Summary:
This class is a list of AttributeSetNodes corresponding the function
prototype of a call or function declaration. This class used to be
called ParamAttrListPtr, then AttrListPtr, then AttributeSet. It is
typically accessed by parameter and return value index, so
"AttributeList" seems like a more intuitive name.
Rename AttributeSetImpl to AttributeListImpl to follow suit.
It's useful to rename this class so that we can rename AttributeSetNode
to AttributeSet later. AttributeSet is the set of attributes that apply
to a single function, argument, or return value.
Reviewers: sanjoy, javed.absar, chandlerc, pete
Reviewed By: pete
Subscribers: pete, jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, mehdi_amini, jfb, nhaehnle, sbc100, void, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31102
llvm-svn: 298393
Summary:
Some frontends emit a speculate-and-select idiom for sqrt, wherein they compute
sqrt(x), check if x is negative, and select NaN if it is:
%cmp = fcmp olt double %a, -0.000000e+00
%sqrt = call double @llvm.sqrt.f64(double %a)
%ret = select i1 %cmp, double 0x7FF8000000000000, double %sqrt
This is technically UB as the LangRef is written today if %a is ever less than
-0. But emitting code that's compliant with the current definition of sqrt
would require a branch, which would then prevent us from matching this idiom in
SelectionDAG (which we do today -- ISD::FSQRT has defined behavior on negative
inputs), because SelectionDAG looks at one BB at a time.
Nothing in LLVM takes advantage of this undefined behavior, as far as we can
tell, and the fact that llvm.sqrt has UB dates from its initial addition to the
LangRef.
Reviewers: arsenm, mehdi_amini, hfinkel
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28797
llvm-svn: 293242
Summary:
The LibFunc::Func enum holds enumerators named for libc functions.
Unfortunately, there are real situations, including libc implementations, where
function names are actually macros (musl uses "#define fopen64 fopen", for
example; any other transitively visible macro would have similar effects).
Strictly speaking, a conforming C++ Standard Library should provide any such
macros as functions instead (via <cstdio>). However, there are some "library"
functions which are not part of the standard, and thus not subject to this
rule (fopen64, for example). So, in order to be both portable and consistent,
the enum should not use the bare function names.
The old enum naming used a namespace LibFunc and an enum Func, with bare
enumerators. This patch changes LibFunc to be an enum with enumerators prefixed
with "LibFFunc_". (Unfortunately, a scoped enum is not sufficient to override
macros.)
There are additional changes required in clang.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mzolotukhin, nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28476
llvm-svn: 292848
Add missing fabs(fpext) optimzation that worked with the call,
and also fixes it creating a second fpext when there were multiple
uses.
llvm-svn: 292172
fabs(x * x) is not generally safe to assume x is positive if x is a NaN.
This is also less general than it could be, so this will be replaced
with a transformation on the intrinsic.
llvm-svn: 291359
Lowering to llvm.cttz() will result in constant folding anyway
if the argument to ffs is a constant. Pointed out by Eli for
fls() in D14590.
llvm-svn: 289888
After r289755, the AssumptionCache is no longer needed. Variables affected by
assumptions are now found by using the new operand-bundle-based scheme. This
new scheme is more computationally efficient, and also we need much less
code...
llvm-svn: 289756
At least the plugin used by the LibreOffice build
(<https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Clang_plugins>) indirectly
uses those members (through inline functions in LLVM/Clang include files in turn
using them), but they are not exported by utils/extract_symbols.py on Windows,
and accessing data across DLL/EXE boundaries on Windows is generally
problematic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26671
llvm-svn: 289647
Teach SimplifyLibcalls that in can treat functions annotated with
apcs, aapcs or aapcs_vfp like normal C functions if they only take
and return integer or pointer values, and the target is not iOS.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24453
llvm-svn: 281322
Hal pointed out that the semantic of our intrinsic and the libc
call are slightly different. Add a comment while I'm here to
explain why we can't emit an intrinsic. Thanks Hal!
llvm-svn: 278200
I tried to be as close as possible to the strongest check that
existed before; cleaning these up properly is left for future work.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19469
llvm-svn: 267758
The destination buffer that sprintf uses is restrict qualified, we do
not need to worry about derived pointers referenced via format
specifiers.
This reverts commit r267580.
llvm-svn: 267605
sprintf doesn't read or copy the terminating null byte from it's string
operands. sprintf will append it's own after processing all of the
format specifiers.
This fixes PR27526.
llvm-svn: 267580
Removed some unused headers, replaced some headers with forward class declarations.
Found using simple scripts like this one:
clear && ack --cpp -l '#include "llvm/ADT/IndexedMap.h"' | xargs grep -L 'IndexedMap[<]' | xargs grep -n --color=auto 'IndexedMap'
Patch by Eugene Kosov <claprix@yandex.ru>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19219
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 266595
We already skip optimizations if the return value
of printf() is used, so CI->use_empty() is always
true.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18656
llvm-svn: 265253
The sinpi/cospi can be replaced with sincospi to remove unnecessary
computations. However, we need to make sure that the calls are within
the same function!
This fixes PR26993.
llvm-svn: 263875
This is a step towards solving PR25892:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25892
It won't handle the reported case. As noted by the 'TODO' comments in the patch,
we need to relax the hasOneUse() constraint and also match patterns that include
memset_chk() and the llvm.memset() intrinsic in addition to memset().
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16337
llvm-svn: 258816
Use the helper function added in r258428.
The check should really be hoisted to the caller of all of these
optimize* functions, but that's another step.
llvm-svn: 258446
This is similar to the bug/fix:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26211http://reviews.llvm.org/rL258325
The fmin() test case reveals another bug caused by sloppy
code duplication. It will crash without this patch because
fp128 is a valid floating-point type, but we would think
that we had matched a function that used doubles.
The new helper function can be used to replace similar
checks that are used in several other places in this file.
llvm-svn: 258428
The test case will crash without this patch because the subsequent call to
hasUnsafeAlgebra() assumes that the call instruction is an FPMathOperator
(ie, returns an FP type).
This part of the function signature check was omitted for the sqrt() case,
but seems to be in place for all other transforms.
Before:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL257400
...we would have needlessly continued execution in optimizeSqrt(), but the
bug was harmless because we'd eventually fail some other check and return
without damage.
This should fix:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26211
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16198
llvm-svn: 258325
This is a continuation of adding FMF to call instructions:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL255555
As with D15937, the intent of the patch is to preserve the current behavior of the transform
except that we use the pow call's 'fast' attribute as a trigger rather than a function-level
attribute.
The TODO comment notes a potential follow-on patch that would propagate FMF to the new
instructions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16122
llvm-svn: 258153
This is a continuation of adding FMF to call instructions:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL255555
The intent of the patch is to preserve the current behavior of the transform except
that we use the sqrt instruction's 'fast' attribute as a trigger rather than the
function-level attribute.
But this raises a bug noted by the new FIXME comment.
In order to do this transform:
sqrt((x * x) * y) ---> fabs(x) * sqrt(y)
...we need all of the sqrt, the first fmul, and the second fmul to be 'fast'.
If any of those ops is strict, we should bail out.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15937
llvm-svn: 257400
