I think byval/sret and the others are close to being able to rip out
the code to support the missing type case. A lot of this code is
shared with inalloca, so catch this up to the others so that can
happen.
This commit fixes how metadata is handled in CloneModule to be sound,
and improves how it's handled in CloneFunctionInto (although the latter
is still awkward when called within a module).
Ruiling Song pointed out in PR48841 that CloneModule was changed to
unsoundly use the RF_ReuseAndMutateDistinctMDs flag (renamed in
fa35c1f80f0ea080a7cbc581416929b0a654f25c for clarity). This flag papered
over a crash caused by other various changes made to CloneFunctionInto
over the past few years that made it unsound to use cloning between
different modules.
(This commit partially addresses PR48841, fixing the repro from
preprocessed source but not textual IR. MDNodeMapper::mapDistinctNode
became unsound in df763188c9a1ecb1e7e5c4d4ea53a99fbb755903 and this
commit does not address that regression.)
RF_ReuseAndMutateDistinctMDs is designed for the IRMover to use,
avoiding unnecessary clones of all referenced metadata when linking
between modules (with IRMover, the source module is discarded after
linking). It never makes sense to use when you're not discarding the
source. This commit drops its incorrect use in CloneModule.
Sadly, the right thing to do with metadata when cloning a function is
complicated, and this patch doesn't totally fix it.
The first problem is that there are two different types of referenceable
metadata and it's not obvious what to with one of them when remapping.
- `!0 = !{!1}` is metadata's version of a constant. Programatically it's
called "uniqued" (probably a better term would be "constant") because,
like `ConstantArray`, it's stored in uniquing tables. Once it's
constructed, it's illegal to change its arguments.
- `!0 = distinct !{!1}` is a bit closer to a global variable. It's legal
to change the operands after construction.
What should be done with distinct metadata when cloning functions within
the same module?
- Should new, cloned nodes be created?
- Should all references point to the same, old nodes?
The answer depends on whether that metadata is effectively owned by a
function.
And that's the second problem. Referenceable metadata's ownership model
is not clear or explicit. Technically, it's all stored on an
LLVMContext. However, any metadata that is `distinct`, that transitively
references a `distinct` node, or that transitively references a
GlobalValue is specific to a Module and is effectively owned by it. More
specifically, some metadata is effectively owned by a specific Function
within a module.
Effectively function-local metadata was introduced somewhere around
c10d0e5ccd12f049bddb24dcf8bbb7fbbc6c68f2, which made it illegal for two
functions to share a DISubprogram attachment.
When cloning a function within a module, you need to clone the
function-local debug info and suppress cloning of global debug info (the
status quo suppresses cloning some global debug info but not all). When
cloning a function to a new/different module, you need to clone all of
the debug info.
Here's what I think we should do (eventually? soon? not this patch
though):
- Distinguish explicitly (somehow) between pure constant metadata owned
by the LLVMContext, global metadata owned by the Module, and local
metadata owned by a GlobalValue (such as a function).
- Update CloneFunctionInto to trigger cloning of all "local" metadata
(only), perhaps by adding a bit to RemapFlag. Alternatively, split
out a separate function CloneFunctionMetadataInto to prime the
metadata map that callers are updated to call ahead of time as
appropriate.
Here's the somewhat more isolated fix in this patch:
- Converted the `ModuleLevelChanges` parameter to `CloneFunctionInto` to
an enum called `CloneFunctionChangeType` that is one of
LocalChangesOnly, GlobalChanges, DifferentModule, and ClonedModule.
- The code maintaining the "functions uniquely own subprograms"
invariant is now only active in the first two cases, where a function
is being cloned within a single module. That's necessary because this
code inhibits cloning of (some) "global" metadata that's effectively
owned by the module.
- The code maintaining the "all compile units must be explicitly
referenced by !llvm.dbg.cu" invariant is now only active in the
DifferentModule case, where a function is being cloned into a new
module in isolation.
- CoroSplit.cpp's call to CloneFunctionInto in CoroCloner::create
uses LocalChangeOnly, since fa635d730f74f3285b77cc1537f1692184b8bf5b
only set `ModuleLevelChanges` to trigger cloning of local metadata.
- CloneModule drops its unsound use of RF_ReuseAndMutateDistinctMDs
and special handling of !llvm.dbg.cu.
- Fixed some outdated header docs and left a couple of FIXMEs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96531
When trying to enable -debug-info-kind=constructor there was an assert
that occurs during debug info cloning ("mismatched subprogram between
llvm.dbg.value variable and !dbg attachment").
It appears that during llvm::CloneFunctionInto, a DISubprogram could be
duplicated when MapMetadata is called, and then added to the MD map again
when DIFinder gets a list of subprograms. This results in two different
versions of the DISubprogram.
This patch switches the order so that the DIFinder subprograms are
added before MapMetadata is called.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46784
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86185
Commit d77ae1552fc21a9f3877f3ed7e13d631f517c825
("[DebugInfo] Support to emit debugInfo for extern variables")
added deebugInfo for extern variables for BPF target.
The commit is reverted by 891e25b02d760d0de18c7d46947913b3166047e7
as the committed tests using %clang instead of %clang_cc1 causing
test failed in certain scenarios as reported by Reid Kleckner.
This patch fixed the tests by using %clang_cc1.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71818
This reverts commit d77ae1552fc21a9f3877f3ed7e13d631f517c825.
The tests committed along with this change do not pass, and should be
changed to use %clang_cc1.
Extern variable usage in BPF is different from traditional
pure user space application. Recent discussion in linux bpf
mailing list has two use cases where debug info types are
required to use extern variables:
- extern types are required to have a suitable interface
in libbpf (bpf loader) to provide kernel config parameters
to bpf programs.
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzYCNo5GeVGMhp3fhysQ=_axAf=23PtwaZs-yAyafmXC9g@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
- extern types are required so kernel bpf verifier can
verify program which uses external functions more precisely.
This will make later link with actual external function no
need to reverify.
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/87eez4odqp.fsf@toke.dk/T/#m8d5c3e87ffe7f2764e02d722cb0d8cbc136880ed
This patch added clang support to emit debuginfo for extern variables
with a TargetInfo hook to enable it. The debuginfo for the
extern variable is emitted only if that extern variable is
referenced in the current compilation unit.
Currently, only BPF target enables to generate debug info for
extern variables. The emission of such debuginfo is disabled for C++
at this moment since BPF only supports a subset of C language.
Emission with C++ can be enabled later if an appropriate use case
is identified.
-fstandalone-debug permits us to see more debuginfo with the cost
of bloated binary size. This patch did not add emission of extern
variable debug info with -fstandalone-debug. This can be
re-evaluated if there is a real need.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70696
...cloning a function from a different module
Currently when a function with debug info is cloned from a different module, the
cloned function may have hanging DICompileUnits, so that the module with the
cloned function fails debug info verification.
The proposed fix inserts all DICompileUnits reachable from the cloned function
to "llvm.dbg.cu" metadata operands of the cloned function module.
Reviewed By: aprantl, efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66510
Patch by Oleg Pliss (Oleg.Pliss@azul.com)
llvm-svn: 370265
loop
Summary:
Do the cloning in two steps, first allocate all the new loops, then
clone the basic blocks in the same order as the original loop.
Reviewer: Meinersbur, fhahn, kbarton, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: hfinkel, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tag: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64224
Differential Revision:
llvm-svn: 365366
DomTreeUpdater depends on headers from Analysis, but is in IR. This is a
layering violation since Analysis depends on IR. Relocate this code from IR
to Analysis to fix the layering violation.
llvm-svn: 353265
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This will hold flags specific to subprograms. In the future
we could potentially free up scarce bits in DIFlags by moving
subprogram-specific flags from there to the new flags word.
This patch does not change IR/bitcode formats, that will be
done in a follow-up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54597
llvm-svn: 347239
This patch updates DuplicateInstructionsInSplitBetween to update a DTU
instead of applying updates to the DT directly.
Given that there only are 2 users, also updated them in this patch to
avoid churn.
I slightly moved the code in CallSiteSplitting around to reduce the
places where we have to pass in DTU. If necessary, I could split those
changes in a separate patch.
This fixes missing DT updates when dealing with musttail calls in
CallSiteSplitting, by using DTU->deleteBB.
Reviewers: junbuml, kuhar, NutshellySima, indutny, brzycki
Reviewed By: NutshellySima
llvm-svn: 346769
