This changes getDomMemoryDef to check if a Current is a valid
candidate for elimination before checking for reads. Before the change,
we were spending a lot of compile-time in checking for read accesses for
Current that might not even be removable.
This patch flips the logic, so we skip Current if they cannot be
removed before checking all their uses. This is much more efficient in
practice.
It also adds a more aggressive limit for checking partially overlapping
stores. The main problem with overlapping stores is that we do not know
if they will lead to elimination until seeing all of them. This patch
limits adds a new limit for overlapping store candidates, which keeps
the number of modified overlapping stores roughly the same.
This is another substantial compile-time improvement (while also
increasing the number of stores eliminated). Geomean -O3 -0.67%,
ReleaseThinLTO -0.97%.
http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=0a929b6978a068af8ddb02d0d4714a2843dd8ba9&to=2e630629b43f64b60b282e90f0d96082fde2dacc&stat=instructions
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86487
For DSE with MemorySSA it is beneficial to manually traverse the
defining access, instead of using a MemorySSA walker, so we can
better control the number of steps together with other limits and
also weed out invalid/unprofitable paths early on.
This patch requires a follow-up patch to be most effective, which I will
share soon after putting this patch up.
This temporarily XFAIL's the limit tests, because we now explore more
MemoryDefs that may not alias/clobber the killing def. This will be
improved/fixed by the follow-up patch.
This patch also renames some `Dom*` variables to `Earlier*`, because the
dominance relation is not really used/important here and potentially
confusing.
This patch allows us to aggressively cut down compile time, geomean
-O3 -0.64%, ReleaseThinLTO -1.65%, at the expense of fewer stores
removed. Subsequent patches will increase the number of removed stores
again, while keeping compile-time in check.
http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=d8e3294118a8c5f3f97688a704d5a05b67646012&to=0a929b6978a068af8ddb02d0d4714a2843dd8ba9&stat=instructions
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86486
Currently we repeatedly check the same uses for read clobbers in some
cases. We can avoid unnecessary checks by keeping track of the memory
accesses we already found read clobbers for. To do so, we just add
memory access causing read-clobbers to a set. Note that marking all
visited accesses as read-clobbers would be to pessimistic, as that might
include accesses not on any path to the actual read clobber.
If we do not find any read-clobbers, we can add all visited instructions
to another set and use that to skip the same accesses in the next call.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75025
Using callCapturesBefore potentially improves the precision and the
number of stores we can remove. But in practice, it seems to have very
little impact in terms of stores removed. For example, for
SPEC2000/SPEC2006/MultiSource with -O3 -flto, ~50 more stores are
removed (out of ~26900 stores removed). But in terms of compile-time, it
is very expensive and the patch gives substantial compile-time
improvements: Geomean O3 -0.24%, ReleaseThinLTO -0.47%, ReleaseLTO-g
-0.39%.
http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=612a0bff88ed906c83b82f079d4c49e5fecfb9d0&to=e6c86b96d20d97dd88e903a409bd8d39b6114312&stat=instructions
Avoid computing InvisibleToCallerBefore/AfterRet up front. In most
cases, this information is not really needed. Instead, introduce helper
functions to compute and cache the result on demand.
Notably, this also does not use PointerMayBeCapturedBefore for
isInvisibleToCallerBeforeRet, as it requires the killing MemoryDef as
starting instruction, making the caching ineffective. But it appears the
use of PointerMayBeCapturedBefore has very limited benefits in practice
(e.g. on SPEC2000/SPEC2006/MultiSource there are no binary changes with
-O3 -flto). Refrain from using it for now, to limit-compile-time.
This gives some nice compile-time improvements:
http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=db9345f6810f379a36752dc52caf5230585d0ebd&to=b4d091047e1b8a3d377d200137b79d03aca65663&stat=instructions
Limit elimination of stores at the end of a function to MemoryDefs with
a single underlying object, to save compile time.
In practice, the case with multiple underlying objects seems not very
important in practice. For -O3 -flto on MultiSource/SPEC2000/SPEC2006
this results in a total of 2 more stores being eliminated.
We can always re-visit that in the future.
isWriteAtEndOfFunction needs to check all memory uses of Def, which is
much more expensive than getting the underlying objects in practice.
Switch the call order, as recommended by the TODO, which was added as
per an earlier review.
This shaves off a bit of compile-time.
Currently the code does not account for the fact that getDomMemoryDef
can be called with ScanLimit == 0, if we reached the limit while
processing an earlier access. Also tighten the check a bit more and bump
the scan limit now that it is handled properly.
In some cases, this brings a 2x speedup in terms of compile-time.
We are re-using tryToMergePartialOverlappingStores, which requires
earlier to domiante Later. In the long run,
tryToMergeParialOverlappingStores should be re-written using MemorySSA.
Fixes PR46513.
When the byref attribute is added, there will need to be two similar
functions for the existing cases which have an associate value copy,
and byref which does not. Most, but not all of the existing uses will
use the existing version.
The associated size function added by D82679 also needs to
contextually differ, and will help eliminate a few places still
relying on pointee element types.
This fixes an instance where MemorySSA-using Dead Store Elimination is failing
to do a transformation that the non-MemorySSA-using version does.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83783
This patch adds support for eliminating stores by free & lifetime.end
calls. We can remove stores that are not read before calling a memory
terminator and we can eliminate all stores after a memory terminator
until we see a new lifetime.start. The second case seems to not really
trigger much in practice though.
Reviewers: dmgreen, rnk, efriedma, bryant, asbirlea, Tyker
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72410
Summary:
Avoid exposing details about how roots are stored. This enables subsequent
type-erasure changes.
v5:
- cleanup a unit test by using EXPECT_EQ instead of EXPECT_TRUE
Change-Id: I532b774cc71f2224e543bc7d79131d97f63f093d
Reviewers: arsenm, RKSimon, mehdi_amini, courbet
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, hiraditya, kuhar, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83085
This patch add support for eliminating MemoryDefs that do not have any
aliasing users, which indicates that there are no reads/writes to the
memory location until the end of the function.
To eliminate such defs, we have to ensure that the underlying object is
not visible in the caller and does not escape via returning. We need a
separate check for that, as InvisibleToCaller does not consider returns.
Reviewers: dmgreen, rnk, efriedma, bryant, asbirlea, Tyker, george.burgess.iv
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72631
This patch extends storeIsNoop to also detect stores of 0 to an calloced
object. This basically ports the logic from legacy DSE to the MemorySSA
backed version.
It triggers in a few cases on MultiSource, SPEC2000, SPEC2006 with -O3
LTO:
Same hash: 218 (filtered out)
Remaining: 19
Metric: dse.NumNoopStores
Program base patch2 diff
test-suite...CFP2000/177.mesa/177.mesa.test 1.00 15.00 1400.0%
test-suite...6/482.sphinx3/482.sphinx3.test 1.00 14.00 1300.0%
test-suite...lications/ClamAV/clamscan.test 2.00 28.00 1300.0%
test-suite...CFP2006/433.milc/433.milc.test 1.00 8.00 700.0%
test-suite...pplications/oggenc/oggenc.test 2.00 9.00 350.0%
test-suite.../CINT2000/176.gcc/176.gcc.test 6.00 6.00 0.0%
test-suite.../CINT2006/403.gcc/403.gcc.test NaN 137.00 nan%
test-suite...libquantum/462.libquantum.test NaN 3.00 nan%
test-suite...6/464.h264ref/464.h264ref.test NaN 7.00 nan%
test-suite...decode/alacconvert-decode.test NaN 2.00 nan%
test-suite...encode/alacconvert-encode.test NaN 2.00 nan%
test-suite...ications/JM/ldecod/ldecod.test NaN 9.00 nan%
test-suite...ications/JM/lencod/lencod.test NaN 39.00 nan%
test-suite.../Applications/lemon/lemon.test NaN 2.00 nan%
test-suite...pplications/treecc/treecc.test NaN 4.00 nan%
test-suite...hmarks/McCat/08-main/main.test NaN 4.00 nan%
test-suite...nsumer-lame/consumer-lame.test NaN 3.00 nan%
test-suite.../Prolangs-C/bison/mybison.test NaN 1.00 nan%
test-suite...arks/mafft/pairlocalalign.test NaN 30.00 nan%
Reviewers: efriedma, zoecarver, asbirlea
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82204
This updates the MemorySSA backed implementation to treat arguments
passed by value similar to allocas: in they are assumed to be invisible
in the caller. This is similar to how they are treated in legacy DSE.
Reviewers: efriedma, asbirlea, george.burgess.iv
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82222
Currently we stop exploring candidates too early in some cases.
In particular, we can continue checking the defining accesses of
non-removable MemoryDefs and defs without analyzable write location
(read clobbers are already ruled out using MemorySSA at this point).
As we traverse the CFG backwards, we could end up reaching unreachable
blocks. For unreachable blocks, we won't have computed post order
numbers and because DomAccess is reachable, unreachable blocks cannot be
on any path from it.
This fixes a crash with unreachable blocks.
Port partial constant store merging logic to MemorySSA backed DSE. The
heavy lifting is done by the existing helper function. It is used in
context where we already ensured that the later instruction can
eliminate the earlier one, if it is a complete overwrite.
isOverwrite expects the later location as first argument and the earlier
result later. The adjusted call is intended to check whether CC
overwrites DefLoc.
This patch relaxes the post-dominance requirement for accesses to
objects visible after the function returns.
Instead of requiring the killing def to post-dominate the access to
eliminate, the set of 'killing blocks' (= blocks that completely
overwrite the original access) is collected.
If all paths from the access to eliminate and an exit block go through a
killing block, the access can be removed.
To check this property, we first get the common post-dominator block for
the killing blocks. If this block does not post-dominate the access
block, there may be a path from DomAccess to an exit block not involving
any killing block.
Otherwise we have to check if there is a path from the DomAccess to the
common post-dominator, that does not contain a killing block. If there
is no such path, we can remove DomAccess. For this check, we start at
the common post-dominator and then traverse the CFG backwards. Paths are
terminated when we hit a killing block or a block that is not executed
between DomAccess and a killing block according to the post-order
numbering (if the post order number of a block is greater than the one
of DomAccess, the block cannot be in in a path starting at DomAccess).
This gives the following improvements on the total number of stores
after DSE for MultiSource, SPEC2K, SPEC2006:
Tests: 237
Same hash: 206 (filtered out)
Remaining: 31
Metric: dse.NumRemainingStores
Program base new100 diff
test-suite...CFP2000/188.ammp/188.ammp.test 3624.00 3544.00 -2.2%
test-suite...ch/g721/g721encode/encode.test 128.00 126.00 -1.6%
test-suite.../Benchmarks/Olden/mst/mst.test 73.00 72.00 -1.4%
test-suite...CFP2006/433.milc/433.milc.test 3202.00 3163.00 -1.2%
test-suite...000/186.crafty/186.crafty.test 5062.00 5010.00 -1.0%
test-suite...-typeset/consumer-typeset.test 40460.00 40248.00 -0.5%
test-suite...Source/Benchmarks/sim/sim.test 642.00 639.00 -0.5%
test-suite...nchmarks/McCat/09-vor/vor.test 642.00 644.00 0.3%
test-suite...lications/sqlite3/sqlite3.test 35664.00 35563.00 -0.3%
test-suite...T2000/300.twolf/300.twolf.test 7202.00 7184.00 -0.2%
test-suite...lications/ClamAV/clamscan.test 19475.00 19444.00 -0.2%
test-suite...INT2000/164.gzip/164.gzip.test 2199.00 2196.00 -0.1%
test-suite...peg2/mpeg2dec/mpeg2decode.test 2380.00 2378.00 -0.1%
test-suite.../Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet.test 39335.00 39309.00 -0.1%
test-suite...:: External/Povray/povray.test 36951.00 36927.00 -0.1%
test-suite...marks/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test 67396.00 67356.00 -0.1%
test-suite...6/464.h264ref/464.h264ref.test 31497.00 31481.00 -0.1%
test-suite...006/453.povray/453.povray.test 51441.00 51416.00 -0.0%
test-suite...T2006/401.bzip2/401.bzip2.test 4450.00 4448.00 -0.0%
test-suite...Applications/kimwitu++/kc.test 23481.00 23471.00 -0.0%
test-suite...chmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs.test 6286.00 6284.00 -0.0%
test-suite.../CINT2000/254.gap/254.gap.test 13719.00 13715.00 -0.0%
test-suite.../Applications/SPASS/SPASS.test 30345.00 30338.00 -0.0%
test-suite...006/450.soplex/450.soplex.test 15018.00 15016.00 -0.0%
test-suite...ications/JM/lencod/lencod.test 27780.00 27777.00 -0.0%
test-suite.../CINT2006/403.gcc/403.gcc.test 105285.00 105276.00 -0.0%
There might be potential to pre-compute some of the information of which
blocks are on the path to an exit for each block, but the overall
benefit might be comparatively small.
On the set of benchmarks, 15738 times out of 20322 we reach the
CFG check, the CFG check is successful. The total number of iterations
in the CFG check is 187810, so on average we need less than 10 steps in
the check loop. Bumping the threshold in the loop from 50 to 150 gives a
few small improvements, but I don't think they warrant such a big bump
at the moment. This is all pending further tuning in the future.
Reviewers: dmgreen, bryant, asbirlea, Tyker, efriedma, george.burgess.iv
Reviewed By: george.burgess.iv
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78932
- Now all SalvageDebugInfo() calls will mark undef if the salvage
attempt fails.
Reviewed by: vsk, Orlando
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78369
This is D77454, except for stores. All the infrastructure work was done
for loads, so the remaining changes necessary are relatively small.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79968
