I love how using out of scope variables is not an error with GCC, no really I do.

llvm-svn: 60643
This commit is contained in:
Chris Lattner 2008-12-07 00:38:27 +00:00
parent 20b7d9667d
commit e4c5f66b3b

View File

@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ getDependencyFrom(Instruction *QueryInst, BasicBlock::iterator ScanIt,
Value *MemPtr = 0;
uint64_t MemSize = 0;
if (StoreInst* S = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(QueryInst)) {
if (StoreInst *S = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(QueryInst)) {
// If this is a volatile store, don't mess around with it. Just return the
// previous instruction as a clobber.
if (S->isVolatile())
@ -126,10 +126,10 @@ getDependencyFrom(Instruction *QueryInst, BasicBlock::iterator ScanIt,
MemPtr = S->getPointerOperand();
MemSize = TD->getTypeStoreSize(S->getOperand(0)->getType());
} else if (LoadInst* LI = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(QueryInst)) {
} else if (LoadInst *LI = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(QueryInst)) {
// If this is a volatile load, don't mess around with it. Just return the
// previous instruction as a clobber.
if (S->isVolatile())
if (LI->isVolatile())
return MemDepResult::getClobber(--ScanIt);
MemPtr = LI->getPointerOperand();