mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2025-01-24 12:55:45 +00:00
[DebugInfo] Disallow fragmenting DIExpressions with shift operators
DIExpressions with shift operators should not be fragmented for the same reason as arithmetic operators: carry over cannot be expressed from one fragment to the other, so an invalid result would be produced. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70601
This commit is contained in:
parent
dd53195fe6
commit
198a91ed95
@ -1148,10 +1148,14 @@ Optional<DIExpression *> DIExpression::createFragmentExpression(
|
||||
for (auto Op : Expr->expr_ops()) {
|
||||
switch (Op.getOp()) {
|
||||
default: break;
|
||||
case dwarf::DW_OP_shr:
|
||||
case dwarf::DW_OP_shra:
|
||||
case dwarf::DW_OP_shl:
|
||||
case dwarf::DW_OP_plus:
|
||||
case dwarf::DW_OP_plus_uconst:
|
||||
case dwarf::DW_OP_minus:
|
||||
// We can't safely split arithmetic into multiple fragments because we
|
||||
// can't express carry-over between fragments.
|
||||
// We can't safely split arithmetic or shift operations into multiple
|
||||
// fragments because we can't express carry-over between fragments.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// FIXME: We *could* preserve the lowest fragment of a constant offset
|
||||
// operation if the offset fits into SizeInBits.
|
||||
|
@ -2394,6 +2394,49 @@ TEST_F(DIExpressionTest, isValid) {
|
||||
#undef EXPECT_INVALID
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(DIExpressionTest, createFragmentExpression) {
|
||||
#define EXPECT_VALID_FRAGMENT(Offset, Size, ...) \
|
||||
do { \
|
||||
uint64_t Elements[] = {__VA_ARGS__}; \
|
||||
DIExpression* Expression = DIExpression::get(Context, Elements); \
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(DIExpression::createFragmentExpression( \
|
||||
Expression, Offset, Size).hasValue()); \
|
||||
} while (false)
|
||||
#define EXPECT_INVALID_FRAGMENT(Offset, Size, ...) \
|
||||
do { \
|
||||
uint64_t Elements[] = {__VA_ARGS__}; \
|
||||
DIExpression* Expression = DIExpression::get(Context, Elements); \
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(DIExpression::createFragmentExpression( \
|
||||
Expression, Offset, Size).hasValue()); \
|
||||
} while (false)
|
||||
|
||||
// createFragmentExpression adds correct ops.
|
||||
Optional<DIExpression*> R = DIExpression::createFragmentExpression(
|
||||
DIExpression::get(Context, {}), 0, 32);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(R.hasValue(), true);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(3u, (*R)->getNumElements());
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(dwarf::DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, (*R)->getElement(0));
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(0u, (*R)->getElement(1));
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(32u, (*R)->getElement(2));
|
||||
|
||||
// Valid fragment expressions.
|
||||
EXPECT_VALID_FRAGMENT(0, 32, {});
|
||||
EXPECT_VALID_FRAGMENT(0, 32, dwarf::DW_OP_deref);
|
||||
EXPECT_VALID_FRAGMENT(0, 32, dwarf::DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 0, 32);
|
||||
EXPECT_VALID_FRAGMENT(16, 16, dwarf::DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 0, 32);
|
||||
|
||||
// Invalid fragment expressions (incompatible ops).
|
||||
EXPECT_INVALID_FRAGMENT(0, 32, dwarf::DW_OP_constu, 6, dwarf::DW_OP_plus);
|
||||
EXPECT_INVALID_FRAGMENT(0, 32, dwarf::DW_OP_constu, 14, dwarf::DW_OP_minus);
|
||||
EXPECT_INVALID_FRAGMENT(0, 32, dwarf::DW_OP_constu, 16, dwarf::DW_OP_shr);
|
||||
EXPECT_INVALID_FRAGMENT(0, 32, dwarf::DW_OP_constu, 16, dwarf::DW_OP_shl);
|
||||
EXPECT_INVALID_FRAGMENT(0, 32, dwarf::DW_OP_constu, 16, dwarf::DW_OP_shra);
|
||||
EXPECT_INVALID_FRAGMENT(0, 32, dwarf::DW_OP_plus_uconst, 6);
|
||||
|
||||
#undef EXPECT_VALID_FRAGMENT
|
||||
#undef EXPECT_INVALID_FRAGMENT
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
typedef MetadataTest DIObjCPropertyTest;
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(DIObjCPropertyTest, get) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user