mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2025-02-16 18:30:52 +00:00
NFC: update the test comments in LV test about early exit loops
llvm-svn: 340337
This commit is contained in:
parent
5e7745379a
commit
49cd3aed8b
@ -4,6 +4,14 @@ target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f3
|
||||
|
||||
; tests skipping iterations within a VF through break/continue/gotos.
|
||||
|
||||
; The main difficulty in vectorizing these loops in test1,test2 and test3 is
|
||||
; safely speculating that the widened load of A[i] should not fault if the
|
||||
; scalarized loop does not fault. For example, the
|
||||
; original load in the scalar loop may not fault, but the last iteration of the
|
||||
; vectorized load can fault (if it crosses a page boudary for example).
|
||||
; This last vector iteration is where *one* of the
|
||||
; scalar iterations lead to the early exit.
|
||||
|
||||
; int test(int *A, int Length) {
|
||||
; for (int i = 0; i < Length; i++) {
|
||||
; if (A[i] > 10.0) goto end;
|
||||
@ -51,7 +59,10 @@ end: ; preds = %end.loopexit, %entr
|
||||
; }
|
||||
; return false;
|
||||
; }
|
||||
; TODO: Today we do not vectorize this, but we could teach the vectorizer.
|
||||
; TODO: Today we do not vectorize this, but we could teach the vectorizer, once
|
||||
; the hard part of proving/speculating A[i:VF - 1] loads does not fault is handled by the
|
||||
; compiler/hardware.
|
||||
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: test2(
|
||||
; CHECK-NOT: <4 x i32>
|
||||
define i32 @test2(i32* nocapture %A, i32 %Length, i32 %K) {
|
||||
@ -92,7 +103,8 @@ end: ; preds = %end.loopexit, %entr
|
||||
; }
|
||||
; return -1;
|
||||
; }
|
||||
; TODO: Today we do not vectorize this, but we could teach the vectorizer.
|
||||
; TODO: Today we do not vectorize this, but we could teach the vectorizer (once
|
||||
; we handle the speculation safety of the widened load).
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: test3(
|
||||
; CHECK-NOT: <4 x i32>
|
||||
define i32 @test3(i32* nocapture %A, i32 %Length, i32 %K) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user