Duncan Sands 60220e7127 Sign-extend rather than zero-extend when promoting ... the condition for a BRCOND, according to what is returned by getSetCCResultContents. Since all targets return the same thing (ZeroOrOneSetCCResult), this should be harmless! The point is that all over the place the result of SETCC is fed directly into BRCOND. On machines for which getSetCCResultContents returns ZeroOrNegativeOneSetCCResult, this is a sign-extended boolean. So it seems dangerous to also feed BRCOND zero-extended booleans in some circumstances - for example, when promoting the condition. llvm-svn: 58861		2008-11-07 20:13:04 +00:00
..
llvm	Sign-extend rather than zero-extend when promoting	2008-11-07 20:13:04 +00:00
llvm-c	Add C bindings for extractvalue and insertvalue. Patch by Frits van Bommel!	2008-11-03 22:55:43 +00:00