If the branch condition for a loop was a phi which itself
was fed from a phi from a loop, it isn't safe to try
to delete the phi until after the loop is handled.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@298737 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If the loop condition was an i1 phi with a constantexpr input, this
would add a loop intrinsic fed by a phi dependent on a call to
if.break in the same block. Insert the call in the loop header.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@298121 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Move backend internal intrinsics along with the rest of the
normal intrinsics, and use the Intrinsic::getDeclaration
API instead of manually constructing the type list.
It's surprising this was working before. fdiv.fast had
the wrong number of parameters. The control flow intrinsic
declaration attributes were not being applied, and
their types were inconsistent. The actual IR use types
did not match the declaration, and were closer to the
types used for the patterns. The brcond lowering
was changing the types, so introduce new nodes for those.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@298119 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These clean up some unnecessary or instructions in
cases with complex loops.
In the original testcase I noticed this, the same
or with exec was repeated 5 or 6 times in a row. With
this only one is emitted or sometimes a copy.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@281786 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If the result of the find is only used to compare against end(), just
use is_contained instead.
No functionality change is intended.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@278433 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This fully solves the problem where the StructurizeCFG pass does not
consider the same branches as uniform as the SIAnnotateControlFlow pass.
The patch in D19013 helps with this problem, but is not sufficient
(and, interestingly, causes a "regression" with one of the existing
test cases).
No tests included here, because tests in D19013 already cover this.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19018
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@266346 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
I've been carrying this change around with me for a while, because the if ()
managed to confuse me while following the code. All callers ensure that the
assertion holds.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19042
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@266344 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Under certain circumstances, multi-level breaks (or what is understood by
the control flow passes as such) could be miscompiled in a way that causes
infinite loops, by emitting incorrect control flow intrinsics.
This fixes a hang in
dEQP-GLES3.functional.shaders.loops.while_dynamic_iterations.conditional_continue_vertex
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18967
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@266088 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
It is possible that the loop condition can be a boolean constant (infinite loop,
for example). So we sould handle constant condition in annotating a loop. This
patch adds this functionality to support annotating constant condition.
Reviewers: tstellarAMD, arsenm
Subscribers: llvm-commits, arsenm
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15093
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@260692 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
One of the changes in lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUMCInstLower.cpp was a new
one. Previously, bundle iterators and single-instruction iterators
could be compared to each other (comparing on underlying pointers).
I changed a comparison from using `MBB->end()` to using
`MBB->instr_end()`, since both end iterators should point at the some
place anyway.
I don't think the implicit conversion between the two iterator types is
a good idea since it's fairly easy to accidentally compare to the wrong
thing (they aren't always end iterators). Otherwise I would have just
added the conversion.
Even with that, no there should be functionality change here.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@250218 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
through APIs that are no longer necessary now that the update API has
been removed.
This will make changes to the AA interfaces significantly less
disruptive (I hope). Either way, it seems like a really nice cleanup.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@242882 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
