Prints architecture type of all input files.
Patch by Anusha Basana <anusha.basana@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64668
llvm-svn: 366772
[Attributor] Liveness analysis.
Liveness analysis abstract attribute used to indicate which BasicBlocks are dead and can therefore be ignored.
Right now we are only looking at noreturn calls.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, uenoku
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64162
llvm-svn: 366769
We were silently using the ABI alignment for all of the stores generated for deopt and gc values. We'd gotten the alignment of the stack slot itself properly reduced (via MachineFrameInfo's clamping), but having the MMO on the store incorrect was enough for us to generate an aligned store to a unaligned location.
The simplest fix would have been to just pass the alignment to the helper function, but once we do that, the helper function doesn't really help. So, inline it and directly call the MMO version of DAG.getStore with a properly constructed MMO.
Note that there's a separate performance possibility here. Even if we *can* realign stacks, we probably don't *want to* if all of the stores are in slowpaths. But that's a later patch, if at all. :)
llvm-svn: 366765
This patch exnteds the error handling in the debug line parser to get
rid of the existing MD5 assertion. I want to reuse the debug line parser
from LLVM in LLDB where we cannot crash on invalid input.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64544
llvm-svn: 366762
It is not safe in general to replace an alias in a GEP with its aliasee
if the alias can be replaced with another definition (i.e. via strong/weak
resolution (linkonce_odr) or via symbol interposition (default visibility
in ELF)) while the aliasee cannot. An example of how this can go wrong is
in the included test case.
I was concerned that this might be a load-bearing misoptimization (it's
possible for us to use aliases to share vtables between base and derived
classes, and on Windows, vtable symbols will always be aliases in RTTI
mode, so this change could theoretically inhibit trivial devirtualization
in some cases), so I built Chromium for Linux and Windows with and without
this change. The file sizes of the resulting binaries were identical, so it
doesn't look like this is going to be a problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65118
llvm-svn: 366754
[Attributor] Liveness analysis.
Liveness analysis abstract attribute used to indicate which BasicBlocks are dead and can therefore be ignored.
Right now we are only looking at noreturn calls.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, uenoku
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64162
llvm-svn: 366753
This comes up in JPEG decoding, see e.g.
Figure F.12 – Extending the sign bit of a decoded value in V
of ITU T.81 (JPEG specification).
llvm-svn: 366750
Even if we formed @llvm.umul.with.overflow, we are still stuck
with that guard against div-by-zero, which is no longer needed,
because we didn't flatten the CFG.
llvm-svn: 366749
While we can form the @llvm.mul.with.overflow easily,
we are still left with that check that was guarding against div-by-0.
And in the second case we won't even flatten the CFG.
llvm-svn: 366747
Liveness analysis abstract attribute used to indicate which BasicBlocks are dead and can therefore be ignored.
Right now we are only looking at noreturn calls.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, uenoku
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64162
llvm-svn: 366736
The build_vector will become a constant pool load. By using the
desired type initially, it ensures we don't generate a bitcast
of the constant pool load which will need to be folded with
the load.
While experimenting with another patch, I noticed that when the
load type and the constant pool type don't match, then
SimplifyDemandedBits can't handle it. While we should probably
fix that, this was a simple way to fix the issue I saw.
llvm-svn: 366732
Summary:
Since we are planning to add ADDIStocHA for 32bit in later patch, we decided
to change 64bit one first to follow naming convention with 8 behind opcode.
Patch by: Xiangling_L
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64814
llvm-svn: 366731
Porting function return value attribute noalias to attributor.
This will be followed with a patch for callsite and function argumets.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63067
llvm-svn: 366728
Stubs out a TargetLoweringObjectFileXCOFF class, implementing only
SelectSectionForGlobal for common symbols. Also adds an override of
EmitGlobalVariable in PPCAIXAsmPrinter which adds a number of defensive errors
and adds support for emitting common globals.
llvm-svn: 366727
While debugging code that uses SafeStack, we've noticed that LLVM
produces an invalid DWARF. Concretely, in the following example:
int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
std::string value = "";
printf("%s\n", value.c_str());
return 0;
}
DWARF would describe the value variable as being located at:
DW_OP_breg14 R14+0, DW_OP_deref, DW_OP_constu 0x20, DW_OP_minus
The assembly to get this variable is:
leaq -32(%r14), %rbx
The order of operations in the DWARF symbols is incorrect in this case.
Specifically, the deref is incorrect; this appears to be incorrectly
re-inserted in repalceOneDbgValueForAlloca.
With this change which inserts the deref after the offset instead of
before it, LLVM produces correct DWARF:
DW_OP_breg14 R14-32
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64971
llvm-svn: 366726
The bytes inserted before an overaligned global need to be padded according
to the alignment set on the original global in order for the initializer
to meet the global's alignment requirements. The previous implementation
that padded to the pointer width happened to be correct for vtables on most
platforms but may do the wrong thing if the vtable has a larger alignment.
This issue is visible with a prototype implementation of HWASAN for globals,
which will overalign all globals including vtables to 16 bytes.
There is also no padding requirement for the bytes inserted after the global
because they are never read from nor are they significant for alignment
purposes, so stop inserting padding there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65031
llvm-svn: 366725
We were previously ignoring alignment entirely when combining globals
together in this pass. There are two main things that we need to do here:
add additional padding before each global to meet the alignment requirements,
and set the combined global's alignment to the maximum of all of the original
globals' alignments.
Since we now need to calculate layout as we go anyway, use the calculated
layout to produce GlobalLayout instead of using StructLayout.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65033
llvm-svn: 366722
This reverts commit r366686 as it appears to be causing buildbot
failures on sanitizer-x86_64-linux-android and sanitizer-x86_64-linux.
llvm-svn: 366708
ARMLowOverheadLoops would assert a failure if it did not find all the
pseudo instructions that comprise the hardware loop. Instead of doing
this, iterate through all the instructions of the function and revert
any remaining pseudo instructions that haven't been converted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65080
llvm-svn: 366691
This patch was not the reason of the buildbot failure.
Deleted code was introduced as a work around for a bug in the gold linker
(http://sourceware.org/PR16794). Test case that was given as a reason for
this part of code, the one on previous link, now works for the gold.
This condition is too strict and when a code is compiled with debug info
it forces generation of numerous relocations with symbol for architectures
that do not have relocation addend.
Reviewers: arsenm, espindola
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64327
llvm-svn: 366686
We need to ensure that the number of T's is correct when adding multiple
instructions into the same VPT block.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65049
llvm-svn: 366684
This patch enables us to find the source loads for each element, splitting them into a Load and ByteOffset, and attempts to recognise consecutive loads that are in fact from the same source load.
A helper function, findEltLoadSrc, recurses to find a LoadSDNode and determines the element's byte offset within it. When attempting to match consecutive loads, byte offsetted loads then attempt to matched against a previous load that has already been confirmed to be a consecutive match.
Next step towards PR16739 - after this we just need to account for shuffling/repeated elements to create a vector load + shuffle.
Fixed out of bounds load assert identified in rL366501
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64551
llvm-svn: 366681
ARM has code to recognise uses of the "returned" function parameter
attribute which guarantee that the value passed to the function in r0
will be returned in r0 unmodified. IPRA replaces the regmask on call
instructions, so needs to be told about this to avoid reverting the
optimisation.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64986
llvm-svn: 366669
Current algorithm to update branch weights of latch block and its copies is
based on the assumption that number of peeling iterations is approximately equal
to trip count.
However it is not correct. According to profitability check in one case we can decide to peel
in case it helps to reduce the number of phi nodes. In this case the number of peeled iteration
can be less then estimated trip count.
This patch introduces another way to set the branch weights to peeled of branches.
Let F is a weight of the edge from latch to header.
Let E is a weight of the edge from latch to exit.
F/(F+E) is a probability to go to loop and E/(F+E) is a probability to go to exit.
Then, Estimated TripCount = F / E.
For I-th (counting from 0) peeled off iteration we set the the weights for
the peeled latch as (TC - I, 1). It gives us reasonable distribution,
The probability to go to exit 1/(TC-I) increases. At the same time
the estimated trip count of remaining loop reduces by I.
As a result after peeling off N iteration the weights will be
(F - N * E, E) and trip count of loop becomes
F / E - N or TC - N.
The idea is taken from the review of the patch D63918 proposed by Philip.
Reviewers: reames, mkuper, iajbar, fhahn
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: hiraditya, zzheng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64235
llvm-svn: 366665
icmp ne %x, INT_MIN can be treated similarly to icmp sgt %x, INT_MIN.
icmp ne %x, INT_MAX can be treated similarly to icmp slt %x, INT_MAX.
icmp ne %x, UINT_MAX can be treated similarly to icmp ult %x, UINT_MAX.
We already treat icmp ne %x, 0 similarly to icmp ugt %x, 0
llvm-svn: 366662
Much like with `urem`, the same optimization (albeit with slightly
different algorithm) applies for the signed case, too.
I'm simply copying the test coverage from `urem` case for now,
i believe it should be (close to?) sufficient.
llvm-svn: 366640
Summary:
Four things here:
1. Generalize the fold to handle non-splat divisors. Reasonably trivial.
2. Unban power-of-two divisors. I don't see any reason why they should
be illegal.
* There is no ban in Hacker's Delight
* I think the ban came from the same bug that caused the miscompile
in the base patch - in `floor((2^W - 1) / D)` we were dividing by
`D0` instead of `D`, and we **were** ensuring that `D0` is not `1`,
which made sense.
3. Unban `1` divisors. I no longer believe Hacker's Delight actually says
that the fold is invalid for `D = 0`. Further considerations:
* We know that
* `(X u% 1) == 0` can be constant-folded to `1`,
* `(X u% 1) != 0` can be constant-folded to `0`,
* Also, we know that
* `X u<= -1` can be constant-folded to `1`,
* `X u> -1` can be constant-folded to `0`,
* https://godbolt.org/z/7jnZJXhttps://rise4fun.com/Alive/oF6p
* We know will end up with the following:
`(setule/setugt (rotr (mul N, P), K), Q)`
* Therefore, for given new DAG nodes and comparison predicates
(`ule`/`ugt`), we will still produce the correct answer if:
`Q` is a all-ones constant; and both `P` and `K` are *anything*
other than `undef`.
* The fold will indeed produce `Q = all-ones`.
4. Try to re-splat the `P` and `K` vectors - we don't care about
their values for the lanes where divisor was `1`.
Reviewers: RKSimon, hermord, craig.topper, spatel, xbolva00
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, javed.absar, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63963
llvm-svn: 366637
