mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2025-02-15 09:51:00 +00:00
![Mehdi Amini](/assets/img/avatar_default.png)
With this patch, clang -O3 optimizes correctly providing > 1000x speedup on this artificial benchmark): for (a=0; a<n; a++) for (b=0; b<n; b++) for (c=0; c<n; c++) for (d=0; d<n; d++) for (e=0; e<n; e++) for (f=0; f<n; f++) x++; From test-suite/SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/nestedloop.c Reviewers: sanjoyd Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13390 From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com> llvm-svn: 249431
Analysis Opportunities: //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this: {1,+,3,+,2}<loop> Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as (-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n)) In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic, which is very inefficient when expanded into code. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// In formatValue in test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll, ScalarEvolution is forming this expression: ((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))) This could be folded to (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)) //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//