of the CodeExtractor utility. This allows speculatively computing input
and output sets to measure the likely size impact of the code
extraction.
These sets cannot be reused sadly -- we mutate the function prior to
forming the final sets used by the actual extraction.
The interface has been revamped slightly to make it easier to use
correctly by making the interface const and sinking the computation of
the number of exit blocks into the full extraction function and away
from the rest of this logic which just computed two output parameters.
llvm-svn: 156168
and expose it as a utility class rather than as free function wrappers.
The simple free-function interface works well for the bugpoint-specific
pass's uses of code extraction, but in an upcoming patch for more
advanced code extraction, they simply don't expose a rich enough
interface. I need to expose various stages of the process of doing the
code extraction and query information to decide whether or not to
actually complete the extraction or give up.
Rather than build up a new predicate model and pass that into these
functions, just take the class that was actually implementing the
functions and lift it up into a proper interface that can be used to
perform code extraction. The interface is cleaned up and re-documented
to work better in a header. It also is now setup to accept the blocks to
be extracted in the constructor rather than in a method.
In passing this essentially reverts my previous commit here exposing
a block-level query for eligibility of extraction. That is no longer
necessary with the more rich interface as clients can query the
extraction object for eligibility directly. This will reduce the number
of walks of the input basic block sequence by quite a bit which is
useful if this enters the normal optimization pipeline.
llvm-svn: 156163
This manually enumerated list of super-register classes has been
superceeded by the automatically computed super-register class masks
available through SuperRegClassIterator.
llvm-svn: 156151
The masks returned by SuperRegClassIterator are computed automatically
by TableGen. This is better than depending on the manually specified
SuperRegClasses.
llvm-svn: 156147
This iterator class provides a more abstract interface to the (Idx,
Mask) lists of super-registers for a register class. The layout of the
tables shouldn't be exposed to clients.
llvm-svn: 156144
minor behavior changes with this, but nothing I have seen evidence of in
the wild or expect to be meaningful. The real goal is unifying our logic
and simplifying the interfaces. A summary of the changes follows:
- Make 'callIsSmall' actually accept a callsite so it can handle
intrinsics, and simplify callers appropriately.
- Nuke a completely bogus declaration of 'callIsSmall' that was still
lurking in InlineCost.h... No idea how this got missed.
- Teach the 'isInstructionFree' about the various more intelligent
'free' heuristics that got added to the inline cost analysis during
review and testing. This mostly surrounds int->ptr and ptr->int casts.
- Switch most of the interesting parts of the inline cost analysis that
were essentially computing 'is this instruction free?' to use the code
metrics routine instead. This way we won't keep duplicating logic.
All of this is motivated by the desire to allow other passes to compute
a roughly equivalent 'cost' metric for a particular basic block as the
inline cost analysis. Sadly, re-using the same analysis for both is
really messy because only the actual inline cost analysis is ever going
to go to the contortions required for simplification, SROA analysis,
etc.
llvm-svn: 156140
but using a FoldingSet underneath and with a largely compatible
interface to that of FoldingSet. This can be used anywhere a FoldingSet
would be natural, but iteration order is significant. The initial
intended use case is in Clang's template specialization lists to
preserve instantiation order iteration.
llvm-svn: 156131
This is a pointer into one of the tables used by
getMatchingSuperRegClass(). It makes it possible to use a shared
implementation of that function.
llvm-svn: 156121
extraction into a public interface. Also clean it up and apply it more
consistently such that we check for landing pads *anywhere* in the
extracted code, not just in single-block extraction.
This will be used to guide decisions in passes that are planning to
eventually perform a round of code extraction.
llvm-svn: 156114
Some targets have no sub-registers at all. Use the TargetRegisterInfo
versions of composeSubRegIndices(), getSubClassWithSubReg(), and
getMatchingSuperRegClass() for those targets.
llvm-svn: 156075
The ensures that virtual registers always belong to an allocatable class.
If your target attempts to create a vreg for an operand that has no
allocatable register subclass, you will crash quickly.
This ensures that targets define register classes as intended.
llvm-svn: 156046
Note that support for rvalue references does not imply support
for the full set of move-related STL operations.
I've preserved support for an odd little thing in insert() where
we're trying to support inserting a new element from an existing
one. If we actually want to support that, there's a lot more we
need to do: insert can call either grow or push_back, neither of
which is safe against this particular use pattern.
llvm-svn: 155979
The TargetPassManager's default constructor wants to initialize the PassManager
to 'null'. But it's illegal to bind a null reference to a null l-value. Make the
ivar a pointer instead.
PR12468
llvm-svn: 155902
Allow the "SplitCriticalEdge" function to split the edge to a landing pad. If
the pass is *sure* that it thinks it knows what it's doing, then it may go ahead
and specify that the landing pad can have its critical edge split. The loop
unswitch pass is one of these passes. It will split the critical edges of all
edges coming from a loop to a landing pad not within the loop. Doing so will
retain important loop analysis information, such as loop simplify.
llvm-svn: 155817
This way we can enable the POD-like class optimization for a lot more classes,
saving ~120k of code in clang/i386/Release+Asserts when selfhosting.
llvm-svn: 155761
- FlatArrayMap. Very simple map container that uses flat array inside.
- MultiImplMap. Map container interface, that has two modes, one for small amount of elements and one for big amount.
- SmallMap. SmallMap is DenseMap compatible MultiImplMap. It uses FlatArrayMap for small mode, and DenseMap for big mode.
Also added unittests for new classes and update for ProgrammersManual.
For more details about new classes see ProgrammersManual and comments in sourcecode.
llvm-svn: 155557
When an instruction match is found, but the subtarget features it
requires are not available (missing floating point unit, or thumb vs arm
mode, for example), issue a diagnostic that identifies what the feature
mismatch is.
rdar://11257547
llvm-svn: 155499
Strategy.
0. Implement new classes. Classes doesn't affect anything. They still work with ConstantInt base values at this stage.
1. Fictitious replacement of current ConstantInt case values with ConstantRangesSet. Case ranges set will still hold single value, and ConstantInt *getCaseValue() will return it. But additionally implement new method in SwitchInst that allows to work with case ranges. Currenly I think it should be some wrapper that returns either single value or ConstantRangesSet object.
2. Step-by-step replacement of old "ConstantInt* getCaseValue()" with new alternative. Modify algorithms for all passes that works with SwitchInst. But don't modify LLParser and BitcodeReader/Writer. Still hold single value in each ConstantRangesSet object. On this stage some parts of LLVM will use old-style methods, and some ones new-style.
3. After all getCaseValue() usages will removed and whole LLVM and its clients will work in new style - modify LLParser, Reader and Writer. Remove getCaseValue().
4. Replace ConstantInt*-based case ranges set items with APInt ones.
Currently we are on Zero Stage: New classes.
ConstantRangesSet.
I selected ConstantArrays as case ranges set "holder" object (it is a temporary decision, I'll explain why below). The array items are may be ConstantVectors with single item, and ConstantVectors with two items (that means single number and range respectively).
The ConstantInt will used as basic value representation. It will replaced with APInt then. Of course ConstantArray and ConstantVector will go away after ConstantInt => APInt replacement.
New class mandatory features:
- bool isSatisfies(ConstantInt *V) method (need better name?). Returns true if the given value satisfies this case.
- Case's ranges and values enumeration. In some passes we need to analize each case (SwitchLowering for example).
Factory + unified clusterify.
I also propose to implement the factory that allows to build case object with user friendly way. I called it CRSBuilder by now.
Currenly I implemented the factory that allows add,remove pairs of range+successor. It also allows add existing ConstantRangesSet decompiling it to separated ranges. Factory can emit either clusters set (single case range + successor) or the set of "ConstantRangesSet + Successor" pairs.
So you can use it either as builder for new cases set for SwitchInst, or for clusterification of existing cases set.
Just call Factory.optimize() and it emits optimized and sorted clusters collection for you!
I tested clusterification on SelectionDAGBuilder - it works fine. Don't worry it was not included in this patch. Just new classes.
Factory is a template. There are two params: SuccessorClass and IsReadonly. So you can specify what successor you need (BB or MBB). And you can also restrict your factory to use values in read-only mode (SelectionDAGBuilder need IsReadonly=true). Read-only factory couldn't build the cases ranges.
llvm-svn: 155464
on X86 Atom. Some of our tests failed because the tail merging part of
the BranchFolding pass was creating new basic blocks which did not
contain live-in information. When the anti-dependency code in the Post-RA
scheduler ran, it would sometimes rename the register containing
the function return value because the fact that the return value was
live-in to the subsequent block had been lost. To fix this, it is necessary
to run the RegisterScavenging code in the BranchFolding pass.
This patch makes sure that the register scavenging code is invoked
in the X86 subtarget only when post-RA scheduling is being done.
Post RA scheduling in the X86 subtarget is only done for Atom.
This patch adds a new function to the TargetRegisterClass to control
whether or not live-ins should be preserved during branch folding.
This is necessary in order for the anti-dependency optimizations done
during the PostRASchedulerList pass to work properly when doing
Post-RA scheduling for the X86 in general and for the Intel Atom in particular.
The patch adds and invokes the new function trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc()
instead of using the existing requiresRegisterScavenging().
It changes BranchFolding.cpp to call trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc() instead of
requiresRegisterScavenging(). It changes the all the targets that
implemented requiresRegisterScavenging() to also implement
trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc().
It adds an assertion in the Post RA scheduler to make sure that post RA
liveness information is available when it is needed.
It changes the X86 break-anti-dependencies test to use –mcpu=atom, in order
to avoid running into the added assertion.
Finally, this patch restores the use of anti-dependency checking
(which was turned off temporarily for the 3.1 release) for
Intel Atom in the Post RA scheduler.
Patch by Andy Zhang!
Thanks to Jakob and Anton for their reviews.
llvm-svn: 155395
test suite failures. The failures occur at each stage, and only get
worse, so I'm reverting all of them.
Please resubmit these patches, one at a time, after verifying that the
regression test suite passes. Never submit a patch without running the
regression test suite.
llvm-svn: 155372
