Philip Reames b342730bfb Reapply 254950 w/fix
254950 ended up being not NFC.  The previous code was overriding the flags for whether an instruction read or wrote memory using the target specific flags returned via TTI.  I'd missed this in my refactoring.  Since I mistakenly built only x86 and didn't notice the number of unsupported tests, I didn't catch that before the original checkin.

This raises an interesting issue though.  Given we have function attributes (i.e. readonly, readnone, argmemonly) which describe the aliasing of intrinsics, why does TTI have this information overriding the instruction definition at all?  I see no reason for this, but decided to preserve existing behavior for the moment.  The root issue might be that we don't have a "writeonly" attribute.

Original commit message:
[EarlyCSE] Simplify and invert ParseMemoryInst [NFCI]

Restructure ParseMemoryInst - which was introduced to abstract over target specific load and stores instructions - to just query the underlying instructions. In theory, this could be slightly slower than caching the results, but in practice, it's very unlikely to be measurable.

The simple query scheme makes it far easier to understand, and much easier to extend with new queries. Given I'm about to need to add new query types, doing the cleanup first seemed worthwhile.

Do we still believe the target specific intrinsic handling is worthwhile in EarlyCSE? It adds quite a bit of complexity and makes the code harder to read. Being able to delete the abstraction entirely would be wonderful.

llvm-svn: 254957
2015-12-07 22:41:23 +00:00
2015-12-07 22:41:23 +00:00
2015-12-07 20:50:29 +00:00
2015-12-07 19:21:39 +00:00

Low Level Virtual Machine (LLVM)
================================

This directory and its subdirectories contain source code for LLVM,
a toolkit for the construction of highly optimized compilers,
optimizers, and runtime environments.

LLVM is open source software. You may freely distribute it under the terms of
the license agreement found in LICENSE.txt.

Please see the documentation provided in docs/ for further
assistance with LLVM, and in particular docs/GettingStarted.rst for getting
started with LLVM and docs/README.txt for an overview of LLVM's
documentation setup.

If you are writing a package for LLVM, see docs/Packaging.rst for our
suggestions.
Description
Fork of llvm with experimental commits and workarounds for RPCS3
Readme 634 MiB
Languages
C++ 96.9%
C 1%
Python 1%
CMake 0.6%
OCaml 0.2%
Other 0.1%