Summary:
If the callsite is inside landing pad, do not perform callsite splitting.
Callsite splitting uses utility function llvm::DuplicateInstructionsInSplitBetween, which eventually calls llvm::SplitEdge. llvm::SplitEdge calls llvm::SplitCriticalEdge with an assumption that the function returns nullptr only when the target edge is not a critical edge (and further assumes that if the return value was not nullptr, the predecessor of the original target edge always has a single successor because critical edge splitting was successful). However, this assumtion is not true because SplitCriticalEdge returns nullptr if the destination block is a landing pad. This invalid assumption results assertion failure.
Fundamental solution might be fixing llvm::SplitEdge to not to rely on the invalid assumption. However, it'll involve a lot of work because current API assumes that llvm::SplitEdge never fails. Instead, this patch makes callsite splitting to not to attempt splitting if the callsite is in a landing pad.
Attached test case will crash with assertion failure without the fix.
Reviewers: fhahn, junbuml, dberlin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45130
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@329250 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: @llvm.icall.branch.funnel is musttail with variable number of
arguments. After inlining current backend can't separate call targets from call
arguments.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45116
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@329235 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Clang's __builtin_operator_new/delete was recently taught about the aligned allocation overloads (r328134). This patch makes LLVM aware of them as well.
This allows the compiler to perform certain optimizations including eliding new/delete calls.
Reviewers: rsmith, majnemer, dblaikie, vsk, bkramer
Reviewed By: bkramer
Subscribers: ckennelly, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44769
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@329218 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Clang's __builtin_operator_new/delete was recently taught about the aligned allocation overloads (r328134). This patch makes LLVM aware of them as well.
This allows the compiler to perform certain optimizations including eliding new/delete calls.
Reviewers: rsmith, majnemer, dblaikie, vsk, bkramer
Reviewed By: bkramer
Subscribers: ckennelly, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44769
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@329215 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Fixes cases like the new test @nonuniform. In that test, %cc itself
is a uniform value; however, when reading it after the end of the loop in
basic block %if, its value is effectively non-uniform, so the branch is
non-uniform.
This problem was encountered in
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103743; however, this change
in itself is not sufficient to fix that bug, as there is another issue
in the AMDGPU backend.
As discovered after committing an earlier version of this change, this
exposes a subtle interaction between this pass and DivergenceAnalysis:
since we remove and re-create branch instructions, we can no longer rely
on DivergenceAnalysis for branches in subregions that were already
processed by the pass.
Explicitly remove branch instructions from DivergenceAnalysis to
avoid dangling pointers as a matter of defensive programming, and
change how we detect non-uniform subregions.
Change-Id: I32bbffece4a32f686fab54964dae1a5dd72949d4
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43743
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@329165 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch teaches SCEV how to prove implications for SCEVUnknown nodes that are Phis.
If we need to prove `Pred` for `LHS, RHS`, and `LHS` is a Phi with possible incoming values
`L1, L2, ..., LN`, then if we prove `Pred` for `(L1, RHS), (L2, RHS), ..., (LN, RHS)` then we can also
prove it for `(LHS, RHS)`. If both `LHS` and `RHS` are Phis from the same block, it is sufficient
to prove the predicate for values that come from the same predecessor block.
The typical case that it handles is that we sometimes need to prove that `Phi(Len, Len - 1) >= 0`
given that `Len > 0`. The new logic was added to `isImpliedViaOperations` and only uses it and
non-recursive reasoning to prove the facts we need, so it should not hurt compile time a lot.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44001
Reviewed By: anna
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@329150 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Currently merge conditional stores can't handle cases where PostBB (the block we need to move the store to) has more than 2 predecessors.
This patch removes that restriction by creating a new block with only the 2 predecessors we care about and an unconditional branch to the original block. This provides a place to put the store.
Reviewers: efriedma, jmolloy, ABataev
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39760
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@329142 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The tests marked with 'FIXME' require loosening the check
in SimplifyAssociativeOrCommutative() to optimize completely;
that's still checking isFast() in Instruction::isAssociative().
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@329121 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
If an alloca need to be stored in the coroutine frame and it has an alignment specified and the alignment does not match the natural alignment of the alloca type. Insert appropriate padding into the coroutine frame to make sure that it gets requested alignment.
For example for a packet type (which natural alignment is 1), but alloca alignment is 8, we may need to insert a padding field with required number of bytes to make sure it is properly aligned.
```
%PackedStruct = type <{ i64 }>
...
%data = alloca %PackedStruct, align 8
```
If the previous field in the coroutine frame had alignment 2, we would have [6 x i8] inserted before %PackedStruct in the coroutine frame:
```
%f.Frame = type { ..., i16, [6 x i8], %PackedStruct }
```
Reviewers: rnk, lewissbaker, modocache
Reviewed By: modocache
Subscribers: EricWF, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45221
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@329112 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It also updates test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/call-instructions.ll
to use accesses where we can prove dependence after D35430.
Reviewers: sebpop, karthikthecool, blitz.opensource
Reviewed By: sebpop
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45206
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@329111 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Folding patterns like:
%vec = shufflevector <4 x i8> %insvec, <4 x i8> undef, <4 x i32> zeroinitializer
%cast = bitcast <4 x i8> %vec to i32
%cond = icmp eq i32 %cast, 0
into:
%ext = extractelement <4 x i8> %insvec, i32 0
%cond = icmp eq i32 %ext, 0
Combined with existing rules, this allows us to fold patterns like:
%insvec = insertelement <4 x i8> undef, i8 %val, i32 0
%vec = shufflevector <4 x i8> %insvec, <4 x i8> undef, <4 x i32> zeroinitializer
%cast = bitcast <4 x i8> %vec to i32
%cond = icmp eq i32 %cast, 0
into:
%cond = icmp eq i8 %val, 0
When we construct a splat vector via a shuffle, and bitcast the vector into an integer type for comparison against an integer constant. Then we can simplify the the comparison to compare the splatted value against the integer constant.
Reviewers: spatel, anna, mkazantsev
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: efriedma, rengolin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44997
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@329087 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
If the load/extractelement/extractvalue instructions are not originally
consecutive, the SLP vectorizer is unable to vectorize them. Patch
allows reordering of such instructions.
Patch does not support reordering of the repeated instruction, this must
be handled in the separate patch.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, hfinkel, mkuper, Ayal, ashahid
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43776
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@329085 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I have taken the opportunity to simplify some tests slightly and move
parts around.
It also brings back a few IR checks for interchangable loops.
Reviewers: karthikthecool, sebpop, grosser
Reviewed By: sebpop
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45207
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@329081 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For Hexagon, peeling loops with small runtime trip count is beneficial for our
benchmarks. We set PeelCount in HexagonTargetInfo.cpp and we use PeelCount set
by the target for computing the desired peel count.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44880
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@329042 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We use two approaches for determining the minimum bitwidth.
* Demanded bits
* Value tracking
If demanded bits doesn't result in a narrower type, we then try value tracking.
We need this if we want to root SLP trees with the indices of getelementptr
instructions since all the bits of the indices are demanded.
But there is a missing piece though. We need to be able to distinguish "demanded
and shrinkable" from "demanded and not shrinkable". For example, the bits of %i
in
%i = sext i32 %e1 to i64
%gep = getelementptr inbounds i64, i64* %p, i64 %i
are demanded, but we can shrink %i's type to i32 because it won't change the
result of the getelementptr. On the other hand, in
%tmp15 = sext i32 %tmp14 to i64
%tmp16 = insertvalue { i64, i64 } undef, i64 %tmp15, 0
it doesn't make sense to shrink %tmp15 and we can skip the value tracking.
Ideas are from Matthew Simpson!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44868
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@329035 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
When attempting to split a coroutine with 'hidden' visibility (for
example, a C++ coroutine that is inlined when compiled with the option
'-fvisibility-inlines-hidden'), LLVM would hit an assertion in
include/llvm/IR/GlobalValue.h:240: "local linkage requires default
visibility". The issue is that the visibility is copied from the source
of the function split in the `CloneFunctionInto` function, but the linkage
is not. To fix, create the new function first with external linkage,
then copy the linkage from the original function *after* `CloneFunctionInto`
is called.
Since `GlobalValue::setLinkage` in turn calls `maybeSetDsoLocal`, the
explicit call to `setDSOLocal` can be removed in CoroSplit.cpp.
Test Plan: check-llvm
Reviewers: GorNishanov, lewissbaker, EricWF, majnemer, rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits, eric_niebler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44185
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@329033 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The cast simplifications that instcombine does here do not make any
attempt to obey the verifier rules for musttail calls. Therefore we have
to disable them.
Reviewers: efriedma, majnemer, pcc
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45186
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@329027 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Otherwise, we end up inlining a musttail call into a non-tail position,
which breaks verifier invariants.
Fixes PR31014
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@329015 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Some Function level metadatas, such as function entry count, are not cloned in
DeadArgumentElim. This happens a lot in lto/thinlto because of DeadArgumentElim
after internalization.
This patch clones the metadatas in the original function to the new function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44127
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@328991 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
A recent addition to Coroutines TS (https://wg21.link/p0913) adds a pre-defined coroutine noop_coroutine that does nothing.
To implement this feature, we implemented an llvm.coro.noop intrinsic that returns a coroutine handle to a coroutine that does nothing when resumed or destroyed.
Reviewers: EricWF, modocache, rnk, lewissbaker
Reviewed By: modocache
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45114
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@328986 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
If the load/extractelement/extractvalue instructions are not originally
consecutive, the SLP vectorizer is unable to vectorize them. Patch
allows reordering of such instructions.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, hfinkel, mkuper, Ayal, ashahid
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43776
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@328980 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Adds -import-cutoff=N which will stop importing during the thin link
after N imports. Default is -1 (no limit).
Reviewers: wmi
Subscribers: inglorion, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45127
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@328934 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If a loop has a loop exiting latch, it can be profitable
to rotate the loop if it leads to the simplification of
a phi node. Perform rotation in these cases even if loop
rotate itself didnt simplify the loop to get there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44199
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@328933 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For Hexagon, peeling loops with small runtime trip count is beneficial for our
benchmarks. We set PeelCount in HexagonTargetInfo.cpp and we use PeelCount set
by the target for computing the desired peel count.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44880
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@328854 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In r312664 (D36404), JumpThreading stopped threading edges into
loop headers. Unfortunately, I observed a significant performance
regression as a result of this change. Upon further investigation,
the problematic pattern looked something like this (after
many high level optimizations):
while (true) {
bool cond = ...;
if (!cond) {
<body>
}
if (cond)
break;
}
Now, naturally we want jump threading to essentially eliminate the
second if check and hook up the edges appropriately. However, the
above mentioned change, prevented it from doing this because it would
have to thread an edge into the loop header.
Upon further investigation, what is happening is that since both branches
are threadable, JumpThreading picks one of them at arbitrarily. In my
case, because of the way that the IR ended up, it tended to pick
the one to the loop header, bailing out immediately after. However,
if it had picked the one to the exit block, everything would have
worked out fine (because the only remaining branch would then be folded,
not thraded which is acceptable).
Thus, to fix this problem, we can simply eliminate loop headers from
consideration as possible threading targets earlier, to make sure that
if there are multiple eligible branches, we can still thread one of
the ones that don't target a loop header.
Patch by Keno Fischer!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42260
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@328798 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As a follow-up to r328480, this updates the logic for the decreasing
safety checks in a similar manner:
- CanBeMax is replaced by CannotBeMaxInLoop which queries
isLoopEntryGuardedByCond on the maximum value.
- SumCanReachMin is replaced by isSafeDecreasingBound which includes
some logic from parseLoopStructure and, again, has been updated to
use isLoopEntryGuardedByCond on the given bounds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44776
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@328613 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently, `getExact` fails if it sees two exit counts in different blocks. There is
no solid reason to do so, given that we only calculate exact non-taken count
for exiting blocks that dominate latch. Using this fact, we can simply take min
out of all exits of all blocks to get the exact taken count.
This patch makes the calculation more optimistic with enforcing our assumption
with asserts. It allows us to calculate exact backedge taken count in trivial loops
like
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
if (i > 50) break;
. . .
}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44676
Reviewed By: fhahn
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@328611 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
MemorySSAUpdater::getPreviousDefRecursive is a recursive algorithm, for
each block, it computes the previous definition for each predecessor,
then takes those definitions and combines them. But currently it doesn't
remember results which it already computed; this means it can visit the
same block multiple times, which adds up to exponential time overall.
To fix this, this patch adds a cache. If we computed the result for a
block already, we don't need to visit it again because we'll come up
with the same result. Well, unless we RAUW a MemoryPHI; in that case,
the TrackingVH will be updated automatically.
This matches the original source paper for this algorithm.
The testcase isn't really a test for the bug, but it adds coverage for
the case where tryRemoveTrivialPhi erases an existing PHI node. (It's
hard to write a good regression test for a performance issue.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44715
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@328577 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This change brings performance of zlib up by 10%. The example below is from a
hot loop in longest_match() from zlib.
do.body:
%cur_match.addr.0 = phi i32 [ %cur_match, %entry ], [ %2, %do.cond ]
%idx.ext = zext i32 %cur_match.addr.0 to i64
%add.ptr = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* %win, i64 %idx.ext
%add.ptr2 = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* %add.ptr, i64 %idx.ext1
%add.ptr3 = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* %add.ptr2, i64 -1
In this example %idx.ext1 is a loop invariant. It will be moved above the use of
loop induction variable %idx.ext such that it can be hoisted out of the loop by
LICM. The operands that have dependences carried by the loop will be sinked down
in the GEP chain. This patch will produce the following output:
do.body:
%cur_match.addr.0 = phi i32 [ %cur_match, %entry ], [ %2, %do.cond ]
%idx.ext = zext i32 %cur_match.addr.0 to i64
%add.ptr = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* %win, i64 %idx.ext1
%add.ptr2 = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* %add.ptr, i64 -1
%add.ptr3 = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* %add.ptr2, i64 %idx.ext
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@328539 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This replaces a large chunk of code that was looking for compound
patterns that include these sub-patterns. Existing tests ensure that
all of the previous examples are still folded as expected.
We still need to loosen the FMF check.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@328502 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Current logic of loop SCEV invalidation in Loop Unroller implicitly relies on
fact that exit count of outer loops cannot rely on exiting blocks of
inner loops, which is true in current implementation of backedge taken count
calculation but is wrong in general. As result, when we only forget the loop that
we have just unrolled, we may still have cached data for its outer loops (in particular,
exit counts) which keeps references on blocks of inner loop that could have been
changed or even deleted.
The attached test demonstrates a situaton when after unrolling of innermost loop
the outermost loop contains a dangling pointer on non-existant block. The problem
shows up when we apply patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D44677 that makes SCEV
smarter about exit count calculation. I am not sure if the bug exists without this patch,
it appears that now it is accidentally correct just because in practice exact backedge
taken count for outer loops with complex control flow inside is never calculated.
But when SCEV learns to do so, this problem shows up.
This patch replaces existing logic of SCEV loop invalidation with a correct one, which
happens to be invalidation of outermost loop (which also leads to invalidation of all
loops inside of it). It is the only way to ensure that no outer loop keeps dangling pointers
on removed blocks, or just outdated information that has changed after unrolling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44818
Reviewed By: samparker
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@328483 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Since allocsize refers to the argument number it gets invalidated when
an argument is removed and the numbers shift.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@328481 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
CanBeMin is currently used which will report true for any unknown
values, but often a check is performed outside the loop which covers
this situation:
for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i)
...
if (N > 0)
for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i)
...
So I've add 'LoopGuardedAgainstMin' which reports whether N is
greater than the minimum value which then allows loop with a variable
loop count to be optimised. I've also moved the increasing bound
checking into its own function and replaced SumCanReachMax is another
isLoopEntryGuardedByCond function.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@328480 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Taewook Oh