------------------------------------------------------------------------
r245588 | aprantl | 2015-08-20 14:23:56 -0400 (Thu, 20 Aug 2015) | 11 lines
Fix a debug location handling bug in GVN.
Caught by the famous "DebugLoc describes the currect SubProgram" assertion.
When GVN is removing a nonlocal load it updates the debug location of the
SSA value it replaced the load with with the one of the load. In the
testcase this actually overwrites a valid debug location with an empty one.
In reality GVN has to make an arbitrary choice between two equally valid
debug locations. This patch changes to behavior to only update the
location if the value doesn't already have a debug location.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_37@253571 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r246694 | benny.kra | 2015-09-02 15:52:23 -0400 (Wed, 02 Sep 2015) | 44 lines
[RemoveDuplicatePHINodes] Start over after removing a PHI.
This makes RemoveDuplicatePHINodes more effective and fixes an assertion
failure. Triggering the assertions requires a DenseSet reallocation
so this change only contains a constructive test.
I'll explain the issue with a small example. In the following function
there's a duplicate PHI, %4 and %5 are identical. When this is found
the DenseSet in RemoveDuplicatePHINodes contains %2, %3 and %4.
define void @F() {
br label %1
; <label>:1 ; preds = %1, %0
%2 = phi i32 [ 42, %0 ], [ %4, %1 ]
%3 = phi i32 [ 42, %0 ], [ %5, %1 ]
%4 = phi i32 [ 42, %0 ], [ 23, %1 ]
%5 = phi i32 [ 42, %0 ], [ 23, %1 ]
br label %1
}
after RemoveDuplicatePHINodes runs the function looks like this. %3 has
changed and is now identical to %2, but RemoveDuplicatePHINodes never
saw this.
define void @F() {
br label %1
; <label>:1 ; preds = %1, %0
%2 = phi i32 [ 42, %0 ], [ %4, %1 ]
%3 = phi i32 [ 42, %0 ], [ %4, %1 ]
%4 = phi i32 [ 42, %0 ], [ 23, %1 ]
br label %1
}
If the DenseSet does a reallocation now it will reinsert all
keys and stumble over %3 now having a different hash value than it had
when inserted into the map for the first time. This change clears the
set whenever a PHI is deleted and starts the progress from the
beginning, allowing %3 to be deleted and avoiding inconsistent DenseSet
state. This potentially has a negative performance impact because
it rescans all PHIs, but I don't think that this ever makes a difference
in practice.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_37@252938 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r245820 | mehdi.amini | 2015-08-23 18:15:49 -0400 (Sun, 23 Aug 2015) | 64 lines
Require Dominator Tree For SROA, improve compile-time
TL-DR: SROA is followed by EarlyCSE which requires the DominatorTree.
There is no reason not to require it up-front for SROA.
Some history is necessary to understand why we ended-up here.
r123437 switched the second (Legacy)SROA in the optimizer pipeline to
use SSAUpdater in order to avoid recomputing the costly
DominanceFrontier. The purpose was to speed-up the compile-time.
Later r123609 removed the need for the DominanceFrontier in
(Legacy)SROA.
Right after, some cleanup was made in r123724 to remove any reference
to the DominanceFrontier. SROA existed in two flavors: SROA_SSAUp and
SROA_DT (the latter replacing SROA_DF).
The second argument of `createScalarReplAggregatesPass` was renamed
from `UseDomFrontier` to `UseDomTree`.
I believe this is were a mistake was made. The pipeline was not
updated and the call site was still:
PM->add(createScalarReplAggregatesPass(-1, false));
At that time, SROA was immediately followed in the pipeline by
EarlyCSE which required alread the DominatorTree. Not requiring
the DominatorTree in SROA didn't save anything, but unfortunately
it was lost at this point.
When the new SROA Pass was introduced in r163965, I believe the goal
was to have an exact replacement of the existing SROA, this bug
slipped through.
You can see currently:
$ echo "" | clang -x c++ -O3 -c - -mllvm -debug-pass=Structure
...
...
FunctionPass Manager
SROA
Dominator Tree Construction
Early CSE
After this patch:
$ echo "" | clang -x c++ -O3 -c - -mllvm -debug-pass=Structure
...
...
FunctionPass Manager
Dominator Tree Construction
SROA
Early CSE
This improves the compile time from 88s to 23s for PR17855.
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17855
And from 113s to 12s for PR16756
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16756
Reviewers: chandlerc
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12267
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_37@252510 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r229099 in branch 37 only, because it caused PR24292.
I'll continue investigating and will fix on trunk, but being an optimization
change, we can let the rest of the release go without this one.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_37@245568 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r244448 | fcormack | 2015-08-10 07:48:47 -0700 (Mon, 10 Aug 2015) | 12 lines
Prevent the scalarizer from caching incorrect entries
The scalarizer can cache incorrect entries when walking up a chain of
insertelement instructions. This occurs when it encounters more than one
instruction that it is not actively searching for, as it unconditionally caches
every element it finds. The fix is to only cache the first element that it
isn't searching for so we don't overwrite correct entries.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11559
------------------------------------------------------------------------
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_37@245457 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r245119 | nicholas | 2015-08-14 15:46:49 -0700 (Fri, 14 Aug 2015) | 2 lines
Fix a crash where a utility function wasn't aware of fcmp vectors and created a value with the wrong type. Fixes PR24458!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_37@245386 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r243999 | tbrethou | 2015-08-04 20:51:17 -0700 (Tue, 04 Aug 2015) | 2 lines
Rename all references to old mailing lists to new lists.llvm.org address.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_37@244768 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r244676 | sanjoy | 2015-08-11 14:33:55 -0700 (Tue, 11 Aug 2015) | 7 lines
Fix PR24354.
`InstCombiner::OptimizeOverflowCheck` was asserting an
invariant (operands to binary operations are ordered by decreasing
complexity) that wasn't really an invariant. Fix this by instead having
`InstCombiner::OptimizeOverflowCheck` establish the invariant if it does
not hold.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_37@244764 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r242869 | chandlerc | 2015-07-21 20:32:42 -0700 (Tue, 21 Jul 2015) | 60 lines
[SROA] Fix a nasty pile of bugs to do with big-endian, different alloca
types and loads, loads or stores widened past the size of an alloca,
etc.
This started off with a bug report about big-endian behavior with
bitfields and loads and stores to a { i32, i24 } struct. An initial
attempt to fix this was sent for review in D10357, but that didn't
really get to the root of the problem.
The core issue was that canConvertValue and convertValue in SROA were
handling different bitwidth integers by doing a zext of the integer. It
wouldn't do a trunc though, only a zext! This would in turn lead SROA to
form an i24 load from an i24 alloca, zext it to i32, and then use it.
This would at least produce the wrong value for big-endian systems.
One of my many false starts here was to correct the computation for
big-endian systems by shifting. But this doesn't actually work because
the original code has a 64-bit store to the entire 8 bytes, and a 32-bit
load of the last 4 bytes, and because the alloc size is 8 bytes, we
can't lose that last (least significant if bigendian) byte! The real
problem here is that we're forming an i24 load in SROA which is actually
not sufficiently wide to load all of the necessary bits here. The source
has an i32 load, and SROA needs to form that as well.
The straightforward way to do this is to disable the zext logic in
canConvertValue and convertValue, forcing us to actually load all
32-bits. This seems like a really good change, but it in turn breaks
several other parts of SROA.
First in the chain of knock-on failures, we had places where we were
doing integer-widening promotion even though some of the integer loads
or stores extended *past the end* of the alloca's memory! There was even
a comment about preventing this, but it only prevented the case where
the type had a different bit size from its store size. So I added checks
to handle the cases where we actually have a widened load or store and
to avoid trying to special integer widening promotion in those cases.
Second, we actually rely on the ability to promote in the face of loads
past the end of an alloca! This is important so that we can (for
example) speculate loads around PHI nodes to do more promotion. The bits
loaded are garbage, but as long as they aren't used and the alignment is
suitable high (which it wasn't in the test case!) this is "fine". And we
can't stop promoting here, lots of things stop working well if we do. So
we need to add specific logic to handle the extension (and truncation)
case, but *only* where that extension or truncation are over bytes that
*are outside the alloca's allocated storage* and thus totally bogus to
load or store.
And of course, once we add back this correct handling of extension or
truncation, we need to correctly handle bigendian systems to avoid
re-introducing the exact bug that started us off on this chain of misery
in the first place, but this time even more subtle as it only happens
along speculated loads atop a PHI node.
I've ported an existing test for PHI speculation to the big-endian test
file and checked that we get that part correct, and I've added several
more interesting big-endian test cases that should help check that we're
getting this correct.
Fun times.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_37@242924 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I am planning to add more nested classes inside RuntimePointerCheck so
all these triple-nesting would be hard to follow.
Also rename it to RuntimePointerChecking (i.e. append 'ing').
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@242218 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Sometimes an incidentally created instruction can duplicate a Value used
elsewhere. It then often doesn't end up in the leader table. If it's later
removed, we attempt to remove it from the leader table and segfault.
Instead we should just ignore the removal request, which won't cause any
problems. The reverse situation, where the original instruction is replaced by
the new one (which you might think could leave the leader table empty) cannot
occur, because the incidental instruction will never be found in the first
place.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@242199 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Volatile loads and stores are made visible in global state regardless of
what memory is involved. It is not correct to disregard the ordering
and synchronization scope because it is possible to synchronize with
memory operations performed by hardware.
This partially addresses PR23737.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@242126 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously we would refrain from attempting to increase the linkage of
available_externally globals because they were considered weak for the
linker. Now they are treated more like a declaration instead of a weak
definition.
This was causing SSE alignment faults in Chromuim, when some code
assumed it could increase the alignment of a dllimported global that it
didn't control. http://crbug.com/509256
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@242091 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When spotting that a loop can use ctpop, we were incorrectly replacing all uses of a value with a value derived from ctpop.
The bug here was exposed because we were replacing a use prior to the ctpop with the ctpop value and so we have a use before def, i.e., we changed
%tobool.5 = icmp ne i32 %num, 0
store i1 %tobool.5, i1* %ptr
br i1 %tobool.5, label %for.body.lr.ph, label %for.end
to
store i1 %1, i1* %ptr
%0 = call i32 @llvm.ctpop.i32(i32 %num)
%1 = icmp ne i32 %0, 0
br i1 %1, label %for.body.lr.ph, label %for.end
Even if we inserted the ctpop so that it dominates the store here, that would still be incorrect. The store doesn’t want the result of ctpop.
The fix is very simple, and involves replacing only the branch condition with the ctpop instead of all uses.
Reviewed by Hal Finkel.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@242068 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Enable runtime unrolling for loops with unroll count metadata ("#pragma unroll N")
and a runtime trip count. Also, do not unroll loops with unroll full metadata if the
loop has a runtime loop count. Previously, such loops would be unrolled with a
very large threshold (pragma-unroll-threshold) if runtime unrolled happened to be
enabled resulting in a very large (and likely unwise) unroll factor.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@242047 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Passes should never modify it, just use the const version. While there
reduce copying in LoopInterchange. No functional change intended.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@242041 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There is no suitable basic block to sink instructions in loops without
exits. The only way an instruction in a loop without exits can be used
is as an incoming value to a PHI. In such cases, the incoming block for
the corresponding value is unreachable.
This fixes PR24013.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10903
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@241987 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The following functions are moved from the LoopVectorizer to VectorUtils:
- getGEPInductionOperand
- stripGetElementPtr
- getUniqueCastUse
- getStrideFromPointer
These used to be static functions in LoopVectorize, but will also be used by
the upcoming loop versioning LICM transformation.
Patch by Ashutosh Nema!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@241980 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
No in-tree alias analysis used this facility, and it was not called in
any particularly rigorous way, so it seems unlikely to be correct.
Note that one of the only stateful AA implementations in-tree,
GlobalsModRef is completely broken currently (and any AA passes like it
are equally broken) because Module AA passes are not effectively
invalidated when a function pass that fails to update the AA stack runs.
Ultimately, it doesn't seem like we know how we want to build stateful
AA, and until then trying to support and maintain correctness for an
untested API is essentially impossible. To that end, I'm planning to rip
out all of the update API. It can return if and when we need it and know
how to build it on top of the new pass manager and as part of *tested*
stateful AA implementations in the tree.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10889
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@241975 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Following the discussion on r241884, it's more reasonable to assume that a
target has no vector registers by default instead of letting every such
target overrides getNumberOfRegisters.
Therefore, this patch modifies BasicTTIImpl::getNumberOfRegisters to
return 0 when Vector is true, and partially reverts r241884 which
modifies NVPTXTTIImpl::getNumberOfRegisters.
It also fixes a performance bug in LoopVectorizer. Even if a target has
no vector registers, vectorization may still help ILP. So, we need both
checks to be false before disabling loop vectorization all together.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11108
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@241942 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The class will obviously need improvement down the road. For one, there
is no reason that addPHINodes would have to be exposed like that. I
will make this and other improvements in follow-up patches.
The main goal is to be able to share this functionality. The
LoopLoadElimination pass I am working on needs it too. Later we can
move other clients as well (LV and Ashutosh's LICMVer).
Reviewers: hfinkel, ashutosh.nema
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10577
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@241932 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This makes them available to the LoopVersioning class as that is moved
to its own module in the next patch.
Reviewers: ashutosh.nema, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10576
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@241931 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This introduces new instructions neccessary to implement MSVC-compatible
exception handling support. Most of the middle-end and none of the
back-end haven't been audited or updated to take them into account.
Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, reames, nlewycky, rjmccall
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11041
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@241888 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Not doing this can lead to misoptimizations down the line, e.g. because
of range metadata on the replacing load excluding values that are valid
for the load that is being replaced.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@241886 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
In RewriteLoopExitValues, before expanding out an SCEV expression using
SCEVExpander, try to see if an existing LLVM IR expression already
computes the value we're interested in. If so use that existing
expression.
Apart from reducing IndVars' reliance on the rest of the compilation
pipeline, this also prevents IndVars from concluding some expressions as
"high cost" when they're not. For instance,
`InductiveRangeCheckElimination` often emits code of the following form:
```
len = umin(len_A, len_B)
loop:
...
if (i++ < len)
goto loop
outside_loop:
use(i)
```
`SCEVExpander` refuses to rewrite the use of `i` in `outside_loop`,
since it thinks the value of `i` on loop exit, `len`, is a high cost
expansion since it contains an `umax` in it. With this change,
`IndVars` can see that it can re-use `len` instead of creating a new
expression to compute `umin(len_A, len_B)`.
I considered putting this cleverness in `SCEVExpander`, but I was
worried that it may then have a deterimental effect on other passes
that use it. So I decided it was better to just do this in the one
place where it seems like an obviously good idea, with the intent of
generalizing later if needed.
Reviewers: atrick, reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10782
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@241838 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Place all code corresponding to a run-time check in one place.
Previously we generated some code, then proceeded to a next check, then
finished the code for the first check (like splitting blocks and
generating branches). Now the code for generating a check is
self-contained.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@241741 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Initially, these intrinsics seemed like part of a family of "frame"
related intrinsics, but now I think that's more confusing than helpful.
Initially, the LangRef specified that this would create a new kind of
allocation that would be allocated at a fixed offset from the frame
pointer (EBP/RBP). We ended up dropping that design, and leaving the
stack frame layout alone.
These intrinsics are really about sharing local stack allocations, not
frame pointers. I intend to go further and add an `llvm.localaddress()`
intrinsic that returns whatever register (EBP, ESI, ESP, RBX) is being
used to address locals, which should not be confused with the frame
pointer.
Naming suggestions at this point are welcome, I'm happy to re-run sed.
Reviewers: majnemer, nicholas
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11011
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@241633 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r241602. We had a latent bug in SCCP where we would
make a basic block empty and then proceed to ask questions about it's
terminator.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@241616 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This change includes a fix for https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=499508#c3,
which required updating the visibility for symbols with eliminated definitions.
--Original Commit Message--
Add new EliminateAvailableExternally module pass, which is performed in
O2 compiles just before GlobalDCE, unless we are preparing for LTO.
This pass eliminates available externally globals (turning them into
declarations), regardless of whether they are dead/unreferenced, since
we are guaranteed to have a copy available elsewhere at link time.
This enables additional opportunities for GlobalDCE.
If we are preparing for LTO (e.g. a -flto -c compile), the pass is not
included as we want to preserve available externally functions for possible
link time inlining. The FE indicates whether we are doing an -flto compile
via the new PrepareForLTO flag on the PassManagerBuilder.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@241466 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Tom Stellard