Users of VPValues are managed in a vector, so we need to be more
careful when iterating over users while updating them. For now, just
copy them.
Fixes 51798.
(cherry picked from commit 368af7558e55039e4e93c3eed68ce00da86e5e35)
This patch adds more instructions to the Uniforms list, for example certain
intrinsics that are uniform by definition or whose operands are loop invariant.
This list includes:
1. The intrinsics 'experimental.noalias.scope.decl' and 'sideeffect', which
are always uniform by definition.
2. If intrinsics 'lifetime.start', 'lifetime.end' and 'assume' have
loop invariant input operands then these are also uniform too.
Also, in VPRecipeBuilder::handleReplication we check if an instruction is
uniform based purely on whether or not the instruction lives in the Uniforms
list. However, there are certain cases where calls to some intrinsics can
be effectively treated as uniform too. Therefore, we now also treat the
following cases as uniform for scalable vectors:
1. If the 'assume' intrinsic's operand is not loop invariant, then we
are free to treat this as uniform anyway since it's only a performance
hint. We will get the benefit for the first lane.
2. When the input pointers for 'lifetime.start' and 'lifetime.end' are loop
variant then for scalable vectors we assume these still ultimately come
from the broadcast of an alloca. We do not support scalable vectorisation
of loops containing alloca instructions, hence the alloca itself would
be invariant. If the pointer does not come from an alloca then the
intrinsic itself has no effect.
I have updated the assume test for fixed width, since we now treat it
as uniform:
Transforms/LoopVectorize/assume.ll
I've also added new scalable vectorisation tests for other intriniscs:
Transforms/LoopVectorize/scalable-assume.ll
Transforms/LoopVectorize/scalable-lifetime.ll
Transforms/LoopVectorize/scalable-noalias-scope-decl.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107284
(cherry picked from commit 3fd96e1b2e129b981f1bc1be2615486187e74687)
Consider the following loop:
void foo(float *dst, float *src, int N) {
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
dst[i] = 0.0;
for (int j = 0; j < N; j++) {
dst[i] += src[(i * N) + j];
}
}
}
When we are not building with -Ofast we may attempt to vectorise the
inner loop using ordered reductions instead. In addition we also try
to select an appropriate interleave count for the inner loop. However,
when choosing a VF=1 the inner loop will be scalar and there is existing
code in selectInterleaveCount that limits the interleave count to 2
for reductions due to concerns about increasing the critical path.
For ordered reductions this problem is even worse due to the additional
data dependency, and so I've added code to simply disable interleaving
for scalar ordered reductions for now.
Test added here:
Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/strict-fadd-vf1.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106646
The loop vectorizer may decide to use tail folding when the trip-count
is low. When that happens, scalable VFs are no longer a candidate,
since tail folding/predication is not yet supported for scalable vectors.
This can be re-enabled in a future patch.
Reviewed By: kmclaughlin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106657
Invalid costs can be used to avoid vectorization with a given VF, which is
used for scalable vectors to avoid things that the code-generator cannot
handle. If we override the cost using the -force-target-instruction-cost
option of the LV, we would override this mechanism, rendering the flag useless.
This change ensures the cost is only overriden when the original cost that
was calculated is valid. That allows the flag to be used in combination
with the -scalable-vectorization option.
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106677
Scalarization for scalable vectors is not (yet) supported, so the
LV discards a VF when scalarization is chosen as the widening
decision. It should therefore not assert that the VF is not scalable
when it computes the decision to scalarize.
The code can get here when both the interleave-cost, gather/scatter cost
and scalarization-cost are all illegal. This may e.g. happen for SVE
when the VF=1, to avoid generating `<vscale x 1 x eltty>` types that
the code-generator cannot yet handle.
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106656
This fixes an issue that was found in D105199, where a GEP instruction
is used both as the address of a store, as well as the value of a store.
For the former, the value is scalar after vectorization, but the latter
(as value) requires widening.
Other code in that function seems to prevent similar cases from happening,
but it seems this case was missed.
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106164
This reverts the revert commit b1777b04dc4b1a9fee0e7effa7e177892ab32ef0.
The patch originally got reverted due to a crash:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1232798#c2
The underlying issue was that we were not using the stored values from
the modified memory recipes, but the out-of-date values directly from
the IR (accessed via the VPlan). This should be fixed in d995d6376. A
reduced version of the reproducer has been added in 93664503be6b.
Need to fix several cost-related problems. The final type may be defined
incorrectly because of to early definition (we may end up with the wider
type), the CommonCost should not be redefined in ExtractElements
cost related calculations and the shuffle of the final insertelements
vectors should be calculated as a cost of single vector permutations
+ costs of two vector permutations for other n-1 incoming vectors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106578
Fixes more casts to `<FixedVectorType>` for the cases where the
instruction is a Insert/ExtractElementInst.
For fixed-width, this part of truncateToMinimalBitWidths is tested by
AArch64/type-shrinkage-insertelt.ll. I attempted to write a test case for this part
of truncateToMinimalBitWidths which uses scalable vectors, but was unable to add
one. The tests in type-shrinkage-insertelt.ll rely on scalarization to create extract
element instructions for instance, which is not possible for scalable vectors.
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106163
Need to fix several cost-related problems. The final type may be defined
incorrectly because of to early definition (we may end up with the wider
type), the CommonCost should not be redefined in ExtractElements
cost related calculations and the shuffle of the final insertelements
vectors should be calculated as a cost of single vector permutations
+ costs of two vector permutations for other n-1 incoming vectors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106578
Instead of getting the VPValue for the stored IR values through the
current plan, use the stored value of the recipes directly.
This way, the correct VPValues are used if the store recipes have been
modified in the VPlan and the IR value is not correct any longer. This
can happen, e.g. due to D105008.
I have added a new FastMathFlags parameter to getArithmeticReductionCost
to indicate what type of reduction we are performing:
1. Tree-wise. This is the typical fast-math reduction that involves
continually splitting a vector up into halves and adding each
half together until we get a scalar result. This is the default
behaviour for integers, whereas for floating point we only do this
if reassociation is allowed.
2. Ordered. This now allows us to estimate the cost of performing
a strict vector reduction by treating it as a series of scalar
operations in lane order. This is the case when FP reassociation
is not permitted. For scalable vectors this is more difficult
because at compile time we do not know how many lanes there are,
and so we use the worst case maximum vscale value.
I have also fixed getTypeBasedIntrinsicInstrCost to pass in the
FastMathFlags, which meant fixing up some X86 tests where we always
assumed the vector.reduce.fadd/mul intrinsics were 'fast'.
New tests have been added here:
Analysis/CostModel/AArch64/reduce-fadd.ll
Analysis/CostModel/AArch64/sve-intrinsics.ll
Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/strict-fadd-cost.ll
Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/sve-strict-fadd-cost.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105432
Makes clang crash: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105008#2903350
This reverts commit d2a73fb44ea0b8c981e4b923f811f18793fc4770.
Also revert a minor formatting follow-up:
This reverts commit 82834a673246f27a541ffcc57e0eb65b008102ef.
This patch avoids computing discounts for predicated instructions when the
VF is scalable.
There is no support for vectorization of loops with division because the
vectorizer cannot guarantee that zero divisions will not happen.
This loop now does not use VF scalable
```
for (long long i = 0; i < n; i++)
if (cond[i])
a[i] /= b[i];
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101916
Currently the Instruction cost of getReductionPatternCost returns an
Invalid cost to specify "did not find the pattern". This changes that to
return an Optional with None specifying not found, allowing Invalid to
mean an infinite cost as is used elsewhere.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106140
This patch removes the assertion when VF is scalable and replaces
getKnownMinValue() by getFixedValue(), so it still guards the code against
scalable vector types.
The assertions were used to guarantee that getknownMinValue were not used for
scalable vectors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106359
This patch adds a VPFirstOrderRecurrencePHIRecipe, to further untangle
VPWidenPHIRecipe into distinct recipes for distinct use cases/lowering.
See D104989 for a new recipe for reduction phis.
This patch also introduces a new `FirstOrderRecurrenceSplice`
VPInstruction opcode, which is used to make the forming of the vector
recurrence value explicit in VPlan. This more accurately models def-uses
in VPlan and also simplifies code-generation. Now, the vector recurrence
values are created at the right place during VPlan-codegeneration,
rather than during post-VPlan fixups.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105008
The incoming values for PHI nodes may come from unreachable BasicBlocks,
need to handle this case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106264
Part of D105020. Also, fixed FIXMEs that need to use wider vector type
when trying to calculate the cost of reused scalars. This may cause
regressions unless D100486 is landed to improve the cost estimations
for long vectors shuffling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106060
The cost of the InsertSubvector shuffle kind cost is not complete and
may end up with just extracts + inserts costs in many cases. Added
a workaround to represent it as a generic PermuteSingleSrc, which is
still pessimistic but better than InsertSubvector.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105827
This patch returns an Invalid cost from getInstructionCost() for alloca
instructions if the VF is scalable, as otherwise loops which contain
these instructions will crash when attempting to scalarize the alloca.
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105824
The original patch was:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D105806
There were some issues with undeterministic behaviour of the sorting
function, which led to scalable-call.ll passing and/or failing. This
patch fixes the issue by numbering all instructions in the array first,
and using that number as the order, which should provide a consistent
ordering.
This reverts commit a607f64118240f70bf1b14ec121b65f49d63800d.
This bug was introduced with D105730 / 25ee55c0baff .
If we are not converting all of the operations of a reduction
into a vector op, we need to preserve the existing select form
of the remaining ops. Otherwise, we are potentially leaking
poison where it did not in the original code.
Alive2 agrees that the version that freezes some inputs
and then falls back to scalar is correct:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/erF4K2
This change enables vectorization of multiple exit loops when the exit count is statically computable. That requirement - shared with the rest of LV - in turn requires each exit to be analyzeable and to dominate the latch.
The majority of work to support this was done in a set of previous patches. In particular,, 72314466 avoids having multiple edges from the middle block to the exits, and 4b33b2387 which added support for non-latch single exit and multiple exits with a single exiting block. As a result, this change is basically just removing a bailout and adjusting some tests now that the prerequisite work is done and has stuck in tree for a bit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105817
This reverts commit efaf3099c8cec1954831ee28a2f75a72096f50eb.
This reverts commit dc7bdc1e7121693df112f2fdb11cc6b88580ba4b.
Reverting patches due to buildbot failures.
The sort function for emitting an OptRemark was not deterministic,
which caused scalable-call.ll to fail on some buildbots. This patch
fixes that.
This patch also fixes an issue where `Instruction::comesBefore()`
is called when two Instructions are in different basic blocks,
which would otherwise cause an assertion failure.
This patch emits remarks for instructions that have invalid costs for
a given set of vectorization factors. Some example output:
t.c:4:19: remark: Instruction with invalid costs prevented vectorization at VF=(vscale x 1): load
dst[i] = sinf(src[i]);
^
t.c:4:14: remark: Instruction with invalid costs prevented vectorization at VF=(vscale x 1, vscale x 2, vscale x 4): call to llvm.sin.f32
dst[i] = sinf(src[i]);
^
t.c:4:12: remark: Instruction with invalid costs prevented vectorization at VF=(vscale x 1): store
dst[i] = sinf(src[i]);
^
Reviewed By: fhahn, kmclaughlin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105806
The cost of the InsertSubvector shuffle kind cost is not complete and
may end up with just extracts + inserts costs in many cases. Added
a workaround to represent it as a generic PermuteSingleSrc, which is
still pessimistic but better than InsertSubvector.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105827
This has been a work-in-progress for a long time...we finally have all of
the pieces in place to handle vectorization of compare code as shown in:
https://llvm.org/PR41312
To do this (see PhaseOrdering tests), we converted SimplifyCFG and
InstCombine to the poison-safe (select) forms of the logic ops, so now we
need to have SLP recognize those patterns and insert a freeze op to make
a safe reduction:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/NH54Ah
We get the minimal patterns with this patch, but the PhaseOrdering tests
show that we still need adjustments to get the ideal IR in some or all of
the motivating cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105730
The const version of VPValue::getVPValue still had a default value for
the value index. Remove the default value and use getVPSingleValue
instead, which is the proper function.
Instead of performing the isMoreProfitable() operation on
InstructionCost::CostTy the operation is performed on InstructionCost
directly, so that it can handle the case where one of the costs is
Invalid.
This patch also changes the CostTy to be int64_t, so that the type is
wide enough to deal with multiplications with e.g. `unsigned MaxTripCount`.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105113
This makes it clearer when we have encountered the extra arg.
Also, we may need to adjust the way the operand iteration
works when handling logical and/or.
This is NFC-intended currently (so no test diffs). The motivation
is to eventually allow matching for poison-safe logical-and and
logical-or (these are in the form of a select-of-bools).
( https://llvm.org/PR41312 )
Those patterns will not have all of the same constraints as min/max
in the form of cmp+sel. We may also end up removing the cmp+sel
min/max matching entirely (if we canonicalize to intrinsics), so
this will make that step easier.
This patch removes the IsPairwiseForm flag from the Reduction Cost TTI
hooks, along with some accompanying code for pattern matching reductions
from trees starting at extract elements. IsPairWise is now assumed to be
false, which was the predominant way that the value was used from both
the Loop and SLP vectorizers. Since the adjustments such as D93860, the
SLP vectorizer has not relied upon this distinction between paiwise and
non-pairwise reductions.
This also removes some code that was detecting reductions trees starting
from extract elements inside the costmodel. This case was
double-counting costs though, adding the individual costs on the
individual instruction _and_ the total cost of the reduction. Removing
it changes the costs in llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/X86/reduction.ll to
not double count. The cost of reduction intrinsics is still tested
through the various tests in
llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/X86/reduce-xyz.ll.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105484
Patch tries to improve the vectorization of stores. Originally, we just
check the type and the base pointer of the store.
Patch adds some extra checks to avoid non-profitable vectorization
cases. It includes analysis of the scalar values to be stored and
triggers the vectorization attempt only if the scalar values have
same/alt opcode and are from same basic block, i.e. we don't end up
immediately with the gather node, which is not profitable.
This also improves compile time by filtering out non-profitable cases.
Part of D57059.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104122
Revived D101297 in its original form + added some changes in X86
legalization cehcking for masked gathers.
This solution is the most stable and the most correct one. We have to
check the legality before trying to build the masked gather in SLP.
Without this check we have incorrect cost (for SLP) in case if the masked gather
is not legal/slower than the gather. And we're missing some
vectorization opportunities.
This can be fixed in the cost model, but in this case we need to add
special checks for the cost of GEPs for ScatterVectorize node, add
special check for small trees, etc., i.e. there are a lot of corner
cases here and there, which insrease code base and make it harder to
maintain the code.
> Can't we rely on cost model to deal with this? This can be profitable for futher vectorization, when we can start from such gather loads as seed.
The question from D101297. Actually, no, it can't. Actually, simple
gather may give us better result, especially after we started
vectorization of insertelements. Plus, like I said before, the cost for
non-legal masked gathers leads to missed vectorization opportunities.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105042
The reduction matching was probably only dealing with binops
when it was written, but we have now generalized it to handle
select and intrinsics too, so assert on that too.
Resubmit after the following changes:
* Fix a latent bug related to unrolling with required epilogue (see e49d65f). I believe this is the cause of the prior PPC buildbot failure.
* Disable non-latch exits for epilogue vectorization to be safe (9ffa90d)
* Split out assert movement (600624a) to reduce churn if this gets reverted again.
Previous commit message (try 3)
Resubmit after fixing test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/ARM/mve-gather-scatter-tailpred.ll
Previous commit message...
This is a resubmit of 3e5ce4 (which was reverted by 7fe41ac). The original commit caused a PPC build bot failure we never really got to the bottom of. I can't reproduce the issue, and the bot owner was non-responsive. In the meantime, we stumbled across an issue which seems possibly related, and worked around a latent bug in 80e8025. My best guess is that the original patch exposed that latent issue at higher frequency, but it really is just a guess.
Original commit message follows...
If we know that the scalar epilogue is required to run, modify the CFG to end the middle block with an unconditional branch to scalar preheader. This is instead of a conditional branch to either the preheader or the exit block.
The motivation to do this is to support multiple exit blocks. Specifically, the current structure forces us to identify immediate dominators and *which* exit block to branch from in the middle terminator. For the multiple exit case - where we know require scalar will hold - these questions are ill formed.
This is the last change needed to support multiple exit loops, but since the diffs are already large enough, I'm going to land this, and then enable separately. You can think of this as being NFCIish prep work, but the changes are a bit too involved for me to feel comfortable tagging the review that way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94892
Florian Hahn