Currently the default C calling convention functions are treated
the same as compute kernels. Make this explicit so the default
calling convention can be changed to a non-kernel.
Converted with perl -pi -e 's/define void/define amdgpu_kernel void/'
on the relevant test directories (and undoing in one place that actually
wanted a non-kernel).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@298444 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit also relied on r296812, which I just reverted. We should probably
apply it again, after the r296812 has been discussed and been reapplied in some
variant.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@296820 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Modify the test so that it is still testing something
closer to what it was intended to originally.
I think the original intent was to test the situation where
there was a branch on execz and then unconditional branch
required relaxing.With the change in r296539,
there was no longer and execz branch.
Change the test so that there is now an execz branch inserted.
There is no longer an unconditional branch after the execz branch,
so this might need to be tricked in some other way to keep that
there.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@296574 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Lay out trellis-shaped CFGs optimally.
A trellis of the shape below:
A B
|\ /|
| \ / |
| X |
| / \ |
|/ \|
C D
would be laid out A; B->C ; D by the current layout algorithm. Now we identify
trellises and lay them out either A->C; B->D or A->D; B->C. This scales with an
increasing number of predecessors. A trellis is a a group of 2 or more
predecessor blocks that all have the same successors.
because of this we can tail duplicate to extend existing trellises.
As an example consider the following CFG:
B D F H
/ \ / \ / \ / \
A---C---E---G---Ret
Where A,C,E,G are all small (Currently 2 instructions).
The CFG preserving layout is then A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,Ret.
The current code will copy C into B, E into D and G into F and yield the layout
A,C,B(C),E,D(E),F(G),G,H,ret
define void @straight_test(i32 %tag) {
entry:
br label %test1
test1: ; A
%tagbit1 = and i32 %tag, 1
%tagbit1eq0 = icmp eq i32 %tagbit1, 0
br i1 %tagbit1eq0, label %test2, label %optional1
optional1: ; B
call void @a()
br label %test2
test2: ; C
%tagbit2 = and i32 %tag, 2
%tagbit2eq0 = icmp eq i32 %tagbit2, 0
br i1 %tagbit2eq0, label %test3, label %optional2
optional2: ; D
call void @b()
br label %test3
test3: ; E
%tagbit3 = and i32 %tag, 4
%tagbit3eq0 = icmp eq i32 %tagbit3, 0
br i1 %tagbit3eq0, label %test4, label %optional3
optional3: ; F
call void @c()
br label %test4
test4: ; G
%tagbit4 = and i32 %tag, 8
%tagbit4eq0 = icmp eq i32 %tagbit4, 0
br i1 %tagbit4eq0, label %exit, label %optional4
optional4: ; H
call void @d()
br label %exit
exit:
ret void
}
here is the layout after D27742:
straight_test: # @straight_test
; ... Prologue elided
; BB#0: # %entry ; A (merged with test1)
; ... More prologue elided
mr 30, 3
andi. 3, 30, 1
bc 12, 1, .LBB0_2
; BB#1: # %test2 ; C
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 30, 30
beq 0, .LBB0_3
b .LBB0_4
.LBB0_2: # %optional1 ; B (copy of C)
bl a
nop
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 30, 30
bne 0, .LBB0_4
.LBB0_3: # %test3 ; E
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 29, 29
beq 0, .LBB0_5
b .LBB0_6
.LBB0_4: # %optional2 ; D (copy of E)
bl b
nop
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 29, 29
bne 0, .LBB0_6
.LBB0_5: # %test4 ; G
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 28, 28
beq 0, .LBB0_8
b .LBB0_7
.LBB0_6: # %optional3 ; F (copy of G)
bl c
nop
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 28, 28
beq 0, .LBB0_8
.LBB0_7: # %optional4 ; H
bl d
nop
.LBB0_8: # %exit ; Ret
ld 30, 96(1) # 8-byte Folded Reload
addi 1, 1, 112
ld 0, 16(1)
mtlr 0
blr
The tail-duplication has produced some benefit, but it has also produced a
trellis which is not laid out optimally. With this patch, we improve the layouts
of such trellises, and decrease the cost calculation for tail-duplication
accordingly.
This patch produces the layout A,C,E,G,B,D,F,H,Ret. This layout does have
back edges, which is a negative, but it has a bigger compensating
positive, which is that it handles the case where there are long strings
of skipped blocks much better than the original layout. Both layouts
handle runs of executed blocks equally well. Branch prediction also
improves if there is any correlation between subsequent optional blocks.
Here is the resulting concrete layout:
straight_test: # @straight_test
; BB#0: # %entry ; A (merged with test1)
mr 30, 3
andi. 3, 30, 1
bc 12, 1, .LBB0_4
; BB#1: # %test2 ; C
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 30, 30
bne 0, .LBB0_5
.LBB0_2: # %test3 ; E
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 29, 29
bne 0, .LBB0_6
.LBB0_3: # %test4 ; G
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 28, 28
bne 0, .LBB0_7
b .LBB0_8
.LBB0_4: # %optional1 ; B (Copy of C)
bl a
nop
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 30, 30
beq 0, .LBB0_2
.LBB0_5: # %optional2 ; D (Copy of E)
bl b
nop
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 29, 29
beq 0, .LBB0_3
.LBB0_6: # %optional3 ; F (Copy of G)
bl c
nop
rlwinm. 3, 30, 0, 28, 28
beq 0, .LBB0_8
.LBB0_7: # %optional4 ; H
bl d
nop
.LBB0_8: # %exit
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28522
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@295223 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When choosing the best successor for a block, ordinarily we would have preferred
a block that preserves the CFG unless there is a strong probability the other
direction. For small blocks that can be duplicated we now skip that requirement
as well, subject to some simple frequency calculations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28583
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@293716 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit ada6595a526d71df04988eb0a4b4fe84df398ded.
This needs a simple probability check because there are some cases where it is
not profitable.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@291695 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When choosing the best successor for a block, ordinarily we would have preferred
a block that preserves the CFG unless there is a strong probability the other
direction. For small blocks that can be duplicated we now skip that requirement
as well.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27742
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@291609 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The structured CFG is just an aid to inserting exec
mask modification instructions, once that is done
we don't really need it anymore. We also
do not analyze blocks with terminators that
modify exec, so this should only be impacting
true branches.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@288744 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Codegen prepare sinks comparisons close to a user is we have only one register
for conditions. For AMDGPU we have many SGPRs capable to hold vector conditions.
Changed BE to report we have many condition registers. That way IR LICM pass
would hoist an invariant comparison out of a loop and codegen prepare will not
sink it.
With that done a condition is calculated in one block and used in another.
Current behavior is to store workitem's condition in a VGPR using v_cndmask_b32
and then restore it with yet another v_cmp instruction from that v_cndmask's
result. To mitigate the issue a propagation of source SGPR pair in place of v_cmp
is implemented. Additional side effect of this is that we may consume less VGPRs
at a cost of more SGPRs in case if holding of multiple conditions is needed, and
that is a clear win in most cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26114
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@288053 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
addSchedBarrierDeps() is supposed to add use operands to the ExitSU
node. The current implementation adds uses for calls/barrier instruction
and the MBB live-outs in all other cases. The use
operands of conditional jump instructions were missed.
Also added code to macrofusion to set the latencies between nodes to
zero to avoid problems with the fusing nodes lingering around in the
pending list now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25140
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@286544 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Codegen prepare sinks comparisons close to a user is we have only one register
for conditions. For AMDGPU we have many SGPRs capable to hold vector conditions.
Changed BE to report we have many condition registers. That way IR LICM pass
would hoist an invariant comparison out of a loop and codegen prepare will not
sink it.
With that done a condition is calculated in one block and used in another.
Current behavior is to store workitem's condition in a VGPR using v_cndmask
and then restore it with yet another v_cmp instruction from that v_cndmask's
result. To mitigate the issue a forward propagation of a v_cmp 64 bit result
to an user is implemented. Additional side effect of this is that we may
consume less VGPRs in a cost of more SGPRs in case if holding of multiple
conditions is needed, and that is a clear win in most cases.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@286171 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The comment explaining why this was necessary is incorrect
in its description of v_cmp's behavior for inactive workitems.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@286134 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
