Update test case to appease bots after 263255.

I'll follow up with Matt to confirm this is the correct fix.

llvm-svn: 263268
This commit is contained in:
Chad Rosier 2016-03-11 17:33:36 +00:00
parent 9da9e86e49
commit 8faf1c7ea8

View File

@ -44,9 +44,9 @@ define void @simple_read2st64_f32_1_2(float addrspace(1)* %out, float addrspace(
}
; SI-LABEL: @simple_read2st64_f32_max_offset
; SI: ds_read2st64_b32 v{{\[}}[[LO_VREG:[0-9]+]]:[[HI_VREG:[0-9]+]]{{\]}}, v{{[0-9]+}} offset0:1 offset1:255
; SI: ds_read2st64_b32 v{{\[}}[[LO_VREG:[0-9]+]]:[[HI_VREG:[0-9]+]]{{\]}}, v{{[0-9]+}} offset0:255 offset1:1
; SI: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
; SI: v_add_f32_e32 [[RESULT:v[0-9]+]], v[[HI_VREG]], v[[LO_VREG]]
; SI: v_add_f32_e32 [[RESULT:v[0-9]+]], v[[LO_VREG]], v[[HI_VREG]]
; SI: buffer_store_dword [[RESULT]]
; SI: s_endpgm
define void @simple_read2st64_f32_max_offset(float addrspace(1)* %out, float addrspace(3)* %lds) #0 {
@ -176,9 +176,9 @@ define void @misaligned_read2st64_f64(double addrspace(1)* %out, double addrspac
; The maximum is not the usual 0xff because 0xff * 8 * 64 > 0xffff
; SI-LABEL: @simple_read2st64_f64_max_offset
; SI: ds_read2st64_b64 v{{\[}}[[LO_VREG:[0-9]+]]:[[HI_VREG:[0-9]+]]{{\]}}, v{{[0-9]+}} offset0:4 offset1:127
; SI: ds_read2st64_b64 v{{\[}}[[LO_VREG:[0-9]+]]:[[HI_VREG:[0-9]+]]{{\]}}, v{{[0-9]+}} offset0:127 offset1:4
; SI: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
; SI: v_add_f64 [[RESULT:v\[[0-9]+:[0-9]+\]]], v{{\[}}[[LO_VREG]]:{{[0-9]+\]}}, v{{\[[0-9]+}}:[[HI_VREG]]{{\]}}
; SI: v_add_f64 [[RESULT:v\[[0-9]+:[0-9]+\]]], v{{\[[0-9]+}}:[[HI_VREG]]{{\]}}, v{{\[}}[[LO_VREG]]:{{[0-9]+\]}}
; SI: buffer_store_dwordx2 [[RESULT]]
; SI: s_endpgm
define void @simple_read2st64_f64_max_offset(double addrspace(1)* %out, double addrspace(3)* %lds) #0 {