Blackfin supports and/or/xor on i32 but not on i16. Teach
DAGCombiner::SimplifyBinOpWithSameOpcodeHands to not produce illegal nodes
after legalize ops.
llvm-svn: 78497
since they are in 64 bit mode with i64immSExt32 imms. JIT is not affected since
it handles both word absolute relocations in the same way
llvm-svn: 78479
- Part of optimal static profiling patch sequence by Andreas Neustifter.
- Store edge, block, and function information separately for each functions
(instead of in one giant map).
- Return frequencies as double instead of int, and use a sentinel value for
missing information.
llvm-svn: 78477
Handle large integers, x86_fp80, ConstantAggregateZero, and two more ConstantExpr:
GetElementPtr and IntToPtr
Set SHF_MERGE bit for mergeable strings
Avoid zero initialized strings to be classified as a bss symbol
Don't allow common symbols to be classified as STB_WEAK
Add a constant to be used as a global value offset in data relocations
llvm-svn: 78476
Also don't dereference old pointers after they have been deleted causing
random crashes when enabling the machine code verifier.
Ahem...
I have not included a test case for the crash. It hapened when enabling the
verifier on CodeGen/X86/2009-08-06-branchfolder-crash.ll.
The crash depends on an MBB being allocated at the same address as a
previously deleted MBB. I don't think that can be reproduced reliably.
llvm-svn: 78472
Now there is no special treatment of instructions that redefine part of a
super-register. Instead, the super-register is marked with <imp-use,kill> and
<imp-def>. For instance, from LowerSubregs on ARM:
subreg: CONVERTING: %Q1<def> = INSERT_SUBREG %Q1<undef>, %D1<kill>, 5
subreg: %D2<def> = FCPYD %D1<kill>, 14, %reg0, %Q1<imp-def>
subreg: CONVERTING: %Q1<def> = INSERT_SUBREG %Q1, %D0<kill>, 6
subreg: %D3<def> = FCPYD %D0<kill>, 14, %reg0, %Q1<imp-use,kill>, %Q1<imp-def>
llvm-svn: 78466
Verify that early clobber registers and their aliases are not used.
All changes to RegsAvailable are now done as a transaction so the order of
operands makes no difference.
The included test case is from PR4686. It has behaviour that was dependent on the order of operands.
llvm-svn: 78465
- This doesn't actually improve the algorithm (its still linear), but the
generated (match) code is now fairly compact and table driven. Still need a
generic string matcher.
- The table still needs to be compressed, this is quite simple to do and should
shrink it to under 16k.
- This also simplifies and restructures the code to make the match classes more
explicit, in anticipation of resolving ambiguities.
llvm-svn: 78461
directly from the intrinsics produced by the frontend. If it is more
convenient to have a custom DAG node for using these to implement shuffles,
we can add that later.
llvm-svn: 78459
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=78127, I'm changing the
ExecutionEngine's global mappings to hold AssertingVH<const GlobalValue>. That
way, if unregistering a mapping fails to actually unregister it, we'll get an
assert. Running the jit nightly tests didn't uncover any actual instances of
the problem.
This also uncovered the fact that AssertingVH<const X> didn't work, so I fixed
that too.
llvm-svn: 78400
LoopDependenceAnalysis::getLoops is currently O(N*M) for a loop-nest of
depth N and a compound SCEV of M atomic SCEVs. As both N and M will
typically be very small, this should not be a problem. If it turns out
to be one, rewriting getLoops as SCEVVisitor will reduce complexity to
O(M).
llvm-svn: 78394
