Make repairIntervalsInRange() more robust. There are now no longer any liveness-

related failures when running 'make check' without LiveVariables with the
verifier enabled. Some of the remaining failures elsewhere may still be fallout
from incorrect updating of LiveIntervals or the few missing cases left in the
two-address pass.

llvm-svn: 175672
This commit is contained in:
Cameron Zwarich 2013-02-20 22:09:57 +00:00
parent 170d2a8c25
commit dd619b6db9

View File

@ -1066,13 +1066,27 @@ LiveIntervals::repairIntervalsInRange(MachineBasicBlock *MBB,
continue;
LiveInterval &LI = getInterval(Reg);
LiveInterval::iterator LII = LI.FindLiveRangeContaining(endIdx);
// FIXME: Should we support undefs that gain defs?
if (!LI.hasAtLeastOneValue())
continue;
LiveInterval::iterator LII = LI.find(endIdx);
SlotIndex lastUseIdx;
if (LII != LI.end() && LII->start < endIdx)
lastUseIdx = LII->end;
else
--LII;
for (MachineBasicBlock::iterator I = End; I != Begin;) {
--I;
MachineInstr *MI = I;
SlotIndex instrIdx = getInstructionIndex(MI);
bool isStartValid = getInstructionFromIndex(LII->start);
bool isEndValid = getInstructionFromIndex(LII->end);
// FIXME: This doesn't currently handle early-clobber or multiple removed
// defs inside of the region to repair.
for (MachineInstr::mop_iterator OI = MI->operands_begin(),
OE = MI->operands_end(); OI != OE; ++OI) {
const MachineOperand &MO = *OI;
@ -1080,25 +1094,54 @@ LiveIntervals::repairIntervalsInRange(MachineBasicBlock *MBB,
continue;
if (MO.isDef()) {
assert(LII != LI.end() &&
"Dead register defs are not yet supported.");
if (!Indexes->getInstructionFromIndex(LII->start)) {
LII->start = instrIdx.getRegSlot();
LII->valno->def = instrIdx.getRegSlot();
if (!isStartValid) {
if (LII->end.isDead()) {
SlotIndex prevStart;
if (LII != LI.begin())
prevStart = llvm::prior(LII)->start;
// FIXME: This could be more efficient if there was a removeRange
// method that returned an iterator.
LI.removeRange(*LII, true);
if (prevStart.isValid())
LII = LI.find(prevStart);
else
LII = LI.begin();
} else {
LII->start = instrIdx.getRegSlot();
LII->valno->def = instrIdx.getRegSlot();
if (MO.getSubReg() && !MO.isUndef())
lastUseIdx = instrIdx.getRegSlot();
else
lastUseIdx = SlotIndex();
continue;
}
}
if (!lastUseIdx.isValid()) {
VNInfo *VNI = LI.getNextValue(instrIdx.getRegSlot(),
VNInfoAllocator);
LiveRange LR(instrIdx.getRegSlot(), instrIdx.getDeadSlot(), VNI);
LII = LI.addRange(LR);
} else if (LII->start != instrIdx.getRegSlot()) {
VNInfo *VNI = LI.getNextValue(instrIdx.getRegSlot(), VNInfoAllocator);
LiveRange LR = LiveRange(instrIdx.getRegSlot(), LII->start, VNI);
VNInfo *VNI = LI.getNextValue(instrIdx.getRegSlot(),
VNInfoAllocator);
LiveRange LR(instrIdx.getRegSlot(), lastUseIdx, VNI);
LII = LI.addRange(LR);
}
} else if (MO.isUse()) {
if (LII == LI.end())
--LII;
assert(LII->start < instrIdx &&
"Registers with multiple used live ranges are not yet supported.");
SlotIndex endIdx = LII->end;
if (!endIdx.isBlock() && !Indexes->getInstructionFromIndex(endIdx))
if (MO.getSubReg() && !MO.isUndef())
lastUseIdx = instrIdx.getRegSlot();
else
lastUseIdx = SlotIndex();
} else if (MO.isUse()) {
// FIXME: This should probably be handled outside of this branch,
// either as part of the def case (for defs inside of the region) or
// after the loop over the region.
if (!isEndValid && !LII->end.isBlock())
LII->end = instrIdx.getRegSlot();
if (!lastUseIdx.isValid())
lastUseIdx = instrIdx.getRegSlot();
}
}
}