstance(content, str) else content
else:
evaluation_data = response
print(f"Debug - Parsed evaluation_data: {evaluation_data}")
# Create and return ProjectEvaluation instance
return ProjectEvaluation(
innovation_score=int(evaluation_data.get('innovation_score', 0)),
technical_complexity=int(evaluation_data.get('technical_complexity', 0)),
presentation_quality=int(evaluation_data.get('presentation_quality', 0)),
user_experience=int(evaluation_data.get('user_experience', 0)),
completeness=int(evaluation_data.get('completeness', 0)),
overall_score=int(evaluation_data.get('overall_score', 0)),
key_strengths=evaluation_data.get('key_strengths', []),
areas_for_improvement=evaluation_data.get('areas_for_improvement', []),
notable_features=evaluation_data.get('notable_features', []),
technical_highlights=evaluation_data.get('technical_highlights', []),
recommendations=evaluation_data.get('recommendations', []),
market_potential=str(evaluation_data.get('market_potential', '')),
scalability_assessment=str(evaluation_data.get('scalability_assessment', ''))
)
except Exception as e:
print(f"Debug - Raw response: {response}")
print(f"Error processing response: {e}")
raise
if __name__ == "__main__":
# Example usage
current_dir = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))
video_path = os.path.join(current_dir, "presentation.mp4")
result = evaluate_project(video_path) # Now returns ProjectEvaluation directly
print("\nHackathon Project Evaluation")
print("===========================")
print(f"\nOverall Score: {result.overall_score}/100")
print("\nDetailed Scores:")
print(f"Innovation: {result.innovation_score}/100")
print(f"Technical Complexity: {result.technical_complexity}/100")
print(f"Presentation: {result.presentation_quality}/100")
print(f"User Experience: {result.user_experience}/100")
print(f"Completeness: {result.completeness}/100")
print("\nKey Strengths:")
for strength in result.key_strengths:
print(f"- {strength}")
print("\nAreas for Improvement:")
for area in result.areas_for_improvement:
print(f"- {area}")
print("\nTechnical Highlights:")
for highlight in result.technical_highlights:
print(f"- {highlight}")
print("\nRecommendations:")
for rec in result.recommendations:
print(f"- {rec}")
print(f"\nMarket Potential: {result.market_potential}")
print(f"\nScalability Assessment: {result.scalability_assessment}")
```
</Step>
</Steps>
## Understanding the Output
The hackathon project evaluation generates a comprehensive report with the following components:
- Scoring Metrics (0-100)
- Innovation Score
- Technical Complexity
- Presentation Quality
- User Experience
- Project Completeness
- Overall Score
- Qualitative Analysis
- Key Strengths
- Areas for Improvement
- Notable Features
- Technical Highlights
- Strategic Assessment
- Recommendations
- Market Potential
- Scalability Assessment
## Next Steps
<CardGroup>
<Card title="Introduction" icon="book" href="/introduction">
Learn more about PraisonAI and its core concepts
</Card>
<Card title="Quick Start" icon="bolt" href="/quickstart">
Get started with the basics of PraisonAI
</Card>
<Card title="API Reference" icon="code" href="/api-reference">
Explore the complete API documentation
</Card>
</CardGroup>
+2 -2
View File
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ icon: "images"
<Step title="Install Package">
First, install the PraisonAI Agents package:
```bash
pip install praisonaiagents
pip install praisonaiagents opencv-python moviepy
```
</Step>
<Step title="Set API Key">
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ icon: "images"
<Step title="Install Package">
Install the PraisonAI package:
```bash
pip install praisonai
pip install praisonai opencv-python moviepy
```
</Step>
<Step title="Set API Key">
+11 -1
View File
@@ -146,6 +146,8 @@
"group": "Examples",
"pages": [
"examples/examples",
"examples/code-analysis",
"examples/hackathon-judge",
"examples/predictive-maintenance",
"examples/emergency-response",
"examples/code-review",
@@ -240,7 +242,15 @@
"pages": [
"ui/overview",
"ui/gradio",
"ui/streamlit",
{
"group": "Streamlit",
"icon": "pen-paintbrush",
"pages": [
"ui/streamlit",
"ui/streamlit/code-analysis-streamlit",
"ui/streamlit/hackathon-judge-streamlit"
]
},
"ui/ui",
"ui/chat",
"ui/code"
@@ -0,0 +1,333 @@
---
title: "Code Analysis Agent UI"
sidebarTitle: "Code Analysis"
description: "Build an interactive web interface for analyzing code quality and providing detailed recommendations using Streamlit and AI agents."
icon: "laptop-code"
---
```mermaid
flowchart LR
Input[Input URL] --> Process[Process Code]
Process --> Analyze[AI Analysis]
Analyze --> Display[Display Results]
Display --> Metrics[Show Metrics]
Display --> Details[Show Details]
style Input fill:#8B0000,color:#fff
style Process fill:#2E8B57,color:#fff
style Analyze fill:#2E8B57,color:#fff
style Display fill:#2E8B57,color:#fff
style Metrics fill:#2E8B57,color:#fff
style Details fill:#2E8B57,color:#fff
```
## What is the Code Analysis Streamlit App?
The Code Analysis Streamlit App provides a user-friendly web interface for analyzing code repositories and generating comprehensive quality assessments. It combines AI-powered code analysis with an interactive dashboard to display detailed metrics, recommendations, and insights.
## Features
<CardGroup cols={2}>
<Card title="Repository Analysis" icon="code-branch">
Support for GitHub URLs and local code repositories.
</Card>
<Card title="Real-time Processing" icon="spinner">
Live analysis and evaluation of code.
</Card>
<Card title="Interactive Metrics" icon="chart-column">
Visual presentation of code quality metrics.
</Card>
<Card title="Detailed Reports" icon="file-lines">
Comprehensive analysis of code structure and patterns.
</Card>
<Card title="Best Practices" icon="check-double">
Evaluation against industry best practices.
</Card>
</CardGroup>
## Quick Start
<Steps>
<Step title="Install Dependencies">
Install the required packages:
```bash
pip install streamlit praisonaiagents gitingest
```
</Step>
<Step title="Set API Key">
Set your OpenAI API key as an environment variable:
```bash
export OPENAI_API_KEY=your_api_key_here
```
</Step>
<Step title="Create the App">
Create a new file `code_analysis_app.py` with the following code:
```python
import streamlit as st
from praisonaiagents import Agent, Task, PraisonAIAgents
from pydantic import BaseModel
from typing import List, Dict, Any
from gitingest import ingest
# Import the same classes and code from code-analysis-agents.py
class CodeMetrics(BaseModel):
category: str
score: int
findings: List[str]
class CodeAnalysisReport(BaseModel):
overall_quality: int
code_metrics: List[CodeMetrics]
architecture_score: int
maintainability_score: int
performance_score: int
security_score: int
test_coverage: int
key_strengths: List[str]
improvement_areas: List[str]
tech_stack: List[str]
recommendations: List[str]
complexity_metrics: Dict[str, int]
best_practices: List[Dict[str, str]]
potential_risks: List[str]
documentation_quality: int
def analyze_code(code_source: str) -> CodeAnalysisReport:
"""
Analyze code from directory path or GitHub URL
"""
# Create code analyzer agent
code_analyzer = Agent(
role="Code Analysis Expert",
goal="Provide comprehensive code evaluation and recommendations",
backstory="""Expert code analyst specializing in architecture review,
best practices, and technical debt assessment.""",
verbose=True
)
# Create analysis task
code_analysis_task = Task(
description="""Analyze code repository and provide structured evaluation:
1. Overall Quality (0-100)
2. Core Metrics Analysis:
- Architecture and Design
- Code Maintainability
- Performance Optimization
- Security Practices
- Test Coverage
3. Technical Assessment:
- Technology Stack Review
- Code Complexity Analysis
- Best Practices Adherence
- Risk Assessment
4. Recommendations:
- Key Improvements
- Architecture Suggestions
- Security Enhancements""",
expected_output="Detailed code analysis report with metrics and recommendations",
agent=code_analyzer,
output_pydantic=CodeAnalysisReport
)
# Ingest code content
summary, tree, content = ingest(code_source)
# Concatenate context into structured format
context_text = f"""
CODE REPOSITORY ANALYSIS
=======================
SUMMARY
-------
{summary}
REPOSITORY STRUCTURE
-------------------
{tree}
SOURCE CODE
-----------
{content}
"""
# Initialize and run analysis
agents = PraisonAIAgents(
agents=[code_analyzer],
tasks=[code_analysis_task]
)
result = agents.start(context_text)
# Extract the Pydantic model from the result
if isinstance(result, dict) and 'task_results' in result:
# Get the first task result's pydantic output
analysis_result = result['task_results'][0].pydantic
if isinstance(analysis_result, CodeAnalysisReport):
return analysis_result
# If we can't get the Pydantic model, create one from the raw data
return CodeAnalysisReport(**result)
def display_code_metrics(metrics, cols):
"""Display code metrics in columns with color-coded scores"""
for i, metric in enumerate(metrics):
score = metric.score
color = "red" if score < 60 else "orange" if score < 75 else "green"
# Use modulo to alternate between columns
with cols[i % len(cols)]:
st.markdown(f"### {metric.category}")
st.markdown(f"**Score:** :{color}[{score}%]")
for finding in metric.findings:
st.markdown(f"• {finding}")
def display_section(title: str, items: list, icon: str = "•"):
"""Display a section with items in a consistent format"""
st.markdown(f"### {title}")
for item in items:
if isinstance(item, dict):
for key, value in item.items():
st.markdown(f"{icon} **{key}**: {value}")
else:
st.markdown(f"{icon} {item}")
def main():
st.set_page_config(
page_title="Code Analysis Agent",
layout="wide",
initial_sidebar_state="expanded"
)
st.title("Code Analysis Agent")
with st.sidebar:
st.header("Input")
code_source = st.text_input(
"GitHub URL or Local Path",
placeholder="https://github.com/username/repo or /path/to/directory"
)
analyze_button = st.button("Analyze Code", type="primary")
if analyze_button and code_source:
try:
with st.spinner("Analyzing code..."):
result = analyze_code(code_source)
# Overall Metrics
st.header("Overall Metrics")
cols = st.columns(6)
metrics = {
"Overall Quality": result.overall_quality,
"Architecture": result.architecture_score,
"Maintainability": result.maintainability_score,
"Performance": result.performance_score,
"Security": result.security_score,
"Test Coverage": result.test_coverage
}
for (metric, value), col in zip(metrics.items(), cols):
color = "red" if value < 60 else "orange" if value < 75 else "green"
col.metric(metric, f"{value}%")
col.markdown(f":{color}[{'●' * (value // 20)}]")
# Detailed Analysis
st.header("Detailed Analysis")
metric_cols = st.columns(2)
display_code_metrics(result.code_metrics, metric_cols)
# Technology Stack
col1, col2 = st.columns(2)
with col1:
st.header("Technology Stack")
for tech in result.tech_stack:
st.markdown(f"🔧 {tech}")
with col2:
st.header("Complexity Metrics")
for metric, value in result.complexity_metrics.items():
st.metric(metric.replace('_', ' ').title(), value)
# Key Findings
st.header("Key Findings")
cols = st.columns(2)
with cols[0]:
display_section("✅ Strengths", result.key_strengths)
display_section("🔄 Best Practices", result.best_practices)
with cols[1]:
display_section("⚠️ Areas for Improvement", result.improvement_areas)
display_section("❗ Potential Risks", result.potential_risks)
# Recommendations
st.header("Recommendations")
for i, rec in enumerate(result.recommendations, 1):
st.markdown(f"**{i}.** {rec}")
# Documentation Quality
st.header("Documentation")
doc_score = result.documentation_quality
color = "red" if doc_score < 60 else "orange" if doc_score < 75 else "green"
st.markdown(f"Documentation Quality: :{color}[{doc_score}%]")
except Exception as e:
st.error(f"Error analyzing code: {str(e)}")
st.exception(e)
elif analyze_button:
st.warning("Please enter a GitHub URL or local path")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
```
</Step>
<Step title="Run the App">
Start the Streamlit app:
```bash
streamlit run code_analysis_app.py
```
</Step>
</Steps>
## Understanding the Interface
The Streamlit app provides an intuitive interface with the following sections:
- **Input**: GitHub URL or local path input in the sidebar
- **Overall Metrics**: Visual display of key quality scores
- Overall Quality
- Architecture Score
- Maintainability Score
- Performance Score
- Security Score
- Test Coverage
- **Detailed Analysis**:
- Code Metrics with Findings
- Technology Stack Overview
- Complexity Metrics
- **Key Findings**:
- Strengths
- Best Practices
- Areas for Improvement
- Potential Risks
- **Additional Information**:
- Recommendations
- Documentation Quality Assessment
## Next Steps
<CardGroup>
<Card title="Streamlit Docs" icon="book" href="https://docs.streamlit.io">
Learn more about Streamlit features
</Card>
<Card title="PraisonAI Docs" icon="bolt" href="/introduction">
Explore PraisonAI capabilities
</Card>
<Card title="Examples" icon="code" href="/examples">
View more example applications
</Card>
</CardGroup>
@@ -0,0 +1,323 @@
---
title: "Hackathon Judge Agent UI"
sidebarTitle: "Hackathon Judge"
description: "Build an interactive web interface for evaluating hackathon projects using Streamlit and AI agents."
icon: "desktop"
---
```mermaid
flowchart LR
Upload[Upload Video] --> Process[Process Video]
Process --> Evaluate[AI Evaluation]
Evaluate --> Display[Display Results]
Display --> Scores[Show Scores]
Display --> Feedback[Show Feedback]
style Upload fill:#8B0000,color:#fff
style Process fill:#2E8B57,color:#fff
style Evaluate fill:#2E8B57,color:#fff
style Display fill:#2E8B57,color:#fff
style Scores fill:#2E8B57,color:#fff
style Feedback fill:#2E8B57,color:#fff
```
## What is the Hackathon Judge Streamlit App?
The Hackathon Judge Streamlit App provides a user-friendly web interface for evaluating hackathon projects through video demonstrations. It combines the power of AI evaluation with an interactive dashboard to display comprehensive project assessments, scores, and feedback.
## Features
<CardGroup cols={2}>
<Card title="Video Upload" icon="upload">
Easy-to-use interface for uploading project demonstration videos.
</Card>
<Card title="Real-time Processing" icon="spinner">
Live processing and evaluation of uploaded videos.
</Card>
<Card title="Interactive Dashboard" icon="chart-simple">
Visual presentation of scores and metrics.
</Card>
<Card title="Detailed Feedback" icon="comments">
Comprehensive display of evaluation results and recommendations.
</Card>
<Card title="Market Analysis" icon="briefcase">
Visual presentation of market potential and scalability.
</Card>
</CardGroup>
## Quick Start
<Steps>
<Step title="Install Dependencies">
Install the required packages:
```bash
pip install streamlit praisonaiagents opencv-python moviepy
```
</Step>
<Step title="Set API Key">
Set your OpenAI API key as an environment variable:
```bash
export OPENAI_API_KEY=your_api_key_here
```
</Step>
<Step title="Create the App">
Create a new file `hackathon_judge_app.py` with the following code:
```python
import streamlit as st
import os
from praisonaiagents import Agent, Task, PraisonAIAgents
from pydantic import BaseModel
from typing import List, Dict
import tempfile
import json
class ProjectEvaluation(BaseModel):
innovation_score: int # 0-100
technical_complexity: int # 0-100
presentation_quality: int # 0-100
user_experience: int # 0-100
completeness: int # 0-100
overall_score: int # 0-100
key_strengths: List[str]
areas_for_improvement: List[str]
notable_features: List[str]
technical_highlights: List[str]
recommendations: List[str]
market_potential: str
scalability_assessment: str
# Set page config
st.set_page_config(
page_title="Hackathon Project Evaluator",
page_icon="🏆",
layout="wide"
)
# Create Vision Analysis Agent
@st.cache_resource
def get_hackathon_judge():
return Agent(
name="HackathonJudge",
role="Technical Project Evaluator",
goal="Evaluate hackathon projects through video demonstrations",
backstory="""You are an experienced hackathon judge and technical expert.
You excel at evaluating innovation, technical implementation, and presentation quality.
You provide constructive feedback and identify both strengths and areas for improvement.""",
llm="gpt-4o-mini", # Using vision-capable model
self_reflect=False,
knowledge=""
)
def evaluate_project(video_path: str) -> ProjectEvaluation:
"""
Evaluate a hackathon project based on its video demonstration
"""
hackathon_judge = get_hackathon_judge()
evaluation_task = Task(
name="project_evaluation",
description="""Analyze this hackathon project video demonstration and provide a comprehensive evaluation:
1. Score the following aspects (0-100):
- Innovation and Creativity
- Technical Complexity
- Presentation Quality
- User Experience
- Project Completeness
2. Identify:
- Key strengths and standout features
- Areas that could be improved
- Notable technical implementations
- Market potential and scalability
3. Provide:
- Specific recommendations for improvement
- Technical suggestions
- Potential future enhancements""",
expected_output="Detailed project evaluation with scores and feedback",
agent=hackathon_judge,
output_pydantic=ProjectEvaluation,
images=[video_path] # Video input for multimodal analysis
)
# Initialize and run evaluation
agents = PraisonAIAgents(
agents=[hackathon_judge],
tasks=[evaluation_task],
process="sequential",
verbose=True
)
response = agents.start()
try:
# If response contains task_results, extract the Pydantic model directly
if isinstance(response, dict) and 'task_results' in response:
task_output = response['task_results'][0]
if hasattr(task_output, 'pydantic'):
return task_output.pydantic
elif hasattr(task_output, 'raw'):
# Extract JSON from raw string if it's wrapped in ```json
raw_text = task_output.raw
if raw_text.startswith('```json'):
raw_text = raw_text.split('\n', 1)[1].rsplit('\n', 1)[0]
evaluation_data = json.loads(raw_text)
else:
evaluation_data = json.loads(task_output) if isinstance(task_output, str) else task_output
elif isinstance(response, str):
evaluation_data = json.loads(response)
elif isinstance(response, dict) and 'task_status' in response:
content = response['task_status']
if isinstance(content, dict):
evaluation_data = content
else:
evaluation_data = json.loads(content) if isinstance(content, str) else content
else:
evaluation_data = response
# Create and return ProjectEvaluation instance
return ProjectEvaluation(
innovation_score=int(evaluation_data.get('innovation_score', 0)),
technical_complexity=int(evaluation_data.get('technical_complexity', 0)),
presentation_quality=int(evaluation_data.get('presentation_quality', 0)),
user_experience=int(evaluation_data.get('user_experience', 0)),
completeness=int(evaluation_data.get('completeness', 0)),
overall_score=int(evaluation_data.get('overall_score', 0)),
key_strengths=evaluation_data.get('key_strengths', []),
areas_for_improvement=evaluation_data.get('areas_for_improvement', []),
notable_features=evaluation_data.get('notable_features', []),
technical_highlights=evaluation_data.get('technical_highlights', []),
recommendations=evaluation_data.get('recommendations', []),
market_potential=str(evaluation_data.get('market_potential', '')),
scalability_assessment=str(evaluation_data.get('scalability_assessment', ''))
)
except Exception as e:
print(f"Debug - Raw response: {response}")
print(f"Error processing response: {e}")
raise
# Title and description
st.title("🏆 Hackathon Judge Agent")
st.markdown("""
Upload your hackathon project demonstration video for an AI-powered evaluation.
Get comprehensive feedback on various aspects of your project.
""")
# File uploader
uploaded_file = st.file_uploader("Choose a video file", type=['mp4', 'avi', 'mov', 'mkv'])
if uploaded_file:
# Create a temporary file to store the video
with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile(delete=False, suffix='.'+uploaded_file.name.split('.')[-1]) as tmp_file:
tmp_file.write(uploaded_file.getvalue())
video_path = tmp_file.name
with st.spinner("🤖 AI is evaluating your project..."):
try:
# Evaluate the project
result = evaluate_project(video_path)
# Display results
st.header("Overall Score")
st.metric("Overall Score", f"{result.overall_score}/100")
# Display detailed scores
st.header("Detailed Scores")
col1, col2, col3 = st.columns(3)
with col1:
st.metric("Innovation", f"{result.innovation_score}/100")
st.metric("Technical Complexity", f"{result.technical_complexity}/100")
with col2:
st.metric("Presentation", f"{result.presentation_quality}/100")
st.metric("User Experience", f"{result.user_experience}/100")
with col3:
st.metric("Completeness", f"{result.completeness}/100")
# Display qualitative feedback
st.header("Key Strengths")
for strength in result.key_strengths:
st.write(f"• {strength}")
st.header("Areas for Improvement")
for area in result.areas_for_improvement:
st.write(f"• {area}")
st.header("Technical Highlights")
for highlight in result.technical_highlights:
st.write(f"• {highlight}")
st.header("Notable Features")
for feature in result.notable_features:
st.write(f"• {feature}")
st.header("Recommendations")
for rec in result.recommendations:
st.write(f"• {rec}")
# Market Analysis
st.header("Market Analysis")
col1, col2 = st.columns(2)
with col1:
st.subheader("Market Potential")
st.write(result.market_potential)
with col2:
st.subheader("Scalability Assessment")
st.write(result.scalability_assessment)
except Exception as e:
st.error(f"Error evaluating the project: {str(e)}")
finally:
# Clean up the temporary file
os.unlink(video_path)
else:
# Display placeholder content
st.info("👆 Upload a video file to get started!")
```
</Step>
<Step title="Run the App">
Start the Streamlit app:
```bash
streamlit run hackathon_judge_app.py
```
</Step>
</Steps>
## Understanding the Interface
The Streamlit app provides an intuitive interface with the following sections:
- **Video Upload**: Drag and drop or browse to upload your project demo video
- **Overall Score**: A prominent display of the project's overall rating
- **Detailed Scores**:
- Innovation Score
- Technical Complexity
- Presentation Quality
- User Experience
- Project Completeness
- **Qualitative Feedback**:
- Key Strengths
- Areas for Improvement
- Technical Highlights
- Notable Features
- Recommendations
- **Market Analysis**:
- Market Potential
- Scalability Assessment
## Next Steps
<CardGroup>
<Card title="Streamlit Docs" icon="book" href="https://docs.streamlit.io">
Learn more about Streamlit features
</Card>
<Card title="PraisonAI Docs" icon="bolt" href="/introduction">
Explore PraisonAI capabilities
</Card>
<Card title="Examples" icon="code" href="/examples">
View more example applications
</Card>
</CardGroup>
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
from praisonaiagents import Agent, Task, PraisonAIAgents
from pydantic import BaseModel
from typing import List, Dict
from gitingest import ingest
class CodeMetrics(BaseModel):
category: str
score: int
findings: List[str]
class CodeAnalysisReport(BaseModel):
overall_quality: int
code_metrics: List[CodeMetrics]
architecture_score: int
maintainability_score: int
performance_score: int
security_score: int
test_coverage: int
key_strengths: List[str]
improvement_areas: List[str]
tech_stack: List[str]
recommendations: List[str]
complexity_metrics: Dict[str, int]
best_practices: List[Dict[str, str]]
potential_risks: List[str]
documentation_quality: int
code_analyzer = Agent(
role="Code Analysis Expert",
goal="Provide comprehensive code evaluation and recommendations",
backstory="""Expert code analyst specializing in architecture review,
best practices, and technical debt assessment.""",
verbose=True
)
code_analysis_task = Task(
description="""Analyze code repository and provide structured evaluation:
1. Overall Quality (0-100)
2. Core Metrics Analysis:
- Architecture and Design
- Code Maintainability
- Performance Optimization
- Security Practices
- Test Coverage
3. Technical Assessment:
- Technology Stack Review
- Code Complexity Analysis
- Best Practices Adherence
- Risk Assessment
4. Recommendations:
- Key Improvements
- Architecture Suggestions
- Security Enhancements""",
expected_output="Detailed code analysis report with metrics and recommendations",
agent=code_analyzer,
output_pydantic=CodeAnalysisReport
)
def analyze_code(code_source: str) -> CodeAnalysisReport:
"""
Analyze code from directory path or GitHub URL
"""
# Ingest code content
summary, tree, content = ingest(code_source)
# Concatenate context into structured format
context_text = f"""
CODE REPOSITORY ANALYSIS
=======================
SUMMARY
-------
{summary}
REPOSITORY STRUCTURE
-------------------
{tree}
SOURCE CODE
-----------
{content}
"""
# Initialize and run analysis
agents = PraisonAIAgents(
agents=[code_analyzer],
tasks=[code_analysis_task]
)
return agents.start(context_text)
if __name__ == "__main__":
# Example usage
code_source = "https://github.com/openai/openai-python/tree/main/src/openai/cli/_api/chat" # GitHub URL or local directory
result = analyze_code(code_source)
print(result)
@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
import streamlit as st
from praisonaiagents import Agent, Task, PraisonAIAgents
from pydantic import BaseModel
from typing import List, Dict, Any
from gitingest import ingest
# Import the same classes and code from code-analysis-agents.py
class CodeMetrics(BaseModel):
category: str
score: int
findings: List[str]
class CodeAnalysisReport(BaseModel):
overall_quality: int
code_metrics: List[CodeMetrics]
architecture_score: int
maintainability_score: int
performance_score: int
security_score: int
test_coverage: int
key_strengths: List[str]
improvement_areas: List[str]
tech_stack: List[str]
recommendations: List[str]
complexity_metrics: Dict[str, int]
best_practices: List[Dict[str, str]]
potential_risks: List[str]
documentation_quality: int
def analyze_code(code_source: str) -> CodeAnalysisReport:
"""
Analyze code from directory path or GitHub URL
"""
# Create code analyzer agent
code_analyzer = Agent(
role="Code Analysis Expert",
goal="Provide comprehensive code evaluation and recommendations",
backstory="""Expert code analyst specializing in architecture review,
best practices, and technical debt assessment.""",
verbose=True
)
# Create analysis task
code_analysis_task = Task(
description="""Analyze code repository and provide structured evaluation:
1. Overall Quality (0-100)
2. Core Metrics Analysis:
- Architecture and Design
- Code Maintainability
- Performance Optimization
- Security Practices
- Test Coverage
3. Technical Assessment:
- Technology Stack Review
- Code Complexity Analysis
- Best Practices Adherence
- Risk Assessment
4. Recommendations:
- Key Improvements
- Architecture Suggestions
- Security Enhancements""",
expected_output="Detailed code analysis report with metrics and recommendations",
agent=code_analyzer,
output_pydantic=CodeAnalysisReport
)
# Ingest code content
summary, tree, content = ingest(code_source)
# Concatenate context into structured format
context_text = f"""
CODE REPOSITORY ANALYSIS
=======================
SUMMARY
-------
{summary}
REPOSITORY STRUCTURE
-------------------
{tree}
SOURCE CODE
-----------
{content}
"""
# Initialize and run analysis
agents = PraisonAIAgents(
agents=[code_analyzer],
tasks=[code_analysis_task]
)
result = agents.start(context_text)
# Extract the Pydantic model from the result
if isinstance(result, dict) and 'task_results' in result:
# Get the first task result's pydantic output
analysis_result = result['task_results'][0].pydantic
if isinstance(analysis_result, CodeAnalysisReport):
return analysis_result
# If we can't get the Pydantic model, create one from the raw data
return CodeAnalysisReport(**result)
def display_code_metrics(metrics, cols):
"""Display code metrics in columns with color-coded scores"""
for i, metric in enumerate(metrics):
score = metric.score
color = "red" if score < 60 else "orange" if score < 75 else "green"
# Use modulo to alternate between columns
with cols[i % len(cols)]:
st.markdown(f"### {metric.category}")
st.markdown(f"**Score:** :{color}[{score}%]")
for finding in metric.findings:
st.markdown(f"• {finding}")
def display_section(title: str, items: list, icon: str = "•"):
"""Display a section with items in a consistent format"""
st.markdown(f"### {title}")
for item in items:
if isinstance(item, dict):
for key, value in item.items():
st.markdown(f"{icon} **{key}**: {value}")
else:
st.markdown(f"{icon} {item}")
def main():
st.set_page_config(
page_title="Code Analysis Agent",
layout="wide",
initial_sidebar_state="expanded"
)
st.title("Code Analysis Agent")
with st.sidebar:
st.header("Input")
code_source = st.text_input(
"GitHub URL or Local Path",
placeholder="https://github.com/username/repo or /path/to/directory"
)
analyze_button = st.button("Analyze Code", type="primary")
if analyze_button and code_source:
try:
with st.spinner("Analyzing code..."):
result = analyze_code(code_source)
# Overall Metrics
st.header("Overall Metrics")
cols = st.columns(6)
metrics = {
"Overall Quality": result.overall_quality,
"Architecture": result.architecture_score,
"Maintainability": result.maintainability_score,
"Performance": result.performance_score,
"Security": result.security_score,
"Test Coverage": result.test_coverage
}
for (metric, value), col in zip(metrics.items(), cols):
color = "red" if value < 60 else "orange" if value < 75 else "green"
col.metric(metric, f"{value}%")
col.markdown(f":{color}[{'●' * (value // 20)}]")
# Detailed Analysis
st.header("Detailed Analysis")
metric_cols = st.columns(2)
display_code_metrics(result.code_metrics, metric_cols)
# Technology Stack
col1, col2 = st.columns(2)
with col1:
st.header("Technology Stack")
for tech in result.tech_stack:
st.markdown(f"🔧 {tech}")
with col2:
st.header("Complexity Metrics")
for metric, value in result.complexity_metrics.items():
st.metric(metric.replace('_', ' ').title(), value)
# Key Findings
st.header("Key Findings")
cols = st.columns(2)
with cols[0]:
display_section("✅ Strengths", result.key_strengths)
display_section("🔄 Best Practices", result.best_practices)
with cols[1]:
display_section("⚠️ Areas for Improvement", result.improvement_areas)
display_section("❗ Potential Risks", result.potential_risks)
# Recommendations
st.header("Recommendations")
for i, rec in enumerate(result.recommendations, 1):
st.markdown(f"**{i}.** {rec}")
# Documentation Quality
st.header("Documentation")
doc_score = result.documentation_quality
color = "red" if doc_score < 60 else "orange" if doc_score < 75 else "green"
st.markdown(f"Documentation Quality: :{color}[{doc_score}%]")
except Exception as e:
st.error(f"Error analyzing code: {str(e)}")
st.exception(e)
elif analyze_button:
st.warning("Please enter a GitHub URL or local path")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
from praisonaiagents import Agent, Task, PraisonAIAgents
from pydantic import BaseModel
from typing import List, Dict
import os
import json
class ProjectEvaluation(BaseModel):
innovation_score: int # 0-100
technical_complexity: int # 0-100
presentation_quality: int # 0-100
user_experience: int # 0-100
completeness: int # 0-100
overall_score: int # 0-100
key_strengths: List[str]
areas_for_improvement: List[str]
notable_features: List[str]
technical_highlights: List[str]
recommendations: List[str]
market_potential: str
scalability_assessment: str
# Create Vision Analysis Agent
hackathon_judge = Agent(
name="HackathonJudge",
role="Technical Project Evaluator",
goal="Evaluate hackathon projects through video demonstrations",
backstory="""You are an experienced hackathon judge and technical expert.
You excel at evaluating innovation, technical implementation, and presentation quality.
You provide constructive feedback and identify both strengths and areas for improvement.""",
llm="gpt-4o-mini", # Using vision-capable model
self_reflect=False,
knowledge=""
)
def evaluate_project(video_path: str) -> ProjectEvaluation:
"""
Evaluate a hackathon project based on its video demonstration
"""
evaluation_task = Task(
name="project_evaluation",
description="""Analyze this hackathon project video demonstration and provide a comprehensive evaluation:
1. Score the following aspects (0-100):
- Innovation and Creativity
- Technical Complexity
- Presentation Quality
- User Experience
- Project Completeness
2. Identify:
- Key strengths and standout features
- Areas that could be improved
- Notable technical implementations
- Market potential and scalability
3. Provide:
- Specific recommendations for improvement
- Technical suggestions
- Potential future enhancements""",
expected_output="Detailed project evaluation with scores and feedback",
agent=hackathon_judge,
output_pydantic=ProjectEvaluation,
images=[video_path] # Video input for multimodal analysis
)
# Initialize and run evaluation
agents = PraisonAIAgents(
agents=[hackathon_judge],
tasks=[evaluation_task],
process="sequential",
verbose=True
)
response = agents.start()
try:
# If response contains task_results, extract the Pydantic model directly
if isinstance(response, dict) and 'task_results' in response:
task_output = response['task_results'][0]
if hasattr(task_output, 'pydantic'):
return task_output.pydantic
elif hasattr(task_output, 'raw'):
# Extract JSON from raw string if it's wrapped in ```json
raw_text = task_output.raw
if raw_text.startswith('```json'):
raw_text = raw_text.split('\n', 1)[1].rsplit('\n', 1)[0]
evaluation_data = json.loads(raw_text)
else:
evaluation_data = json.loads(task_output) if isinstance(task_output, str) else task_output
# If response is a string, try to parse it as JSON
elif isinstance(response, str):
evaluation_data = json.loads(response)
# If response is a dict with task_status
elif isinstance(response, dict) and 'task_status' in response:
content = response['task_status']
if isinstance(content, dict):
evaluation_data = content
else:
evaluation_data = json.loads(content) if isinstance(content, str) else content
else:
evaluation_data = response
print(f"Debug - Parsed evaluation_data: {evaluation_data}")
# Create and return ProjectEvaluation instance
return ProjectEvaluation(
innovation_score=int(evaluation_data.get('innovation_score', 0)),
technical_complexity=int(evaluation_data.get('technical_complexity', 0)),
presentation_quality=int(evaluation_data.get('presentation_quality', 0)),
user_experience=int(evaluation_data.get('user_experience', 0)),
completeness=int(evaluation_data.get('completeness', 0)),
overall_score=int(evaluation_data.get('overall_score', 0)),
key_strengths=evaluation_data.get('key_strengths', []),
areas_for_improvement=evaluation_data.get('areas_for_improvement', []),
notable_features=evaluation_data.get('notable_features', []),
technical_highlights=evaluation_data.get('technical_highlights', []),
recommendations=evaluation_data.get('recommendations', []),
market_potential=str(evaluation_data.get('market_potential', '')),
scalability_assessment=str(evaluation_data.get('scalability_assessment', ''))
)
except Exception as e:
print(f"Debug - Raw response: {response}")
print(f"Error processing response: {e}")
raise
if __name__ == "__main__":
# Example usage
current_dir = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))
video_path = os.path.join(current_dir, "presentation.mp4")
result = evaluate_project(video_path) # Now returns ProjectEvaluation directly
print("\nHackathon Project Evaluation")
print("===========================")
print(f"\nOverall Score: {result.overall_score}/100")
print("\nDetailed Scores:")
print(f"Innovation: {result.innovation_score}/100")
print(f"Technical Complexity: {result.technical_complexity}/100")
print(f"Presentation: {result.presentation_quality}/100")
print(f"User Experience: {result.user_experience}/100")
print(f"Completeness: {result.completeness}/100")
print("\nKey Strengths:")
for strength in result.key_strengths:
print(f"- {strength}")
print("\nAreas for Improvement:")
for area in result.areas_for_improvement:
print(f"- {area}")
print("\nTechnical Highlights:")
for highlight in result.technical_highlights:
print(f"- {highlight}")
print("\nRecommendations:")
for rec in result.recommendations:
print(f"- {rec}")
print(f"\nMarket Potential: {result.market_potential}")
print(f"\nScalability Assessment: {result.scalability_assessment}")
@@ -0,0 +1,210 @@
import streamlit as st
import os
from praisonaiagents import Agent, Task, PraisonAIAgents
from pydantic import BaseModel
from typing import List, Dict
import tempfile
import json
class ProjectEvaluation(BaseModel):
innovation_score: int # 0-100
technical_complexity: int # 0-100
presentation_quality: int # 0-100
user_experience: int # 0-100
completeness: int # 0-100
overall_score: int # 0-100
key_strengths: List[str]
areas_for_improvement: List[str]
notable_features: List[str]
technical_highlights: List[str]
recommendations: List[str]
market_potential: str
scalability_assessment: str
# Set page config
st.set_page_config(
page_title="Hackathon Project Evaluator",
page_icon="🏆",
layout="wide"
)
# Create Vision Analysis Agent
@st.cache_resource
def get_hackathon_judge():
return Agent(
name="HackathonJudge",
role="Technical Project Evaluator",
goal="Evaluate hackathon projects through video demonstrations",
backstory="""You are an experienced hackathon judge and technical expert.
You excel at evaluating innovation, technical implementation, and presentation quality.
You provide constructive feedback and identify both strengths and areas for improvement.""",
llm="gpt-4o-mini", # Using vision-capable model
self_reflect=False,
knowledge=""
)
def evaluate_project(video_path: str) -> ProjectEvaluation:
"""
Evaluate a hackathon project based on its video demonstration
"""
hackathon_judge = get_hackathon_judge()
evaluation_task = Task(
name="project_evaluation",
description="""Analyze this hackathon project video demonstration and provide a comprehensive evaluation:
1. Score the following aspects (0-100):
- Innovation and Creativity
- Technical Complexity
- Presentation Quality
- User Experience
- Project Completeness
2. Identify:
- Key strengths and standout features
- Areas that could be improved
- Notable technical implementations
- Market potential and scalability
3. Provide:
- Specific recommendations for improvement
- Technical suggestions
- Potential future enhancements""",
expected_output="Detailed project evaluation with scores and feedback",
agent=hackathon_judge,
output_pydantic=ProjectEvaluation,
images=[video_path] # Video input for multimodal analysis
)
# Initialize and run evaluation
agents = PraisonAIAgents(
agents=[hackathon_judge],
tasks=[evaluation_task],
process="sequential",
verbose=True
)
response = agents.start()
try:
# If response contains task_results, extract the Pydantic model directly
if isinstance(response, dict) and 'task_results' in response:
task_output = response['task_results'][0]
if hasattr(task_output, 'pydantic'):
return task_output.pydantic
elif hasattr(task_output, 'raw'):
# Extract JSON from raw string if it's wrapped in ```json
raw_text = task_output.raw
if raw_text.startswith('```json'):
raw_text = raw_text.split('\n', 1)[1].rsplit('\n', 1)[0]
evaluation_data = json.loads(raw_text)
else:
evaluation_data = json.loads(task_output) if isinstance(task_output, str) else task_output
elif isinstance(response, str):
evaluation_data = json.loads(response)
elif isinstance(response, dict) and 'task_status' in response:
content = response['task_status']
if isinstance(content, dict):
evaluation_data = content
else:
evaluation_data = json.loads(content) if isinstance(content, str) else content
else:
evaluation_data = response
# Create and return ProjectEvaluation instance
return ProjectEvaluation(
innovation_score=int(evaluation_data.get('innovation_score', 0)),
technical_complexity=int(evaluation_data.get('technical_complexity', 0)),
presentation_quality=int(evaluation_data.get('presentation_quality', 0)),
user_experience=int(evaluation_data.get('user_experience', 0)),
completeness=int(evaluation_data.get('completeness', 0)),
overall_score=int(evaluation_data.get('overall_score', 0)),
key_strengths=evaluation_data.get('key_strengths', []),
areas_for_improvement=evaluation_data.get('areas_for_improvement', []),
notable_features=evaluation_data.get('notable_features', []),
technical_highlights=evaluation_data.get('technical_highlights', []),
recommendations=evaluation_data.get('recommendations', []),
market_potential=str(evaluation_data.get('market_potential', '')),
scalability_assessment=str(evaluation_data.get('scalability_assessment', ''))
)
except Exception as e:
print(f"Debug - Raw response: {response}")
print(f"Error processing response: {e}")
raise
# Title and description
st.title("🏆 Hackathon Judge Agent")
st.markdown("""
Upload your hackathon project demonstration video for an AI-powered evaluation.
Get comprehensive feedback on various aspects of your project.
""")
# File uploader
uploaded_file = st.file_uploader("Choose a video file", type=['mp4', 'avi', 'mov', 'mkv'])
if uploaded_file:
# Create a temporary file to store the video
with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile(delete=False, suffix='.'+uploaded_file.name.split('.')[-1]) as tmp_file:
tmp_file.write(uploaded_file.getvalue())
video_path = tmp_file.name
with st.spinner("🤖 AI is evaluating your project..."):
try:
# Evaluate the project
result = evaluate_project(video_path)
# Display results
st.header("Overall Score")
st.metric("Overall Score", f"{result.overall_score}/100")
# Display detailed scores
st.header("Detailed Scores")
col1, col2, col3 = st.columns(3)
with col1:
st.metric("Innovation", f"{result.innovation_score}/100")
st.metric("Technical Complexity", f"{result.technical_complexity}/100")
with col2:
st.metric("Presentation", f"{result.presentation_quality}/100")
st.metric("User Experience", f"{result.user_experience}/100")
with col3:
st.metric("Completeness", f"{result.completeness}/100")
# Display qualitative feedback
st.header("Key Strengths")
for strength in result.key_strengths:
st.write(f"• {strength}")
st.header("Areas for Improvement")
for area in result.areas_for_improvement:
st.write(f"• {area}")
st.header("Technical Highlights")
for highlight in result.technical_highlights:
st.write(f"• {highlight}")
st.header("Notable Features")
for feature in result.notable_features:
st.write(f"• {feature}")
st.header("Recommendations")
for rec in result.recommendations:
st.write(f"• {rec}")
# Market Analysis
st.header("Market Analysis")
col1, col2 = st.columns(2)
with col1:
st.subheader("Market Potential")
st.write(result.market_potential)
with col2:
st.subheader("Scalability Assessment")
st.write(result.scalability_assessment)
except Exception as e:
st.error(f"Error evaluating the project: {str(e)}")
finally:
# Clean up the temporary file
os.unlink(video_path)
else:
# Display placeholder content
st.info("👆 Upload a video file to get started!")
Binary file not shown.
+1 -1
View File
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ class Praisonai < Formula
desc "AI tools for various AI applications"
homepage "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI"
url "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/archive/refs/tags/2.0.50.tar.gz"
url "https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/archive/refs/tags/2.0.51.tar.gz"
sha256 "1828fb9227d10f991522c3f24f061943a254b667196b40b1a3e4a54a8d30ce32" # Replace with actual SHA256 checksum
license "MIT"
+1 -1
View File
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ class CloudDeployer:
file.write("FROM python:3.11-slim\n")
file.write("WORKDIR /app\n")
file.write("COPY . .\n")
file.write("RUN pip install flask praisonai==2.0.50 gunicorn markdown\n")
file.write("RUN pip install flask praisonai==2.0.51 gunicorn markdown\n")
file.write("EXPOSE 8080\n")
file.write('CMD ["gunicorn", "-b", "0.0.0.0:8080", "api:app"]\n')
+4 -4
View File
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
[project]
name = "PraisonAI"
version = "2.0.50"
version = "2.0.51"
description = "PraisonAI is an AI Agents Framework with Self Reflection. PraisonAI application combines PraisonAI Agents, AutoGen, and CrewAI into a low-code solution for building and managing multi-agent LLM systems, focusing on simplicity, customisation, and efficient human-agent collaboration."
readme = "README.md"
license = ""
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ dependencies = [
"rich>=13.7",
"markdown>=3.5",
"pyparsing>=3.0.0",
"praisonaiagents>=0.0.41",
"praisonaiagents>=0.0.42",
"python-dotenv>=0.19.0",
"instructor>=1.3.3",
"PyYAML>=6.0",
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ autogen = ["pyautogen>=0.2.19", "praisonai-tools>=0.0.7", "crewai"]
[tool.poetry]
name = "PraisonAI"
version = "2.0.50"
version = "2.0.51"
description = "PraisonAI is an AI Agents Framework with Self Reflection. PraisonAI application combines PraisonAI Agents, AutoGen, and CrewAI into a low-code solution for building and managing multi-agent LLM systems, focusing on simplicity, customisation, and efficient human–agent collaboration."
authors = ["Mervin Praison"]
license = ""
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ python = ">=3.10,<3.13"
rich = ">=13.7"
markdown = ">=3.5"
pyparsing = ">=3.0.0"
praisonaiagents = ">=0.0.41"
praisonaiagents = ">=0.0.42"
python-dotenv = ">=0.19.0"
instructor = ">=1.3.3"
PyYAML = ">=6.0"
Generated
+5 -5
View File
@@ -3060,7 +3060,7 @@ wheels = [
[[package]]
name = "praisonai"
version = "2.0.50"
version = "2.0.51"
source = { editable = "." }
dependencies = [
{ name = "instructor" },
@@ -3197,7 +3197,7 @@ requires-dist = [
{ name = "plotly", marker = "extra == 'realtime'", specifier = ">=5.24.0" },
{ name = "praisonai-tools", marker = "extra == 'autogen'", specifier = ">=0.0.7" },
{ name = "praisonai-tools", marker = "extra == 'crewai'", specifier = ">=0.0.7" },
{ name = "praisonaiagents", specifier = ">=0.0.41" },
{ name = "praisonaiagents", specifier = ">=0.0.42" },
{ name = "pyautogen", marker = "extra == 'autogen'", specifier = ">=0.2.19" },
{ name = "pydantic", marker = "extra == 'chat'", specifier = "<=2.10.1" },
{ name = "pydantic", marker = "extra == 'code'", specifier = "<=2.10.1" },
@@ -3250,16 +3250,16 @@ wheels = [
[[package]]
name = "praisonaiagents"
version = "0.0.41"
version = "0.0.42"
source = { registry = "https://pypi.org/simple" }
dependencies = [
{ name = "openai" },
{ name = "pydantic" },
{ name = "rich" },
]
sdist = { url = "https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/d9/39/2e97f6f1ea30948ae93c15cfab67998c999fe859b26481e2dfbddbc5543c/praisonaiagents-0.0.41.tar.gz", hash = "sha256:f8760446ff2bae5957a695616bc23b990bf422054edc2d2d37f2336fd708475b", size = 75859 }
sdist = { url = "https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/da/06/c38a7889fb3ed80786591f25c4852acd1505cafafe59b9994b67255a1282/praisonaiagents-0.0.42.tar.gz", hash = "sha256:7266b13b091f79bdb3b868599eb6b2e4cf11808ecaf3c107a1b33c908e4d003d", size = 75885 }
wheels = [
{ url = "https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/63/7a/3da6a6076b2501246a0770d662c5d72158eaacfc10eb4b0938ae43b17d19/praisonaiagents-0.0.41-py3-none-any.whl", hash = "sha256:72dc3e1f5c939ab74898e952bba2b106e3f2b5bf4577f9ff96bc725e17d5b212", size = 93589 },
{ url = "https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/bf/48/dd42c2887d982ce02b7b7c990bb295ef045db454b277d477dbbd95e9e4cf/praisonaiagents-0.0.42-py3-none-any.whl", hash = "sha256:27cf3c5de305fe54b2192d7fa3d14700b3722852d712fa554314ac62b6d85399", size = 93626 },
]
[[package]]