SDNode subclasses to keep state that requires non-trivial
destructors, however it was already effectively impossible,
since the destructor isn't actually ever called. There currently
aren't any SDNode subclasses affected by this, and in general
it's desireable to keep SDNode objects light-weight.
This eliminates the last virtual member function in the SDNode
class, so it eliminates the need for a vtable pointer, making
SDNode smaller.
llvm-svn: 62539
doing very similar pointer capture analysis.
Factor out the common logic. The new version
is from FunctionAttrs since it does a better
job than the version in BasicAliasAnalysis
llvm-svn: 62461
and every other instruction in their blocks to keep the terminator
instructions at the end, teach the post-RA scheduler how to operate
on ranges of instructions, and exclude terminators from the range
of instructions that get scheduled.
Also, exclude mid-block labels, such as EH_LABEL instructions, and
schedule code before them separately from code after them. This
fixes problems with the post-RA scheduler moving code past
EH_LABELs.
llvm-svn: 62366
For example, PIC16 needs to break a long or int constant into mulitple parts and emit multiple directives. So Allow targets to overried EmitConstantValueOnly().
llvm-svn: 62301
a new toy hazard recognizier heuristic which attempts to direct the
scheduler to avoid clumping large groups of loads or stores too densely.
llvm-svn: 62291
loops, hoisting instructions all the way out in one step rather
than hoisting them one nest level at a time. Also, make a few
other code simplifications. This speeds up MachineLICM
by several fold.
llvm-svn: 62283
and into the ScheduleDAGInstrs class, so that they don't get
destructed and re-constructed for each block. This fixes a
compile-time hot spot in the post-pass scheduler.
To help facilitate this, tidy and do some minor reorganization
in the scheduler constructor functions.
llvm-svn: 62275
my earlier patch to this file.
The issue there was that all uses of an IV inside a loop
are actually references to Base[IV*2], and there was one
use outside that was the same but LSR didn't see the base
or the scaling because it didn't recurse into uses outside
the loop; thus, it used base+IV*scale mode inside the loop
instead of pulling base out of the loop. This was extra bad
because register pressure later forced both base and IV into
memory. Doing that recursion, at least enough
to figure out addressing modes, is a good idea in general;
the change in AddUsersIfInteresting does this. However,
there were side effects....
It is also possible for recursing outside the loop to
introduce another IV where there was only 1 before (if
the refs inside are not scaled and the ref outside is).
I don't think this is a common case, but it's in the testsuite.
It is right to be very aggressive about getting rid of
such introduced IVs (CheckForIVReuse and the handling of
nonzero RewriteFactor in StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers).
In the testcase in question the new IV produced this way
has both a nonconstant stride and a nonzero base, neither
of which was handled before. And when inserting
new code that feeds into a PHI, it's right to put such
code at the original location rather than in the PHI's
immediate predecessor(s) when the original location is outside
the loop (a case that couldn't happen before)
(RewriteInstructionToUseNewBase); better to avoid making
multiple copies of it in this case.
Also, the mechanism for keeping SCEV's corresponding to GEP's
no longer works, as the GEP might change after its SCEV
is remembered, invalidating the SCEV, and we might get a bad
SCEV value when looking up the GEP again for a later loop.
This also couldn't happen before, as we weren't recursing
into GEP's outside the loop.
Also, when we build an expression that involves a (possibly
non-affine) IV from a different loop as well as an IV from
the one we're interested in (containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop),
don't recurse into that. We can't do much with it and will
get in trouble if we try to create new non-affine IVs or something.
More testcases are coming.
llvm-svn: 62212
