Duncan P. N. Exon Smith 707997192f Reapply "blockfreq: Rewrite BlockFrequencyInfoImpl"
This reverts commit r206677, reapplying my BlockFrequencyInfo rewrite.

I've done a careful audit, added some asserts, and fixed a couple of
bugs (unfortunately, they were in unlikely code paths).  There's a small
chance that this will appease the failing bots [1][2].  (If so, great!)

If not, I have a follow-up commit ready that will temporarily add
-debug-only=block-freq to the two failing tests, allowing me to compare
the code path between what the failing bots and what my machines (and
the rest of the bots) are doing.  Once I've triggered those builds, I'll
revert both commits so the bots go green again.

[1]: http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/ninja-x64-msvc-RA-centos6/builds/1816
[2]: http://llvm-amd64.freebsd.your.org/b/builders/clang-i386-freebsd/builds/18445

<rdar://problem/14292693>

llvm-svn: 206704
2014-04-19 22:34:26 +00:00
..
2014-04-17 22:26:44 +00:00
2014-04-17 22:26:44 +00:00

Analysis Opportunities:

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the
ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this:

  {1,+,3,+,2}<loop>

Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however
ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as

  (-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n))

In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic,
which is very inefficient when expanded into code.

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In formatValue in test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll,

ScalarEvolution is forming this expression:

((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)))

This could be folded to

(-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//