mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2024-11-26 04:40:38 +00:00
Test that volatile load type isn't changed
Summary: As discussed in D75505, it's not particularly useful to change the type of a load to/from floating-point/integer because it's followed by a bitcast, and it might lead to surprising code generation. Check that this doesn't generally happen. Reviewers: lebedev.ri Subscribers: jkorous, dexonsmith, ributzka, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75644
This commit is contained in:
parent
31973e0dfa
commit
11b6dfb970
@ -2456,10 +2456,11 @@ The compiler may assume execution will continue after a volatile operation,
|
||||
so operations which modify memory or may have undefined behavior can be
|
||||
hoisted past a volatile operation.
|
||||
|
||||
IR-level volatile loads and stores cannot safely be optimized into
|
||||
llvm.memcpy or llvm.memmove intrinsics even when those intrinsics are
|
||||
flagged volatile. Likewise, the backend should never split or merge
|
||||
target-legal volatile load/store instructions.
|
||||
IR-level volatile loads and stores cannot safely be optimized into llvm.memcpy
|
||||
or llvm.memmove intrinsics even when those intrinsics are flagged volatile.
|
||||
Likewise, the backend should never split or merge target-legal volatile
|
||||
load/store instructions. Similarly, IR-level volatile loads and stores cannot
|
||||
change from integer to floating-point or vice versa.
|
||||
|
||||
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
|
59
test/Transforms/InstCombine/volatile_load_cast.ll
Normal file
59
test/Transforms/InstCombine/volatile_load_cast.ll
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
|
||||
; RUN: opt < %s -instcombine -S | FileCheck %s
|
||||
|
||||
; Ensure that volatile loads followed by a bitcast don't get transformed into a
|
||||
; volatile load of the bitcast-target type. This is unlikely to provide much in
|
||||
; terms of optimizations, and might break the programmer's expectation for code
|
||||
; generation, however brittle that expectation might be.
|
||||
;
|
||||
; See llvm.org/D75644 and llvm.org/D75505
|
||||
target datalayout = "e-p:64:64-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64"
|
||||
|
||||
define float @float_load(i32* %addr) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @float_load(
|
||||
; CHECK: %i32 = load volatile i32, i32* %addr, align 4
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: %float = bitcast i32 %i32 to float
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret float %float
|
||||
%i32 = load volatile i32, i32* %addr, align 4
|
||||
%float = bitcast i32 %i32 to float
|
||||
ret float %float
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
define i32 @i32_load(float* %addr) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @i32_load(
|
||||
; CHECK: %float = load volatile float, float* %addr, align 4
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: %i32 = bitcast float %float to i32
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 %i32
|
||||
%float = load volatile float, float* %addr, align 4
|
||||
%i32 = bitcast float %float to i32
|
||||
ret i32 %i32
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
define double @double_load(i64* %addr) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @double_load(
|
||||
; CHECK: %i64 = load volatile i64, i64* %addr, align 8
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: %double = bitcast i64 %i64 to double
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret double %double
|
||||
%i64 = load volatile i64, i64* %addr, align 8
|
||||
%double = bitcast i64 %i64 to double
|
||||
ret double %double
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
define i64 @i64_load(double* %addr) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @i64_load(
|
||||
; CHECK: %double = load volatile double, double* %addr, align 8
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: %i64 = bitcast double %double to i64
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i64 %i64
|
||||
%double = load volatile double, double* %addr, align 8
|
||||
%i64 = bitcast double %double to i64
|
||||
ret i64 %i64
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
define i8* @ptr_load(i64* %addr) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @ptr_load(
|
||||
; CHECK: %i64 = load volatile i64, i64* %addr, align 8
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: %ptr = inttoptr i64 %i64 to i8*
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i8* %ptr
|
||||
%i64 = load volatile i64, i64* %addr, align 8
|
||||
%ptr = inttoptr i64 %i64 to i8*
|
||||
ret i8* %ptr
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user