5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chandler Carruth
6b547686c5 Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@351636 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2019-01-19 08:50:56 +00:00
Mikael Holmen
fadab83bc0 Require DominatorTree when requiring/preserving LoopInfo in the old pass manager
Summary:
Require DominatorTree when requiring/preserving LoopInfo in the old pass manager

BreakCriticalEdges tries to keep LoopInfo and DominatorTree updated if they
exist. However, since commit r321653 and r321805, to update LoopInfo we
must have a DominatorTree, or we will hit an assert.

To fix this we now make a couple of passes that only required/preserved
LoopInfo also require DominatorTree.

This solves PR37334.

Reviewers: eli.friedman, efriedma

Reviewed By: efriedma

Subscribers: efriedma, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46829

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@332583 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2018-05-17 09:05:40 +00:00
Adam Nemet
25b6db9fd9 [LazyBFI] Fix typos
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@295073 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-02-14 17:21:12 +00:00
Adam Nemet
b17a45cae0 [BPI] Add new LazyBPI analysis
Summary:
The motivation is the same as in D22141: In order to add the hotness
attribute to optimization remarks we need BFI to be available in all
passes that emit optimization remarks.  BFI depends on BPI so unless we
make this lazy as well we would still compute BPI unconditionally.

The solution is to use the new LazyBPI pass in LazyBFI and only compute
BPI when computation of BFI is requested by the client.

I extended the laziness test using a LoopDistribute test to also cover
BPI.

Reviewers: hfinkel, davidxl

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22835

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@277083 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2016-07-28 23:31:12 +00:00
Adam Nemet
15e85ff776 [BFI] Add new LazyBFI analysis pass
Summary:
This is necessary for D21771.  In order to add the hotness attribute to
optimization remarks we need BFI to be available in all passes that emit
optimization remarks.

However we don't want to pay for computing BFI unless the hotness
attribute is requested.

This is achieved by making BFI lazy at the very high-level through a new
analysis pass -- BFI is not calculated unless requested.

I am adding a test to check the laziness under D21771 where the first
user of the analysis is added.

Reviewers: hfinkel, dexonsmith, davidxl

Subscribers: davidxl, dexonsmith, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22141

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@275250 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2016-07-13 05:01:48 +00:00