This uses TLS slot 90, which actually belongs to JavaScriptCore. We only support
frames with static size
Patch by Brian Anderson.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147960 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
hoped this would revive one of the llvm-gcc selfhost build bots, but it
didn't so it doesn't appear that my transform is the culprit.
If anyone else is seeing failures, please let me know!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147957 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
directives was in the wrong place and getting triggered incorectly with a
cpp .file directive. This change fixes that and adds a test case.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147951 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
strange build bot failures that look like a miscompile into an infloop.
I'll investigate this tomorrow, but I'd both like to know whether my
patch is the culprit, and get the bots back to green.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147945 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
detect a pattern which can be implemented with a small 'shl' embedded in
the addressing mode scale. This happens in real code as follows:
unsigned x = my_accelerator_table[input >> 11];
Here we have some lookup table that we look into using the high bits of
'input'. Each entity in the table is 4-bytes, which means this
implicitly gets turned into (once lowered out of a GEP):
*(unsigned*)((char*)my_accelerator_table + ((input >> 11) << 2));
The shift right followed by a shift left is canonicalized to a smaller
shift right and masking off the low bits. That hides the shift right
which x86 has an addressing mode designed to support. We now detect
masks of this form, and produce the longer shift right followed by the
proper addressing mode. In addition to saving a (rather large)
instruction, this also reduces stalls in Intel chips on benchmarks I've
measured.
In order for all of this to work, one part of the DAG needs to be
canonicalized *still further* than it currently is. This involves
removing pointless 'trunc' nodes between a zextload and a zext. Without
that, we end up generating spurious masks and hiding the pattern.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147936 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
1. Size heuristics changed. Now we calculate number of unswitching
branches only once per loop.
2. Some checks was moved from UnswitchIfProfitable to
processCurrentLoop, since it is not changed during processCurrentLoop
iteration. It allows decide to skip some loops at an early stage.
Extended statistics:
- Added total number of instructions analyzed.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147935 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Allow LDRD to be formed from pairs with different LDR encodings. This was the original intention of the pass. Somewhere along the way, the LDR opcodes were refined which broke the optimization. We really don't care what the original opcodes are as long as they both map to the same LDRD and the immediate still fits.
Fixes rdar://10435045 ARMLoadStoreOptimization cannot handle mixed LDRi8/LDRi12
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147922 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Consider this code:
int h() {
int x;
try {
x = f();
g();
} catch (...) {
return x+1;
}
return x;
}
The variable x is undefined on the first edge to the landing pad, but it
has the f() return value on the second edge to the landing pad.
SplitAnalysis::getLastSplitPoint() would assume that the return value
from f() was live into the landing pad when f() throws, which is of
course impossible.
Detect these cases, and treat them as if the landing pad wasn't there.
This allows spill code to be inserted after the function call to f().
<rdar://problem/10664933>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147912 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
with other symbols.
An object in the __cfstring section is suppoed to be filled with CFString
objects, which have a pointer to ___CFConstantStringClassReference followed by a
pointer to a __cstring. If we allow the object in the __cstring section to be
merged with another global, then it could end up in any section. Because the
linker is going to remove these symbols in the final executable, we shouldn't
bother to merge them.
<rdar://problem/10564621>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147899 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add a test that checks the stack alignment of a simple function for
Darwin, Linux and NetBSD for 32bit and 64bit mode.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147888 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This function runs after all constant islands have been placed, and may
shrink some instructions to their 2-byte forms. This can actually cause
some constant pool entries to move out of range because of growing
alignment padding.
Treat instructions that may be shrunk the same as inline asm - they
erode the known alignment bits.
Also reinstate an old assertion in verify(). It is correct now that
basic block offsets include alignments.
Add a single large test case that will hopefully exercise many parts of
the constant island pass.
<rdar://problem/10670199>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147885 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
assembly source when it generates the TAG_subprogram dwarf debug info for
the labels that have nothing between them as in this bit of assembly source:
% cat ZeroLength.s
_func1:
_func2:
nop
One solution would be to not emit the subsequent labels with the same address
and use the next label with a different address or the end of the section for
the AT_high_pc value of the TAG_subprogram.
Turns out in llvm-mc it is not possible in all cases to determine of two
symbols have the same value at the point we put out the TAG_subprogram dwarf
debug info.
So we will have llvm-mc instead of putting out TAG_subprogram's put out
DW_TAG_label's. And the DW_TAG_label does not have a AT_high_pc value which
avoids the problem.
This commit is only the functional change to make the diffs clear as to what is
really being changed. The next commit will be to clean up the names of such
things like MCGenDwarfSubprogramEntry to something like MCGenDwarfLabelEntry.
rdar://10666925
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147860 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
define physical registers. It's currently very restrictive, only catching
cases where the CE is in an immediate (and only) predecessor. But it catches
a surprising large number of cases.
rdar://10660865
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147827 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These heuristics are sufficient for enabling IV chains by
default. Performance analysis has been done for i386, x86_64, and
thumbv7. The optimization is rarely important, but can significantly
speed up certain cases by eliminating spill code within the
loop. Unrolled loops are prime candidates for IV chains. In many
cases, the final code could still be improved with more target
specific optimization following LSR. The goal of this feature is for
LSR to make the best choice of induction variables.
Instruction selection may not completely take advantage of this
feature yet. As a result, there could be cases of slight code size
increase.
Code size can be worse on x86 because it doesn't support postincrement
addressing. In fact, when chains are formed, you may see redundant
address plus stride addition in the addressing mode. GenerateIVChains
tries to compensate for the common cases.
On ARM, code size increase can be mitigated by using postincrement
addressing, but downstream codegen currently misses some opportunities.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147826 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
After collecting chains, check if any should be materialized. If so,
hide the chained IV users from the LSR solver. LSR will only solve for
the head of the chain. GenerateIVChains will then materialize the
chained IV users by computing the IV relative to its previous value in
the chain.
In theory, chained IV users could be exposed to LSR's solver. This
would be considerably complicated to implement and I'm not aware of a
case where we need it. In practice it's more important to
intelligently prune the search space of nontrivial loops before
running the solver, otherwise the solver is often forced to prune the
most optimal solutions. Hiding the chained users does this well, so
that LSR is more likely to find the best IV for the chain as a whole.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147801 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We still save an instruction when just the "and" part is replaced.
Also change the code to match comments more closely.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147753 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This enables basic local CSE, giving us 20% smaller code for
consumer-typeset in -O0 builds.
<rdar://problem/10658692>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147720 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
LoopSimplify may not run on some outer loops, e.g. because of indirect
branches. SCEVExpander simply cannot handle outer loops with no preheaders.
Fixes rdar://10655343 SCEVExpander segfault.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147718 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
file error checking. Use that to error on an unfinished cfi_startproc.
The error is not nice, but is already better than a segmentation fault.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147717 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
opportunities that only present themselves after late optimizations
such as tail duplication .e.g.
## BB#1:
movl %eax, %ecx
movl %ecx, %eax
ret
The register allocator also leaves some of them around (due to false
dep between copies from phi-elimination, etc.)
This required some changes in codegen passes. Post-ra scheduler and the
pseudo-instruction expansion passes have been moved after branch folding
and tail merging. They were before branch folding before because it did
not always update block livein's. That's fixed now. The pass change makes
independently since we want to properly schedule instructions after
branch folding / tail duplication.
rdar://10428165
rdar://10640363
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147716 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This eliminates a lot of constant pool entries for -O0 builds of code
with many global variable accesses.
This speeds up -O0 codegen of consumer-typeset by 2x because the
constant island pass no longer has to look at thousands of constant pool
entries.
<rdar://problem/10629774>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147712 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
