When the object size argument is -1, no checking can be done, so calling the
_chk variant is unnecessary. We already did this for a bunch of these
functions.
rdar://50797197
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62358
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@362272 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Enable some of the existing size optimizations for cold code under PGO.
A ~5% code size saving in big internal app under PGO.
The way it gets BFI/PSI is discussed in the RFC thread
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-March/130894.html
Note it doesn't currently touch loop passes.
Reviewers: davidxl, eraman
Reviewed By: eraman
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, smeenai, mehdi_amini, eraman, zzheng, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59514
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@358422 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The Emscripten OS provides a definition of __EMSCRIPTEN__, and also that it
supports iprintf optimizations.
Also define small_printf optimizations, which is a printf with float support
but not long double (which in wasm can be useful since long doubles are 128
bit and force linking of float128 emulation code). This part is based on
sunfish's https://reviews.llvm.org/D57620 (which can't land yet since
the WASI integration isn't ready yet).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60167
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@357552 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The code might intend to replace puts("") with putchar('\n') even if the
return value is used. It failed because use_empty() was used to guard
the whole block. While returning '\n' (putchar('\n')) is technically
correct (puts is only required to return a nonnegative number on
success), doing this looks weird and there is really little benefit to
optimize puts whose return value is used. So don't do that.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@355921 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Right now, when we encounter a string equality check,
e.g. `if (memcmp(a, b, s) == 0)`, we try to expand to a comparison if `s` is a
small compile-time constant, and fall back on calling `memcmp()` else.
This is sub-optimal because memcmp has to compute much more than
equality.
This patch replaces `memcmp(a, b, s) == 0` by `bcmp(a, b, s) == 0` on platforms
that support `bcmp`.
`bcmp` can be made much more efficient than `memcmp` because equality
compare is trivially parallel while lexicographic ordering has a chain
dependency.
Subscribers: fedor.sergeev, jyknight, ckennelly, gchatelet, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56593
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@355672 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Recommit r352791 after tweaking DerivedTypes.h slightly, so that gcc
doesn't choke on it, hopefully.
Original Message:
The FunctionCallee type is effectively a {FunctionType*,Value*} pair,
and is a useful convenience to enable code to continue passing the
result of getOrInsertFunction() through to EmitCall, even once pointer
types lose their pointee-type.
Then:
- update the CallInst/InvokeInst instruction creation functions to
take a Callee,
- modify getOrInsertFunction to return FunctionCallee, and
- update all callers appropriately.
One area of particular note is the change to the sanitizer
code. Previously, they had been casting the result of
`getOrInsertFunction` to a `Function*` via
`checkSanitizerInterfaceFunction`, and storing that. That would report
an error if someone had already inserted a function declaraction with
a mismatching signature.
However, in general, LLVM allows for such mismatches, as
`getOrInsertFunction` will automatically insert a bitcast if
needed. As part of this cleanup, cause the sanitizer code to do the
same. (It will call its functions using the expected signature,
however they may have been declared.)
Finally, in a small number of locations, callers of
`getOrInsertFunction` actually were expecting/requiring that a brand
new function was being created. In such cases, I've switched them to
Function::Create instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57315
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@352827 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit f47d6b38c7a61d50db4566b02719de05492dcef1 (r352791).
Seems to run into compilation failures with GCC (but not clang, where
I tested it). Reverting while I investigate.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@352800 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The FunctionCallee type is effectively a {FunctionType*,Value*} pair,
and is a useful convenience to enable code to continue passing the
result of getOrInsertFunction() through to EmitCall, even once pointer
types lose their pointee-type.
Then:
- update the CallInst/InvokeInst instruction creation functions to
take a Callee,
- modify getOrInsertFunction to return FunctionCallee, and
- update all callers appropriately.
One area of particular note is the change to the sanitizer
code. Previously, they had been casting the result of
`getOrInsertFunction` to a `Function*` via
`checkSanitizerInterfaceFunction`, and storing that. That would report
an error if someone had already inserted a function declaraction with
a mismatching signature.
However, in general, LLVM allows for such mismatches, as
`getOrInsertFunction` will automatically insert a bitcast if
needed. As part of this cleanup, cause the sanitizer code to do the
same. (It will call its functions using the expected signature,
however they may have been declared.)
Finally, in a small number of locations, callers of
`getOrInsertFunction` actually were expecting/requiring that a brand
new function was being created. In such cases, I've switched them to
Function::Create instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57315
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@352791 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@351636 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
In several places in the code we use the following pattern:
if (hasUnaryFloatFn(&TLI, Ty, LibFunc_tan, LibFunc_tanf, LibFunc_tanl)) {
[...]
Value *Res = emitUnaryFloatFnCall(X, TLI.getName(LibFunc_tan), B, Attrs);
[...]
}
In short, we check if there is a lib-function for a certain type, and then
we _always_ fetch the name of the "double" version of the lib function and
construct a call to the appropriate function, that we just checked exists,
using that "double" name as a basis.
This is of course a problem in cases where the target doesn't support the
"double" version, but e.g. only the "float" version.
In that case TLI.getName(LibFunc_tan) returns "", and
emitUnaryFloatFnCall happily appends an "f" to "", and we erroneously end
up with a call to a function called "f".
To solve this, the above pattern is changed to
if (hasUnaryFloatFn(&TLI, Ty, LibFunc_tan, LibFunc_tanf, LibFunc_tanl)) {
[...]
Value *Res = emitUnaryFloatFnCall(X, &TLI, LibFunc_tan, LibFunc_tanf,
LibFunc_tanl, B, Attrs);
[...]
}
I.e instead of first fetching the name of the "double" version and then
letting emitUnaryFloatFnCall() add the final "f" or "l", we let
emitUnaryFloatFnCall() fetch the right name from TLI.
Reviewers: eli.friedman, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: efriedma, bjope, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53370
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@344725 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
InstCombine keeps a worklist and assumes that optimizations don't
eraseFromParent() the instruction, which SimplifyLibCalls violates. This change
adds a new callback to SimplifyLibCalls to let clients specify their own hander
for erasing actions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52729
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@344251 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Generalize the simplification of `pow(2.0, y)` to `pow(2.0 ** n, y)` for all
scalar and vector types.
This improvement helps some benchmarks in SPEC CPU2000 and CPU2006, such as
252.eon, 447.dealII, 453.povray. Otherwise, no significant regressions on
x86-64 or A64.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49273
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@341095 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Expand the simplification of `pow(exp{,2}(x), y)` to all FP types.
This improvement helps some benchmarks in SPEC CPU2000 and CPU2006, such as
252.eon, 447.dealII, 453.povray. Otherwise, no significant regressions on
x86-64 or A64.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51195
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340948 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Generalize the simplification of `pow(2.0, y)` to `pow(2.0 ** n, y)` for all
scalar and vector types.
This improvement helps some benchmarks in SPEC CPU2000 and CPU2006, such as
252.eon, 447.dealII, 453.povray. Otherwise, no significant regressions on
x86-64 or A64.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49273
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340947 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Refactor all cases dealing with `exp{,2,10}()` into one function in
preparation for D49273. Otherwise, NFC.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340061 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a follow-up suggested with rL339604.
For tan(), we don't have a corresponding LLVM
intrinsic -- unlike sin/cos -- so this is the
only way/place that we can do this fold currently.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@339958 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Even though this code is below a function called optimizeFloatingPointLibCall(),
we apparently can't guarantee that we're dealing with FPMathOperators, so bail
out immediately if that's not true.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@339618 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Can't set the builder flags without knowing this is an FPMathOperator. I'll add a test
for that and try again.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@339609 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a very partial fix for the reported problem. I suspect
we do not get this fold in most motivating cases because most of
the time, the libcall would have been replaced by an intrinsic,
and that optimization is handled elsewhere...but maybe it should
be handled here?
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@339604 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Merge the helper functions for shrinking unary and binary functions into a
single one, while keeping all their functionality. Otherwise, NFC.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@338905 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Review feedback from r328165. Split out just the one function from the
file that's used by Analysis. (As chandlerc pointed out, the original
change only moved the header and not the implementation anyway - which
was fine for the one function that was used (since it's a
template/inlined in the header) but not in general)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@333954 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
