Remove #include of Transforms/Scalar.h from Transform/Utils to fix layering.
Transforms depends on Transforms/Utils, not the other way around. So
remove the header and the "createStripGCRelocatesPass" function
declaration (& definition) that is unused and motivated this dependency.
Move Transforms/Utils/Local.h into Analysis because it's used by
Analysis/MemoryBuiltins.cpp.
llvm-svn: 328165
In case PredBB == BB and StopAt == BB's terminator, StopAt != &*BI will
fail, because BB's terminator instruction gets replaced.
By using BB.getTerminator() we get the current terminator which we can use
to compare.
Reviewers: sanjoy, anna, reames
Reviewed By: anna
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43822
llvm-svn: 326779
Summary:
And now that we no longer have to explicitly free() the Loop instances, we can
(with more ease) use the destructor of LoopBase to do what LoopBase::clear() was
doing.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38201
llvm-svn: 314375
a function into itself.
We tried to fix this before in r306495 but that got reverted as the
assert was actually hit.
This fixes the original bug (which we seem to have lost track of with
the revert) by blocking a second remapping when the function being
inlined is also the caller and the remapping could succeed but
erroneously.
The included test case would actually load from an inlined copy of the
alloca before this change, failing to load the stored value and
miscompiling.
Many thanks to Richard Smith for diagnosing a user miscompile to this
bug, and to Kyle for the first attempt and initial analysis and David Li
for remembering the issue and how to fix it and suggesting the patch.
I'm just stitching it together and landing it. =]
llvm-svn: 311229
Summary:
This is an addon to the change rl304488 cloning fixes. (Originally rl304226 reverted rl304228 and reapplied rl304488 https://reviews.llvm.org/D33655)
rl304488 works great when DILocalVariables that comes from the inlined function has a 'unique-ed' type, but,
in the case when the variable type is distinct we will create a second DILocalVariable in the scope of the original function that was inlined.
Consider cloning of the following function:
```
define private void @f() !dbg !5 {
%1 = alloca i32, !dbg !11
call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %1, metadata !14, metadata !12), !dbg !18
ret void, !dbg !18
}
!14 = !DILocalVariable(name: "inlined", scope: !15, file: !6, line: 5, type: !17) ; came from an inlined function
!15 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "inlined", linkageName: "inlined", scope: null, file: !6, line: 8, type: !7, isLocal: true, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 9, isOptimized: false, unit: !0, variables: !16)
!16 = !{!14}
!17 = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "some_struct", size: 32, align: 32)
```
Without this fix, when function 'f' is cloned, we will create another DILocalVariable for "inlined", due to its type being distinct.
```
define private void @f.1() !dbg !23 {
%1 = alloca i32, !dbg !26
call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %1, metadata !28, metadata !12), !dbg !30
ret void, !dbg !30
}
!14 = !DILocalVariable(name: "inlined", scope: !15, file: !6, line: 5, type: !17)
!15 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "inlined", linkageName: "inlined", scope: null, file: !6, line: 8, type: !7, isLocal: true, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 9, isOptimized: false, unit: !0, variables: !16)
!16 = !{!14}
!17 = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "some_struct", size: 32, align: 32)
;
!28 = !DILocalVariable(name: "inlined", scope: !15, file: !6, line: 5, type: !29) ; OOPS second DILocalVariable
!29 = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "some_struct", size: 32, align: 32)
```
Now we have two DILocalVariable for "inlined" within the same scope. This result in assert in AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.h:131: void llvm::DbgVariable::addMMIEntry(const llvm::DbgVariable &): Assertion `V.Var == Var && "conflicting variable"' failed.
(Full example: See: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33492)
In this change we prevent duplication of types so that when a metadata for DILocalVariable is cloned it will get uniqued to the same metadate node as an original variable.
Reviewers: loladiro, dblaikie, aprantl, echristo
Reviewed By: loladiro
Subscribers: EricWF, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35106
llvm-svn: 307418
This commit pretty much rolls back the logic added in r306495
as in the testcase provided we simplify an `icmp` looking through
a PHI that hasn't been mapped yet.
I think instsimplify shouldn't do threading over select/phis or
just looking through phis in general, but this is what we have
now. Also, add a test to prevent this from happening in case somebody
wants to modify this code again.
Briefly discussed with Kyle Butt (thanks Kyle!).
llvm-svn: 306938
When simplifying an instruction that has been re-mapped, it should never
simplify to an instruction in the original function. In the edge case
where we are inlining a function into itself, the existing code led to
incorrect behavior. Replace the incorrect code with an assert verifying
that we never expect simplification to produce an instruction in the old
function, unless the functions are the same.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33850
llvm-svn: 306495
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
This was rL304226, reverted in 304228 due to a clang assertion failure
on the build bots. That problem should have been addressed by clang
commit rL304470.
llvm-svn: 304488
Summary:
In rL302576, DISubprograms gained the constraint that a !dbg attachments to functions must
have a 1:1 mapping to DISubprograms. As part of that change, the function cloning support
was adjusted to attempt to enforce this invariant during cloning. However, there
were several problems with the implementation. Part of these were fixed in rL304079.
However, there was a more fundamental problem with these changes, namely that it
bypasses the matadata value map, causing the cloned metadata to be a mix of metadata
pointing to the new suprogram (where manual code was added to fix those up) and the
old suprogram (where this was not the case). This mismatch could cause a number of
different assertion failures in the DWARF emitter. Some of these are given at
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/22069, but some others have been observed
as well. Attempt to rectify this by partially reverting the manual DI metadata fixup,
and instead using the standard value map approach. To retain the desired semantics
of not duplicating the compilation unit and inlined subprograms, explicitly freeze
these in the value map.
Reviewers: dblaikie, aprantl, GorNishanov, echristo
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33655
llvm-svn: 304226
Summary:
I believe https://reviews.llvm.org/rL302576 introduced two bugs:
1) it produces duplicate distinct variables for every: dbg.value describing the same variable.
To fix the problme I switched form getDistinct() to get() in DebugLoc.cpp: auto reparentVar = [&](DILocalVariable *Var) {
return DILocalVariable::getDistinct(
2) It passes NewFunction plain name as a linkagename parameter to Subprogram constructor. Breaks assert in:
|| DeclLinkageName.empty()) || LinkageName == DeclLinkageName) && "decl has a linkage name and it is different"' failed.
#9 0x00007f5010261b75 llvm::DwarfUnit::applySubprogramDefinitionAttributes(llvm::DISubprogram const*, llvm::DIE&) /home/gor/llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfUnit.cpp:1173:3
#
(Edit: reproducer added)
Here how https://reviews.llvm.org/rL302576 broke coroutine debug info.
Coroutine body of the original function is split into several parts by cloning and removing unneeded code.
All parts describe the original function and variables present in the original function.
For a simple case, prior to Split, original function has these two blocks:
```
PostSpill: ; preds = %AllocaSpillBB
call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %x, i64 0, metadata !14, metadata !15), !dbg !13
store i32 %x, i32* %x.addr, align 4
...
and
sw.epilog: ; preds = %sw.bb
%x.addr.reload.addr = getelementptr inbounds %f.Frame, %f.Frame* %FramePtr, i32 0, i32 4, !dbg !20
%4 = load i32, i32* %x.addr.reload.addr, align 4, !dbg !20
call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %4, i64 0, metadata !14, metadata !15), !dbg !13!14 = !DILocalVariable(name: "x", arg: 1, scope: !6, file: !7, line: 55, type: !11)
```
Note that in two blocks different expression represent the same original user variable X.
Before rL302576, for every cloned function there was exactly one cloned DILocalVariable(name: "x" as in:
```
define i8* @f(i32 %x) #0 !dbg !6 {
...
!6 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "f", scope: !7, file: !7, line: 55, type: !8, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 55, flags: DIFlagPrototyped,
...
!14 = !DILocalVariable(name: "x", arg: 1, scope: !6, file: !7, line: 55, type: !11)
define internal fastcc void @f.resume(%f.Frame* %FramePtr) #0 !dbg !25 {
...
!25 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "f", scope: !7, file: !7, line: 55, type: !8, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 55, flags: DIFlagPrototyped, isOptimized: false, unit: !0, variables: !2)
!28 = !DILocalVariable(name: "x", arg: 1, scope: !25, file: !7, line: 55, type: !11)
```
After rL302576, for every cloned function there were as many DILocalVariable(name: "x" as there were "call void @llvm.dbg.value" for that variable.
This was causing asserts in VerifyDebugInfo and AssemblyPrinter.
Example:
```
!27 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "f", linkageName: "f.resume", scope: !7, file: !7, line: 55, type: !8, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 55,
!29 = distinct !DILocalVariable(name: "x", arg: 1, scope: !27, file: !7, line: 55, type: !11)
!39 = distinct !DILocalVariable(name: "x", arg: 1, scope: !27, file: !7, line: 55, type: !11)
!41 = distinct !DILocalVariable(name: "x", arg: 1, scope: !27, file: !7, line: 55, type: !11)
```
Second problem:
Prior to rL302576, all clones were described by DISubprogram referring to original function.
```
define i8* @f(i32 %x) #0 !dbg !6 {
...
!6 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "f", scope: !7, file: !7, line: 55, type: !8, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 55, flags: DIFlagPrototyped,
define internal fastcc void @f.resume(%f.Frame* %FramePtr) #0 !dbg !25 {
...
!25 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "f", scope: !7, file: !7, line: 55, type: !8, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 55, flags: DIFlagPrototyped,
```
After rL302576, DISubprogram for clones is of two minds, plain name refers to the original name, linkageName refers to plain name of the clone.
```
!27 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "f", linkageName: "f.resume", scope: !7, file: !7, line: 55, type: !8, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 55,
```
I think the assumption in AsmPrinter is that both name and linkageName should refer to the same entity. It asserts here when they are not:
```
|| DeclLinkageName.empty()) || LinkageName == DeclLinkageName) && "decl has a linkage name and it is different"' failed.
#9 0x00007f5010261b75 llvm::DwarfUnit::applySubprogramDefinitionAttributes(llvm::DISubprogram const*, llvm::DIE&) /home/gor/llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfUnit.cpp:1173:3
```
After this fix, behavior (with respect to coroutines) reverts to exactly as it was before and therefore making them debuggable again, or even more importantly, compilable, with "-g"
Reviewers: dblaikie, echristo, aprantl
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33614
llvm-svn: 304079
Summary:
Implements PR889
Removing the virtual table pointer from Value saves 1% of RSS when doing
LTO of llc on Linux. The impact on time was positive, but too noisy to
conclusively say that performance improved. Here is a link to the
spreadsheet with the original data:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1F4FHir0qYnV0MEp2sYYp_BuvnJgWlWPhWOwZ6LbW7W4/edit?usp=sharing
This change makes it invalid to directly delete a Value, User, or
Instruction pointer. Instead, such code can be rewritten to a null check
and a call Value::deleteValue(). Value objects tend to have their
lifetimes managed through iplist, so for the most part, this isn't a big
deal. However, there are some places where LLVM deletes values, and
those places had to be migrated to deleteValue. I have also created
llvm::unique_value, which has a custom deleter, so it can be used in
place of std::unique_ptr<Value>.
I had to add the "DerivedUser" Deleter escape hatch for MemorySSA, which
derives from User outside of lib/IR. Code in IR cannot include MemorySSA
headers or call the MemoryAccess object destructors without introducing
a circular dependency, so we need some level of indirection.
Unfortunately, no class derived from User may have any virtual methods,
because adding a virtual method would break User::getHungOffOperands(),
which assumes that it can find the use list immediately prior to the
User object. I've added a static_assert to the appropriate OperandTraits
templates to help people avoid this trap.
Reviewers: chandlerc, mehdi_amini, pete, dberlin, george.burgess.iv
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Subscribers: krytarowski, eraman, george.burgess.iv, mzolotukhin, Prazek, nlewycky, hans, inglorion, pcc, tejohnson, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31261
llvm-svn: 303362
As recently discussed on llvm-dev [1], this patch makes it illegal for
two Functions to point to the same DISubprogram and updates
FunctionCloner to also clone the debug info of a function to conform
to the new requirement. To simplify the implementation it also factors
out the creation of inlineAt locations from the Inliner into a
general-purpose utility in DILocation.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-May/112661.html
<rdar://problem/31926379>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32975
This reapplies r302469 with a fix for a bot failure (reparentDebugInfo
now checks for the case the orig and new function are identical).
llvm-svn: 302576
This caused PR32977.
Original commit message:
> Make it illegal for two Functions to point to the same DISubprogram
>
> As recently discussed on llvm-dev [1], this patch makes it illegal for
> two Functions to point to the same DISubprogram and updates
> FunctionCloner to also clone the debug info of a function to conform
> to the new requirement. To simplify the implementation it also factors
> out the creation of inlineAt locations from the Inliner into a
> general-purpose utility in DILocation.
>
> [1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-May/112661.html
> <rdar://problem/31926379>
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32975
llvm-svn: 302533
As recently discussed on llvm-dev [1], this patch makes it illegal for
two Functions to point to the same DISubprogram and updates
FunctionCloner to also clone the debug info of a function to conform
to the new requirement. To simplify the implementation it also factors
out the creation of inlineAt locations from the Inliner into a
general-purpose utility in DILocation.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-May/112661.html
<rdar://problem/31926379>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32975
llvm-svn: 302469
Commits were:
"Use WeakVH instead of WeakTrackingVH in AliasSetTracker's UnkownInsts"
"Add a new WeakVH value handle; NFC"
"Rename WeakVH to WeakTrackingVH; NFC"
The changes assumed pointers are 8 byte aligned on all architectures.
llvm-svn: 301429
Summary:
I plan to use WeakVH to mean "nulls itself out on deletion, but does
not track RAUW" in a subsequent commit.
Reviewers: dblaikie, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: arsenm, mehdi_amini, mcrosier, mzolotukhin, jfb, llvm-commits, nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32266
llvm-svn: 301424
Add hasParamAttribute() and use it instead of hasAttribute(ArgNo+1,
Kind) everywhere.
The fact that the AttributeList index for an argument is ArgNo+1 should
be a hidden implementation detail.
NFC
llvm-svn: 300272
This seems like a much more natural API, based on Derek Schuff's
comments on r300015. It further hides the implementation detail of
AttributeList that function attributes come last and appear at index
~0U, which is easy for the user to screw up. git diff says it saves code
as well: 97 insertions(+), 137 deletions(-)
This also makes it easier to change the implementation, which I want to
do next.
llvm-svn: 300153
and to expose a handle to represent the actual case rather than having
the iterator return a reference to itself.
All of this allows the iterator to be used with common STL facilities,
standard algorithms, etc.
Doing this exposed some missing facilities in the iterator facade that
I've fixed and required some work to the actual iterator to fully
support the necessary API.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31548
llvm-svn: 300032
Summary:
For now, it just wraps AttributeSetNode*. Eventually, it will hold
AvailableAttrs as an inline bitset, and adding and removing enum
attributes will be super cheap.
This sinks AttributeSetNode back down to lib/IR/AttributeImpl.h.
Reviewers: pete, chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits, jfb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31940
llvm-svn: 300014
This re-lands r299875.
I introduced a bug in Clang code responsible for replacing K&R, no
prototype declarations with a real function definition with a prototype.
The bug was here:
// Collect any return attributes from the call.
- if (oldAttrs.hasAttributes(llvm::AttributeList::ReturnIndex))
- newAttrs.push_back(llvm::AttributeList::get(newFn->getContext(),
- oldAttrs.getRetAttributes()));
+ newAttrs.push_back(oldAttrs.getRetAttributes());
Previously getRetAttributes() carried AttributeList::ReturnIndex in its
AttributeList. Now that we return the AttributeSetNode* directly, it no
longer carries that index, and we call this overload with a single node:
AttributeList::get(LLVMContext&, ArrayRef<AttributeSetNode*>)
That aborted with an assertion on x86_32 targets. I added an explicit
triple to the test and added CHECKs to help find issues like this in the
future sooner.
llvm-svn: 299899
Summary:
AttributeList::get(Fn|Ret|Param)Attributes no longer creates a temporary
AttributeList just to hide the AttributeSetNode type.
I've also added a factory method to create AttributeLists from a
parallel array of AttributeSetNodes. I think this simplifies
construction of AttributeLists when rewriting function prototypes.
Previously we would test if a particular index had attributes, and
conditionally add a temporary attribute list to a vector. Now the
attribute set vector is parallel to the argument vector already that
these passes already construct.
My long term vision is to wrap AttributeSetNode* inside an AttributeSet
type that holds the enum attributes, but that will come in a follow up
change.
I haven't done any performance measurements for this change because
profiling hasn't shown that any of the affected code is hot.
Reviewers: pete, chandlerc, sanjoy, hfinkel
Reviewed By: pete
Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31198
llvm-svn: 299875
Summary:
This class is a list of AttributeSetNodes corresponding the function
prototype of a call or function declaration. This class used to be
called ParamAttrListPtr, then AttrListPtr, then AttributeSet. It is
typically accessed by parameter and return value index, so
"AttributeList" seems like a more intuitive name.
Rename AttributeSetImpl to AttributeListImpl to follow suit.
It's useful to rename this class so that we can rename AttributeSetNode
to AttributeSet later. AttributeSet is the set of attributes that apply
to a single function, argument, or return value.
Reviewers: sanjoy, javed.absar, chandlerc, pete
Reviewed By: pete
Subscribers: pete, jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, mehdi_amini, jfb, nhaehnle, sbc100, void, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31102
llvm-svn: 298393
Summary:
JumpThreading for guards feature has been reverted at https://reviews.llvm.org/rL295200
due to the following problem: the feature used the following algorithm for detection of
diamond patters:
1. Find a block with 2 predecessors;
2. Check that these blocks have a common single parent;
3. Check that the parent's terminator is a branch instruction.
The problem is that these checks are insufficient. They may pass for a non-diamond
construction in case if those two predecessors are actually the same block. This may
happen if parent's terminator is a br (either conditional or unconditional) to a block
that ends with "switch" instruction with exactly two branches going to one block.
This patch re-enables the JumpThreading for guards and fixes this issue by adding the
check that those found predecessors are actually different blocks. This guarantees that
parent's terminator is a conditional branch with exactly 2 different successors, which
is now ensured by assertions. It also adds two more tests for this situation (with parent's
terminator being a conditional and an unconditional branch).
Patch by Max Kazantsev!
Reviewers: anna, sanjoy, reames
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30036
llvm-svn: 295410
Summary:
This patch allows JumpThreading also thread through guards.
Virtually, guard(cond) is equivalent to the following construction:
if (cond) { do something } else {deoptimize}
Yet it is not explicitly converted into IFs before lowering.
This patch enables early threading through guards in simple cases.
Currently it covers the following situation:
if (cond1) {
// code A
} else {
// code B
}
// code C
guard(cond2)
// code D
If there is implication cond1 => cond2 or !cond1 => cond2, we can transform
this construction into the following:
if (cond1) {
// code A
// code C
} else {
// code B
// code C
guard(cond2)
}
// code D
Thus, removing the guard from one of execution branches.
Patch by Max Kazantsev!
Reviewers: reames, apilipenko, igor-laevsky, anna, sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29620
llvm-svn: 294617
CGSCC use a WeakVH to track call sites. RAUW a call within a function
can result in that WeakVH getting confused about whether or not the call
site is still around.
llvm-svn: 279268
This reverts commit r277611 and the followup r277614.
Bootstrap builds and chromium builds are crashing during inlining after
this change.
llvm-svn: 277642
It is possible for the value map to not have an entry for some value
that has already been removed.
I don't have a testcase, this is fall-out from a buildbot.
llvm-svn: 277614
We were able to figure out that the result of a call is some constant.
While propagating that fact, we added the constant to the value map.
This is problematic because it results in us losing the call site when
processing the value map.
This fixes PR28802.
llvm-svn: 277611
r273711 was reverted by r273743. The inliner needs to know about any
call sites in the inlined function. These were obscured if we replaced
a call to undef with an undef but kept the call around.
This fixes PR28298.
llvm-svn: 273753
Summary:
Dominator updation fails for a loop inserted with a new basicblock.
A block required by DT to set the IDom might not have been cloned yet. This is because there is no predefined ordering of loop blocks (except for the header block which should be the first block in the list).
The patch first creates DT nodes for the cloned blocks and then separately updates the DT in a follow-on loop.
Reviewers: anemet, dberlin
Subscribers: dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20899
llvm-svn: 272479
This will be necessary to allow the global merge pass to attach
multiple debug info metadata nodes to global variables once we reverse
the edge from DIGlobalVariable to GlobalVariable.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20414
llvm-svn: 271358
Remove the ModuleLevelChanges argument, and the ability to create new
subprograms for cloned functions. The latter was added without review in
r203662, but it has no in-tree clients (all non-test callers pass false
for ModuleLevelChanges [1], so it isn't reachable outside of tests). It
also isn't clear that adding a duplicate subprogram to the compile unit is
always the right thing to do when cloning a function within a module. If
this functionality comes back it should be accompanied with a more concrete
use case.
Furthermore, all in-tree clients add the returned function to the module.
Since that's pretty much the only sensible thing you can do with the function,
just do that in CloneFunction.
[1] http://llvm-cs.pcc.me.uk/lib/Transforms/Utils/CloneFunction.cpp/rCloneFunction
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18628
llvm-svn: 269110
Summary:
cloneLoopWithPreheader() does not update LoopInfo for sub-loop of
the original loop being cloned. Add assert to ensure no sub-loops for loop being cloned.
Reviewers: anemet, ashutosh.nema, hfinkel
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15922
llvm-svn: 267671
This catches two nullptr insertions into the ValueMap I missed in
r266567. I missed CloneFunction becuase it never calls RemapInstruction
directly. Here's one of the still-failing bots:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x64-ninja-win7/builds/11496
llvm-svn: 266570
As a follow-up to r123058, assert that there are no null mappings in the
ValueMap instead of just ignoring them when they are there. There were
a couple of accidental insertions in CloneFunction so I cleaned those up
(caught by testcases).
llvm-svn: 266565
Currently each Function points to a DISubprogram and DISubprogram has a
scope field. For member functions the scope is a DICompositeType. DIScopes
point to the DICompileUnit to facilitate type uniquing.
Distinct DISubprograms (with isDefinition: true) are not part of the type
hierarchy and cannot be uniqued. This change removes the subprograms
list from DICompileUnit and instead adds a pointer to the owning compile
unit to distinct DISubprograms. This would make it easy for ThinLTO to
strip unneeded DISubprograms and their transitively referenced debug info.
Motivation
----------
Materializing DISubprograms is currently the most expensive operation when
doing a ThinLTO build of clang.
We want the DISubprogram to be stored in a separate Bitcode block (or the
same block as the function body) so we can avoid having to expensively
deserialize all DISubprograms together with the global metadata. If a
function has been inlined into another subprogram we need to store a
reference the block containing the inlined subprogram.
Attached to https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27284 is a python script
that updates LLVM IR testcases to the new format.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19034
<rdar://problem/25256815>
llvm-svn: 266446
Clarify what this RemapFlag actually means.
- Change the flag name to match its intended behaviour.
- Clearly document that it's not supposed to affect globals.
- Add a host of FIXMEs to indicate how to fix the behaviour to match
the intent of the flag.
RF_IgnoreMissingLocals should only affect the behaviour of
RemapInstruction for function-local operands; namely, for operands of
type Argument, Instruction, and BasicBlock. Currently, it is *only*
passed into RemapInstruction calls (and the transitive MapValue calls
that it makes).
When I split Metadata from Value I didn't understand the flag, and I
used it in a bunch of places for "global" metadata.
This commit doesn't have any functionality change, but prepares to
cleanup MapMetadata and MapValue.
llvm-svn: 265628
Commit r260791 contained an error in that it would introduce a cross-module
reference in the old module. It also introduced O(N^2) complexity in the
module cloner by requiring the entire module to be visited for each function.
Fix both of these problems by avoiding use of the CloneDebugInfoMetadata
function (which is only designed to do intra-module cloning) and cloning
function-attached metadata in the same way that we clone all other metadata.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18583
llvm-svn: 264935
