[AggressiveInstCombine] Fixed TruncCombine class to handle TruncInst leaf node correctly.

This covers the case where TruncInst leaf node is a constant expression.
See PR36121 for more details.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42622

llvm-svn: 323926
This commit is contained in:
Amjad Aboud 2018-01-31 22:39:05 +00:00
parent 3ce0662dba
commit 671bdf42ed
3 changed files with 99 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ void TruncInstCombine::ReduceExpressionDag(Type *SclTy) {
// just return the source. There's no need to insert it because it is not
// new.
if (I->getOperand(0)->getType() == Ty) {
assert(!isa<TruncInst>(I) && "Cannot reach here with TruncInst");
NodeInfo.NewValue = I->getOperand(0);
continue;
}
@ -326,11 +327,18 @@ void TruncInstCombine::ReduceExpressionDag(Type *SclTy) {
Opc == Instruction::SExt);
// Update Worklist entries with new value if needed.
if (auto *NewCI = dyn_cast<TruncInst>(Res)) {
auto Entry = find(Worklist, I);
if (Entry != Worklist.end())
// There are three possible changes to the Worklist:
// 1. Update Old-TruncInst -> New-TruncInst.
// 2. Remove Old-TruncInst (if New node is not TruncInst).
// 3. Add New-TruncInst (if Old node was not TruncInst).
auto Entry = find(Worklist, I);
if (Entry != Worklist.end()) {
if (auto *NewCI = dyn_cast<TruncInst>(Res))
*Entry = NewCI;
}
else
Worklist.erase(Entry);
} else if (auto *NewCI = dyn_cast<TruncInst>(Res))
Worklist.push_back(NewCI);
break;
}
case Instruction::Add:

View File

@ -46,6 +46,37 @@ define void @const_expression_trunc() {
ret void
}
; Check that we handle constant expression trunc instruction, when it is a leaf
; of other trunc expression pattern:
; 1. %T1 is the constant expression trunc instruction.
; 2. %T2->%T1 is the trunc expression pattern we want to reduce.
define void @const_expression_trunc_leaf() {
; CHECK-LABEL: @const_expression_trunc_leaf(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call i32 @use32(i32 44)
; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
;
%T1 = trunc i64 44 to i48
%T2 = trunc i48 %T1 to i32
call i32 @use32(i32 %T2)
ret void
}
; Check that we handle zext instruction, which turns into trunc instruction.
; Notice that there are two expression patterns below:
; 1. %T2->%T1
; 2. %T1`->%A (where %T1` is the reduced node of %T1 into trunc instruction)
define void @const_expression_zext_to_trunc() {
; CHECK-LABEL: @const_expression_zext_to_trunc(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call i32 @use32(i32 44)
; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
;
%A = add i64 11, 33
%T1 = zext i64 %A to i128
%T2 = trunc i128 %T1 to i32
call i32 @use32(i32 %T2)
ret void
}
define void @const_expression_mul_vec() {
; CHECK-LABEL: @const_expression_mul_vec(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call <2 x i32> @use32_vec(<2 x i32> <i32 24531, i32 24864>)

View File

@ -212,3 +212,59 @@ define void @multi_use_vec_sub(<2 x i32> %X, <2 x i32> %Y) {
call <2 x i32> @use64_vec(<2 x i64> %A2)
ret void
}
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;; These tests check cases where expression dag post-dominated by TruncInst
;; contains TruncInst leaf or ZEXT/SEXT leafs which turn into TruncInst leaves.
;; Check that both expressions are reduced and no TruncInst remains or (was
;; generated).
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
; Notice that there are two expression patterns below:
; 1. %T2->%C2->(%B2->(%T1, 15), %B2->(%T1, 15))
; 2. %T1`->%C1->(%B1->(%A1, 15), %B1->(%A1, 15))
; (where %T1` is the reduced node of %T1 into trunc instruction)
define void @trunc_as_a_leaf(i32 %X) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @trunc_as_a_leaf(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[B1:%.*]] = add i32 [[X:%.*]], 15
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C1:%.*]] = mul i32 [[B1]], [[B1]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[B2:%.*]] = add i32 [[C1]], 15
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C2:%.*]] = mul i32 [[B2]], [[B2]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call i32 @use32(i32 [[C2]])
; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
;
%A1 = zext i32 %X to i64
%B1 = add i64 %A1, 15
%C1 = mul i64 %B1, %B1
%T1 = trunc i64 %C1 to i48 ; leaf trunc
%B2 = add i48 %T1, 15
%C2 = mul i48 %B2, %B2
%T2 = trunc i48 %C2 to i32
call i32 @use32(i32 %T2)
ret void
}
; Notice that there are two expression patterns below:
; 1. %T2->%C2->(%B2->(%T1, 15), %B2->(%T1, 15))
; 2. %T1`->%C1->(%B1->(%A1, 15), %B1->(%A1, 15))
; (where %T1` is the reduced node of %T1 into trunc instruction)
define void @zext_as_a_leaf(i16 %X) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @zext_as_a_leaf(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[A1:%.*]] = zext i16 [[X:%.*]] to i32
; CHECK-NEXT: [[B1:%.*]] = add i32 [[A1]], 15
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C1:%.*]] = mul i32 [[B1]], [[B1]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[B2:%.*]] = add i32 [[C1]], 15
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C2:%.*]] = mul i32 [[B2]], [[B2]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call i32 @use32(i32 [[C2]])
; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
;
%A1 = zext i16 %X to i48
%B1 = add i48 %A1, 15
%C1 = mul i48 %B1, %B1
%T1 = zext i48 %C1 to i64 ; leaf zext, which will turn into trunc
%B2 = add i64 %T1, 15
%C2 = mul i64 %B2, %B2
%T2 = trunc i64 %C2 to i32
call i32 @use32(i32 %T2)
ret void
}