Add assertion checks after the calls to LowerFormalArguments, LowerCall,

and LowerReturn, to verify that the targets' hooks have respected some
of their postconditions.

llvm-svn: 78312
This commit is contained in:
Dan Gohman 2009-08-06 15:37:27 +00:00
parent 904eb68a6a
commit e94b3f7a34

View File

@ -993,6 +993,12 @@ void SelectionDAGLowering::visitRet(ReturnInst &I) {
unsigned CallConv = DAG.getMachineFunction().getFunction()->getCallingConv();
Chain = TLI.LowerReturn(Chain, CallConv, isVarArg,
Outs, getCurDebugLoc(), DAG);
// Verify that the target's LowerReturn behaved as expected.
assert(Chain.getNode() && Chain.getValueType() == MVT::Other &&
"LowerReturn didn't return a valid chain!");
// Update the DAG with the new chain value resulting from return lowering.
DAG.setRoot(Chain);
}
@ -5696,7 +5702,20 @@ TargetLowering::LowerCallTo(SDValue Chain, const Type *RetTy,
SmallVector<SDValue, 4> InVals;
Chain = LowerCall(Chain, Callee, CallConv, isVarArg, isTailCall,
Outs, Ins, dl, DAG, InVals);
assert((!isTailCall || InVals.empty()) && "Tail call had return SDValues!");
// Verify that the target's LowerCall behaved as expected.
assert(Chain.getNode() && Chain.getValueType() == MVT::Other &&
"LowerCall didn't return a valid chain!");
assert((!isTailCall || InVals.empty()) &&
"LowerCall emitted a return value for a tail call!");
assert((isTailCall || InVals.size() == Ins.size()) &&
"LowerCall didn't emit the correct number of values!");
DEBUG(for (unsigned i = 0, e = Ins.size(); i != e; ++i) {
assert(InVals[i].getNode() &&
"LowerCall emitted a null value!");
assert(Ins[i].VT == InVals[i].getValueType() &&
"LowerCall emitted a value with the wrong type!");
});
// For a tail call, the return value is merely live-out and there aren't
// any nodes in the DAG representing it. Return a special value to
@ -5839,6 +5858,20 @@ LowerArguments(BasicBlock *LLVMBB) {
SDValue NewRoot = TLI.LowerFormalArguments(DAG.getRoot(), F.getCallingConv(),
F.isVarArg(), Ins,
dl, DAG, InVals);
// Verify that the target's LowerFormalArguments behaved as expected.
assert(NewRoot.getNode() && NewRoot.getValueType() == MVT::Other &&
"LowerFormalArguments didn't return a valid chain!");
assert(InVals.size() == Ins.size() &&
"LowerFormalArguments didn't emit the correct number of values!");
DEBUG(for (unsigned i = 0, e = Ins.size(); i != e; ++i) {
assert(InVals[i].getNode() &&
"LowerFormalArguments emitted a null value!");
assert(Ins[i].VT == InVals[i].getValueType() &&
"LowerFormalArguments emitted a value with the wrong type!");
});
// Update the DAG with the new chain value resulting from argument lowering.
DAG.setRoot(NewRoot);
// Set up the argument values.