Now we only support returning Optional<> values and have changed all clients over to use Optional::getValueOr().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28569
llvm-svn: 291686
the latter to the Transforms library.
While the loop PM uses an analysis to form the IR units, the current
plan is to have the PM itself establish and enforce both loop simplified
form and LCSSA. This would be a layering violation in the analysis
library.
Fundamentally, the idea behind the loop PM is to *transform* loops in
addition to running passes over them, so it really seemed like the most
natural place to sink this was into the transforms library.
We can't just move *everything* because we also have loop analyses that
rely on a subset of the invariants. So this patch splits the the loop
infrastructure into the analysis management that has to be part of the
analysis library, and the transform-aware pass manager.
This also required splitting the loop analyses' printer passes out to
the transforms library, which makes sense to me as running these will
transform the code into LCSSA in theory.
I haven't split the unittest though because testing one component
without the other seems nearly intractable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28452
llvm-svn: 291662
arguments much like the CGSCC pass manager.
This is a major redesign following the pattern establish for the CGSCC layer to
support updates to the set of loops during the traversal of the loop nest and
to support invalidation of analyses.
An additional significant burden in the loop PM is that so many passes require
access to a large number of function analyses. Manually ensuring these are
cached, available, and preserved has been a long-standing burden in LLVM even
with the help of the automatic scheduling in the old pass manager. And it made
the new pass manager extremely unweildy. With this design, we can package the
common analyses up while in a function pass and make them immediately available
to all the loop passes. While in some cases this is unnecessary, I think the
simplicity afforded is worth it.
This does not (yet) address loop simplified form or LCSSA form, but those are
the next things on my radar and I have a clear plan for them.
While the patch is very large, most of it is either mechanically updating loop
passes to the new API or the new testing for the loop PM. The code for it is
reasonably compact.
I have not yet updated all of the loop passes to correctly leverage the update
mechanisms demonstrated in the unittests. I'll do that in follow-up patches
along with improved FileCheck tests for those passes that ensure things work in
more realistic scenarios. In many cases, there isn't much we can do with these
until the loop simplified form and LCSSA form are in place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28292
llvm-svn: 291651
Support for DW_FORM_implicit_const DWARFv5 feature.
When this form is used attribute value goes to .debug_abbrev section (as SLEB).
As this form would break any debug tool which doesn't support DWARFv5
it is guarded by dwarf version check. Attempt to use this form with
dwarf version <= 4 is considered a fatal error.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28456
llvm-svn: 291599
In some cases StructurizeCfg updates root node, but dominator info
remains unchanges, it causes crash when expensive checks are enabled.
To cope with this problem a new method was added to DominatorTreeBase
that allows adding new root nodes, it is called in StructurizeCfg to
put dominator tree in sync.
This change fixes PR27488.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28114
llvm-svn: 291530
This patch uses C++11 parameter packs and constexpr functions
to allow AlignedCharArrayUnion to hold an arbitrary number of
types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28429
llvm-svn: 291503
If we split a filename into `Name` and `Prefix`, `Prefix` is at most
145 bytes. We had a bug that didn't split a path correctly. This bug
was pointed out by Rafael in the post commit review.
This patch adds a unit test for TarWriter to verify the fix.
llvm-svn: 291494
APICalls allows groups of functions to be composed into an API that can be
registered as a unit with an RPC endpoint. Doing registration on a-whole API
basis (rather than per-function) allows missing API functions to be detected
early.
APICalls also allows Function membership to be tested at compile-time. This
allows clients to write static assertions that functions to be called are
members of registered APIs.
llvm-svn: 291380
I somehow wrote this fix and then lost it prior to commit. Really sorry
about the noise. This should fix some issues with hacking add_definition
to do things with warning flags.
llvm-svn: 291033
This required re-working the streaming support and lit's support for
'--gtest_list_tests' but otherwise seems to be a clean upgrade.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28154
llvm-svn: 291029
If this is a problem for anyone (shared_ptr is two pointers in size,
whereas IntrusiveRefCntPtr is 1 - and the ref count control block that
make_shared adds is probably larger than the one int in RefCountedBase)
I'd prefer to address this by adding a lower-overhead version of
shared_ptr (possibly refactoring IntrusiveRefCntPtr into such a thing)
to avoid the intrusiveness - this allows memory ownership to remain
orthogonal to types and at least to me, seems to make code easier to
understand (since no implicit ownership acquisition can happen).
This recommits 291006, reverted in r291007.
llvm-svn: 291016
If this is a problem for anyone (shared_ptr is two pointers in size,
whereas IntrusiveRefCntPtr is 1 - and the ref count control block that
make_shared adds is probably larger than the one int in RefCountedBase)
I'd prefer to address this by adding a lower-overhead version of
shared_ptr (possibly refactoring IntrusiveRefCntPtr into such a thing)
to avoid the intrusiveness - this allows memory ownership to remain
orthogonal to types and at least to me, seems to make code easier to
understand (since no implicit ownership acquisition can happen).
llvm-svn: 291006
This just removes the usage of llvm::reverse and llvm::seq. That makes
it harder to handle the empty case correctly and so I've also added
a test there.
This is just a shot in the dark at what might be behind the buildbot
failures. I can't reproduce any issues locally including with ASan...
I feel like I'm missing something...
llvm-svn: 290954
This is both convenient and more efficient as we can skip any
intermediate reallocation of the vector.
This usage pattern came up in a subsequent patch on the pass manager,
but it seems generically useful so I factored it out and added unittests
here.
llvm-svn: 290952
This test was testing that we could correctly find the parent of a DIE, but it was actually just testing the special case where a DIE's depth was 1. This corrects that error by adding an extra level into the the DWARF to ensure that we correctly get the parent by looking for the parent with a depth that is 1 less than the current depth.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28261
llvm-svn: 290918
I'm not sure if this was intentional, but today
isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor returns true for readonly and
argmemonly calls that may throw. This commit changes the function to
not implicitly infer nounwind this way.
Even if we eventually specify readonly calls as not throwing,
isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor is not the best place to
infer that. We should instead teach FunctionAttrs or some other such
pass to tag readonly functions / calls as nounwind instead.
llvm-svn: 290794
The bug was introduced in r289619.
Reviewers: Mehdi Amini
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28134
llvm-svn: 290749
Summary:
This class is unnecessary.
Its comment indicated that it was a compile error to allocate an
instance of a class that inherits from RefCountedBaseVPTR on the stack.
This may have been true at one point, but it's not today.
Moreover you really do not want to allocate *any* refcounted object on
the stack, vptrs or not, so if we did have a way to prevent these
objects from being stack-allocated, we'd want to apply it to regular
RefCountedBase too, obviating the need for a separate RefCountedBaseVPTR
class.
It seems that the main way RefCountedBaseVPTR provides safety is by
making its subclass's destructor virtual. This may have been helpful at
one point, but these days clang will emit an error if you define a class
with virtual functions that inherits from RefCountedBase but doesn't
have a virtual destructor.
Reviewers: compnerd, dblaikie
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28162
llvm-svn: 290717
analyses when we're about to break apart an SCC.
We can't wait until after breaking apart the SCC to invalidate things:
1) Which SCC do we then invalidate? All of them?
2) Even if we invalidate all of them, a newly created SCC may not have
a proxy that will convey the invalidation to functions!
Previously we only invalidated one of the SCCs and too late. This led to
stale analyses remaining in the cache. And because the caching strategy
actually works, they would get used and chaos would ensue.
Doing invalidation early is somewhat pessimizing though if we *know*
that the SCC structure won't change. So it turns out that the design to
make the mutation API force the caller to know the *kind* of mutation in
advance was indeed 100% correct and we didn't do enough of it. So this
change also splits two cases of switching a call edge to a ref edge into
two separate APIs so that callers can clearly test for this and take the
easy path without invalidating when appropriate. This is particularly
important in this case as we expect most inlines to be between functions
in separate SCCs and so the common case is that we don't have to so
aggressively invalidate analyses.
The LCG API change in turn needed some basic cleanups and better testing
in its unittest. No interesting functionality changed there other than
more coverage of the returned sequence of SCCs.
While this seems like an obvious improvement over the current state, I'd
like to revisit the core concept of invalidating within the CG-update
layer at all. I'm wondering if we would be better served forcing the
callers to handle the invalidation beforehand in the cases that they
can handle it. An interesting example is when we want to teach the
inliner to *update and preserve* analyses. But we can cross that bridge
when we get there.
With this patch, the new pass manager an build all of the LLVM test
suite at -O3 and everything passes. =D I haven't bootstrapped yet and
I'm sure there are still plenty of bugs, but this gives a nice baseline
so I'm going to increasingly focus on fleshing out the missing
functionality, especially the bits that are just turned off right now in
order to let us establish this baseline.
llvm-svn: 290664
due to a call cycle.
This actually crashed the ref removal before.
I've added a unittest that covers this kind of interesting graph
structure and mutation.
llvm-svn: 290645
Fix a warning detected by gcc 6:
warning: cast from type 'const void*' to type 'uint8_t* {aka unsigned char*}' casts away qualifiers [-Wcast-qual]
llvm-svn: 290618
that require deferred invalidation.
This handles the other real-world invalidation scenario that we have
cases of: a function analysis which caches references to a module
analysis. We currently do this in the AA aggregation layer and might
well do this in other places as well.
Since this is relative rare, the technique is somewhat more cumbersome.
Analyses need to register themselves when accessing the outer analysis
manager's proxy. This proxy is already necessarily present to allow
access to the outer IR unit's analyses. By registering here we can track
and trigger invalidation when that outer analysis goes away.
To make this work we need to enhance the PreservedAnalyses
infrastructure to support a (slightly) more explicit model for "sets" of
analyses, and allow abandoning a single specific analyses even when
a set covering that analysis is preserved. That allows us to describe
the scenario of preserving all Function analyses *except* for the one
where deferred invalidation has triggered.
We also need to teach the invalidator API to support direct ID calls
instead of always going through a template to dispatch so that we can
just record the ID mapping.
I've introduced testing of all of this both for simple module<->function
cases as well as for more complex cases involving a CGSCC layer.
Much like the previous patch I've not tried to fully update the loop
pass management layer because that layer is due to be heavily reworked
to use similar techniques to the CGSCC to handle updates. As that
happens, we'll have a better testing basis for adding support like this.
Many thanks to both Justin and Sean for the extensive reviews on this to
help bring the API design and documentation into a better state.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27198
llvm-svn: 290594
constant expression and to correctly form function reference edges
through them without crashing because one of the operands (the
`BasicBlock` isn't actually a constant despite being an operand of
a constant).
llvm-svn: 290581
This recommits r290512 that was reverted when MSVC failed to compile it. Since
then I've played with various approaches using rextester.com (where I was able
to reproduce the failure) and think that I have a solution thanks in part to
the help of Dave Blaikie! It seems MSVC just has a defective `decltype` in this
version. Manually writing out the type seems to do the trick, even though it is
.... quite complicated.
Original commit message:
This allows both defining convenience iterator/range accessors on types
which walk across N different independent ranges within the object, and
more direct and simple usages with range based for loops such as shown
in the unittest. The same facilities are used for both. They end up
quite small and simple as it happens.
I've also switched an iterator on `Module` to use this. I would like to
add another convenience iterator that includes even more sequences as
part of it and seeing this one already present motivated me to actually
abstract it away and introduce a general utility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28093
llvm-svn: 290528
multiple asynchronous RPC calls.
ParallelCallGroup allows multiple asynchronous calls to be dispatched,
and provides a wait method that blocks until all asynchronous calls have
been executed on the remote and all return value handlers run on the
local machine.
This will allow, for example, the JIT client to issue memory allocation calls
for all sections in parallel, then block until all memory has been allocated
on the remote and the allocated addresses registered with the client, at which
point the JIT client can proceed to applying relocations.
llvm-svn: 290523
