[SystemZ] Fix assertion failure in adjustSubwordCmp

When comparing a zero-extended value against a constant small enough to
be in range of the inner type, it doesn't matter whether a signed or
unsigned compare operation (for the outer type) is being used.  This is
why the code in adjustSubwordCmp had this assertion:

    assert(C.ICmpType == SystemZICMP::Any &&
           "Signedness shouldn't matter here.");

assuming the the caller had already detected that fact.  However, it
turns out that there cases, in particular with always-true or always-
false conditions that have not been eliminated when compiling at -O0,
where this is not true.

Instead of failing an assertion if C.ICmpType is not SystemZICMP::Any
here, we can simply *set* it safely to SystemZICMP::Any, however.

llvm-svn: 255786
This commit is contained in:
Ulrich Weigand 2015-12-16 18:04:06 +00:00
parent ad6347a9fa
commit e19c3de669
2 changed files with 26 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -1603,8 +1603,8 @@ static void adjustSubwordCmp(SelectionDAG &DAG, SDLoc DL, Comparison &C) {
} else if (Load->getExtensionType() == ISD::ZEXTLOAD) {
if (Value > Mask)
return;
assert(C.ICmpType == SystemZICMP::Any &&
"Signedness shouldn't matter here.");
// If the constant is in range, we can use any comparison.
C.ICmpType = SystemZICMP::Any;
} else
return;

View File

@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
; This used to crash the backend due to a failed assertion.
; No particular output expected, but must compile.
;
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=s390x-linux-gnu
define void @test(i16 *%input, i32 *%result) {
entry:
%0 = load i16, i16* %input, align 2
%1 = zext i16 %0 to i32
%2 = icmp slt i32 %1, 0
br i1 %2, label %if.then, label %if.else
if.then:
store i32 1, i32* %result, align 4
br label %return
if.else:
store i32 0, i32* %result, align 4
br label %return
return:
ret void
}