Summary:
The function SplitCriticalEdge (called by SplitEdge) can return a nullptr in
cases where the edge is a critical. SplitEdge uses SplitCriticalEdge assuming it
can always split all critical edges, which is an incorrect assumption.
The three cases where the function SplitCriticalEdge will return a nullptr is:
1. DestBB is an exception block
2. Options.IgnoreUnreachableDests is set to true and
isa(DestBB->getFirstNonPHIOrDbgOrLifetime()) is not equal to a nullptr
3. LoopSimplify form must be preserved (Options.PreserveLoopSimplify is true)
and it cannot be maintained for a loop due to indirect branches
For each of these situations they are handled in the following way:
1. Modified the function ehAwareSplitEdge originally from
llvm/lib/Transforms/Coroutines/CoroFrame.cpp to handle the cases when the DestBB
is an exception block. This function is called directly in SplitEdge.
SplitEdge does not call SplitCriticalEdge in this case
2. Options.IgnoreUnreachableDests is set to false by default, so this situation
does not apply.
3. Return a nullptr in this situation since the SplitCriticalEdge also returned
nullptr. Nothing we can do in this case.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision:https://reviews.llvm.org/D94619
This PR implements the function splitBasicBlockBefore to address an
issue
that occurred during SplitEdge(BB, Succ, ...), inside splitBlockBefore.
The issue occurs in SplitEdge when the Succ has a single predecessor
and the edge between the BB and Succ is not critical. This produces
the result ‘BB->Succ->New’. The new function splitBasicBlockBefore
was added to splitBlockBefore to handle the issue and now produces
the correct result ‘BB->New->Succ’.
Below is an example of splitting the block bb1 at its first instruction.
/// Original IR
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlock
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
br bb1.split
bb1.split:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlockBefore
bb0:
br bb1.split
bb1.split
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92200
This PR implements the function splitBasicBlockBefore to address an
issue
that occurred during SplitEdge(BB, Succ, ...), inside splitBlockBefore.
The issue occurs in SplitEdge when the Succ has a single predecessor
and the edge between the BB and Succ is not critical. This produces
the result ‘BB->Succ->New’. The new function splitBasicBlockBefore
was added to splitBlockBefore to handle the issue and now produces
the correct result ‘BB->New->Succ’.
Below is an example of splitting the block bb1 at its first instruction.
/// Original IR
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlock
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
br bb1.split
bb1.split:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlockBefore
bb0:
br bb1.split
bb1.split
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92200
This PR implements the function splitBasicBlockBefore to address an
issue
that occurred during SplitEdge(BB, Succ, ...), inside splitBlockBefore.
The issue occurs in SplitEdge when the Succ has a single predecessor
and the edge between the BB and Succ is not critical. This produces
the result ‘BB->Succ->New’. The new function splitBasicBlockBefore
was added to splitBlockBefore to handle the issue and now produces
the correct result ‘BB->New->Succ’.
Below is an example of splitting the block bb1 at its first instruction.
/// Original IR
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlock
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
br bb1.split
bb1.split:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlockBefore
bb0:
br bb1.split
bb1.split
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92200
PassManager.h is one of the top headers in the ClangBuildAnalyzer frontend worst offenders list.
This exposes a large number of implicit dependencies on various forward declarations/includes in other headers that need addressing.
Hide the method that allows setting probability for particular edge
and introduce a public method that sets probabilities for all
outgoing edges at once.
Setting individual edge probability is error prone. More over it is
difficult to check that the total probability is 1.0 because there is
no easy way to know when the user finished setting all
the probabilities.
Related bug is fixed in BranchProbabilityInfo::calcMetadataWeights().
Changing unreachable branch probabilities to raw(1) and distributing
the rest (oldProbability - raw(1)) over the reachable branches could
introduce total probability inaccuracy bigger than 1/numOfBranches.
Reviewers: yamauchi, ebrevnov
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79396
Splitting critical edges for indirect branches
the SplitIndirectBrCriticalEdges() function may break branch
probabilities if target basic block happens to have unset
a probability for any of its successors. That is because in
such cases the getEdgeProbability(Target) function returns
probability 1/NumOfSuccessors and it is called after Target
was split (thus Target has a single successor). As the result
the correspondent successor of the split block gets
probability 100% but 1/NumOfSuccessors is expected (or better
be left unset).
Reviewers: yamauchi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78806
Summary:
Extract the functionality of eliminating unreachable basic blocks
within a function, previously encapsulated within the
-unreachableblockelim pass, and make it available as a function within
BlockUtils.h. No functional change intended other than making the logic
reusable.
Exposing this logic makes it easier to implement
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59068, which fixes coroutines bug
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40979.
Reviewers: mkazantsev, wmi, davidxl, silvas, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59069
llvm-svn: 355846
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
