Summary:
For relocation types that are known to not require stub functions, there
is no need to allocate extra space for the stub functions.
Reviewers: lhames, reames, maksfb
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14676
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@253920 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The new option is similar to the SampleProfile dump option.
- dump raw/indexed format into text profile format
- merge the profile and output into text profile format.
Note that Value Profiling data text format is not yet designed.
That functionality will be added later.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14894
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@253913 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add a shared helper routine to read the function index from a file
and create/return the function index object. Use it in llvm-link and
llvm-lto.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@253903 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Several fixes to the handling of bitcode files without function summary
sections so that they are skipped during ThinLTO processing in llvm-lto
and the gold plugin when appropriate instead of aborting.
1 Don't assert when trying to add a FunctionInfo that doesn't have
a summary attached.
2 Skip FunctionInfo structures that don't have attached function summary
sections when trying to create the combined function summary.
3 In both llvm-lto and gold-plugin, check whether a bitcode file has
a function summary section before trying to parse the index, and skip
the bitcode file if it does not.
4 Fix hasFunctionSummaryInMemBuffer in BitcodeReader, which had a bug
where we returned to early while looking for the summary section.
Also added llvm-lto and gold-plugin based tests for cases where we
don't have function summaries in the bitcode file. I verified that
either the first couple fixes described above are enough to avoid the
crashes, or fixes 1,3,4. But have combined them all here for added
robustness.
Reviewers: joker.eph
Subscribers: llvm-commits, joker.eph
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14903
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@253796 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Add a -preserve-modules option to llvm-link that simulates LTO
clients that don't destroy modules as they are linked. This enables
reproduction of a recent bug introduced by a metadata linking change
that was only caught when the modules weren't destroyed before
writing bitcode (LTO on Windows).
See http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=253170
for more details on the original bug and the fix.
Confirmed the new test added here reproduces the failure using the new
option when I suppress the fix.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14818
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@253740 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This is split out from the ThinLTO metadata mapping patch
http://reviews.llvm.org/D14752.
To avoid needing to parse the module level metadata during function
importing, a new module-level record is added which holds the
number of module-level metadata values. This is required because
metadata value ids are assigned implicitly during parsing, and the
function-level metadata ids start after the module-level metadata ids.
I made a change to this version of the code compared to D14752
in order to add more consistent and thorough assertion checking of the
new record value. We now unconditionally use the record value to
initialize the MDValueList size, and handle it the same in parseMetadata
for all module level metadata cases (lazy loading or not).
Reviewers: dexonsmith, joker.eph
Subscribers: davidxl, llvm-commits, joker.eph
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14825
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@253668 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This introduces two new options:
- "llvm-lto -save-merged-module -o outfile" dumps the LTO Module to
outfile.merged.bc prior to CodeGen and after LTO optimizations have been run.
- "llvm-lto -filetype=asm -o outfile" makes llvm-lto emit assembly instead of
object code in outfile.
Both are intended for use in lit tests.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@253624 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Missed bit of feedback from D14720.
Use SmallSet<std::error_code> rather than std::set<...> in order to be more efficient.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@253474 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Most linked executables do not have a symbol table in COFF.
However, it is pretty typical to have some export entries. Use those
entries to inform the disassembler about potential function definitions
and call targets.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@253429 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
While still allowing CodeGen/AsmPrinter in llvm to own them using a bump
ptr allocator. (might be nice to replace the pointers there with
something that at least automatically calls their dtors, if that's
necessary/useful, rather than having it done explicitly (I think a typed
BumpPtrAllocator already does this, or maybe a unique_ptr with a custom
deleter, etc))
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@253409 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Missed bit of feedback from D14720.
Show the same "Make sure that all profile
data to be merged is generated from the same binary." hint for hash mismatch
and value site count mismatch as we now do for counter mismatch when merging
incompatible instrumentation profile data.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@253400 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This change tries to make the root cause of instrumented profile data merge failures clearer.
Previous:
$ llvm-profdata merge test_0.profraw test_1.profraw -o test_merged.profdata
test_1.profraw: foo: Function count mismatch
test_1.profraw: bar: Function count mismatch
test_1.profraw: baz: Function count mismatch
...
Changed:
$ llvm-profdata merge test_0.profraw test_1.profraw -o test_merged.profdata
test_1.profraw: foo: Function basic block count change detected (counter mismatch)
Make sure that all profile data to be merged is generated from the same binary.
test_1.profraw: bar: Function basic block count change detected (counter mismatch)
test_1.profraw: baz: Function basic block count change detected (counter mismatch)
...
Reviewers: dnovillo, davidxl, bogner
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14739
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@253384 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch removes the std::string& argument from a number of C++ LTO API calls
and instead makes them use the installed diagnostic handler. This would also
improve consistency of diagnostic handling infrastructure: if an LTO client used
lto_codegen_set_diagnostic_handler() to install a custom error handler, we do
not want some error messages to go through the custom error handler, and some
other error messages to go into sLastErrorString.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@253367 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Now that setExecutable() changed to do all the ground work to make
memory executable on the host, we can remove all (redundant) calls
to invalidate instruction cache here.
As an added bonus, this makes invalidateInstructionCache() dead
code, so it can be removed.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13631
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@253343 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
There are currently two blocks with the METADATA_BLOCK id at module
scope. The first has the module-level metadata values (consisting of
some combination of METADATA_* record codes except for METADATA_KIND).
The second consists only of METADATA_KIND records. The latter is used
only in the METADATA_ATTACHMENT block within function blocks (for
metadata attached to instructions).
For ThinLTO we want to delay the parsing of module level metadata
until all functions have been imported from that module (there is some
bookkeeping used to suture it up when we read it during a post-pass).
However, we do need the METADATA_KIND records when parsing the function
body during importing, since those kinds are used as described above.
To simplify identification and parsing of just the block containing
the metadata kinds, use a different block id (METADATA_KIND_BLOCK_ID).
Support older bitcode without the new block id as well.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, joker.eph
Subscribers: davidxl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14654
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@253154 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This change addresses two possible instances of user error / confusion when
merging sampled profile data.
Previously any input that didn't match the raw or processed instrumented format
would automatically be interpreted as instrumented profile text format data.
No error would be reported during the merge.
Example:
If foo-sampled.profdata and bar-sampled.profdata are binary sampled profiles:
Old behavior:
$ llvm-profdata merge foo-sampled.profdata bar-sampled.profdata -output foobar-sampled.profdata
$ llvm-profdata show -sample foobar-sampled.profdata
error: foobar-sampled.profdata:1: Expected 'mangled_name:NUM:NUM', found lprofi
This change adds basic checks for valid input data when assuming text input.
It also makes error messages related to file format validity more specific about
the assumbed profile data type.
New behavior:
$ llvm-profdata merge foo-sampled.profdata bar-sampled.profdata -o foobar-sampled.profdata
error: foo.profdata: Unrecognized instrumentation profile encoding format
Perhaps you forgot to use the -sample option?
Reviewers: bogner, davidxl, dnovillo
Subscribers: davidxl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14558
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@253009 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This change addresses two possible instances of user error / confusion when
merging sampled profile data.
Previously any input that didn't match the raw or processed instrumented format
would automatically be interpreted as instrumented profile text format data.
No error would be reported during the merge.
Example:
If foo-sampled.profdata and bar-sampled.profdata are binary sampled profiles:
Old behavior:
$ llvm-profdata merge foo-sampled.profdata bar-sampled.profdata -output foobar-sampled.profdata
$ llvm-profdata show -sample foobar-sampled.profdata
error: foobar-sampled.profdata:1: Expected 'mangled_name:NUM:NUM', found lprofi
This change adds basic checks for valid input data when assuming text input.
It also makes error messages related to file format validity more specific about
the assumbed profile data type.
New behavior:
$ llvm-profdata merge foo-sampled.profdata bar-sampled.profdata -o foobar-sampled.profdata
error: foo.profdata: Unrecognized instrumentation profile encoding format
Perhaps you forgot to use the -sample option?
Reviewers: bogner, davidxl, dnovillo
Subscribers: davidxl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14558
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252916 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In `MachOObjectFile::getSymbolType` we currently always return `SymbolRef::ST_Function` for symbols from any section. In order for llvm-symbolizer to correctly symbolize Mach-O globals, symbols from data and BSS sections should return `SymbolRef::ST_Data`.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14576
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252867 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
