mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2024-12-17 08:36:52 +00:00
Add assertion checks after the calls to LowerFormalArguments, LowerCall,
and LowerReturn, to verify that the targets' hooks have respected some of their postconditions. llvm-svn: 78312
This commit is contained in:
parent
904eb68a6a
commit
e94b3f7a34
@ -993,6 +993,12 @@ void SelectionDAGLowering::visitRet(ReturnInst &I) {
|
||||
unsigned CallConv = DAG.getMachineFunction().getFunction()->getCallingConv();
|
||||
Chain = TLI.LowerReturn(Chain, CallConv, isVarArg,
|
||||
Outs, getCurDebugLoc(), DAG);
|
||||
|
||||
// Verify that the target's LowerReturn behaved as expected.
|
||||
assert(Chain.getNode() && Chain.getValueType() == MVT::Other &&
|
||||
"LowerReturn didn't return a valid chain!");
|
||||
|
||||
// Update the DAG with the new chain value resulting from return lowering.
|
||||
DAG.setRoot(Chain);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -5696,7 +5702,20 @@ TargetLowering::LowerCallTo(SDValue Chain, const Type *RetTy,
|
||||
SmallVector<SDValue, 4> InVals;
|
||||
Chain = LowerCall(Chain, Callee, CallConv, isVarArg, isTailCall,
|
||||
Outs, Ins, dl, DAG, InVals);
|
||||
assert((!isTailCall || InVals.empty()) && "Tail call had return SDValues!");
|
||||
|
||||
// Verify that the target's LowerCall behaved as expected.
|
||||
assert(Chain.getNode() && Chain.getValueType() == MVT::Other &&
|
||||
"LowerCall didn't return a valid chain!");
|
||||
assert((!isTailCall || InVals.empty()) &&
|
||||
"LowerCall emitted a return value for a tail call!");
|
||||
assert((isTailCall || InVals.size() == Ins.size()) &&
|
||||
"LowerCall didn't emit the correct number of values!");
|
||||
DEBUG(for (unsigned i = 0, e = Ins.size(); i != e; ++i) {
|
||||
assert(InVals[i].getNode() &&
|
||||
"LowerCall emitted a null value!");
|
||||
assert(Ins[i].VT == InVals[i].getValueType() &&
|
||||
"LowerCall emitted a value with the wrong type!");
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// For a tail call, the return value is merely live-out and there aren't
|
||||
// any nodes in the DAG representing it. Return a special value to
|
||||
@ -5839,6 +5858,20 @@ LowerArguments(BasicBlock *LLVMBB) {
|
||||
SDValue NewRoot = TLI.LowerFormalArguments(DAG.getRoot(), F.getCallingConv(),
|
||||
F.isVarArg(), Ins,
|
||||
dl, DAG, InVals);
|
||||
|
||||
// Verify that the target's LowerFormalArguments behaved as expected.
|
||||
assert(NewRoot.getNode() && NewRoot.getValueType() == MVT::Other &&
|
||||
"LowerFormalArguments didn't return a valid chain!");
|
||||
assert(InVals.size() == Ins.size() &&
|
||||
"LowerFormalArguments didn't emit the correct number of values!");
|
||||
DEBUG(for (unsigned i = 0, e = Ins.size(); i != e; ++i) {
|
||||
assert(InVals[i].getNode() &&
|
||||
"LowerFormalArguments emitted a null value!");
|
||||
assert(Ins[i].VT == InVals[i].getValueType() &&
|
||||
"LowerFormalArguments emitted a value with the wrong type!");
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Update the DAG with the new chain value resulting from argument lowering.
|
||||
DAG.setRoot(NewRoot);
|
||||
|
||||
// Set up the argument values.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user