This reverts commit ea1a0d7c9ae3e5232a4163fc67efad4aabd51f2b.
While this is strictly more powerful, it is also strictly slower.
InstSimplify intentionally does not perform many folds that it
is allowed to perform, if doing so requires a KnownBits calculation
that will be repeated in InstCombine.
Maybe it's worthwhile to do this here, but that needs a more
explicitly stated motivation, evaluated in a review.
We already special-cased a few interesting patterns,
but that is strictly less powerful than using KnownBits.
So instead get the known bits for the operand of `and`,
and iff all the unset bits of the `and`-mask are known to be zeros
in the operand, we can omit said `and`.
Stepping through callstacks in the example from D99759 reveals
this potential compile-time improvement.
The savings come from avoiding ValueTracking's computing known
bits if we have already dealt with special-case patterns.
Further improvements in this direction seem possible.
This makes a degenerate test based on PR49785 about 40x faster
(25 sec -> 0.6 sec), but it does not address the larger question
of how to limit computeKnownBitsFromAssume(). Ie, the original
test there is still infinite-time for all practical purposes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100408
"Does the predicate hold between two ranges?"
Not very surprisingly, some places were already doing this check,
without explicitly naming the algorithm, cleanup them all.
"Does the predicate hold between two ranges?"
Not very surprisingly, some places were already doing this check,
without explicitly naming the algorithm, cleanup them all.
The current code does not properly handle vector indices unless they are
the first index.
At the moment LangRef gives the impression that the vector index must be
the one and only index (https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#getelementptr-instruction).
But vector indices can appear at any position and according to the
verifier there may be multiple vector indices. If that's the case, the
number of elements must match.
This patch updates SimplifyGEPInst to properly handle those additional
cases.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99961
This is the sibling fix to c590a9880d7a -
as there, we can't subsitute a vector value the equality
compare replacement that we are trying requires that the
comparison is true for the entire value. Vector select
can be partly true/false.
In order to bring up scalable vector support in LLVM incrementally,
we introduced behaviour to emit a warning, instead of an error, when
asking the wrong question of a scalable vector, like asking for the
fixed number of elements.
This patch puts that behaviour under a flag. The default behaviour is
that the compiler will always error, which means that all LLVM unit
tests and regression tests will now fail when a code-path is taken that
still uses the wrong interface.
The behaviour to demote an error to a warning can be individually enabled
for tools that want to support experimental use of scalable vectors.
This patch enables that behaviour when driving compilation from Clang.
This means that for users who want to try out scalable-vector support,
fixed-width codegen support, or build user-code with scalable vector
intrinsics, Clang will not crash and burn when the compiler encounters
such a case.
This allows us to do away with the following pattern in many of the SVE tests:
RUN: .... 2>%t
RUN: cat %t | FileCheck --check-prefix=WARN
WARN-NOT: warning: ...
The behaviour to emit warnings is only temporary and we expect this flag
to be removed in the future when scalable vector support is more stable.
This patch also has fixes the following tests:
unittests:
ScalableVectorMVTsTest.SizeQueries
SelectionDAGAddressAnalysisTest.unknownSizeFrameObjects
AArch64SelectionDAGTest.computeKnownBitsSVE_ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG
regression tests:
Transforms/InstCombine/vscale_gep.ll
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm, ctetreau
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98856
This relands 07c3b97e184d5bd828b8a680cdce46e73f3db9fc (D96945) which was reverted by
commit f49354838e526671e616d16199ebdee653b9f6fa.
The two-stage compilation successfully tests passes on my machine.
This is an alternative to D98391/D98585, playing things more
conservatively. If AllowRefinement == false, then we don't use
InstSimplify methods at all, and instead explicitly implement a
small number of non-refining folds. Most cases are handled by
constant folding, and I only had to add three folds to cover
our unit tests / test-suite. While this may lose some optimization
power, I think it is safer to approach from this direction, given
how many issues this code has already caused.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99027
This is a follow-up to D98588, and fixes the inline `FIXME` about a GEP-related simplification not
preserving the provenance.
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/qbQoAY
Additional tests were added in {rGf125f28afdb59eba29d2491dac0dfc0a7bf1b60b}
Depends on D98672
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98611
In preparation for D98611, the upcoming change will need to apply additional checks to `P` and `V`,
and so this refactor paves the way for adding additional checks in a less awkward way.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98672
The motivating pattern was handled in 0a2d69480d ,
but we should have this for symmetry.
But this really highlights that we could generalize for
any shifted constant if we match this in instcombine.
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/MrmVNt
Add simplification of smul.fix and smul.fix.sat according to
X * 0 -> 0
X * undef -> 0
X * (1 << scale) -> X
This includes the commuted patterns and splatted vectors.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98299
This is a patch that adds folding of two logical and/ors that share one variable:
a && (a && b) -> a && b
a && (a & b) -> a && b
...
This is towards removing the poison-unsafe select optimization (D93065 has more context).
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96945
Pulled out from D90479 - this recognises invalid nsw shl patterns with signbit changes that result in poison.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97305
This patch adds a new intrinsic experimental.vector.reduce that takes a single
vector and returns a vector of matching type but with the original lane order
reversed. For example:
```
vector.reverse(<A,B,C,D>) ==> <D,C,B,A>
```
The new intrinsic supports fixed and scalable vectors types.
The fixed-width vector relies on shufflevector to maintain existing behaviour.
Scalable vector uses the new ISD node - VECTOR_REVERSE.
This new intrinsic is one of the named shufflevector intrinsics proposed on the
mailing-list in the RFC at [1].
Patch by Paul Walker (@paulwalker-arm).
[1] https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-November/146864.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94883
We can fold x*C1/C2 <= x to true if C1 <= C2. This is valid even
if the multiplication is not nuw: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/vULors
The multiplication or division can be replaced by shifts. We don't
handle the case where both are shifts, as that should get folded
away by InstCombine.
This is a partial fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44403.
Folding gep p, q-p to q is only legal if p and q have the same
provenance. This fold should probably be guarded by something like
getUnderlyingObject(p) == getUnderlyingObject(q).
This patch is a partial fix that removes the special handling for
gep p, 0-p, which will fold to a null pointer, which would certainly
not pass an underlying object check (unless p is also null, in which
case this would fold trivially anyway). Folding to a null pointer
is particularly problematic due to the special handling it receives
in many places, making end-to-end miscompiles more likely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93820
I don't believe this has an observable effect, because the only
thing we care about here is replacing the operand with a constant
so following folds can apply. This change is just to make the
representation follow canonical unary shuffle form.
Calling null or undef results in immediate undefined behavior.
Return poison instead of undef in this case, similar to what
we do for immediate UB due to division by zero.
Make InstSimplify return poison rather than undef for out-of-bounds
shifts, as specified by LandRef:
> If op2 is (statically or dynamically) equal to or larger than the
> number of bits in op1, this instruction returns a poison value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93998
As the comment already indicates, performing an operation with
nnan/ninf flags on a nan/inf or undef results in poison. Now that
we have a proper poison value, we no longer need to relax it to
undef.
Div/rem by zero is immediate undefined behavior and anything goes.
Currently we fold it to undef, this patch changes it to fold to
poison instead, which is slightly stronger.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93995
This is the same change as D93990, but for extractelement rather
than insertelement.
> If idx exceeds the length of val for a fixed-length vector, the
> result is a poison value. For a scalable vector, if the value of
> idx exceeds the runtime length of the vector, the result is a
> poison value.
This is a simple patch that updates InstSimplify to return poison if the index is/can be out-of-bounds
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93990
The last use of the function, located in RemovePredecessorAndSimplify,
was removed on Dec 25, 2020 in commit
46bea9b29714ba77010612b04ba13aff56d62e7b.
The last use of RemovePredecessorAndSimplify was removed on Sep 29,
2010 in commit 99c985c37dd45dd0fbd03863037d8e93153783e6.
Juneyoung Lee