Combinations of suffixes that look useful are actually ignored;
complaining about them will avoid mistakes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17587
llvm-svn: 262263
Combinations of suffixes that look useful actually are ignored;
complaining about them will avoid mistakes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17587
llvm-svn: 262092
Add `CHECK-SAME`, which requires that the pattern matches on the *same*
line as the previous `CHECK`/`CHECK-NEXT` -- in other words, no newline
is allowed in the skipped region. This is similar to `CHECK-NEXT`,
which requires exactly 1 newline in the skipped region.
My motivation is to simplify checking the long lines of LLVM assembly
for the new debug info hierarchy. This allows CHECK sequences like the
following:
CHECK: ![[REF]] = !SomeMDNode(
CHECK-SAME: file: ![[FILE:[0-9]+]]
CHECK-SAME: otherField: 93{{[,)]}}
which is equivalent to:
CHECK: ![[REF]] = !SomeMDNode({{.*}}file: ![[FILE:[0-9]+]]{{.*}}otherField: 93{{[,)]}}
While this example just has two fields, many nodes in debug info have
more than that. `CHECK-SAME` will keep the logic easy to follow.
Morever, it enables interleaving `CHECK-NOT`s without allowing newlines.
Consider the following:
CHECK: ![[REF]] = !SomeMDNode(
CHECK-SAME: file: ![[FILE:[0-9]+]]
CHECK-NOT: unexpectedField:
CHECK-SAME: otherField: 93{{[,)]}}
CHECK-NOT: otherUnexpectedField:
CHECK-SAME: )
which doesn't seem to have an equivalent `CHECK` line.
llvm-svn: 230612
Currently FileCheck errors out on empty input. This is usually the
right thing to do, but makes testing things like "this command does
not emit some error message" hard to test. This usually leads to
people using "command 2>&1 | count 0" instead, and then the bots that
use guard malloc fail a few hours later.
By adding a flag to FileCheck that allows empty inputs, we can make
tests that consist entirely of "CHECK-NOT" lines feasible.
llvm-svn: 215127
Summary:
Add FileCheck -implicit-check-not option which allows specifying a
pattern that should only occur in the input when explicitly matched by a
positive check. This feature allows checking tool diagnostics in a way
clang -verify does it for compiler diagnostics.
The option has been tested on a number of clang-tidy checks, I'll post a link to
the clang-tidy patch to this thread.
Once there's an agreement on the general direction, I can add tests and
documentation.
Reviewers: djasper, bkramer
Reviewed By: bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4462
llvm-svn: 212810
Summary:
Directives are being ignored, when they occur between a partial-word false
match and any match on another prefix.
For example, with FOO and BAR prefixes:
_FOO
FOO: foo
BAR: bar
FileCheck incorrectly matches:
fog
bar
This happens because FOO falsely matched as a partial word at '_FOO' and was
ignored while BAR matched at 'BAR:'. The match of BAR is incorrectly returned
as the 'first match' causing the FOO directive to be discarded.
Fixed this the same way as r194565 (D2166) did for a similar test case.
The partial-word false match should be counted as a match for the purposes of
finding the first match of a prefix, but should be returned as a false match
using CheckTy::CheckNone so that it isn't treated as a directive.
Fixes PR17995
Reviewers: samsonov, arsenm
Reviewed By: samsonov
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2228
llvm-svn: 195248
Summary:
Fix a case when "FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=CHECKER"
would silently ignore check-lines of the form:
CHECKER: foo
Reviewers: dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2168
llvm-svn: 194577
Summary:
This fixes a subtle bug in new FileCheck feature added
in r194343. When we search for the first satisfying check-prefix,
we should actually return the first encounter of some check-prefix as a
substring, even if it's not a part of valid check-line. Otherwise
"FileCheck --check-prefix=FOO --check-prefix=BAR" with check file:
FOO not a vaild check-line
FOO: foo
BAR: bar
incorrectly accepted file:
fog
bar
as it skipped the first two encounters of FOO, matching only BAR: line.
Reviewers: arsenm, dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2166
llvm-svn: 194565
- Instead of setting the suffixes in a bunch of places, just set one master
list in the top-level config. We now only modify the suffix list in a few
suites that have one particular unique suffix (.ml, .mc, .yaml, .td, .py).
- Aside from removing the need for a bunch of lit.local.cfg files, this enables
4 tests that were inadvertently being skipped (one in
Transforms/BranchFolding, a .s file each in DebugInfo/AArch64 and
CodeGen/PowerPC, and one in CodeGen/SI which is now failing and has been
XFAILED).
- This commit also fixes a bunch of config files to use config.root instead of
older copy-pasted code.
llvm-svn: 188513
FileCheck should check to make sure the prefix was found, and not a word
containing it (e.g -check-prefix=BASEREL shouldn't match NOBASEREL).
Patch by Ron Ofir.
llvm-svn: 188221
CHECK-LABEL is meant to be used in place on CHECK on lines containing identifiers or other unique labels (they need not actually be labels in the source or output language, though.) This is used to break up the input stream into separate blocks delineated by CHECK-LABEL lines, each of which is checked independently. This greatly improves the accuracy of errors and fix-it hints in many cases, and allows for FileCheck to recover from errors in one block by continuing to subsequent blocks.
Some tests will be converted to use this new directive in forthcoming patches.
llvm-svn: 186162
Pattern has source location by itself. After adding a trivial method to
retrieve it, it's unnecessary to pair a source location for CHECK-NOT patterns.
One thing revised after this is the diagnostic info is more accurate by
pointing to the start of the CHECK-NOT pattern instead of the end of the
CHECK-NOT pattern. E.g. diagnostic message previously looks like
<stdin>:1:1: error: CHECK-NOT: string occurred!
test
^
test.txt:1:16: note: CHECK-NOT: pattern specified here
CHECK-NOT: test
^
is changed to
<stdin>:1:1: error: CHECK-NOT: string occurred!
test
^
test.txt:1:12: note: CHECK-NOT: pattern specified here
CHECK-NOT: test
^
llvm-svn: 180578
; CHECK: [[VAR:[a-z]]]
The problem was that to find the end of the regex var definition, it was
simplistically looking for the next ]] and finding the incorrect one. A
better approach is to count nesting of brackets (taking escaping into
account). This way the brackets that are part of the regex can be discovered
and skipped properly, and the ]] ending is detected in the right place.
llvm-svn: 169109
