Commit Graph

12 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Eric Christopher 598198edbc Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@358552 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher 02cc44c1b9 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@358546 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Philip Reames 7fe3ccfcdc [LoopPred] Hoist and of predicated checks where legal
If we have multiple range checks which can be predicated, hoist the and of the results outside the loop.  This minorly cleans up the resulting IR, but the main motivation is as a building block for D60093.



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@358419 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2019-04-15 15:53:25 +00:00
Philip Reames a3d1fd2535 [LoopPred] Be uniform about proving generated conditions
We'd been optimizing the case where the predicate was obviously true, do the same for the false case.  Mostly just for completeness sake, but also may improve compile time in loops which will exit through the guard.  Such loops are presumed rare in fastpath code, but may be present down untaken paths, so optimizing for them is still useful.



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@357408 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2019-04-01 16:26:08 +00:00
Philip Reames 071b5c0eb5 [LoopPred] Delete the old condition expressions if unused
LoopPredication was replacing the original condition, but leaving the instructions to compute the old conditions around.  This would get cleaned up by other passes of course, but we might as well do it eagerly.  That also makes the test output less confusing.  



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@357406 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2019-04-01 16:05:15 +00:00
Philip Reames aa5782c630 [Tests] Autogen all the LoopPredication tests
I'm about to make some changes to the pass which cause widespread - but uninteresting - test diffs.  Prepare the tests for easy updating.



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@357404 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2019-04-01 15:35:30 +00:00
Artur Pilipenko c35c11558b [LoopPredication] Handle the case when the guard and the latch IV have different offsets
This is a follow up change for D37569.

Currently the transformation is limited to the case when:
 * The loop has a single latch with the condition of the form: ++i <pred> latchLimit, where <pred> is u<, u<=, s<, or s<=.
 * The step of the IV used in the latch condition is 1.
 * The IV of the latch condition is the same as the post increment IV of the guard condition.
 * The guard condition is of the form i u< guardLimit.

This patch enables the transform in the case when the latch is

 latchStart + i <pred> latchLimit, where <pred> is u<, u<=, s<, or s<=.

And the guard is

 guardStart + i u< guardLimit

Reviewed By: anna

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39097


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316768 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-10-27 14:46:17 +00:00
Artur Pilipenko 2a079134ab [LoopPredication] Check whether the loop is already guarded by the first iteration check condition
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@315623 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-10-12 21:21:17 +00:00
Artur Pilipenko 946dd32421 [LoopPredication] Support ule, sle latch predicates
This is a follow up for the loop predication change 313981 to support ule, sle latch predicates.

Reviewed By: mkazantsev

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38177

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@315616 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-10-12 20:40:27 +00:00
Artur Pilipenko cbb0a9e68e Rework loop predication pass
We've found a serious issue with the current implementation of loop predication.
The current implementation relies on SCEV and this turned out to be problematic.
To fix the problem we had to rework the pass substantially. We have had the
reworked implementation in our downstream tree for a while. This is the initial
patch of the series of changes to upstream the new implementation.

For now the transformation is limited to the following case:
  * The loop has a single latch with either ult or slt icmp condition.
  * The step of the IV used in the latch condition is 1.
  * The IV of the latch condition is the same as the post increment IV of the guard condition.
  * The guard condition is ult.

See the review or the LoopPredication.cpp header for the details about the
problem and the new implementation.

Reviewed By: sanjoy, mkazantsev

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37569


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@313981 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-09-22 13:13:57 +00:00
Artur Pilipenko 7e587ddfd9 Loop predication expand both sides of the widened condition
This is a fix for a loop predication bug which resulted in malformed IR generation.

Loop invariant side of the widened condition is not guaranteed to be available in the preheader as is, so we need to expand it as well. See added unsigned_loop_0_to_n_hoist_length test for example.

Reviewed By: sanjoy, mkazantsev

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30099


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@296345 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-02-27 15:44:49 +00:00
Artur Pilipenko 1dd101bfef [Guards] Introduce loop-predication pass
This patch introduces guard based loop predication optimization. The new LoopPredication pass tries to convert loop variant range checks to loop invariant by widening checks across loop iterations. For example, it will convert

  for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
    guard(i < len);
    ...
  }

to

  for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
    guard(n - 1 < len);
    ...
  }

After this transformation the condition of the guard is loop invariant, so loop-unswitch can later unswitch the loop by this condition which basically predicates the loop by the widened condition:

  if (n - 1 < len)
    for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
      ...
    } 
  else
    deoptimize

This patch relies on an NFC change to make ScalarEvolution::isMonotonicPredicate public (revision 293062).

Reviewed By: sanjoy

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29034


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@293064 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-01-25 16:00:44 +00:00