This avoids the confusing 'CS.paramHasAttr(ArgNo + 1, Foo)' pattern.
Previously we were testing return value attributes with index 0, so I
introduced hasReturnAttr() for that use case.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@300367 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
and to expose a handle to represent the actual case rather than having
the iterator return a reference to itself.
All of this allows the iterator to be used with common STL facilities,
standard algorithms, etc.
Doing this exposed some missing facilities in the iterator facade that
I've fixed and required some work to the actual iterator to fully
support the necessary API.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31548
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@300032 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: Because SamplePGO passes will be invoked twice in ThinLTO build: once at compile phase, the other at backend. We want to make sure the IR at the 2nd phase matches the hot part in profile, thus we do not want to inline hot callsites in the first phase.
Reviewers: tejohnson, eraman
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, Prazek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31201
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@298428 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Several visitors check if operands to the instruction are constants,
either as it is or after looking up SimplifiedValues, check if the
result is a constant and update the SimplifiedValues map. This
refactoring splits it into a common function that does the checking of
whether the operands are constants and updating of the SimplifiedValues
table, and an instruction specific part that is implemented by each
instruction visitor as a lambda and passed to the common function.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30104
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@295552 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This adds the following to the new PM based inliner in PGO mode:
* Use block frequency analysis to derive callsite's profile count and use
that to adjust thresholds of hot and cold callsites.
* Incrementally update the BFI of the caller after a callee gets inlined
into it. This incremental update is only within an invocation of the run
method - BFI is not preserved across calls to run.
Update the function entry count of the callee after inlining it into a
caller.
* I've tuned the thresholds for the hot and cold callsites using a hacked
up version of the old inliner that explicitly computes BFI on a set of
internal benchmarks and spec. Once the new PM based pipeline stabilizes
(IIRC Chandler mentioned there are known issues) I'll benchmark this
again and adjust the thresholds if required.
Inliner PGO support.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28331
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@292666 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is the third attemp to recommit r292526.
The original summary:
Currently, a GEP is considered free only if its indices are all constant.
TTI::getGEPCost() can give target-specific more accurate analysis. TTI is
already used for the cost of many other instructions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@292633 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is the second attemp to recommit r292526.
The original summary:
Currently, a GEP is considered free only if its indices are all constant.
TTI::getGEPCost() can give target-specific more accurate analysis. TTI is
already used for the cost of many other instructions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@292616 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This recommits r292526 which is reverted in r292529 after fixing the test case.
The original summary:
Currently, a GEP is considered free only if its indices are all constant.
TTI::getGEPCost() can give target-specific more accurate analysis. TTI is
already used for the cost of many other instructions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@292570 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently, a GEP is considered free only if its indices are all constant.
TTI::getGEPCost() can give target-specific more accurate analysis. TTI is
already used for the cost of many other instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28693
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@292526 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Functional change: Previously, if a callee is cold, we used ColdThreshold if it minimizes the existing threshold. This was irrespective of whether we were optimizing for minsize (-Oz) or not. But -Oz uses very low threshold to begin with and the inlining with -Oz is expected to be tuned for lowering code size, so there is no good reason to set an even lower threshold for cold callees. We now lower the threshold for cold callees only when -Oz is not used. For default values of -inlinethreshold and -inlinecold-threshold, this change has no effect and this simplifies the code.
NFC changes: Group all threshold updates that are guarded by !Caller->optForMinSize() and within that group threshold updates that require profile summary info.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28369
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@291487 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This doesn't implement *every* feature of the existing inliner, but
tries to implement the most important ones for building a functional
optimization pipeline and beginning to sort out bugs, regressions, and
other problems.
Notable, but intentional omissions:
- No alloca merging support. Why? Because it isn't clear we want to do
this at all. Active discussion and investigation is going on to remove
it, so for simplicity I omitted it.
- No support for trying to iterate on "internally" devirtualized calls.
Why? Because it adds what I suspect is inappropriate coupling for
little or no benefit. We will have an outer iteration system that
tracks devirtualization including that from function passes and
iterates already. We should improve that rather than approximate it
here.
- Optimization remarks. Why? Purely to make the patch smaller, no other
reason at all.
The last one I'll probably work on almost immediately. But I wanted to
skip it in the initial patch to try to focus the change as much as
possible as there is already a lot of code moving around and both of
these *could* be skipped without really disrupting the core logic.
A summary of the different things happening here:
1) Adding the usual new PM class and rigging.
2) Fixing minor underlying assumptions in the inline cost analysis or
inline logic that don't generally hold in the new PM world.
3) Adding the core pass logic which is in essence a loop over the calls
in the nodes in the call graph. This is a bit duplicated from the old
inliner, but only a handful of lines could realistically be shared.
(I tried at first, and it really didn't help anything.) All told,
this is only about 100 lines of code, and most of that is the
mechanics of wiring up analyses from the new PM world.
4) Updating the LazyCallGraph (in the new PM) based on the *newly
inlined* calls and references. This is very minimal because we cannot
form cycles.
5) When inlining removes the last use of a function, eagerly nuking the
body of the function so that any "one use remaining" inline cost
heuristics are immediately refined, and queuing these functions to be
completely deleted once inlining is complete and the call graph
updated to reflect that they have become dead.
6) After all the inlining for a particular function, updating the
LazyCallGraph and the CGSCC pass manager to reflect the
function-local simplifications that are done immediately and
internally by the inline utilties. These are the exact same
fundamental set of CG updates done by arbitrary function passes.
7) Adding a bunch of test cases to specifically target CGSCC and other
subtle aspects in the new PM world.
Many thanks to the careful review from Easwaran and Sanjoy and others!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24226
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290161 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
After r289755, the AssumptionCache is no longer needed. Variables affected by
assumptions are now found by using the new operand-bundle-based scheme. This
new scheme is more computationally efficient, and also we need much less
code...
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@289756 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Instead, expose whether the current type is an array or a struct, if an array
what the upper bound is, and if a struct the struct type itself. This is
in preparation for a later change which will make PointerType derive from
Type rather than SequentialType.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26594
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@288458 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When calculating the cost of a call instruction we were applying a heuristic penalty as well as the cost of the instruction itself.
However, when calculating the benefit from inlining we weren't discounting the equivalent penalty for the call instruction that would be removed! This caused skew in the calculation and meant we wouldn't inline in the following, trivial case:
int g() {
h();
}
int f() {
g();
}
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@286814 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
I think it is much better this way.
When I firstly saw line:
Cost += InlineConstants::LastCallToStaticBonus;
I though that this is a bug, because everywhere where the cost is being reduced
it is usuing -=.
Reviewers: eraman, tejohnson, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23222
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@278290 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: Hot callsites should have higher threshold than inline hints. This patch uses separate threshold parameter for hot callsites.
Reviewers: davidxl, eraman
Subscribers: Prazek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22368
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@277860 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
For sample-based PGO, using BFI to calculate callsite count is sometime not accurate. This is because with sampling based approach, if a callsite resides in a hot loop deeply nested in a bunch of cold branches, the callsite's BFI frequency would be inaccurately calculated due to lack of samples in the cold branch.
E.g.
if (A1 && A2 && A3 && ..... && A10) {
for (i=0; i < 100000000; i++) {
callsite();
}
}
Assume that A1 to A100 are all 100% taken, and callsite has 1000 samples and thus is considerred hot. Because the loop's trip count is huge, it's normal that all branches outside the loop has no sample at all. As a result, we can only use static branch probability to derive the the frequency of the loop header. Assuming that static heuristic thinks each branch is 50% taken, then the count calculated from BFI will be 1/(2^10) of the actual value.
In order to get more accurate callsite count, we directly annotate the weight on the call instruction, and directly use it when checking callsite hotness.
Note that this mechanism can also be shared by instrumentation based callsite hotness analysis. The side benefit is that it breaks the dependency from Inliner to BFI as call count is embedded in the IR.
Reviewers: davidxl, eraman, dnovillo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22118
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@275073 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Instead of directly using MaxFunctionCount and function entry count to determine callee hotness, use the isHotFunction/isColdFunction methods provided by ProfileSummaryInfo.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21045
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@272321 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Before r257832, the threshold used by SimpleInliner was explicitly specified or generated from opt levels and passed to the base class Inliner's constructor. There, it was first overridden by explicitly specified -inline-threshold. The refactoring in r257832 did not preserve this behavior for all opt levels. This change brings back the original behavior.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20452
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@270153 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This intrinsic takes two arguments, ``%ptr`` and ``%offset``. It loads
a 32-bit value from the address ``%ptr + %offset``, adds ``%ptr`` to that
value and returns it. The constant folder specifically recognizes the form of
this intrinsic and the constant initializers it may load from; if a loaded
constant initializer is known to have the form ``i32 trunc(x - %ptr)``,
the intrinsic call is folded to ``x``.
LLVM provides that the calculation of such a constant initializer will
not overflow at link time under the medium code model if ``x`` is an
``unnamed_addr`` function. However, it does not provide this guarantee for
a constant initializer folded into a function body. This intrinsic can be
used to avoid the possibility of overflows when loading from such a constant.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18367
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@267223 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r266477.
This commit introduces cyclic dependency. This commit has "Analysis" depend on "ProfileData",
while "ProfileData" depends on "Object", which depends on "BitCode", which
depends on "Analysis".
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@266619 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
InlineCost's threshold is multiplied by this value. This lets us adjust
the inlining threshold up or down on a per-target basis. For example,
we might want to increase the threshold on targets where calls are
unusually expensive.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18560
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@266405 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Fixes PR26774.
If you're aware of the issue, feel free to skip the "Motivation"
section and jump directly to "This patch".
Motivation:
I define "refinement" as discarding behaviors from a program that the
optimizer has license to discard. So transforming:
```
void f(unsigned x) {
unsigned t = 5 / x;
(void)t;
}
```
to
```
void f(unsigned x) { }
```
is refinement, since the behavior went from "if x == 0 then undefined
else nothing" to "nothing" (the optimizer has license to discard
undefined behavior).
Refinement is a fundamental aspect of many mid-level optimizations done
by LLVM. For instance, transforming `x == (x + 1)` to `false` also
involves refinement since the expression's value went from "if x is
`undef` then { `true` or `false` } else { `false` }" to "`false`" (by
definition, the optimizer has license to fold `undef` to any non-`undef`
value).
Unfortunately, refinement implies that the optimizer cannot assume
that the implementation of a function it can see has all of the
behavior an unoptimized or a differently optimized version of the same
function can have. This is a problem for functions with comdat
linkage, where a function can be replaced by an unoptimized or a
differently optimized version of the same source level function.
For instance, FunctionAttrs cannot assume a comdat function is
actually `readnone` even if it does not have any loads or stores in
it; since there may have been loads and stores in the "original
function" that were refined out in the currently visible variant, and
at the link step the linker may in fact choose an implementation with
a load or a store. As an example, consider a function that does two
atomic loads from the same memory location, and writes to memory only
if the two values are not equal. The optimizer is allowed to refine
this function by first CSE'ing the two loads, and the folding the
comparision to always report that the two values are equal. Such a
refined variant will look like it is `readonly`. However, the
unoptimized version of the function can still write to memory (since
the two loads //can// result in different values), and selecting the
unoptimized version at link time will retroactively invalidate
transforms we may have done under the assumption that the function
does not write to memory.
Note: this is not just a problem with atomics or with linking
differently optimized object files. See PR26774 for more realistic
examples that involved neither.
This patch:
This change introduces a new set of linkage types, predicated as
`GlobalValue::mayBeDerefined` that returns true if the linkage type
allows a function to be replaced by a differently optimized variant at
link time. It then changes a set of IPO passes to bail out if they see
such a function.
Reviewers: chandlerc, hfinkel, dexonsmith, joker.eph, rnk
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18634
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@265762 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch provides the following infrastructure for PGO enhancements in inliner:
Enable the use of block level profile information in inliner
Incremental update of block frequency information during inlining
Update the function entry counts of callees when they get inlined into callers.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16381
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@262636 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In r252595, I inadvertently changed the condition to "Cost <= Threshold",
which caused a significant size regression in Chrome. This commit rectifies
that.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@259915 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
