We have multiple places in code where we try to identify whether or not
some instruction is a guard. This patch factors out this logic into a separate
utility function which works uniformly in all places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51152
Reviewed By: fedor.sergeev
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340921 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In Thumb1, legal imm range is [0, 255] for ADD/SUB instructions. However, the
legal imm range for LD/ST in (R+Imm) addressing mode is [0, 127]. Imms in
[128, 255] are materialized by mov R, #imm, and LD/STs use them in (R+R)
addressing mode.
This patch checks if a constant is used as offset in (R+Imm), if so, it checks
isLegalAddressingMode passing the constant value as BaseOffset.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50931
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340882 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Port libFuzzer to windows-msvc.
This patch allows libFuzzer targets to be built and run on Windows, using -fsanitize=fuzzer and/or fsanitize=fuzzer-no-link. It allows these forms of coverage instrumentation to work on Windows as well.
It does not fix all issues, such as those with -fsanitize-coverage=stack-depth, which is not usable on Windows as of this patch.
It also does not fix any libFuzzer integration tests. Nearly all of them fail to compile, fixing them will come in a later patch, so libFuzzer tests are disabled on Windows until them.
Patch By: metzman
Reviewers: morehouse, rnk
Reviewed By: morehouse, rnk
Subscribers: morehouse, kcc, eraman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51022
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340860 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Sometimes reading an output *.ll file it is not easy to understand why some callsites are not inlined. We can read output of inline remarks (option --pass-remarks-missed=inline) and try correlating its messages with the callsites.
An easier way proposed by this patch is to add to every callsite processed by Inliner an attribute with the latest message that describes the cause of not inlining this callsite. The attribute is called //inline-remark//. By default this feature is off. It can be switched on by the option //-inline-remark-attribute//.
For example in the provided test the result method //@test1// has two callsites //@bar// and inline remarks report different inlining missed reasons:
remark: <unknown>:0:0: bar not inlined into test1 because too costly to inline (cost=-5, threshold=-6)
remark: <unknown>:0:0: bar not inlined into test1 because it should never be inlined (cost=never): recursive
It is not clear which remark correspond to which callsite. With the inline remark attribute enabled we get the reasons attached to their callsites:
define void @test1() {
call void @bar(i1 true) #0
call void @bar(i1 false) #2
ret void
}
attributes #0 = { "inline-remark"="(cost=-5, threshold=-6)" }
..
attributes #2 = { "inline-remark"="(cost=never): recursive" }
Patch by: yrouban (Yevgeny Rouban)
Reviewers: xbolva00, tejohnson, apilipenko
Reviewed By: xbolva00, tejohnson
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50435
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340834 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This fixes PR31105.
There is code trying to delete dead code that does so by e.g. checking if
the single predecessor of a block is the block itself.
That check fails on a block like this
bb:
br i1 undef, label %bb, label %bb
since that has two (identical) predecessors.
However, after the check for dead blocks there is a call to
ConstantFoldTerminator on the basic block, and that call simplifies the
block to
bb:
br label %bb
Therefore we now do the call to ConstantFoldTerminator before the check if
the block is dead, so it can realize that it really is.
The original behavior lead to the block not being removed, but it was
simplified as above, and then we did a call to
Dest->replaceAllUsesWith(&*I);
with old and new being equal, and an assertion triggered.
Reviewers: chandlerc, fhahn
Reviewed By: fhahn
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51280
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340820 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This lines up with the behavior of an existing transform where if both
operands of the binop are shuffled, we allow moving the binop before the
shuffle regardless of whether the shuffle changes the size of the vector.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340787 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We have a class `ImplicitControlFlowTracking` which allows us to keep track of
instructions that can abnormally exit and answer queries like "whether or not
there is side-exiting instruction above this instruction in its block".
We may want to have the similar tracking for other types of "special" instructions,
for example instructions that write memory.
This patch separates ImplicitControlFlowTracking into two classes, isolating all
general logic not related to implicit control flow into its parent class. We can
later make another child of this class to keep track of instructions that write
memory.
The motivation for that is that we want to make these checks efficiently in the
patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D50891.
NOTE: The naming of the parent class is not super cool, but the other options we
have are hardly better. Please feel free to rename it as NFC if you think you've
found a more informative name for it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50954
Reviewed By: fedor.sergeev
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340728 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a bit awkward in a handful of places where we didn't even have
an instruction and now we have to see if we can build one. But on the
whole, this seems like a win and at worst a reasonable cost for removing
`TerminatorInst`.
All of this is part of the removal of `TerminatorInst` from the
`Instruction` type hierarchy.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340701 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
`isExceptionalTermiantor` and implement it for opcodes as well following
the common pattern in `Instruction`.
Part of removing `TerminatorInst` from the `Instruction` type hierarchy
to make it easier to share logic and interfaces between instructions
that are both terminators and not terminators.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340699 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The core get and set routines move to the `Instruction` class. These
routines are only valid to call on instructions which are terminators.
The iterator and *generic* range based access move to `CFG.h` where all
the other generic successor and predecessor access lives. While moving
the iterator here, simplify it using the iterator utilities LLVM
provides and updates coding style as much as reasonable. The APIs remain
pointer-heavy when they could better use references, and retain the odd
behavior of `operator*` and `operator->` that is common in LLVM
iterators. Adjusting this API, if desired, should be a follow-up step.
Non-generic range iteration is added for the two instructions where
there is an especially easy mechanism and where there was code
attempting to use the range accessor from a specific subclass:
`indirectbr` and `br`. In both cases, the successors are contiguous
operands and can be easily iterated via the operand list.
This is the first major patch in removing the `TerminatorInst` type from
the IR's instruction type hierarchy. This change was discussed in an RFC
here and was pretty clearly positive:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-May/123407.html
There will be a series of much more mechanical changes following this
one to complete this move.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47467
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340698 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Sometimes reading an output *.ll file it is not easy to understand why some callsites are not inlined. We can read output of inline remarks (option --pass-remarks-missed=inline) and try correlating its messages with the callsites.
An easier way proposed by this patch is to add to every callsite processed by Inliner an attribute with the latest message that describes the cause of not inlining this callsite. The attribute is called //inline-remark//. By default this feature is off. It can be switched on by the option //-inline-remark-attribute//.
For example in the provided test the result method //@test1// has two callsites //@bar// and inline remarks report different inlining missed reasons:
remark: <unknown>:0:0: bar not inlined into test1 because too costly to inline (cost=-5, threshold=-6)
remark: <unknown>:0:0: bar not inlined into test1 because it should never be inlined (cost=never): recursive
It is not clear which remark correspond to which callsite. With the inline remark attribute enabled we get the reasons attached to their callsites:
define void @test1() {
call void @bar(i1 true) #0
call void @bar(i1 false) #2
ret void
}
attributes #0 = { "inline-remark"="(cost=-5, threshold=-6)" }
..
attributes #2 = { "inline-remark"="(cost=never): recursive" }
Patch by: yrouban (Yevgeny Rouban)
Reviewers: xbolva00, tejohnson, apilipenko
Reviewed By: xbolva00, tejohnson
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50435
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340618 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Once the invariant_start is reached, we know that no instruction *after* it can modify the memory. So, if we can prove the location isn't read *between entry into the loop and the execution of the invariant_start*, we can execute the invariant_start before entering the loop.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51181
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340617 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch makes the DoesKMove argument non-optional, to force people
to think about it. Most cases where it is false are either code hoisting
or code sinking, where we pick one instruction from a set of
equal instructions among different code paths.
Reviewers: dberlin, nlopes, efriedma, davide
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47475
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340606 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Avoid "count" if possible -> use "find" to check for the existence of keys.
Passed llvm test suite.
Reviewers: fhahn, dcaballe, mkuper, rengolin
Reviewed By: fhahn
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51054
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340563 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These changes expand the FunctionAttr logic in order to mark functions as
WriteOnly when appropriate. This is done through an additional bool variable
and extended logic.
Reviewers: hfinkel, jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48387
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340537 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When GVN sets the incoming value for a phi to undef because the incoming block
is unreachable it needs to also invalidate the cached info for that phi in
MemoryDependenceAnalysis, otherwise later queries will return stale information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51099
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340529 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This version of the patch fixes cleaning up ssa_copy intrinsics, so it does not
crash for instructions in blocks that have been marked unreachable.
This patch updates IPSCCP to use PredicateInfo to propagate
facts to true branches predicated by EQ and to false branches
predicated by NE.
As a follow up, we should be able to extend it to also propagate additional
facts about nonnull.
Reviewers: davide, mssimpso, dberlin, efriedma
Reviewed By: davide, dberlin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45330
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340525 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Most users won't have to worry about this as all of the
'getOrInsertFunction' functions on Module will default to the program
address space.
An overload has been added to Function::Create to abstract away the
details for most callers.
This is based on https://reviews.llvm.org/D37054 but without the changes to
make passing a Module to Function::Create() mandatory. I have also added
some more tests and fixed the LLParser to accept call instructions for
types in the program address space.
Reviewed By: bjope
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47541
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340519 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Add MemorySSA as a dependency to LoopSimplifyCFG and preserve it.
Disabled by default until all passes preserve MemorySSA.
Reviewers: bogner, chandlerc
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, Prazek, george.burgess.iv, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50911
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340445 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Add MemorySSA as a depency to LoopInstInstSimplify and preserve it.
Disabled by default until all passes preserve MemorySSA.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, Prazek, george.burgess.iv, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50906
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340444 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Guard widening should not spend efforts on dealing with guards with trivial true/false conditions.
Such guards can easily be eliminated by any further cleanup pass like instcombine. However we
should not unconditionally delete them because it may be profitable to widen other conditions
into such guards.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50247
Reviewed By: fedor.sergeev
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340381 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently CodeExtractor tries to use the next node after an invoke to
place the store for the result of the invoke, if it is an out parameter
of the region. This fails, as the invoke terminates the current BB.
In that case, we can place the store in the 'normal destination' BB, as
the result will only be available in that case.
Reviewers: davidxl, davide, efriedma
Reviewed By: davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51037
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340331 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I'm assuming its easier to make sure the RHS of an XOR is all ones than it is to check for the many select patterns we have. So lets check that first. Same with the one use check.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340321 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently we assign the same value number to two calls reading the same
memory location if we do not have MemoryDependence info. Without MemDep
Info we cannot guarantee that there is no store between the two calls, so we
have to assign a new number to the second call.
It also adds a new option EnableMemDep to enable/disable running
MemoryDependenceAnalysis and also renamed NoLoads to NoMemDepAnalysis to
be more explicit what it does. As it also impacts calls that read memory,
NoLoads is a bit confusing.
Reviewers: efriedma, sebpop, john.brawn, wmi
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50893
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340319 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Volatility is not an aliasing property. We used to model volatile as if it had extremely conservative aliasing implications, but that hasn't been true for several years now. So, it doesn't make sense to be in AliasSet.
It also turns out the code is entirely a noop. Outside of the AST code to update it, there was only one user: load store promotion in LICM. L/S promotion doesn't need the check since it walks all the users of the address anyway. It already checks each load or store via !isUnordered which causes us to bail for volatile accesses. (Look at the lines immediately following the two remove asserts.)
There is the possibility of some small compile time impact here, but the only case which will get noticeably slower is a loop with a large number of loads and stores to the same address where only the last one we inspect is volatile. This is sufficiently rare it's not worth optimizing for..
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340312 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
DAGCombiner doesn't pay attention to whether constants are opaque before doing the div by constant optimization. So BypassSlowDivision shouldn't introduce control flow that would make DAGCombiner unable to see an opaque constant. This can occur when a div and rem of the same constant are used in the same basic block. it will be hoisted, but not leave the block.
Longer term we probably need to look into the X86 immediate cost model used by constant hoisting and maybe not mark div/rem immediates for hoisting at all.
This fixes the case from PR38649.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51000
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340303 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Follow up change to rL339703, where we now vectorize loops with non-phi
instructions used outside the loop. Note that the cyclic dependency
identification occurs when identifying reduction/induction vars.
We also need to identify that we do not allow users where the PSCEV information
within and outside the loop are different. This was the fix added in rL307837
for PR33706.
Reviewers: Ayal, mkuper, fhahn
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50778
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340278 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
