but to return object_error::parse_failed. Then made the code in llvm-nm
do for Mach-O files what is done in the darwin native tools which is to
print "(?,?)" or just "s" for bad section indexes. Also added a test to show
it prints the bad section index of "42" when printing the fields as raw hex.
llvm-svn: 258434
This is similar to the bug/fix:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26211http://reviews.llvm.org/rL258325
The fmin() test case reveals another bug caused by sloppy
code duplication. It will crash without this patch because
fp128 is a valid floating-point type, but we would think
that we had matched a function that used doubles.
The new helper function can be used to replace similar
checks that are used in several other places in this file.
llvm-svn: 258428
This commit extends the patterns recognised by InstSimplify to also handle (x >> y) <= x in the same way as (x /u y) <= x.
The missing optimisation was found investigating why LLVM did not optimise away bound checks in a binary search: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/30917
Patch by Andrea Canciani!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16402
llvm-svn: 258422
This patch adds the instrumentation for indirect call value profiling. It finds all the indirect call-sites and generates instrprof_value_profile intrinsic calls. A new opt level option -disable-vp is introduced to disable this instrumentation.
Reviewers: davidxl, betulb, vsk
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16016
llvm-svn: 258417
Do not emit profile arc files and note files for module and skeleton
CU's.
Our users report seeing unexpected *.gcda and *.gcno files in their
projects when using gcov-style profiling with modules or frameworks.
The unwanted files come from these modules. This is not very helpful
for end-users. Further, we've seen reports of instrumented programs
crashing while writing these files out (due to I/O failures).
rdar://problem/22838296
Reviewed-by: aprantl
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15997
llvm-svn: 258406
This change attempts to produce vectorized integer expressions in bit widths
that are narrower than their scalar counterparts. The need for demotion arises
especially on architectures in which the small integer types (e.g., i8 and i16)
are not legal for scalar operations but can still be used in vectors. Like
similar work done within the loop vectorizer, we rely on InstCombine to perform
the actual type-shrinking. We use the DemandedBits analysis and
ComputeNumSignBits from ValueTracking to determine the minimum required bit
width of an expression.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15815
llvm-svn: 258404
Summary:
This is now the same as the behaviour of the GNU assembler. This was done
as it is required in order to build the Linux kernel with the integrated
assembler enabled.
Reviewers: dsanders, vkalintiris
Subscribers: dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13594
llvm-svn: 258400
There's an overloading of the "movsd" and "cmpsd" instructions, e.g. movsd can be either "Move Data from String to String" or "Move or Merge Scalar Double-Precision Floating-Point Value".
The former should produce warnings when parsing a memory operand that is not ESI/EDI, but the latter should not.
Fixed the code to produce warnings only after making sure we're dealing with the first case.
Expanded the tests of the produced warnings + fixed RUN line of the test so that it would check both stdout and stderr
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16359
llvm-svn: 258393
The binary contains two (merged) covmap sections which
have duplicate CovMapRecords from comdat (template instantation).
This test makes sure the reader reads it properly. It also
tests that the coverage data from different instantiations
of the same template function are properly merged in show
output.
llvm-svn: 258376
Fix the condition for when the new global takes over the name of
the existing one to be the negation of the condition for the new
global to get internal linkage.
llvm-svn: 258355
Summary:
While working on uniform branching, I've hit a few cases where we emit
i1 SETCC operations.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16233
llvm-svn: 258352
Summary:
This adds a new kind of operand bundle to LLVM denoted by the
`"gc-transition"` tag. Inputs to `"gc-transition"` operand bundle are
lowered into the "transition args" section of `gc.statepoint` by
`RewriteStatepointsForGC`.
This removes the last bit of functionality that was unsupported in the
deopt bundle based code path in `RewriteStatepointsForGC`.
Reviewers: pgavlin, JosephTremoulet, reames
Subscribers: sanjoy, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16342
llvm-svn: 258338
Some architecture specific ELF section flags might have the same value
(for example SHF_X86_64_LARGE and SHF_HEX_GPREL) and we have to check
machine architectures to select an appropriate set of possible flags.
The patch selects architecture specific flags into separate arrays
`ElfxxxSectionFlags` and combines `ElfSectionFlags` and `ElfxxxSectionFlags`
before pass to the `StreamWriter::printFlags()` method.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16269
llvm-svn: 258334
The selection process being split into separate passes, we need generic opcodes
to translate the LLVM IR to target independent code.
This patch adds an opcode for addition: G_ADD.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15472
llvm-svn: 258333
When a symbol S shows up in an expression in assembly there are two
possible interpretations
* The expression is referring to the value of S in this file.
* The expression is referring to the value after symbol resolution.
In the first case the assembler can reason about the value and try to
produce a relocation.
In the second case, that is only possible if the symbol cannot be
preempted.
Assemblers are not very consistent about which interpretation gets used.
This changes MC to agree with GAS in the case of an expression of the
form "Sym - WeakSym".
llvm-svn: 258329
The test case will crash without this patch because the subsequent call to
hasUnsafeAlgebra() assumes that the call instruction is an FPMathOperator
(ie, returns an FP type).
This part of the function signature check was omitted for the sqrt() case,
but seems to be in place for all other transforms.
Before:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL257400
...we would have needlessly continued execution in optimizeSqrt(), but the
bug was harmless because we'd eventually fail some other check and return
without damage.
This should fix:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26211
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16198
llvm-svn: 258325
There was support for writing the AArch64 big endian data fixup entries in
the .eh_frame section in BE. This is changed to write all such fixup
entries in BE with no restriction on the section. This is similar to
the existing support for fixup entries for ARM.
A test is added to check the length field in the .debug_line section as
this is an example of where such a fixup occurs.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16064
llvm-svn: 258320
If converter was somewhat careless about "diamond" cases, where there
was no join block, or in other words, where the true/false blocks did
not have analyzable branches. In such cases, it was possible for it to
remove (needed) branches, resulting in a loss of entire basic blocks.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16156
llvm-svn: 258310
The AArch64 .inst directive was implemented using EmitIntValue, which resulted
in both $x and $d (code and data) mapping symbols being emitted at the same
address. This fixes it to only emit the $x mapping symbol.
EmitIntValue also emits the value in big-endian order when targeting big-endian
systems, but instructions are always emitted in little-endian order for
AArch64.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16349
llvm-svn: 258308
SelectionDAG previously missed opportunities to fold constants into
GlobalAddresses in several areas. For example, given `(add (add GA, c1), y)`, it
would often reassociate to `(add (add GA, y), c1)`, missing the opportunity to
create `(add GA+c, y)`. This isn't often visible on targets such as X86 which
effectively reassociate adds in their complex address-mode folding logic,
however it is currently visible on WebAssembly since it currently has very
simple address mode folding code that doesn't reassociate anything.
This patch fixes this by making SelectionDAG fold offsets into GlobalAddresses
at the same times that it folds constants together, so that it doesn't miss any
opportunities to perform such folding.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16090
llvm-svn: 258296
Summary:
Funclet EH tables require that a given funclet have only one unwind
destination for exceptional exits. The verifier will therefore reject
e.g. two cleanuprets with different unwind dests for the same cleanup, or
two invokes exiting the same funclet but to different unwind dests.
Because catchswitch has no 'nounwind' variant, and because IR producers
are not *required* to annotate calls which will not unwind as 'nounwind',
it is legal to nest a call or an "unwind to caller" catchswitch within a
funclet pad that has an unwind destination other than caller; it is
undefined behavior for such a call or catchswitch to unwind.
Normally when inlining an invoke, calls in the inlined sequence are
rewritten to invokes that unwind to the callsite invoke's unwind
destination, and "unwind to caller" catchswitches in the inlined sequence
are rewritten to unwind to the callsite invoke's unwind destination.
However, if such a call or "unwind to caller" catchswitch is located in a
callee funclet that has another exceptional exit with an unwind
destination within the callee, applying the normal transformation would
give that callee funclet multiple unwind destinations for its exceptional
exits. There would be no way for EH table generation to determine which
is the "true" exit, and the verifier would reject the function
accordingly.
Add logic to the inliner to detect these cases and leave such calls and
"unwind to caller" catchswitches as calls and "unwind to caller"
catchswitches in the inlined sequence.
This fixes PR26147.
Reviewers: rnk, andrew.w.kaylor, majnemer
Subscribers: alexcrichton, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16319
llvm-svn: 258273
Summary:
This teaches MachineSink to not sink instructions that might break the
implicit null check optimization that runs later. This should not
affect frontends that do not use implicit null checks.
Reviewers: aadg, reames, hfinkel, atrick
Subscribers: majnemer, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14632
llvm-svn: 258254
calling convention.
The implementation of the related callbacks in the x86 backend for such
functions are not ready to deal with a prologue block that is not the entry
block of the function.
This fixes PR26107, but the longer term solution would be to fix those callbacks.
llvm-svn: 258221
As vector shuffles can only reference two inputs many (V)INSERTPS patterns end up being split over two targets shuffles.
This patch adds combines to attempt to combine (V)INSERTPS nodes with input/output nodes that are just zeroing out these additional vector elements.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16072
llvm-svn: 258205
In some cases, the max backedge taken count can be more conservative
than the exact backedge taken count (for instance, because
ScalarEvolution::getRange is not control-flow sensitive whereas
computeExitLimitFromICmp can be). In these cases,
computeExitLimitFromCond (specifically the bit that deals with `and` and
`or` instructions) can create an ExitLimit instance with a
`SCEVCouldNotCompute` max backedge count expression, but a computable
exact backedge count expression. This violates an implicit SCEV
assumption: a computable exact BE count should imply a computable max BE
count.
This change
- Makes the above implicit invariant explicit by adding an assert to
ExitLimit's constructor
- Changes `computeExitLimitFromCond` to be more robust around
conservative max backedge counts
llvm-svn: 258184
This is a continuation of adding FMF to call instructions:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL255555
As with D15937, the intent of the patch is to preserve the current behavior of the transform
except that we use the pow call's 'fast' attribute as a trigger rather than a function-level
attribute.
The TODO comment notes a potential follow-on patch that would propagate FMF to the new
instructions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16122
llvm-svn: 258153
