Removed the redundant "llvm::" from class names in InstrProfiling.cpp
clang-format is ran on the changes.
Patch from Betul Buyukkurt.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@239034 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This fixes a bit I forgot in r238335. In addition to the data record and
the counter, we can also move the name of the counter to the comdat for
the associated function.
I'm also adding an IR test case to check that these three elements are
placed in the proper comdat.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@238351 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Counter symbols created for linkonce functions are not discarded by ELF
linkers unless the symbols are placed in the same comdat section as its
associated function.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@238335 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This change is the second of 3 patches to add support for specifying
the profile output from the command line via -fprofile-instr-generate=<path>,
where the specified output path/file will be overridden by the
LLVM_PROFILE_FILE environment variable.
This patch adds the necessary support to the llvm instrumenter, specifically
a new member of GCOVOptions for clang to save the specified filename, and
support for calling the new compiler-rt interface from __llvm_profile_init.
Patch by Teresa Johnson. Thanks!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@236288 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This symbol exists only to pull in the required pieces of the runtime,
so nothing ever needs to refer to it. Making it hidden avoids the
potential for issues with duplicate symbols when linking profiled
libraries together.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@230566 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add handling for __llvm_coverage_mapping to the InstrProfiling
pass. We need to make sure the constant and any profile names it
refers to are in the correct sections, which is easier and cleaner to
do here where we have to know about profiling sections anyway.
This is really tricky to test without a frontend, so I'm committing
the test for the fix in clang. If anyone knows a good way to test this
within LLVM, please let me know.
Fixes PR22531.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@228793 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Introduce the ``llvm.instrprof_increment`` intrinsic and the
``-instrprof`` pass. These provide the infrastructure for writing
counters for profiling, as in clang's ``-fprofile-instr-generate``.
The implementation of the instrprof pass is ported directly out of the
CodeGenPGO classes in clang, and with the followup in clang that rips
that code out to use these new intrinsics this ends up being NFC.
Doing the instrumentation this way opens some doors in terms of
improving the counter performance. For example, this will make it
simple to experiment with alternate lowering strategies, and allows us
to try handling profiling specially in some optimizations if we want
to.
Finally, this drastically simplifies the frontend and puts all of the
lowering logic in one place.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@223672 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
