* The DSE code that tested for overlapping needed to take into account the fact

that one of the numbers is signed while the other is unsigned. This could lead
  to a wrong result when the signed was promoted to an unsigned int.

* Add the data layout line to the testcase so that it will test the appropriate
  thing.

Patch by David Terei!

llvm-svn: 128577
This commit is contained in:
Bill Wendling 2011-03-30 21:37:19 +00:00
parent c7724b4167
commit 59a1021dc6
2 changed files with 4 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -361,8 +361,10 @@ static bool isCompleteOverwrite(const AliasAnalysis::Location &Later,
//
// |--earlier--|
// |----- later ------|
//
// We have to be careful here as *Off is signed while *.Size is unsigned.
if (EarlierOff >= LaterOff &&
EarlierOff + Earlier.Size <= LaterOff + Later.Size)
uint64_t(EarlierOff - LaterOff) + Earlier.Size <= Later.Size)
return true;
// Otherwise, they don't completely overlap.

View File

@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -dse -S | FileCheck %s
; PR9561
target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:32:64-f32:32:32-f64:32:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-f80:128:128-n8:16:32"
target triple = "i386-apple-darwin9.8"
@A = external global [0 x i32]