[NFC] Adjust test cases numbering, test commit.

Summary:
Test case test14 is missing, adjust the numbering to have a consecutive range.
Also a test commit to verify commit access.
This commit is contained in:
Arkady Shlykov 2020-01-14 07:46:46 -08:00
parent e09ba3bb82
commit a04db53f1a

View File

@ -1024,8 +1024,8 @@ if.end: ; preds = %if.then, %for.body
}
; No peeling is profitable here.
define void @test15__ivar_mod2_is_1(i32 %len) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test15__ivar_mod2_is_1(
define void @test14__ivar_mod2_is_1(i32 %len) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test14__ivar_mod2_is_1(
; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP5:%.*]] = icmp sgt i32 [[LEN:%.*]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[CMP5]], label [[FOR_BODY_PREHEADER:%.*]], label [[FOR_COND_CLEANUP:%.*]]
@ -1074,8 +1074,8 @@ if.end: ; preds = %if.then, %for.body
}
; No peeling is profitable here.
define void @test16__ivar_mod2_is_0(i32 %len) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test16__ivar_mod2_is_0(
define void @test15__ivar_mod2_is_0(i32 %len) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test15__ivar_mod2_is_0(
; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP5:%.*]] = icmp sgt i32 [[LEN:%.*]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[CMP5]], label [[FOR_BODY_PREHEADER:%.*]], label [[FOR_COND_CLEANUP:%.*]]
@ -1125,8 +1125,8 @@ if.end: ; preds = %if.then, %for.body
; Similar to @test7, we need to peel one extra iteration, and we can't do that
; as per the -unroll-peel-max-count=4, so this shouldn't be peeled at all.
define void @test17(i32 %k) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test17(
define void @test16(i32 %k) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test16(
; CHECK-NEXT: for.body.lr.ph:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[FOR_BODY:%.*]]
; CHECK: for.body:
@ -1166,8 +1166,8 @@ for.end:
; Similar to @test8, we need to peel one extra iteration, and we can't do that
; as per the -unroll-peel-max-count=4, so this shouldn't be peeled at all.
define void @test18(i32 %k) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test18(
define void @test17(i32 %k) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test17(
; CHECK-NEXT: for.body.lr.ph:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[FOR_BODY:%.*]]
; CHECK: for.body: