mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2025-02-28 16:28:58 +00:00
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d1f2/7d1f232ca48a1ce620eb70a6728fbe1e5d53418e" alt="Hans Wennborg"
It broke Chromium, causing "Instruction does not dominate all uses!" errors. See https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1022297#c1 for a reproducer. > If the recurrence PHI node has a single user, we can sink any > instruction without side effects, given that all users are dominated by > the instruction computing the incoming value of the next iteration > ('Previous'). We can sink instructions that may cause traps, because > that only causes the trap to occur later, but not on any new paths. > > With the relaxed check, we also have to make sure that we do not have a > direct cycle (meaning PHI user == 'Previous), which indicates a > reduction relation, which potentially gets missed by > ReductionDescriptor. > > As follow-ups, we can also sink stores, iff they do not alias with > other instructions we move them across and we could also support sinking > chains of instructions and multiple users of the PHI. > > Fixes PR43398. > > Reviewers: hsaito, dcaballe, Ayal, rengolin > > Reviewed By: Ayal > > Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69228
Analysis Opportunities: //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this: {1,+,3,+,2}<loop> Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as (-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n)) In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic, which is very inefficient when expanded into code. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// In formatValue in test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll, ScalarEvolution is forming this expression: ((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))) This could be folded to (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)) //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//