Summary:
Adds a string saver to the ModuleSummaryIndex so it can store value
names in the case of adding a ValueInfo for a GUID when we don't
have the name stored in a Module string table. This is motivated
by the upcoming summary parser patch, where we will read value names
from the summary entry and want to store them, even when a Module
is not available.
Currently this allows us to store the name in the legacy bitcode case,
and I have added a test to show that.
Reviewers: pcc, dexonsmith
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47842
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@335570 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
I discovered when writing the summary parsing support that the
per-module index builder and writer are computing the GUID from the
value name alone (ignoring the linkage type). This was ok since those
GUID were not emitted in the bitcode, and there are never multiple
conflicting names in a single module.
However, I don't see a reason for making the GUID computation different
for the per-module case. It also makes things simpler on the parsing
side to have the GUID computation consistent. So this patch changes the
summary analysis phase and the per-module summary writer to compute the
GUID using the facility on the GlobalValue.
Reviewers: pcc, dexonsmith
Subscribers: llvm-commits, inglorion
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47844
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@335560 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There are quite a few if statements that enumerate all these cases. It gets
even worse in our fork of LLVM where we also have a Triple::cheri (which
is mips64 + CHERI instructions) and we had to update all if statements that
check for Triple::mips64 to also handle Triple::cheri. This patch helps to
reduce our diff to upstream and should also make some checks more readable.
Reviewed By: atanasyan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48548
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@335493 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We can prove that some delinearized subscripts do not wrap around to become
negative by the fact that they are from inbound geps of load/store locations.
This helps improve the delinearisation in cases where we can't prove that they
are non-negative from SCEV alone.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48481
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@335481 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It's easy for domination numbers to get out-of-date, and this is no more
costly than any of the other verifiers we already have, so it seems nice
to have.
A stage3 build with this Works On My Machine, so this hasn't caught any
bugs... yet. :)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@335444 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
clear out deleted loops from the current queue beyond just the current
loop.
This is important because SimpleLoopUnswitch will now enqueue the same
loop to be re-processed. When it does this with the legacy PM, we don't
have a way of canceling the rest of the pipeline and so we can end up
deleting the loop before we reprocess it. =/
This change also makes it easy to support deleting other loops in the
queue to process, although I don't have any use cases for that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48470
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@335317 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This initiates a discussion on changing Polly accordingly while re-applying r335197 (D48338).
I have never worked on Polly. The proposed change to param_div_div_div_2.ll is not educated, but just patterns that match the output.
All LLVM files are already reviewed in D48338.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, bollu, efriedma
Subscribers: jlebar, sanjoy, hiraditya, llvm-commits, bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48453
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@335292 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This enables da-delinearize in Dependence Analysis for delinearizing array
accesses into multiple dimensions. This can help to increase the power of
Dependence analysis on multi-dimensional arrays and prevent having to fall
back to the slower and less accurate MIV tests. It adds static checks on the
bounds of the arrays to ensure that one dimension doesn't overflow into
another, and brings our code in line with our tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45872
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@335217 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Try to match udiv and urem patterns, and sink zext down to the leaves.
I'm not entirely sure why some unrelated tests change, but the added <nsw>s seem right.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: jlebar, hiraditya, bixia, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48338
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@335197 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: Make the MemorySSA verify also check that all Phi incoming blocks are block predecessors.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48333
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@335174 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For both operands are unsigned, the following optimizations are valid, and missing:
1. X > Y && X != 0 --> X > Y
2. X > Y || X != 0 --> X != 0
3. X <= Y || X != 0 --> true
4. X <= Y || X == 0 --> X <= Y
5. X > Y && X == 0 --> false
unsigned foo(unsigned x, unsigned y) { return x > y && x != 0; }
should fold to x > y, but I found we haven't done it right now.
besides, unsigned foo(unsigned x, unsigned y) { return x < y && y != 0; }
Has been folded to x < y, so there may be a bug.
Patch by: Li Jia He!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47922
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@335129 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The optimizer is getting smarter (eg, D47986) about differentiating shuffles
based on its mask values, so we should make queries on the mask constant
operand generally available to avoid code duplication.
We'll probably use this soon in the vectorizers and instcombine (D48023 and
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37806).
We might clean up TTI a bit more once all of its current 'SK_*' options are
covered.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48236
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@335067 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts r334428. It incorrectly marks some multiplications as nuw. Tim
Shen is working on a proper fix.
Original commit message:
[SCEV] Add nuw/nsw to mul ops in StrengthenNoWrapFlags where safe.
Summary:
Previously we would add them for adds, but not multiplies.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@335016 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Obviates the need for mask/clear/setFlags helpers.
There are some expressions here which can be simplified, but to keep
this easy to review, I have not simplified them in this patch.
No functional change.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48237
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@334874 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In particular, when asked to print a MemoryAccess, we'll now print where
defs are optimized to, and we'll print optimized access types.
This patch also introduces an operator<< to make printing AliasResults
easier.
Patch by Juneyoung Lee!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47860
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@334760 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Specifically, we transform
zext(2^K * (trunc X to iN)) to iM ->
2^K * (zext(trunc X to i{N-K}) to iM)<nuw>
This is helpful because pulling the 2^K out of the zext allows further
optimizations.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, timshen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48158
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@334737 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Previously we would do this simplification only if it did not introduce
any new truncs (excepting new truncs which replace other cast ops).
This change weakens this condition: If the number of truncs stays the
same, but we're able to transform trunc(X + Y) to X + trunc(Y), that's
still simpler, and it may open up additional transformations.
While we're here, also clean up some duplicated code.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48160
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@334736 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As discussed on PR33744, this patch relaxes ShuffleKind::SK_Alternate which requires shuffle masks to only match an alternating pattern from its 2 sources:
e.g. v4f32: <0,5,2,7> or <4,1,6,3>
This seems far too restrictive as most SIMD hardware which will implement it using a general blend/bit-select instruction, so replaces it with SK_Select, permitting elements from either source as long as they are inline:
e.g. v4f32: <0,5,2,7>, <4,1,6,3>, <0,1,6,7>, <4,1,2,3> etc.
This initial patch just updates the name and cost model shuffle mask analysis, later patch reviews will update SLP to better utilise this - it still limits itself to SK_Alternate style patterns.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47985
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@334513 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As discussed on D47985, identity shuffle masks should probably be free.
I've limited this to the case where the input and output types all match - but we could probably accept all cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47986
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@334506 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
An expression like
(zext i2 {(trunc i32 (1 + %B) to i2),+,1}<%while.body> to i32)
will become zero exactly when the nested value becomes zero in its type.
Strip injective operations from the input value in howFarToZero to make
the value simpler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47951
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@334318 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
`%ret = add nuw i8 %x, C`
From [[ https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#add-instruction | langref ]]:
nuw and nsw stand for “No Unsigned Wrap” and “No Signed Wrap”,
respectively. If the nuw and/or nsw keywords are present,
the result value of the add is a poison value if unsigned
and/or signed overflow, respectively, occurs.
So if `C` is `-1`, `%x` can only be `0`, and the result is always `-1`.
I'm not sure we want to use `KnownBits`/`LVI` here, because there is
exactly one possible value (all bits set, `-1`), so some other pass
should take care of replacing the known-all-ones with constant `-1`.
The `test/Transforms/InstCombine/set-lowbits-mask-canonicalize.ll` change *is* confusing.
What happening is, before this: (omitting `nuw` for simplicity)
1. First, InstCombine D47428/rL334127 folds `shl i32 1, %NBits`) to `shl nuw i32 -1, %NBits`
2. Then, InstSimplify D47883/rL334222 folds `shl nuw i32 -1, %NBits` to `-1`,
3. `-1` is inverted to `0`.
But now:
1. *This* InstSimplify fold `%ret = add nuw i32 %setbit, -1` -> `-1` happens first,
before InstCombine D47428/rL334127 fold could happen.
Thus we now end up with the opposite constant,
and it is all good: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/OA9https://rise4fun.com/Alive/sldC
Was mentioned in D47428 review.
Follow-up for D47883.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47908
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@334298 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently the loop branch heuristic is applied before the invoke heuristic which makes us overestimate the probability of the unwind destination of invokes inside loops. This in turn makes us grossly underestimate the frequencies of loops with invokes.
Reviewed By: skatkov, vsk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47371
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@334285 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
`%r = shl nuw i8 C, %x`
As per langref:
```
If the nuw keyword is present, then the shift produces
a poison value if it shifts out any non-zero bits.
```
Thus, if the sign bit is set on `C`, then `%x` can only be `0`,
which means that `%r` can only be `C`.
Or in other words, set sign bit means that the signed value
is negative, so the constant is `<= 0`.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/WMkhttps://rise4fun.com/Alive/udv
Was mentioned in D47428 review.
We already handle the `0` constant, https://godbolt.org/g/UZq1sJ, so this only handles negative constants.
Could use computeKnownBits() / LazyValueInfo,
but the cost-benefit analysis (https://reviews.llvm.org/D47891)
suggests it isn't worth it.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47883
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@334222 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These weren't included in D19544 - probably just an oversight.
D40044 made it more likely that we'll have LLVM math intrinsics rather
than libcalls, so this bug was more easily exposed.
As the tests/code show, we already have the complete mappings for pow/exp/log.
I don't have any experience with SVML, so I don't know if anything else is
missing. It's also not clear to me that we should be doing this transform in
IR rather than DAG/isel, but that's a separate issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47610
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@334211 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
With the upcoming patch to add summary parsing support, IsAnalysis would
be true in contexts where we are not performing module summary analysis.
Rename to the more specific and approprate HaveGVs, which is essentially
what this flag is indicating.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@334140 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When checking a select to see if it matches an abs, allow the true/false values
to be a sign-extension of the comparison value instead of requiring that they're
directly the comparison value, as all the comparison cares about is the sign of
the value.
This fixes a regression due to r333702, where we were no longer generating ctlz
due to isKnownNonNegative failing to match such a pattern.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47631
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@333927 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
